The motor theory of speech perception revised
A motor theory of speech perception, initially proposed to account for results of early experiments with synthetic speech, is now extensively revised to accommodate recent findings, and to relate the assumptions of the theory to those that might be made about other perceptual modes. According to the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognition 1985-10, Vol.21 (1), p.1-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 36 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Cognition |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Liberman, Alvin M. Mattingly, Ignatius G. |
description | A motor theory of speech perception, initially proposed to account for results of early experiments with synthetic speech, is now extensively revised to accommodate recent findings, and to relate the assumptions of the theory to those that might be made about other perceptual modes. According to the revised theory, phonetic information is perceived in a biologically distinct system, a ‘module’ specialized to detect the intended gestures of the speaker that are the basis for phonetic categories. Built into the structure of this module is the unique but lawful relationship between the gestures and the acoustic patterns in which they are variously overlapped. In consequence, the module causes perception of phonetic structure without translation from preliminary auditory impressions. Thus, it is comparable to such other modules as the one that enables an animal to localize sound. Peculiar to the phonetic module are the relation between perception and production it incorporates and the fact that it must compete with other modules for the same stimulus variations.
Une théorie motrice de la perception proposée initialement pour rendre compte des résultats des premières expériences avec de la parole synthétique a été largement révisée afin d'interpréter les données récentes et de relier les propositions de cette théorie à celles que l'on peut faire pour d'autres modalités de perception. La révision de cette théorie stipule que l'information phonétique est fournie par un système biologique distinct, un ‘module’ spécialisé pour détecter les gestes que le locuteur a eu l'intention de faire: ces gestes fondent les catégories phonétiques. La relation entre les gestes et les patterns acoustiques dans lesquels ceux-ci sont imbriqués de facon variée est unique mais régulée. Cette relation est construite dans la structure du module. En conséquence le module provoque la perception de la structure phonétique sans traduction à partir d'impressions auditives préliminaires. Ce module est ainsi comparable à d'autres modules tels que celui qui permet à l'animal de localiser les sons. La particularité de ce module tient à la relation entre perception et production qu'il incorpore et an fait qu'il doit rivaliser avec d'autres modules pour de mêmes variations de stimulus. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76536040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0010027785900216</els_id><sourcerecordid>58126051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-d3c25fbc9a876eec0d690d75e8395456cab8ffbed27ad650b0fc5b65e11d40243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWj_-gcKCInpYnWQ3H3sRpPgFBS96DtlklkbazZpsC_57t7b04EFPc5jnfZl5CDmlcEOBilsACjkwKa8Uv64AGM3FDhlRJYtcqkLtktEWOSCHKX0AQMmk2if7JUguBYxI_jbFbB76ELN-iiF-ZaHJUodop1mH0WLX-9BmEZc-oTsme42ZJTzZzCPy_vjwNn7OJ69PL-P7SW45pX3uCst4U9vKKCmGKnCiAic5qqLiJRfW1KppanRMGic41NBYXguOlLoSWFkckct1bxfD5wJTr-c-WZzNTIthkbQUvBBQwr8gV5QJ4HQAz3-BH2ER2-EJTVlFVaUYKwaqXFM2hpQiNrqLfm7il6agV9L1yqheGdWK6x_pWgyxs035op6j24Y2lof9xWZvkjWzJprW-rTFlJCKcTlgd2sMB7VLj1En67G16HxE22sX_N93fAOWfpsu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291898223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The motor theory of speech perception revised</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Liberman, Alvin M. ; Mattingly, Ignatius G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Alvin M. ; Mattingly, Ignatius G.</creatorcontrib><description>A motor theory of speech perception, initially proposed to account for results of early experiments with synthetic speech, is now extensively revised to accommodate recent findings, and to relate the assumptions of the theory to those that might be made about other perceptual modes. According to the revised theory, phonetic information is perceived in a biologically distinct system, a ‘module’ specialized to detect the intended gestures of the speaker that are the basis for phonetic categories. Built into the structure of this module is the unique but lawful relationship between the gestures and the acoustic patterns in which they are variously overlapped. In consequence, the module causes perception of phonetic structure without translation from preliminary auditory impressions. Thus, it is comparable to such other modules as the one that enables an animal to localize sound. Peculiar to the phonetic module are the relation between perception and production it incorporates and the fact that it must compete with other modules for the same stimulus variations.
