Security of Infant-Mother, -Father, and -Metapelet Attachments among Kibbutz-Reared Israeli Children

Research guided by attachment theory as formulated by Bowlby and Ainsworth is branching out in exciting new directions. The 12 chapters collected together in this Monograph present theoretical and methodological tools that will facilitate further research on attachment across the life span, across g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1985-01, Vol.50 (1/2), p.257-275
Hauptverfasser: Sagi, Abraham, Lamb, Michael E., Lewkowicz, Kathleen S., Shoham, Ronit, Dvir, Rachel, Estes, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 275
container_issue 1/2
container_start_page 257
container_title Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
container_volume 50
creator Sagi, Abraham
Lamb, Michael E.
Lewkowicz, Kathleen S.
Shoham, Ronit
Dvir, Rachel
Estes, David
description Research guided by attachment theory as formulated by Bowlby and Ainsworth is branching out in exciting new directions. The 12 chapters collected together in this Monograph present theoretical and methodological tools that will facilitate further research on attachment across the life span, across generations, and across cultures. The Monograph is divided into 4 parts. Part 1 provides the theoretical framework, emphasizing the ethological and the psychoanalytic roots of attachment theory. Two central ideas in attachment theory are highlighted: attachment as grounded in a behavioral-motivational control system whose set-goal is felt security, and the notion that individuals construct internal working models of self and attachment figures that guide the interpretation and production of behavior. These themes are repeatedly taken up in other chapters of the Monograph. Part 2 is concerned with translating theory into measurement. In Chapter II, Waters and Deane present a Q-sort suitable for assessing attachment security in 12-36-month-olds. This instrument is based on Bowlby's control systems model of attachment. In Chapter III, Main, Kaplan, and Cassidy offer a variety of highly original measures for assessing security in children and adults that have been validated against attachment classifications in infancy. These measures open new avenues for research by moving the study of attachment to the level of representation. Part 3 (Chaps. IV-IX) is organized around issues in adaptation, maladaptation, and intergenerational transmission. Vaughn, Deane, and Waters (Chap. IV) examine short-term and long-term adaptations to nonmaternal care. Findings on short-term adaptation to high-quality day care seemed benign; those on long-term adaptation illustrate that outcome is jointly dependent on attachment security and on whether or when the mother returns to work. In Chapter V, Dontas, Maratos, Fafoutis, and Karangelis present a field study, conducted in a model infant home in Greece, describing 8-12-month-olds' 2-week adaptations to a new principal caregiver (the adoptive mother) in a supportive setting. The theme of Chapters VI and VII is continuity of adaptation from infancy to early childhood in a poverty and in a middle-class sample. Significant relationships between early insecure attachment classification and later preschool behavior problems are reported for the poverty sample (Erickson, Sroufe, & Egeland, Chap. VI) but not for the middle-class sample (Bates, Ma
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3333837
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76488325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3333837</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3333837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-f8035e76a71b5345a8b69d3f7becf9fe6430038d0cb794c347605aa86c3879e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotVbxFwg5iF6MZjfZJHssxWqxRfADvC3Z7MRu2Y-aZA_117uyxZtzmYH34YV5EDqP6G3MqLxj_SgmD9A4SjgliWL8EI0pZZKkUnwcoxPvN5RGPErYCI04FWnE6BgVr2A6V4Ydbi1eNFY3gazasAZ3g8lcD4duCkxWEPQWKgh4GoI26xqa4LGu2-YTP5V53oVv8gLaQYEX3mmoSjxbl1XhoDlFR1ZXHs72e4Le5_dvs0eyfH5YzKZLYuKYBmIVZQlIoWWUJ4wnWuUiLZiVORibWhCc9Q-pgppcptwwLgVNtFbCMCVTYGyCroberWu_OvAhq0tvoKp0A23nMym4UixOevB6AI1rvXdgs60ra-12WUSzX5_Z3mdPXuwru7yG4o_bC-zzyyHf-NC6f2t-AJigeb0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76488325</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Security of Infant-Mother, -Father, and -Metapelet Attachments among Kibbutz-Reared Israeli Children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Sagi, Abraham ; Lamb, Michael E. ; Lewkowicz, Kathleen S. ; Shoham, Ronit ; Dvir, Rachel ; Estes, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Sagi, Abraham ; Lamb, Michael E. ; Lewkowicz, Kathleen S. ; Shoham, Ronit ; Dvir, Rachel ; Estes, David</creatorcontrib><description>Research guided by attachment theory as formulated by Bowlby and Ainsworth is branching out in exciting new directions. The 12 chapters collected together in this Monograph present theoretical and methodological tools that will facilitate further research on attachment across the life span, across generations, and across cultures. The Monograph is divided into 4 parts. Part 1 provides the theoretical framework, emphasizing the ethological and the psychoanalytic roots of attachment theory. Two central ideas in attachment theory are highlighted: attachment as grounded in a