Management of infected knee and hip prostheses

The number of total hip and knee replacements that are performed is growing, resulting in an increased number of procedures undertaken to remove replacements that become infected. The treatment of infected replacements is expensive, creating a strong incentive to avoid infection. Preventive measures...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current opinion in rheumatology 1994-03, Vol.6 (2), p.172-176
1. Verfasser: Wilde, Alan H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176
container_issue 2
container_start_page 172
container_title Current opinion in rheumatology
container_volume 6
creator Wilde, Alan H
description The number of total hip and knee replacements that are performed is growing, resulting in an increased number of procedures undertaken to remove replacements that become infected. The treatment of infected replacements is expensive, creating a strong incentive to avoid infection. Preventive measures such as preoperative intravenous antibiotics and double-latex gloves are useful in this respect. When infection occurs in a knee or hip replacement, various procedures are used. Antibiotic suppression is used when the patient is a poor risk for surgery. Debridement of the knee and administration of intravenous antibiotics is appropriate when infection is diagnosed within 2 weeks of onset. Resection arthroplasty is reserved for large knee implants, such as hinges, in patients with limited functional capacity. Arthrodesis of the knee is undertaken in the young patient with single-joint disease, when two-stage reimplantation fails, or when there are multiple problems such as skin loss, massive bone loss, and virulent organisms. When infection cannot be controlled by any other means, amputation is indicated. For infected hip replacements, debridement of the hip with retention of the prosthesis is often successful. Two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of infected total hip prostheses is more successful than one-stage reimplantation. Arthrodesis of the hip after removal of an infected total hip prosthesis can leave the leg 2 to 3 inches short. The diagnosis and treatment of infected knee and hip replacements is reviewed in detail below.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00002281-199403000-00009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76582946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76582946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2709-8dbfc931dd76116aa5a238da8e6904a121b72f2972284803841ee269087439883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UclOwzAQtRColMInIOXEzcVju16OqGKTirjA2XKSCQnNUuJEFX-PS0tvzGWWN-sbQhJgc2BW37IonBugYK1kInp0F7InZAoLAVRZJU6jzSSjRgOck4sQPhkDboFPyMQwLq3iUzJ_8a3_wAbbIemKpGoLzAbMk3WLmPg2T8pqk2z6LgwlBgyX5KzwdcCrg56R94f7t-UTXb0-Pi_vVjTjmllq8rTIrIA81wpAeb_wXJjcG1SWSQ8cUs0LbnW8QRomjAREHjGjpbDGiBm52feNo79GDINrqpBhXfsWuzE4rRaGW6liotknZnHH0GPhNn3V-P7bAXM7qtwfVe5I1W_IxtLrw4wxbTA_Fh64ibjc49uuHrAP63rcYu9K9PVQuv8-IH4AFAVwqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76582946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of infected knee and hip prostheses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Wilde, Alan H</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilde, Alan H</creatorcontrib><description>The number of total hip and knee replacements that are performed is growing, resulting in an increased number of procedures undertaken to remove replacements that become infected. The treatment of infected replacements is expensive, creating a strong incentive to avoid infection. Preventive measures such as preoperative intravenous antibiotics and double-latex gloves are useful in this respect. When infection occurs in a knee or hip replacement, various procedures are used. Antibiotic suppression is used when the patient is a poor risk for surgery. Debridement of the knee and administration of intravenous antibiotics is appropriate when infection is diagnosed within 2 weeks of onset. Resection arthroplasty is reserved for large knee implants, such as hinges, in patients with limited functional capacity. Arthrodesis of the knee is undertaken in the young patient with single-joint disease, when two-stage reimplantation fails, or when there are multiple problems such as skin loss, massive bone loss, and virulent organisms. When infection cannot be controlled by any other means, amputation is indicated. For infected hip replacements, debridement of the hip with retention of the prosthesis is often successful. Two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of infected total hip prostheses is more successful than one-stage reimplantation. Arthrodesis of the hip after removal of an infected total hip prosthesis can leave the leg 2 to 3 inches short. The diagnosis and treatment of infected knee and hip replacements is reviewed in detail below.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-8711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-6963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00002281-199403000-00009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8024962</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott-Raven Publishers</publisher><subject>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Humans ; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - epidemiology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy ; Risk Factors ; Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology ; Staphylococcal Infections - therapy</subject><ispartof>Current opinion in rheumatology, 1994-03, Vol.6 (2), p.172-176</ispartof><rights>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2709-8dbfc931dd76116aa5a238da8e6904a121b72f2972284803841ee269087439883</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8024962$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilde, Alan H</creatorcontrib><title>Management of infected knee and hip prostheses</title><title>Current opinion in rheumatology</title><addtitle>Curr