Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation

ABSTRACT Eyeblink performance parameters were investigated in subjects engaged in a series of duration discrimination tasks differing in modality (visual vs. auditory) and presentation schedule (fixed vs. variable). Visual tasks were associated with slower blink rates and shorter blink durations tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychophysiology 1985-11, Vol.22 (6), p.629-635
Hauptverfasser: Goldstein, Robert, Walrath, Larry C., Stern, John A., Strock, Barbara D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 635
container_issue 6
container_start_page 629
container_title Psychophysiology
container_volume 22
creator Goldstein, Robert
Walrath, Larry C.
Stern, John A.
Strock, Barbara D.
description ABSTRACT Eyeblink performance parameters were investigated in subjects engaged in a series of duration discrimination tasks differing in modality (visual vs. auditory) and presentation schedule (fixed vs. variable). Visual tasks were associated with slower blink rates and shorter blink durations than auditory tasks. Sensitivity measures suggested that this difference might be due, in part, to the greater difficulty of the visual tasks. Blink latency declined within and across tasks and was longer for target stimuli which were followed by responses. Since the target stimuli were the short duration stimuli, the latter effect could be a compound of two opposing effects. The first is related to the response, which tends to delay the blink on target trials, while the second, related to decision processes, would tend to increase latencies on nontarget trials. Schedule of stimulus presentation did not affect dependent measures as predicted. RT was unaffected by either of the experimental variables.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76581358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76581358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5039-dd48a432837eacb3f9f497e711fffceaa1e5a42f94f2f2725663a19f7afa1f553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1v0zAUhi0EGmXwE5AshLhLsOP4ixu0DbYhbVApQxNX1qljg9s0GXEC7b_HWaPe4xtLfj-Oz4PQG0pyms77dU5LoTOllcipVjwfVoQKrvLdE7Q4Sk_RgpBSZVzK4jl6EeOaEKJpUZygk5IoTZRaoJ_nTWg3-MwO4U8Y9ji0GPCnEG0ftqGFIXQtvoO4wRCTcDm29vGp87gawnZsxohvuxqaKQttjSv7y9Vj4ybHsnfRtcNjyUv0zEMT3av5PkXfLz_fXVxnN9-uvlyc3WSWE6azui4VlKxQTDqwK-a1L7V0klLvvXUA1HEoC69LX_hCFlwIBlR7CR6o55ydoneH3oe--z26OJhtWsY1DbSuG6ORCRNlXCXjh4PR9l2MvfPmIa0M_d5QYibKZm0mlGZCaSbKZqZsdin8ep4yrrauPkZnrEl_O-sQLTS-h9aGeLQpISgTOtk-Hmx_Q-P2__EBs6x-LEUxNWSHhhAHtzs2QL8xQjLJzf3XK3NPrpWsqluzZP8A4T-qlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76581358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Goldstein, Robert ; Walrath, Larry C. ; Stern, John A. ; Strock, Barbara D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Robert ; Walrath, Larry C. ; Stern, John A. ; Strock, Barbara D.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Eyeblink performance parameters were investigated in subjects engaged in a series of duration discrimination tasks differing in modality (visual vs. auditory) and presentation schedule (fixed vs. variable). Visual tasks were associated with slower blink rates and shorter blink durations than auditory tasks. Sensitivity measures suggested that this difference might be due, in part, to the greater difficulty of the visual tasks. Blink latency declined within and across tasks and was longer for target stimuli which were followed by responses. Since the target stimuli were the short duration stimuli, the latter effect could be a compound of two opposing effects. The first is related to the response, which tends to delay the blink on target trials, while the second, related to decision processes, would tend to increase latencies on nontarget trials. Schedule of stimulus presentation did not affect dependent measures as predicted. RT was unaffected by either of the experimental variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4089088</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSPHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Auditory Perception ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blink duration ; Blink latency ; Blink rate ; Blinking ; Discrimination Learning ; Eyeblink ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Information processing ; Male ; Modality ; Occupational psychology ; Oculomotor behavior ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Schedule ; Temporal discrimination ; Time Perception ; Visual Perception ; Vocational training. Adult education</subject><ispartof>Psychophysiology, 1985-11, Vol.22 (6), p.629-635</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5039-dd48a432837eacb3f9f497e711fffceaa1e5a42f94f2f2725663a19f7afa1f553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5039-dd48a432837eacb3f9f497e711fffceaa1e5a42f94f2f2725663a19f7afa1f553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8661369$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4089088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walrath, Larry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strock, Barbara D.</creatorcontrib><title>Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation</title><title>Psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Eyeblink performance parameters were investigated in subjects engaged in a series of duration discrimination tasks differing in modality (visual vs. auditory) and presentation schedule (fixed vs. variable). Visual tasks were associated with slower blink rates and shorter blink durations than auditory tasks. Sensitivity measures suggested that this difference might be due, in part, to the greater difficulty of the visual tasks. Blink latency declined within and across tasks and was longer for target stimuli which were followed by responses. Since the target stimuli were the short duration stimuli, the latter effect could be a compound of two opposing effects. The first is related to the response, which tends to delay the blink on target trials, while the second, related to decision processes, would tend to increase latencies on nontarget trials. Schedule of stimulus presentation did not affect dependent measures as predicted. RT was unaffected by either of the experimental variables.