Une théorie motrice de la perception proposée initialement pour rendre compte des résultats des premières expériences avec de la parole synthétique a été largement révisée afin d'interpréter les données récentes et de relier les propositions de cette théorie à celles que l'on peut faire pour d'autres modalités de perception. La révision de cette théorie stipule que l'information phonétique est fournie par un système biologique distinct, un ‘module’ spécialisé pour détecter les gestes que le locuteur a eu l'intention de faire: ces gestes fondent les catégories phonétiques. La relation entre les gestes et les patterns acoustiques dans lesquels ceux-ci sont imbriqués de facon variée est unique mais régulée. Cette relation est construite dans la structure du module. En conséquence le module provoque la perception de la structure phonétique sans traduction à partir d'impressions auditives préliminaires. Ce module est ainsi comparable à d'autres modules tels que celui qui permet à l'animal de localiser les sons. La particularité de ce module tient à la relation entre perception et production qu'il incorpore et an fait qu'il doit rivaliser avec d'autres modules pour de mêmes variations de stimulus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4075760</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CGTNAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Communication disorders ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Production and perception of spoken language ; Psychological Theory ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Speech Perception</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 1985-10, Vol.21 (1), p.1-36</ispartof><rights>1985</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-d3c25fbc9a876eec0d690d75e8395456cab8ffbed27ad650b0fc5b65e11d40243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-d3c25fbc9a876eec0d690d75e8395456cab8ffbed27ad650b0fc5b65e11d40243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27869,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8678257$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4075760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Alvin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattingly, Ignatius G.</creatorcontrib><title>The motor theory of speech perception revised</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>A motor theory of speech perception, initially proposed to account for results of early experiments with synthetic speech, is now extensively revised to accommodate recent findings, and to relate the assumptions of the theory to those that might be made about other perceptual modes. According to the revised theory, phonetic information is perceived in a biologically distinct system, a ‘module’ specialized to detect the intended gestures of the speaker that are the basis for phonetic categories. Built into the structure of this module is the unique but lawful relationship between the gestures and the acoustic patterns in which they are variously overlapped. In consequence, the module causes perception of phonetic structure without translation from preliminary auditory impressions. Thus, it is comparable to such other modules as the one that enables an animal to localize sound. Peculiar to the phonetic module are the relation between perception and production it incorporates and the fact that it must compete with other modules for the same stimulus variations.
Une théorie motrice de la perception proposée initialement pour rendre compte des résultats des premières expériences avec de la parole synthétique a été largement révisée afin d'interpréter les données récentes et de relier les propositions de cette théorie à celles que l'on peut faire pour d'autres modalités de perception. La révision de cette théorie stipule que l'information phonétique est fournie par un système biologique distinct, un ‘module’ spécialisé pour détecter les gestes que le locuteur a eu l'intention de faire: ces gestes fondent les catégories phonétiques. La relation entre les gestes et les patterns acoustiques dans lesquels ceux-ci sont imbriqués de facon variée est unique mais régulée. Cette relation est construite dans la structure du module. En conséquence le module provoque la perception de la structure phonétique sans traduction à partir d'impressions auditives préliminaires. Ce module est ainsi comparable à d'autres modules tels que celui qui permet à l'animal de localiser les sons. La particularité de ce module tient à la relation entre perception et production qu'il incorpore et an fait qu'il doit rivaliser avec d'autres modules pour de mêmes variations de stimulus.