behavioral-motivational control system whose set-goal is felt security, and the notion that individuals construct internal working models of self and attachment figures that guide the interpretation and production of behavior. These themes are repeatedly taken up in other chapters of the Monograph. Part 2 is concerned with translating theory into measurement. In Chapter II, Waters and Deane present a Q-sort suitable for assessing attachment security in 12-36-month-olds. This instrument is based on Bowlby's control systems model of attachment. In Chapter III, Main, Kaplan, and Cassidy offer a variety of highly original measures for assessing security in children and adults that have been validated against attachment classifications in infancy. These measures open new avenues for research by moving the study of attachment to the level of representation. Part 3 (Chaps. IV-IX) is organized around issues in adaptation, maladaptation, and intergenerational transmission. Vaughn, Deane, and Waters (Chap. IV) examine short-term and long-term adaptations to nonmaternal care. Findings on short-term adaptation to high-quality day care seemed benign; those on long-term adaptation illustrate that outcome is jointly dependent on attachment security and on whether or when the mother returns to work. In Chapter V, Dontas, Maratos, Fafoutis, and Karangelis present a field study, conducted in a model infant home in Greece, describing 8-12-month-olds' 2-week adaptations to a new principal caregiver (the adoptive mother) in a supportive setting. The theme of Chapters VI and VII is continuity of adaptation from infancy to early childhood in a poverty and in a middle-class sample. Significant relationships between early insecure attachment classification and later preschool behavior problems are reported for the poverty sample (Erickson, Sroufe, &amp; Egeland, Chap. VI) but not for the middle-class sample (Bates, Maslin, &amp; Frankel, Chap. VII), despite the fact that mother-infant interaction at 6, 13, and 24 months was related to attachment classifications in predictable ways. In Chapter VIII, Schneider-Rosen, Braunwald, Carlson, and Cicchetti discuss infants' adaption to maltreatment. They report a preponderance of insecure attachment classifications at 12, 18, and 24 months, with avoidant classifications becoming dominant at the later ages. Secure attachment in abused children is explained in terms of multifactorial compensatory and potentiating influences. In the concluding chapter of this section, Ricks reviews intergenerational effects related to attachment. Two domains are considered: effects of early separation and familial disruption on parental behavior in the next generation, and continuity in quality of attachment. Part 4 (Chaps. X-XII) is devoted to cross-national research on attachment in infancy. Grossmann, Grossmann, Spangler, Suess, and Unzner (Chap. X) present findings for North German mother-infant pairs, observed at home and in the Strange Situation. This first attempt at replicating the classic Baltimore study corroborated associations between Strange Situation classifications and maternal sensitivity to infant signals reported by Ainsworth and her colleagues. However, the overrepresentation of group A (avoidant) classifications in this sample is ascribed to a culturally valued emphasis on early independence rather than to maternal rejection. In Chapter XI, Sagi, Lamb, Lewkowicz, Shoham, Dvir, and Estes report a high proportion of insecure-resistant (C) classifications in 12-month-old Israeli kibbutz infants, who were observed with mother, father, and metapelet. This finding is explained in terms of heightened stranger anxiety rather than insecurity. A comparison group of Israeli city infants in day care resembled U.S. samples in terms of Strange Situation groups. The insecure-resistant group (C) was also overrepresented in Japan (Miyake, Chen, &amp; Campos, Chap. XII), where C classification was correlated with neonatal temperament but also with maternal interactive behavior. In view of the infants' lack of experience with nonfamilial care, the C classification in Japan is not interpreted as an index of insecure-resistant attachment. Two additional themes running through the Monograph deserve special mention. These are (a) a concern with epigenetic explanations, charting different developmental pathways for secure and insecure infants, and (b) consideration of exceptional cases that do not, at first sight, fit predictions derived from the epigenetic perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-976X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3333837</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4069130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Birth Order ; Child Care ; Child Rearing ; Children ; Circadian Rhythm ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Father-Child Relations ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infants ; Israel ; Kibbutz ; Male ; Mother-Child Relations ; Mothers ; Object Attachment ; Parents ; Part 4: Cross-National Studies of Attachment in Infancy ; Proportions ; Questionnaires ; Temperament ; United States</subject><ispartof>Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1985-01, Vol.50 (1/2), p.257-275</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1985 