Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation
ABSTRACT Eyeblink performance parameters were investigated in subjects engaged in a series of duration discrimination tasks differing in modality (visual vs. auditory) and presentation schedule (fixed vs. variable). Visual tasks were associated with slower blink rates and shorter blink durations tha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychophysiology 1985-11, Vol.22 (6), p.629-635 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 635 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 629 |
container_title | Psychophysiology |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Goldstein, Robert Walrath, Larry C. Stern, John A. Strock, Barbara D. |
description | ABSTRACT
Eyeblink performance parameters were investigated in subjects engaged in a series of duration discrimination tasks differing in modality (visual vs. auditory) and presentation schedule (fixed vs. variable). Visual tasks were associated with slower blink rates and shorter blink durations than auditory tasks. Sensitivity measures suggested that this difference might be due, in part, to the greater difficulty of the visual tasks. Blink latency declined within and across tasks and was longer for target stimuli which were followed by responses. Since the target stimuli were the short duration stimuli, the latter effect could be a compound of two opposing effects. The first is related to the response, which tends to delay the blink on target trials, while the second, related to decision processes, would tend to increase latencies on nontarget trials. Schedule of stimulus presentation did not affect dependent measures as predicted. RT was unaffected by either of the experimental variables. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76581358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76581358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5039-dd48a432837eacb3f9f497e711fffceaa1e5a42f94f2f2725663a19f7afa1f553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1v0zAUhi0EGmXwE5AshLhLsOP4ixu0DbYhbVApQxNX1qljg9s0GXEC7b_HWaPe4xtLfj-Oz4PQG0pyms77dU5LoTOllcipVjwfVoQKrvLdE7Q4Sk_RgpBSZVzK4jl6EeOaEKJpUZygk5IoTZRaoJ_nTWg3-MwO4U8Y9ji0GPCnEG0ftqGFIXQtvoO4wRCTcDm29vGp87gawnZsxohvuxqaKQttjSv7y9Vj4ybHsnfRtcNjyUv0zEMT3av5PkXfLz_fXVxnN9-uvlyc3WSWE6azui4VlKxQTDqwK-a1L7V0klLvvXUA1HEoC69LX_hCFlwIBlR7CR6o55ydoneH3oe--z26OJhtWsY1DbSuG6ORCRNlXCXjh4PR9l2MvfPmIa0M_d5QYibKZm0mlGZCaSbKZqZsdin8ep4yrrauPkZnrEl_O-sQLTS-h9aGeLQpISgTOtk-Hmx_Q-P2__EBs6x-LEUxNWSHhhAHtzs2QL8xQjLJzf3XK3NPrpWsqluzZP8A4T-qlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76581358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Goldstein, Robert ; Walrath, Larry C. ; Stern, John A. ; Strock, Barbara D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Robert ; Walrath, Larry C. ; Stern, John A. ; Strock, Barbara D.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Eyeblink performance parameters were investigated in subjects engaged in a series of duration discrimination tasks differing in modality (visual vs. auditory) and presentation schedule (fixed vs. variable). Visual tasks were associated with slower blink rates and shorter blink durations than auditory tasks. Sensitivity measures suggested that this difference might be due, in part, to the greater difficulty of the visual tasks. Blink latency declined within and across tasks and was longer for target stimuli which were followed by responses. Since the target stimuli were the short duration stimuli, the latter effect could be a compound of two opposing effects. The first is related to the response, which tends to delay the blink on target trials, while the second, related to decision processes, would tend to increase latencies on nontarget trials. Schedule of stimulus presentation did not affect dependent measures as predicted. RT was unaffected by either of the experimental variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4089088</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSPHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Auditory Perception ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blink duration ; Blink latency ; Blink rate ; Blinking ; Discrimination Learning ; Eyeblink ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Information processing ; Male ; Modality ; Occupational psychology ; Oculomotor behavior ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Schedule ; Temporal discrimination ; Time Perception ; Visual Perception ; Vocational training. Adult education</subject><ispartof>Psychophysiology, 1985-11, Vol.22 (6), p.629-635</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5039-dd48a432837eacb3f9f497e711fffceaa1e5a42f94f2f2725663a19f7afa1f553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5039-dd48a432837eacb3f9f497e711fffceaa1e5a42f94f2f2725663a19f7afa1f553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8661369$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4089088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walrath, Larry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strock, Barbara D.</creatorcontrib><title>Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation</title><title>Psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Eyeblink performance parameters were investigated in subjects engaged in a series of duration discrimination tasks differing in modality (visual vs. auditory) and presentation schedule (fixed vs. variable). Visual tasks were associated with slower blink rates and shorter blink durations than auditory tasks. Sensitivity measures suggested that this difference might be due, in part, to the greater difficulty of the visual tasks. Blink latency declined within and across tasks and was longer for target stimuli which were followed by responses. Since the target stimuli were the short duration stimuli, the latter effect could be a compound of two opposing effects. The first is related to the response, which tends to delay the blink on target trials, while the second, related to decision processes, would tend to increase latencies on nontarget trials. Schedule of stimulus presentation did not affect dependent measures as predicted. RT was unaffected by either of the experimental variables.