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Production and perception of spoken language</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWj_-gcKCInpYnWQ3H3sRpPgFBS96DtlklkbazZpsC_57t7b04EFPc5jnfZl5CDmlcEOBilsACjkwKa8Uv64AGM3FDhlRJYtcqkLtktEWOSCHKX0AQMmk2if7JUguBYxI_jbFbB76ELN-iiF-ZaHJUodop1mH0WLX-9BmEZc-oTsme42ZJTzZzCPy_vjwNn7OJ69PL-P7SW45pX3uCst4U9vKKCmGKnCiAic5qqLiJRfW1KppanRMGic41NBYXguOlLoSWFkckct1bxfD5wJTr-c-WZzNTIthkbQUvBBQwr8gV5QJ4HQAz3-BH2ER2-EJTVlFVaUYKwaqXFM2hpQiNrqLfm7il6agV9L1yqheGdWK6x_pWgyxs035op6j24Y2lof9xWZvkjWzJprW-rTFlJCKcTlgd2sMB7VLj1En67G16HxE22sX_N93fAOWfpsu</recordid><startdate>198510</startdate><enddate>198510</enddate><creator>Liberman, Alvin M.</creator><creator>Mattingly, Ignatius G.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198510</creationdate><title>The motor theory of speech perception revised</title><author>Liberman, Alvin M. ; Mattingly, Ignatius G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-d3c25fbc9a876eec0d690d75e8395456cab8ffbed27ad650b0fc5b65e11d40243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Production and perception of spoken language</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liberman, Alvin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattingly, Ignatius G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liberman, Alvin M.</au><au>Mattingly, Ignatius G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The motor theory of speech perception revised</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>1985-10</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>1-36</pages><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><coden>CGTNAU</coden><abstract>A motor theory of speech perception, initially proposed to account for results of early experiments with synthetic speech, is now extensively revised to accommodate recent findings, and to relate the assumptions of the theory to those that might be made about other perceptual modes. According to the revised theory, phonetic information is perceived in a biologically distinct system, a ‘module’ specialized to detect the intended gestures of the speaker that are the basis for phonetic categories. Built into the structure of this module is the unique but lawful relationship between the gestures and the acoustic patterns in which they are variously overlapped. In consequence, the module causes perception of phonetic structure without translation from preliminary auditory impressions. Thus, it is comparable to such other modules as the one that enables an animal to localize sound. Peculiar to the phonetic module are the relation between perception and production it incorporates and the fact that it must compete with other modules for the same stimulus variations.
Une théorie motrice de la perception proposée initialement pour rendre compte des résultats des premières expériences avec de la parole synthétique a été largement révisée afin d'interpréter les données récentes et de relier les propositions de cette théorie à celles que l'on peut faire pour d'autres modalités de perception. La révision de cette théorie stipule que l'information phonétique est fournie par un système biologique distinct, un ‘module’ spécialisé pour détecter les gestes que le locuteur a eu l'intention de faire: ces gestes fondent les catégories phonétiques. La relation entre les gestes et les patterns acoustiques dans lesquels ceux-ci sont imbriqués de facon variée est unique mais régulée. Cette relation est construite dans la structure du module. En conséquence le module provoque la perception de la structure phonétique sans traduction à partir d'impressions auditives préliminaires. Ce module est ainsi comparable à d'autres modules tels que celui qui permet à l'animal de localiser les sons. La particularité de ce module tient à la relation entre perception et production qu'il incorpore et an fait qu'il doit rivaliser avec d'autres modules pour de mêmes variations de stimulus.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>4075760</pmid><doi>10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6</doi><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-0277 |
ispartof | Cognition, 1985-10, Vol.21 (1), p.1-36 |
issn | 0010-0277 1873-7838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76536040 |
source | MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Communication disorders Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Language Production and perception of spoken language Psychological Theory Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Speech Perception |
title | The motor theory of speech perception revised |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T22%3A17%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20motor%20theory%20of%20speech%20perception%20revised&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Liberman,%20Alvin%20M.&rft.date=1985-10&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=1-36&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft.coden=CGTNAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58126051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291898223&rft_id=info:pmid/4075760&rft_els_id=0010027785900216&rfr_iscdi=true |