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-f8035e76a71b5345a8b69d3f7becf9fe6430038d0cb794c347605aa86c3879e33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3333837$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3333837$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4021,27921,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4069130$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sagi, Abraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewkowicz, Kathleen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoham, Ronit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvir, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estes, David</creatorcontrib><title>Security of Infant-Mother, -Father, and -Metapelet Attachments among Kibbutz-Reared Israeli Children</title><title>Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development</title><addtitle>Monogr Soc Res Child Dev</addtitle><description>Research guided by attachment theory as formulated by Bowlby and Ainsworth is branching out in exciting new directions. The 12 chapters collected together in this Monograph present theoretical and methodological tools that will facilitate further research on attachment across the life span, across generations, and across cultures. The Monograph is divided into 4 parts. Part 1 provides the theoretical framework, emphasizing the ethological and the psychoanalytic roots of attachment theory. Two central ideas in attachment theory are highlighted: attachment as grounded in a behavioral-motivational control system whose set-goal is felt security, and the notion that individuals construct internal working models of self and attachment figures that guide the interpretation and production of behavior. These themes are repeatedly taken up in other chapters of the Monograph. Part 2 is concerned with translating theory into measurement. In Chapter II, Waters and Deane present a Q-sort suitable for assessing attachment security in 12-36-month-olds. This instrument is based on Bowlby's control systems model of attachment. In Chapter III, Main, Kaplan, and Cassidy offer a variety of highly original measures for assessing security in children and adults that have been validated against attachment classifications in infancy. These measures open new avenues for research by moving the study of attachment to the level of representation. Part 3 (Chaps. IV-IX) is organized around issues in adaptation, maladaptation, and intergenerational transmission. Vaughn, Deane, and Waters (Chap. IV) examine short-term and long-term adaptations to nonmaternal care. Findings on short-term adaptation to high-quality day care seemed benign; those on long-term adaptation illustrate that outcome is jointly dependent on attachment security and on whether or when the mother returns to work. In Chapter V, Dontas, Maratos, Fafoutis, and Karangelis present a field study, conducted in a model infant home in Greece, describing 8-12-month-olds' 2-week adaptations to a new principal caregiver (the adoptive mother) in a supportive setting. The theme of Chapters VI and VII is continuity of adaptation from infancy to early childhood in a poverty and in a middle-class sample. Significant relationships between early insecure attachment classification and later preschool behavior problems are reported for the poverty sample (Erickson, Sroufe, &amp; Egeland, Chap. VI) but not for the middle-class sample (Bates, Maslin, &amp; Frankel, Chap. VII), despite the fact that mother-infant interaction at 6, 13, and 24 months was related to attachment classifications in predictable ways. In Chapter VIII, Schneider-Rosen, Braunwald, Carlson, and Cicchetti discuss infants' adaption to maltreatment. They report a preponderance of insecure attachment classifications at 12, 18, and 24 months, with avoidant classifications becoming dominant at the later ages. Secure attachment in abused children is explained in terms of multifactorial compensatory and potentiating influences. In the concluding chapter of this section, Ricks reviews intergenerational effects related to attachment. Two domains are considered: effects of early separation and familial disruption on parental behavior in the next generation, and continuity in quality of attachment. Part 4 (Chaps. X-XII) is devoted to cross-national research on attachment in infancy. Grossmann, Grossmann, Spangler, Suess, and Unzner (Chap. X) present findings for North German mother-infant pairs, observed at home and in the Strange Situation. This first attempt at replicating the classic Baltimore study corroborated associations between Strange Situation classifications and maternal sensitivity to infant signals reported by Ainsworth and her colleagues. However, the overrepresentation of group A (avoidant) classifications in this sample is ascribed to a culturally valued emphasis on early independence rather than to maternal rejection. In Chapter XI, Sagi, Lamb, Lewkowicz, Shoham, Dvir, and Estes report a high proportion of insecure-resistant (C) classifications in 12-month-old Israeli kibbutz infants, who were observed with mother, father, and metapelet. This finding is explained in terms of heightened stranger anxiety rather than insecurity. A comparison group of Israeli city infants in day care resembled U.S. samples in terms of Strange Situation groups. The insecure-resistant group (C) was also overrepresented in Japan (Miyake, Chen, &amp; Campos, Chap. XII), where C classification was correlated with neonatal temperament but also with maternal interactive behavior. In view of the infants' lack of experience with nonfamilial care, the C classification in Japan is not interpreted as an index of insecure-resistant attachment. Two additional themes running through the Monograph deserve special mention. These are (a) a concern with epigenetic explanations, charting different developmental pathways for secure and insecure infants, and (b) consideration of exceptional cases that do not, at first sight, fit predictions derived from the epigenetic perspective.