Rapid traction for reduction of cervical spine dislocations

There is still some controversy about the reduction of unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations in the cervical spine. We have reviewed the notes and radiographs of 210 such patients; reduction was attempted by manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) in 91, and by rapid traction under sedation in 11...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume 1994-05, Vol.76 (3), p.352-356
Hauptverfasser: LEE, A. S, MACLEAN, J. C. B, NEWTON, D. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 356
container_issue 3
container_start_page 352
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume
container_volume 76
creator LEE, A. S
MACLEAN, J. C. B
NEWTON, D. A
description There is still some controversy about the reduction of unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations in the cervical spine. We have reviewed the notes and radiographs of 210 such patients; reduction was attempted by manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) in 91, and by rapid traction under sedation in 119, using weights up to 150 lb (68 kg). Our results suggest that early reduction in patients with neurological deficit gives the best chance of neurological recovery, that rapid traction is more often successful than MUA, and that traction is safer than MUA. We found that the use of heavy weights with close monitoring was safe and brought about reduction in an average time of 21 minutes. We recommend this technique for the reduction of all cervical facet dislocations.
doi_str_mv 10.1302/0301-620x.76b3.8175833
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76461440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76461440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9d2fb59f156c5cbaab63c3d5f17d049c5c4018609e2a16d29d01518ce5b79fb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtKxDAUhoMo4zj6CEoX4q7jSXNrceUM3mBAEAV3Ic0FIp22Jq3o29sydVyFk__7z4EPoQsMS0wguwYCOOUZfC8FL8kyx4LlhBygeQaUpowIcYjmf9D7MTqJ8QMAKGNkhmYTPkc3L6r1JumC0p1v6sQ1IQnW9LupcYm24ctrVSWx9bVNjI9Vo9WYxlN05FQV7dn0LtDb_d3r-jHdPD88rW83qSY56dLCZK5khcOMa6ZLpUpONDHMYWGAFsMfBZxzKGymMDdZYQAznGvLSlEMTbJAV7u9bWg-exs7ufVR26pStW36KAWnHFMKA8h3oA5NjME62Qa_VeFHYpCjNTkKkaOQobQictIwFM-nC325tWZf-88vp1zFwYULqtY-7jEKuRAiI7-OHnTv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76461440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid traction for reduction of cervical spine dislocations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>LEE, A. S ; MACLEAN, J. C. B ; NEWTON, D. A</creator><creatorcontrib>LEE, A. S ; MACLEAN, J. C. B ; NEWTON, D. A</creatorcontrib><description>There is still some controversy about the reduction of unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations in the cervical spine. We have reviewed the notes and radiographs of 210 such patients; reduction was attempted by manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) in 91, and by rapid traction under sedation in 119, using weights up to 150 lb (68 kg). Our results suggest that early reduction in patients with neurological deficit gives the best chance of neurological recovery, that rapid traction is more often successful than MUA, and that traction is safer than MUA. We found that the use of heavy weights with close monitoring was safe and brought about reduction in an average time of 21 minutes. We recommend this technique for the reduction of all cervical facet dislocations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-620X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-5377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.76b3.8175833</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8175833</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBSUAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cervical Vertebrae - injuries ; Female ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Joint Dislocations - therapy ; Male ; Manipulation, Orthopedic ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Traction - methods ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 1994-05, Vol.76 (3), p.352-356</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9d2fb59f156c5cbaab63c3d5f17d049c5c4018609e2a16d29d01518ce5b79fb53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4087772$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8175833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LEE, A. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACLEAN, J. C. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWTON, D. A</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid traction for reduction of cervical spine dislocations</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Br</addtitle><description>There is still some controversy about the reduction of unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations in the cervical spine. We have reviewed the notes and radiographs of 210 such patients; reduction was attempted by manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) in 91, and by rapid traction under sedation in 119, using weights up to 150 lb (68 kg). Our results suggest that early reduction in patients with neurological deficit gives the best chance of neurological recovery, that rapid traction is more often successful than MUA, and that traction is safer than MUA. We found that the use of heavy weights with close monitoring was safe and brought about reduction in an average time of 21 minutes. We recommend this technique for the reduction of all cervical facet dislocations.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - injuries</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Joint Dislocations - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manipulation, Orthopedic</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Traction - methods</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0301-620X</issn><issn>2044-5377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtKxDAUhoMo4zj6CEoX4q7jSXNrceUM3mBAEAV3Ic0FIp22Jq3o29sydVyFk__7z4EPoQsMS0wguwYCOOUZfC8FL8kyx4LlhBygeQaUpowIcYjmf9D7MTqJ8QMAKGNkhmYTPkc3L6r1JumC0p1v6sQ1IQnW9LupcYm24ctrVSWx9bVNjI9Vo9WYxlN05FQV7dn0LtDb_d3r-jHdPD88rW83qSY56dLCZK5khcOMa6ZLpUpONDHMYWGAFsMfBZxzKGymMDdZYQAznGvLSlEMTbJAV7u9bWg-exs7ufVR26pStW36KAWnHFMKA8h3oA5NjME62Qa_VeFHYpCjNTkKkaOQobQictIwFM-nC325tWZf-88vp1zFwYULqtY-7jEKuRAiI7-OHnTv</recordid><startdate>19940501</startdate><enddate>19940501</enddate><creator>LEE, A. S</creator><creator>MACLEAN, J. C. B</creator><creator>NEWTON, D. A</creator><general>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940501</creationdate><title>Rapid traction for reduction of cervical spine dislocations</title><author>LEE, A. S ; MACLEAN, J. C. B ; NEWTON, D. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-9d2fb59f156c5cbaab63c3d5f17d049c5c4018609e2a16d29d01518ce5b79fb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - injuries</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Joint Dislocations - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manipulation, Orthopedic</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Traction - methods</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LEE, A. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACLEAN, J. C. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWTON, D. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LEE, A. S</au><au>MACLEAN, J. C. B</au><au>NEWTON, D. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid traction for reduction of cervical spine dislocations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Br</addtitle><date>1994-05-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>352-356</pages><issn>0301-620X</issn><eissn>2044-5377</eissn><coden>JBSUAK</coden><abstract>There is still some controversy about the reduction of unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations in the cervical spine. We have reviewed the notes and radiographs of 210 such patients; reduction was attempted by manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) in 91, and by rapid traction under sedation in 119, using weights up to 150 lb (68 kg). Our results suggest that early reduction in patients with neurological deficit gives the best chance of neurological recovery, that rapid traction is more often successful than MUA, and that traction is safer than MUA. We found that the use of heavy weights with close monitoring was safe and brought about reduction in an average time of 21 minutes. We recommend this technique for the reduction of all cervical facet dislocations.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</pub><pmid>8175833</pmid><doi>10.1302/0301-620x.76b3.8175833</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-620X
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 1994-05, Vol.76 (3), p.352-356
issn 0301-620X
2044-5377
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76461440
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cervical Vertebrae - injuries
Female
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Joint Dislocations - therapy
Male
Manipulation, Orthopedic
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Traction - methods
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
title Rapid traction for reduction of cervical spine dislocations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A44%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20traction%20for%20reduction%20of%20cervical%20spine%20dislocations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20British%20volume&rft.au=LEE,%20A.%20S&rft.date=1994-05-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=352-356&rft.issn=0301-620X&rft.eissn=2044-5377&rft.coden=JBSUAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/0301-620x.76b3.8175833&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76461440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76461440&rft_id=info:pmid/8175833&rfr_iscdi=true