Understanding research

5th in a 5-part series on research, focusing on mixed methodologies using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The use of triangulation, consensus, Delphi and action research methods are described and the benefits of mixed methods research are considered. [(BNI unique abstract)] 27 referenc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Wounds UK 2010-03, Vol.6 (1), p.126-128
1. Verfasser:	Gethin, G
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	128
container_issue	1
container_start_page	126
container_title	Wounds UK
container_volume	6
creator	Gethin, G
description	5th in a 5-part series on research, focusing on mixed methodologies using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The use of triangulation, consensus, Delphi and action research methods are described and the benefits of mixed methods research are considered. [(BNI unique abstract)] 27 references
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764406221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>764406221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p102t-27e1bcd6f3a74ff7e3086ba8c2bda969c7158611054349928f66ac1ca914a46e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzD1vwjAQgGEPRSoC1s7dOkXy2ZezPSJUPiQkFjKji3MGqhBoHP4_SPAu7_Z8qDE4pII84Kea5fynn1EJ2tNYfVVdI30euGvO3fG7lyzcx9NUjRK3WWbvT1S1_N0v1sV2t9os5tviBtoMhXECdWwoWXaYkhP7RGv20dQNBwrRQekJQJdoMQTjExFHiBwAGUnsRP283Ft__b9LHg6Xc47SttzJ9Z4PjhA1GQP2AYZwNzE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>764406221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding research</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gethin, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Gethin, G</creatorcontrib><description>5th in a 5-part series on research, focusing on mixed methodologies using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The use of triangulation, consensus, Delphi and action research methods are described and the benefits of mixed methods research are considered. [(BNI unique abstract)] 27 references</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-6814</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Wounds UK, 2010-03, Vol.6 (1), p.126-128</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gethin, G</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding research</title><title>Wounds UK</title><description>5th in a 5-part series on research, focusing on mixed methodologies using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The use of triangulation, consensus, Delphi and action research methods are described and the benefits of mixed methods research are considered. [(BNI unique abstract)] 27 references</description><issn>1746-6814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotzD1vwjAQgGEPRSoC1s7dOkXy2ZezPSJUPiQkFjKji3MGqhBoHP4_SPAu7_Z8qDE4pII84Kea5fynn1EJ2tNYfVVdI30euGvO3fG7lyzcx9NUjRK3WWbvT1S1_N0v1sV2t9os5tviBtoMhXECdWwoWXaYkhP7RGv20dQNBwrRQekJQJdoMQTjExFHiBwAGUnsRP283Ft__b9LHg6Xc47SttzJ9Z4PjhA1GQP2AYZwNzE</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Gethin, G</creator><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Understanding research</title><author>Gethin, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p102t-27e1bcd6f3a74ff7e3086ba8c2bda969c7158611054349928f66ac1ca914a46e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gethin, G</creatorcontrib><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Wounds UK</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gethin, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding research</atitle><jtitle>Wounds UK</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>126-128</pages><issn>1746-6814</issn><abstract>5th in a 5-part series on research, focusing on mixed methodologies using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The use of triangulation, consensus, Delphi and action research methods are described and the benefits of mixed methods research are considered. [(BNI unique abstract)] 27 references</abstract><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1746-6814
ispartof	Wounds UK, 2010-03, Vol.6 (1), p.126-128
issn	1746-6814
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764406221
source	Alma/SFX Local Collection
title	Understanding research
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A58%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20research&rft.jtitle=Wounds%20UK&rft.au=Gethin,%20G&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=126-128&rft.issn=1746-6814&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E764406221%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=764406221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true