</description><subject>Birth Order</subject><subject>Child Care</subject><subject>Child Rearing</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Circadian Rhythm</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>Father-Child Relations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>Kibbutz</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mother-Child Relations</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Part 4: Cross-National Studies of Attachment in Infancy</subject><subject>Proportions</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Temperament</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0037-976X</issn><issn>1540-5834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotVbxFwg5iF6MZjfZJHssxWqxRfADvC3Z7MRu2Y-aZA_117uyxZtzmYH34YV5EDqP6G3MqLxj_SgmD9A4SjgliWL8EI0pZZKkUnwcoxPvN5RGPErYCI04FWnE6BgVr2A6V4Ydbi1eNFY3gazasAZ3g8lcD4duCkxWEPQWKgh4GoI26xqa4LGu2-YTP5V53oVv8gLaQYEX3mmoSjxbl1XhoDlFR1ZXHs72e4Le5_dvs0eyfH5YzKZLYuKYBmIVZQlIoWWUJ4wnWuUiLZiVORibWhCc9Q-pgppcptwwLgVNtFbCMCVTYGyCroberWu_OvAhq0tvoKp0A23nMym4UixOevB6AI1rvXdgs60ra-12WUSzX5_Z3mdPXuwru7yG4o_bC-zzyyHf-NC6f2t-AJigeb0</recordid><startdate>19850101</startdate><enddate>19850101</enddate><creator>Sagi, Abraham</creator><creator>Lamb, Michael E.</creator><creator>Lewkowicz, Kathleen S.</creator><creator>Shoham, Ronit</creator><creator>Dvir, Rachel</creator><creator>Estes, David</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850101</creationdate><title>Security of Infant-Mother, -Father, and -Metapelet Attachments among Kibbutz-Reared Israeli Children</title><author>Sagi, Abraham ; Lamb, Michael E. ; Lewkowicz, Kathleen S. ; Shoham, Ronit ; Dvir, Rachel ; Estes, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-f8035e76a71b5345a8b69d3f7becf9fe6430038d0cb794c347605aa86c3879e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Birth Order</topic><topic>Child Care</topic><topic>Child Rearing</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Circadian Rhythm</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>Father-Child Relations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>Kibbutz</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mother-Child Relations</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Part 4: Cross-National Studies of Attachment in Infancy</topic><topic>Proportions</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Temperament</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sagi, Abraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewkowicz, Kathleen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoham, Ronit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvir, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estes, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sagi, Abraham</au><au>Lamb, Michael E.</au><au>Lewkowicz, Kathleen S.</au><au>Shoham, Ronit</au><au>Dvir, Rachel</au><au>Estes, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Security of Infant-Mother, -Father, and -Metapelet Attachments among Kibbutz-Reared Israeli Children</atitle><jtitle>Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development</jtitle><addtitle>Monogr Soc Res Child Dev</addtitle><date>1985-01-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>257-275</pages><issn>0037-976X</issn><eissn>1540-5834</eissn><abstract>Research guided by attachment theory as formulated by Bowlby and Ainsworth is branching out in exciting new directions. The 12 chapters collected together in this Monograph present theoretical and methodological tools that will facilitate further research on attachment across the life span, across generations, and across cultures. The Monograph is divided into 4 parts. Part 1 provides the theoretical framework, emphasizing the ethological and the psychoanalytic roots of attachment theory. Two central ideas in attachment theory are highlighted: attachment as grounded in a behavioral-motivational control system whose set-goal is felt security, and the notion that individuals construct internal working models of self and attachment figures that guide the interpretation and production of behavior. These themes are repeatedly taken up in other chapters of the Monograph. Part 2 is concerned with translating theory into measurement. In Chapter II, Waters and Deane present a Q-sort suitable for assessing attachment security in 12-36-month-olds. This instrument is based on Bowlby's control systems model of attachment. In Chapter III, Main, Kaplan, and Cassidy offer a variety of highly original measures for assessing security in children and adults that have been validated against attachment classifications