Native Americans and Brief Spiritual Assessment: Examining and Operationalizing the Joint Commission's Assessment Framework

At the turn of the century, the Joint Commission—the nation's largest health care accrediting organization—began requiring spiritual assessments in hospitals and many other mental health settings frequented by Native Americans. Despite high levels of service use, culturally unique forms of spir...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social work (New York) 2010-10, Vol.55 (4), p.297-307
Hauptverfasser: Hodge, David R., Limb, Gordon E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 307
container_issue 4
container_start_page 297
container_title Social work (New York)
container_volume 55
creator Hodge, David R.
Limb, Gordon E.
description At the turn of the century, the Joint Commission—the nation's largest health care accrediting organization—began requiring spiritual assessments in hospitals and many other mental health settings frequented by Native Americans. Despite high levels of service use, culturally unique forms of spirituality, and a history of oppression in mainstream settings, no research has explored how to best implement this new requirement with Native Americans. Accordingly, this mixed-method study asked recognized experts in Native American culture (N = 50) to identify the degree of cultural consistency, strengths, and limitations of the new assessment framework and a culturally valid question protocol to operationalize the requirements. The results indicate that the framework is moderately consistent with Native American culture, and a number of practice-oriented suggestions and tools are offered to implement the requirements in a culturally valid manner.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/sw/55.4.297
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764415578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A240097048</galeid><ericid>EJ902150</ericid><jstor_id>23719698</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/sw/55.4.297</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A240097048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c703t-5e6980e9e89facf0f7d3f9e1cdd6607678d55bef3e057b0d726436ba5b4818f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt1v0zAUxSMEYmPwxCugCCQGQu3sOLZj3krpvlTWh4GE9mK5yU1xl8TFTuiAfx6HlI6iakx-sOTz87nXvicIHmPUx0iQA7c8oLQf9yPB7wS7mMa0x5KY3Q12ESK8l6CY7QQPnJsjhCOO8P1gJ0KCc0TJbvDzTNX6G4SDEqxOVeVCVWXhO6shD88X2uq6UUU4cA6cK6Gq34ajK1XqSlez3-RkAdY7mEoV-kd7WH-B8NToqg6Hpiy1c17bd385hIdWlbA09vJhcC9XhYNHq30v-HQ4-jg87o0nRyfDwbiXckTqHgUmEgQCEpGrNEc5z0guAKdZxhjijCcZpVPICSDKpyjjEYsJmyo6jROc5ITsBfud78Karw24Wvq-UigKVYFpnOQsjjGlPLkFiRGJYtF6vrqRxDRCBEcJER59_g86N431H-b9qBBts9hDLzpopgqQuspNbVXaespBFCM_LxS3_fW2UDOo_BAKU0Gu_fEG39_C-5VBqdOtF15vXPBMDVf1TDXOyZPzs1uzydH4psZXbGqKAmYg_biHk03-Tcen1jhnIZcLq0tlv0uMZJt66ZaSUhlLn3pPP1v9cDMtIVuzf2LugScd0IZ8LY9OBYowRV5-2cmmWfyn0NMOnLva2Os6hGPhQ3r9TO3889a6speSccKpPP58ISN2wQX58F5y8guR6CZI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759964361</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Native Americans and Brief Spiritual Assessment: Examining and Operationalizing the Joint Commission's Assessment Framework</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Hodge, David R. ; Limb, Gordon E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodge, David R. ; Limb, Gordon E.</creatorcontrib><description>At the turn of the century, the Joint Commission—the nation's largest health care accrediting organization—began requiring spiritual assessments in hospitals and many other mental health settings frequented by Native Americans. Despite high levels of service use, culturally unique forms of spirituality, and a history of oppression in mainstream settings, no research has explored how to best implement this new requirement with Native Americans. Accordingly, this mixed-method study asked recognized experts in Native American culture (N = 50) to identify the degree of cultural consistency, strengths, and limitations of the new assessment framework and a culturally valid question protocol to operationalize the requirements. The results indicate that the framework is moderately consistent with Native American culture, and a number of practice-oriented suggestions and tools are offered to implement the requirements in a culturally valid manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-8046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-6846</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/sw/55.4.297</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20977053</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOWOA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; American Indian Culture ; American Indian people ; American Indians ; Assessment ; Communities ; Cultural Awareness ; Cultural Competency ; Demographic aspects ; Female ; Guidelines ; Health aspects ; Health Care Services ; Health Needs ; Health Services ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Indians, North American - psychology ; Joint Commission ; Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Mental Health ; Mental Health Programs ; Mental health services ; Middle Aged ; Native Americans ; Native culture ; Native North Americans ; Native peoples ; Operational Definitions ; Oppression ; Psychological aspects ; Religion ; Religiosity ; Religious Factors ; Social Work ; Spiritual assessment ; Spiritual belief systems ; Spiritual therapies ; Spirituality ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Turn of the Century ; United States</subject><ispartof>Social work (New York), 2010-10, Vol.55 (4), p.297-307</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 National Association of Social Workers, Inc.