Opin Rheumatol</addtitle><description>The number of total hip and knee replacements that are performed is growing, resulting in an increased number of procedures undertaken to remove replacements that become infected. The treatment of infected replacements is expensive, creating a strong incentive to avoid infection. Preventive measures such as preoperative intravenous antibiotics and double-latex gloves are useful in this respect. When infection occurs in a knee or hip replacement, various procedures are used. Antibiotic suppression is used when the patient is a poor risk for surgery. Debridement of the knee and administration of intravenous antibiotics is appropriate when infection is diagnosed within 2 weeks of onset. Resection arthroplasty is reserved for large knee implants, such as hinges, in patients with limited functional capacity. Arthrodesis of the knee is undertaken in the young patient with single-joint disease, when two-stage reimplantation fails, or when there are multiple problems such as skin loss, massive bone loss, and virulent organisms. When infection cannot be controlled by any other means, amputation is indicated. For infected hip replacements, debridement of the hip with retention of the prosthesis is often successful. Two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of infected total hip prostheses is more successful than one-stage reimplantation. Arthrodesis of the hip after removal of an infected total hip prosthesis can leave the leg 2 to 3 inches short. The diagnosis and treatment of infected knee and hip replacements is reviewed in detail below.</description><subject>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - therapy</subject><issn>1040-8711</issn><issn>1531-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UclOwzAQtRColMInIOXEzcVju16OqGKTirjA2XKSCQnNUuJEFX-PS0tvzGWWN-sbQhJgc2BW37IonBugYK1kInp0F7InZAoLAVRZJU6jzSSjRgOck4sQPhkDboFPyMQwLq3iUzJ_8a3_wAbbIemKpGoLzAbMk3WLmPg2T8pqk2z6LgwlBgyX5KzwdcCrg56R94f7t-UTXb0-Pi_vVjTjmllq8rTIrIA81wpAeb_wXJjcG1SWSQ8cUs0LbnW8QRomjAREHjGjpbDGiBm52feNo79GDINrqpBhXfsWuzE4rRaGW6liotknZnHH0GPhNn3V-P7bAXM7qtwfVe5I1W_IxtLrw4wxbTA_Fh64ibjc49uuHrAP63rcYu9K9PVQuv8-IH4AFAVwqg</recordid><startdate>199403</startdate><enddate>199403</enddate><creator>Wilde, Alan H</creator><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199403</creationdate><title>Management of infected knee and hip prostheses</title><author>Wilde, Alan H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2709-8dbfc931dd76116aa5a238da8e6904a121b72f2972284803841ee269087439883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - therapy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilde, Alan H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current opinion in rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilde, Alan H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of infected knee and hip prostheses</atitle><jtitle>Current opinion in rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Opin Rheumatol</addtitle><date>1994-03</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>172-176</pages><issn>1040-8711</issn><eissn>1531-6963</eissn><abstract>The number of total hip and knee replacements that are performed is growing, resulting in an increased number of procedures undertaken to remove replacements that become infected. The treatment of infected replacements is expensive, creating a strong incentive to avoid infection. Preventive measures such as preoperative intravenous antibiotics and double-latex gloves are useful in this respect. When infection occurs in a knee or hip replacement, various procedures are used. Antibiotic suppression is used when the patient is a poor risk for surgery. Debridement of the knee and administration of intravenous antibiotics is appropriate when infection is diagnosed within 2 weeks of onset. Resection arthroplasty is reserved for large knee implants, such as hinges, in patients with limited functional capacity. Arthrodesis of the knee is undertaken in the young patient with single-joint disease, when two-stage reimplantation fails, or when there are multiple problems such as skin loss, massive bone loss, and virulent organisms. When infection cannot be controlled by any other means, amputation is indicated. For infected hip replacements, debridement of the hip with retention of the prosthesis is often successful. Two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of infected total hip prostheses is more successful than one-stage reimplantation. Arthrodesis of the hip after removal of an infected total hip prosthesis can leave the leg 2 to 3 inches short. The diagnosis and treatment of infected knee and hip replacements is reviewed in detail below.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</pub><pmid>8024962</pmid><doi>10.1097/00002281-199403000-00009</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-8711
ispartof Current opinion in rheumatology, 1994-03, Vol.6 (2), p.172-176
issn 1040-8711
1531-6963
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76582946
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects
Humans
Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects
Prosthesis-Related Infections - epidemiology
Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy
Risk Factors
Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology
Staphylococcal Infections - therapy
title Management of infected knee and hip prostheses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T12%3A27%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20infected%20knee%20and%20hip%20prostheses&rft.jtitle=Current%20opinion%20in%20rheumatology&rft.au=Wilde,%20Alan%20H&rft.date=1994-03&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=172-176&rft.issn=1040-8711&rft.eissn=1531-6963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00002281-199403000-00009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76582946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76582946&rft_id=info:pmid/8024962&rfr_iscdi=true