Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy—How far does the endoscope go?

Two adult-size endoscopes (Olympus GIF-K2 and ACMI TX-8) were compared for extent of duodenal intubation by the endoscopist's estimate of location and x-ray position in 55 patients. The endoscopes were not different in duodenal position when separately analyzed for the endoscopist's estima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 1985-12, Vol.31 (6), p.367-369
Hauptverfasser: Brady, Charles E., Stewart, David L., DiPalma, Jack A., Clement, Donald J., Coleman, Terrence W., Rugh, Kenneth S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two adult-size endoscopes (Olympus GIF-K2 and ACMI TX-8) were compared for extent of duodenal intubation by the endoscopist's estimate of location and x-ray position in 55 patients. The endoscopes were not different in duodenal position when separately analyzed for the endoscopist's estimate or x-ray location. Combining the results for both endoscopes showed the endoscopist's estimate to differ significantly from x-ray location in 47% of patients (p = 0.02). When incorrect, the endoscopist overestimated 62% of the time and underestimated 38% of the time. X-ray evaluation of insertion depth confirmed that the second portion of the duodenum was reached in 96%, third portion in 51%, and fourth portion or beyond in 38% of patients. We conclude that fluoroscopic confirmation may be necessary when endoscopically assessing distal duodenal segments for pathology.
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/S0016-5107(85)72249-3