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blink duration</subject><subject>Blink latency</subject><subject>Blink rate</subject><subject>Blinking</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Eyeblink</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Modality</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Oculomotor behavior</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Schedule</subject><subject>Temporal discrimination</subject><subject>Time Perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Vocational training. Adult education</subject><issn>0048-5772</issn><issn>1469-8986</issn><issn>1540-5958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1v0zAUhi0EGmXwE5AshLhLsOP4ixu0DbYhbVApQxNX1qljg9s0GXEC7b_HWaPe4xtLfj-Oz4PQG0pyms77dU5LoTOllcipVjwfVoQKrvLdE7Q4Sk_RgpBSZVzK4jl6EeOaEKJpUZygk5IoTZRaoJ_nTWg3-MwO4U8Y9ji0GPCnEG0ftqGFIXQtvoO4wRCTcDm29vGp87gawnZsxohvuxqaKQttjSv7y9Vj4ybHsnfRtcNjyUv0zEMT3av5PkXfLz_fXVxnN9-uvlyc3WSWE6azui4VlKxQTDqwK-a1L7V0klLvvXUA1HEoC69LX_hCFlwIBlR7CR6o55ydoneH3oe--z26OJhtWsY1DbSuG6ORCRNlXCXjh4PR9l2MvfPmIa0M_d5QYibKZm0mlGZCaSbKZqZsdin8ep4yrrauPkZnrEl_O-sQLTS-h9aGeLQpISgTOtk-Hmx_Q-P2__EBs6x-LEUxNWSHhhAHtzs2QL8xQjLJzf3XK3NPrpWsqluzZP8A4T-qlQ</recordid><startdate>198511</startdate><enddate>198511</enddate><creator>Goldstein, Robert</creator><creator>Walrath, Larry C.</creator><creator>Stern, John A.</creator><creator>Strock, Barbara D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198511</creationdate><title>Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation</title><author>Goldstein, Robert ; Walrath, Larry C. ; Stern, John A. ; Strock, Barbara D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5039-dd48a432837eacb3f9f497e711fffceaa1e5a42f94f2f2725663a19f7afa1f553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blink duration</topic><topic>Blink latency</topic><topic>Blink rate</topic><topic>Blinking</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Eyeblink</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Modality</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Oculomotor behavior</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Schedule</topic><topic>Temporal discrimination</topic><topic>Time Perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Vocational training. Adult education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walrath, Larry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stern, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strock, Barbara D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldstein, Robert</au><au>Walrath, Larry C.</au><au>Stern, John A.</au><au>Strock, Barbara D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation</atitle><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><date>1985-11</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>635</epage><pages>629-635</pages><issn>0048-5772</issn><eissn>1469-8986</eissn><eissn>1540-5958</eissn><coden>PSPHAF</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
Eyeblink performance parameters were investigated in subjects engaged in a series of duration discrimination tasks differing in modality (visual vs. auditory) and presentation schedule (fixed vs. variable). Visual tasks were associated with slower blink rates and shorter blink durations than auditory tasks. Sensitivity measures suggested that this difference might be due, in part, to the greater difficulty of the visual tasks. Blink latency declined within and across tasks and was longer for target stimuli which were followed by responses. Since the target stimuli were the short duration stimuli, the latter effect could be a compound of two opposing effects. The first is related to the response, which tends to delay the blink on target trials, while the second, related to decision processes, would tend to increase latencies on nontarget trials. Schedule of stimulus presentation did not affect dependent measures as predicted. RT was unaffected by either of the experimental variables.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>4089088</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-5772 |
ispartof | Psychophysiology, 1985-11, Vol.22 (6), p.629-635 |
issn | 0048-5772 1469-8986 1540-5958 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76581358 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Auditory Perception Biological and medical sciences Blink duration Blink latency Blink rate Blinking Discrimination Learning Eyeblink Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Information processing Male Modality Occupational psychology Oculomotor behavior Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Schedule Temporal discrimination Time Perception Visual Perception Vocational training. Adult education |
title | Blink Activity in a Discrimination Task as a Function of Stimulus Modality and Schedule of Presentation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A56%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blink%20Activity%20in%20a%20Discrimination%20Task%20as%20a%20Function%20of%20Stimulus%20Modality%20and%20Schedule%20of%20Presentation&rft.jtitle=Psychophysiology&rft.au=Goldstein,%20Robert&rft.date=1985-11&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=635&rft.pages=629-635&rft.issn=0048-5772&rft.eissn=1469-8986&rft.coden=PSPHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01658.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76581358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76581358&rft_id=info:pmid/4089088&rfr_iscdi=true |