in infancy. These measures open new avenues for research by moving the study of attachment to the level of representation. Part 3 (Chaps. IV-IX) is organized around issues in adaptation, maladaptation, and intergenerational transmission. Vaughn, Deane, and Waters (Chap. IV) examine short-term and long-term adaptations to nonmaternal care. Findings on short-term adaptation to high-quality day care seemed benign; those on long-term adaptation illustrate that outcome is jointly dependent on attachment security and on whether or when the mother returns to work. In Chapter V, Dontas, Maratos, Fafoutis, and Karangelis present a field study, conducted in a model infant home in Greece, describing 8-12-month-olds' 2-week adaptations to a new principal caregiver (the adoptive mother) in a supportive setting. The theme of Chapters VI and VII is continuity of adaptation from infancy to early childhood in a poverty and in a middle-class sample. Significant relationships between early insecure attachment classification and later preschool behavior problems are reported for the poverty sample (Erickson, Sroufe, &amp; Egeland, Chap. VI) but not for the middle-class sample (Bates, Maslin, &amp; Frankel, Chap. VII), despite the fact that mother-infant interaction at 6, 13, and 24 months was related to attachment classifications in predictable ways. In Chapter VIII, Schneider-Rosen, Braunwald, Carlson, and Cicchetti discuss infants' adaption to maltreatment. They report a preponderance of insecure attachment classifications at 12, 18, and 24 months, with avoidant classifications becoming dominant at the later ages. Secure attachment in abused children is explained in terms of multifactorial compensatory and potentiating influences. In the concluding chapter of this section, Ricks reviews intergenerational effects related to attachment. Two domains are considered: effects of early separation and familial disruption on parental behavior in the next generation, and continuity in quality of attachment. Part 4 (Chaps. X-XII) is devoted to cross-national research on attachment in infancy. Grossmann, Grossmann, Spangler, Suess, and Unzner (Chap. X) present findings for North German mother-infant pairs, observed at home and in the Strange Situation. This first attempt at replicating the classic Baltimore study corroborated associations between Strange Situation classifications and maternal sensitivity to infant signals reported by Ainsworth and her colleagues. However, the overrepresentation of group A (avoidant) classifications in this sample is ascribed to a culturally valued emphasis on early independence rather than to maternal rejection. In Chapter XI, Sagi, Lamb, Lewkowicz, Shoham, Dvir, and Estes report a high proportion of insecure-resistant (C) classifications in 12-month-old Israeli kibbutz infants, who were observed with mother, father, and metapelet. This finding is explained in terms of heightened stranger anxiety rather than insecurity. A comparison group of Israeli city infants in day care resembled U.S. samples in terms of Strange Situation groups. The insecure-resistant group (C) was also overrepresented in Japan (Miyake, Chen, &amp; Campos, Chap. XII), where C classification was correlated with neonatal temperament but also with maternal interactive behavior. In view of the infants' lack of experience with nonfamilial care, the C classification in Japan is not interpreted as an index of insecure-resistant attachment. Two additional themes running through the Monograph deserve special mention. These are (a) a concern with epigenetic explanations, charting different developmental pathways for secure and insecure infants, and (b) consideration of exceptional cases that do not, at first sight, fit predictions derived from the epigenetic perspective.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>4069130</pmid><doi>10.2307/3333837</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-976X
ispartof Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1985-01, Vol.50 (1/2), p.257-275
issn 0037-976X
1540-5834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76488325
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Birth Order
Child Care
Child Rearing
Children
Circadian Rhythm
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Father-Child Relations
Female
Humans
Infant
Infants
Israel
Kibbutz
Male
Mother-Child Relations
Mothers
Object Attachment
Parents
Part 4: Cross-National Studies of Attachment in Infancy
Proportions
Questionnaires
Temperament
United States
title Security of Infant-Mother, -Father, and -Metapelet Attachments among Kibbutz-Reared Israeli Children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T05%3A51%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Security%20of%20Infant-Mother,%20-Father,%20and%20-Metapelet%20Attachments%20among%20Kibbutz-Reared%20Israeli%20Children&rft.jtitle=Monographs%20of%20the%20Society%20for%20Research%20in%20Child%20Development&rft.au=Sagi,%20Abraham&rft.date=1985-01-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=257-275&rft.issn=0037-976X&rft.eissn=1540-5834&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3333837&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3333837%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76488325&rft_id=info:pmid/4069130&rft_jstor_id=3333837&rfr_iscdi=true