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blink duration</subject><subject>Blink latency</subject><subject>Blink rate</subject><subject>Blinking</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Eyeblink</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Modality</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Oculomotor behavior</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Schedule</subject><subject>Temporal discrimination</subject><subject>Time Perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Vocational training. Adult education</subject><issn>0048-5772</issn><issn>1469-8986</issn><issn>1540-5958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1v0zAUhi0EGmXwE5AshLhLsOP4ixu0DbYhbVApQxNX1qljg9s0GXEC7b_HWaPe4xtLfj-Oz4PQG0pyms77dU5LoTOllcipVjwfVoQKrvLdE7Q4Sk_RgpBSZVzK4jl6EeOaEKJpUZygk5IoTZRaoJ_nTWg3-MwO4U8Y9ji0GPCnEG0ftqGFIXQtvoO4wRCTcDm29vGp87gawnZsxohvuxqaKQttjSv7y9Vj4ybHsnfRtcNjyUv0zEMT3av5PkXfLz_fXVxnN9-uvlyc3WSWE6azui4VlKxQTDqwK-a1L7V0klLvvXUA1HEoC69LX_hCFlwIBlR7CR6o55ydoneH3oe--z26OJhtWsY1DbSuG6ORCRNlXCXjh4PR9l2MvfPmIa0M_d5QYibKZm0mlGZCaSbKZqZsdin8ep4yrrauPkZnrEl_O-sQLTS-h9aGeLQpISgTOtk-Hmx_Q-P2__EBs6x-LEUxNWSHhhAHtzs2QL8xQjLJzf3XK3NPrpWsqluzZP8A4T-qlQ</recordid><startdate>198511</startdate><enddate>198511</enddate><creator>Goldstein, Robert</creator><creator>Walrath, Larry C.</creator><creator>Stern, John A.</creator><creator>Strock, Barbara D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198511</creationdate><title>Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation</title><author>Goldstein, Robert ; Walrath, Larry C. ; Stern, John A. ; Strock, Barbara D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5039-dd48a432837eacb3f9f497e711fffceaa1e5a42f94f2f2725663a19f7afa1f553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blink duration</topic><topic>Blink latency</topic><topic>Blink rate</topic><topic>Blinking</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Eyeblink</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Modality</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Oculomotor behavior</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Schedule</topic><topic>Temporal discrimination</topic><topic>Time Perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Vocational training. Adult education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walrath, Larry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strock, Barbara D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldstein, Robert</au><au>Walrath, Larry C.</au><au>Stern, John A.</au><au>Strock, Barbara D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation</atitle><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><date>1985-11</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>635</epage><pages>629-635</pages><issn>0048-5772</issn><eissn>1469-8986</eissn><eissn>1540-5958</eissn><coden>PSPHAF</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Eyeblink performance parameters were investigated in subjects engaged in a series of duration discrimination tasks differing in modality (visual vs. auditory) and presentation schedule (fixed vs. variable). Visual tasks were associated with slower blink rates and shorter blink durations than auditory tasks. Sensitivity measures suggested that this difference might be due, in part, to the greater difficulty of the visual tasks. Blink latency declined within and across tasks and was longer for target stimuli which were followed by responses. Since the target stimuli were the short duration stimuli, the latter effect could be a compound of two opposing effects. The first is related to the response, which tends to delay the blink on target trials, while the second, related to decision processes, would tend to increase latencies on nontarget trials. Schedule of stimulus presentation did not affect dependent measures as predicted. RT was unaffected by either of the experimental variables.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>4089088</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5772
ispartof Psychophysiology, 1985-11, Vol.22 (6), p.629-635
issn 0048-5772
1469-8986
1540-5958
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76581358
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Auditory Perception
Biological and medical sciences
Blink duration
Blink latency
Blink rate
Blinking
Discrimination Learning
Eyeblink
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Information processing
Male
Modality
Occupational psychology
Oculomotor behavior
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time
Schedule
Temporal discrimination
Time Perception
Visual Perception
Vocational training. Adult education
title Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A56%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blink%20Activity%20in%20a%20Discrimination%20Task%20as%20a%20Function%20of%20Stimulus%20Modality%20and%20Schedule%20of%20Presentation&rft.jtitle=Psychophysiology&rft.au=Goldstein,%20Robert&rft.date=1985-11&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=635&rft.pages=629-635&rft.issn=0048-5772&rft.eissn=1469-8986&rft.coden=PSPHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76581358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76581358&rft_id=info:pmid/4089088&rfr_iscdi=true