</rights><rights>2010 National Association of Social Workers 2010</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright National Association of Social Workers, Incorporated Oct 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c703t-5e6980e9e89facf0f7d3f9e1cdd6607678d55bef3e057b0d726436ba5b4818f33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23719698$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23719698$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,1586,27931,27932,31007,33782,58024,58257</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ902150$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20977053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodge, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limb, Gordon E.</creatorcontrib><title>Native Americans and Brief Spiritual Assessment: Examining and Operationalizing the Joint Commission's Assessment Framework</title><title>Social work (New York)</title><addtitle>Social Work</addtitle><addtitle>Social Work</addtitle><description>At the turn of the century, the Joint Commission—the nation's largest health care accrediting organization—began requiring spiritual assessments in hospitals and many other mental health settings frequented by Native Americans. Despite high levels of service use, culturally unique forms of spirituality, and a history of oppression in mainstream settings, no research has explored how to best implement this new requirement with Native Americans. Accordingly, this mixed-method study asked recognized experts in Native American culture (N = 50) to identify the degree of cultural consistency, strengths, and limitations of the new assessment framework and a culturally valid question protocol to operationalize the requirements. The results indicate that the framework is moderately consistent with Native American culture, and a number of practice-oriented suggestions and tools are offered to implement the requirements in a culturally valid manner.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>American Indian Culture</subject><subject>American Indian people</subject><subject>American Indians</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Cultural Awareness</subject><subject>Cultural Competency</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Health Needs</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indians, North American - psychology</subject><subject>Joint Commission</subject><subject>Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Mental Health Programs</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Native Americans</subject><subject>Native culture</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Operational Definitions</subject><subject>Oppression</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religiosity</subject><subject>Religious Factors</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Spiritual assessment</subject><subject>Spiritual belief systems</subject><subject>Spiritual therapies</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Turn of the Century</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0037-8046</issn><issn>1545-6846</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt1v0zAUxSMEYmPwxCugCCQGQu3sOLZj3krpvlTWh4GE9mK5yU1xl8TFTuiAfx6HlI6iakx-sOTz87nXvicIHmPUx0iQA7c8oLQf9yPB7wS7mMa0x5KY3Q12ESK8l6CY7QQPnJsjhCOO8P1gJ0KCc0TJbvDzTNX6G4SDEqxOVeVCVWXhO6shD88X2uq6UUU4cA6cK6Gq34ajK1XqSlez3-RkAdY7mEoV-kd7WH-B8NToqg6Hpiy1c17bd385hIdWlbA09vJhcC9XhYNHq30v-HQ4-jg87o0nRyfDwbiXckTqHgUmEgQCEpGrNEc5z0guAKdZxhjijCcZpVPICSDKpyjjEYsJmyo6jROc5ITsBfud78Karw24Wvq-UigKVYFpnOQsjjGlPLkFiRGJYtF6vrqRxDRCBEcJER59_g86N431H-b9qBBts9hDLzpopgqQuspNbVXaespBFCM_LxS3_fW2UDOo_BAKU0Gu_fEG39_C-5VBqdOtF15vXPBMDVf1TDXOyZPzs1uzydH4psZXbGqKAmYg_biHk03-Tcen1jhnIZcLq0tlv0uMZJt66ZaSUhlLn3pPP1v9cDMtIVuzf2LugScd0IZ8LY9OBYowRV5-2cmmWfyn0NMOnLva2Os6hGPhQ3r9TO3889a6speSccKpPP58ISN2wQX58F5y8guR6CZI</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Hodge, David R.</creator><creator>Limb, Gordon E.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>NASW PRESS</general><general>National Association of Social Workers (NASW)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Native Americans and Brief Spiritual Assessment: Examining and Operationalizing the Joint Commission's Assessment Framework</title><author>Hodge, David R. ; Limb, Gordon E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c703t-5e6980e9e89facf0f7d3f9e1cdd6607678d55bef3e057b0d726436ba5b4818f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>American Indian Culture</topic><topic>American Indian people</topic><topic>American Indians</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Cultural Awareness</topic><topic>Cultural Competency</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Health Needs</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indians, North American - psychology</topic><topic>Joint Commission</topic><topic>Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Mental Health Programs</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Native Americans</topic><topic>Native culture</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Operational Definitions</topic><topic>Oppression</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religiosity</topic><topic>Religious Factors</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Spiritual assessment</topic><topic>Spiritual belief systems</topic><topic>Spiritual therapies</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Turn of the Century</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodge, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limb, Gordon E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Social work (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodge, David R.</au><au>Limb, Gordon E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ902150</ericid><atitle>Native Americans and Brief Spiritual Assessment: Examining and Operationalizing the Joint Commission's Assessment Framework</atitle><jtitle>Social work (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Social Work</stitle><addtitle>Social Work</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>297-307</pages><issn>0037-8046</issn><eissn>1545-6846</eissn><coden>SOWOA8</coden><abstract>At the turn of the century, the Joint Commission—the nation's largest health care accrediting organization—began requiring spiritual assessments in hospitals and many other mental health settings frequented by Native Americans. Despite high levels of service use, culturally unique forms of spirituality, and a history of oppression in mainstream settings, no research has explored how to best implement this new requirement with Native Americans. Accordingly, this mixed-method study asked recognized experts in Native American culture (N = 50) to identify the degree of cultural consistency, strengths, and limitations of the new assessment framework and a culturally valid question protocol to operationalize the requirements. The results indicate that the framework is moderately consistent with Native American culture, and a number of practice-oriented suggestions and tools are offered to implement the requirements in a culturally valid manner.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>20977053</pmid><doi>10.1093/sw/55.4.297</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-8046
ispartof Social work (New York), 2010-10, Vol.55 (4), p.297-307
issn 0037-8046
1545-6846
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764415578
source MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Education Source
subjects Adult
American Indian Culture
American Indian people
American Indians
Assessment
Communities
Cultural Awareness
Cultural Competency
Demographic aspects
Female
Guidelines
Health aspects
Health Care Services
Health Needs
Health Services
Hospitals
Humans
Indians, North American - psychology
Joint Commission
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Male
Medical treatment
Mental Health
Mental Health Programs
Mental health services
Middle Aged
Native Americans
Native culture
Native North Americans
Native peoples
Operational Definitions
Oppression
Psychological aspects
Religion
Religiosity
Religious Factors
Social Work
Spiritual assessment
Spiritual belief systems
Spiritual therapies
Spirituality
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Turn of the Century
United States
title Native Americans and Brief Spiritual Assessment: Examining and Operationalizing the Joint Commission's Assessment Framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T05%3A42%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Native%20Americans%20and%20Brief%20Spiritual%20Assessment:%20Examining%20and%20Operationalizing%20the%20Joint%20Commission's%20Assessment%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Social%20work%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Hodge,%20David%20R.&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=297-307&rft.issn=0037-8046&rft.eissn=1545-6846&rft.coden=SOWOA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/sw/55.4.297&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA240097048%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759964361&rft_id=info:pmid/20977053&rft_galeid=A240097048&rft_ericid=EJ902150&rft_jstor_id=23719698&rft_oup_id=10.1093/sw/55.4.297&rfr_iscdi=true