Development of a Standard for Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Teams Using a Modified Delphi Method
Abstract Although palliative care consultation teams are rapidly being disseminated throughout Japan as a result of government policy, the role of these teams has not been standardized. The aim of this study was to develop a hospital-based palliative care consultation team standard. We adopted a mod...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pain and symptom management 2009-10, Vol.38 (4), p.496-504 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 504 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 496 |
container_title | Journal of pain and symptom management |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Sasahara, Tomoyo, RN, PhD Kizawa, Yoshiyuki, MD Morita, Tatsuya, MD Iwamitsu, Yuumi, PhD Otaki, Junji, MD, DMedSc Okamura, Hitoshi, MD, PhD Takahashi, Mikako, RN, MS Takenouchi, Sayaka, RN, MPH Bito, Seiji, MD |
description | Abstract Although palliative care consultation teams are rapidly being disseminated throughout Japan as a result of government policy, the role of these teams has not been standardized. The aim of this study was to develop a hospital-based palliative care consultation team standard. We adopted a modified Delphi method to develop a standard. Twenty-seven multiprofessional panelists were selected according to two criteria: adequate experience as part of a palliative care consultation team and representative of 16 palliative care-related organizations. Panelists rated the appropriateness of 33 statements in a provisional standard, which was generated by the authors, using a nine-point Likert-type scale in a first-round survey. We set two criteria for agreement: the median value was 8 or more, and the difference between the minimum and maximum was 4 or less. There were 15 disagreements in the first-round survey. Based on discussions through e-mails and a panel meeting, these 15 statements were dealt with as follows: one was rejected, one was combined with another statement, three were unmodified, and 10 underwent minor revisions. Moreover, two statements that generated agreement were divided into two statements each. Consequently, the number of statements was 37. In a second-round survey, three statements engendered disagreement and were modified. At the end of the process, there were 37 statements in four areas: “philosophy and policy,” “structure for care provision,” “contents of activities,” and “quality assurance and care improvements.” This standard may be useful as a clinical activity guide as well as a method to evaluate palliative care consultation teams. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.01.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764395514</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0885392409007039</els_id><sourcerecordid>734085210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-31e12e14571dd803815bc31b7bf6558524a299fe2c3a0abf9be97e1245a9de1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EosvCX0DhAJwS_BEn8QUJtkCRWoHU9mw59oR6cezUTlbaf49XuwLEAbjYkvW8MyM_g9ALgiuCSfNmW20nZX3aj6PyFcVYVJhUGLcP0Ip0LSsbTthDtMJdx0smaH2GnqS0xRhz1rDH6IyIjlLa1ivkz2EHLkwj-LkIQ6GK61l5o6IphhCLi5AmOytXvlcJTPFVOWfVbHdQbFTMR_BpcXN-Cb64ATWm4jZZ_y2XuQrGDjZnzsFNd7a4gvkumKfo0aBcgmene41uP3642VyUl18-fd68uyx1U5O5ZAQIBVLzlhjTYdYR3mtG-rYfGs47TmtFhRiAaqaw6gfRg2hzpOZKGCCardHrY90phvsF0ixHmzQ4pzyEJcm2qZngnNT_JlmNc0OCM_nqryRvGW1JLTIojqCOIaUIg5yiHVXcS4LlQaDcyt8EyoNAiYnMAnP2-anJ0o9gfiVPxjLw8gSopJUbovLapp8cpZhTkT2v0ebIQf7mnYUok7bgNRgbQc_SBPtf47z9o4p21tvc-DvsIW3DEn32KIlMVGJ5fdi4w8JhkdOYCfYDc4rT6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57327149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of a Standard for Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Teams Using a Modified Delphi Method</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sasahara, Tomoyo, RN, PhD ; Kizawa, Yoshiyuki, MD ; Morita, Tatsuya, MD ; Iwamitsu, Yuumi, PhD ; Otaki, Junji, MD, DMedSc ; Okamura, Hitoshi, MD, PhD ; Takahashi, Mikako, RN, MS ; Takenouchi, Sayaka, RN, MPH ; Bito, Seiji, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Sasahara, Tomoyo, RN, PhD ; Kizawa, Yoshiyuki, MD ; Morita, Tatsuya, MD ; Iwamitsu, Yuumi, PhD ; Otaki, Junji, MD, DMedSc ; Okamura, Hitoshi, MD, PhD ; Takahashi, Mikako, RN, MS ; Takenouchi, Sayaka, RN, MPH ; Bito, Seiji, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Although palliative care consultation teams are rapidly being disseminated throughout Japan as a result of government policy, the role of these teams has not been standardized. The aim of this study was to develop a hospital-based palliative care consultation team standard. We adopted a modified Delphi method to develop a standard. Twenty-seven multiprofessional panelists were selected according to two criteria: adequate experience as part of a palliative care consultation team and representative of 16 palliative care-related organizations. Panelists rated the appropriateness of 33 statements in a provisional standard, which was generated by the authors, using a nine-point Likert-type scale in a first-round survey. We set two criteria for agreement: the median value was 8 or more, and the difference between the minimum and maximum was 4 or less. There were 15 disagreements in the first-round survey. Based on discussions through e-mails and a panel meeting, these 15 statements were dealt with as follows: one was rejected, one was combined with another statement, three were unmodified, and 10 underwent minor revisions. Moreover, two statements that generated agreement were divided into two statements each. Consequently, the number of statements was 37. In a second-round survey, three statements engendered disagreement and were modified. At the end of the process, there were 37 statements in four areas: “philosophy and policy,” “structure for care provision,” “contents of activities,” and “quality assurance and care improvements.” This standard may be useful as a clinical activity guide as well as a method to evaluate palliative care consultation teams.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.01.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19822274</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSPME2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; Biological and medical sciences ; cancer ; Consultation teams ; Delphi method ; Hospitals - standards ; Humans ; Japan ; Medical sciences ; Models, Organizational ; modified Delphi method ; Ontario ; Pain - prevention & control ; Pain Medicine ; Palliative care ; Palliative Care - standards ; palliative care consultation team ; Patient Care Team - standards ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Policy making ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Program Evaluation ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards ; Referral and Consultation - standards ; Revisions</subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 2009-10, Vol.38 (4), p.496-504</ispartof><rights>U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee</rights><rights>2009 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-31e12e14571dd803815bc31b7bf6558524a299fe2c3a0abf9be97e1245a9de1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-31e12e14571dd803815bc31b7bf6558524a299fe2c3a0abf9be97e1245a9de1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392409007039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30977,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22052905$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19822274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sasahara, Tomoyo, RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizawa, Yoshiyuki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morita, Tatsuya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwamitsu, Yuumi, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otaki, Junji, MD, DMedSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Hitoshi, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Mikako, RN, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takenouchi, Sayaka, RN, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bito, Seiji, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Development of a Standard for Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Teams Using a Modified Delphi Method</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>Abstract Although palliative care consultation teams are rapidly being disseminated throughout Japan as a result of government policy, the role of these teams has not been standardized. The aim of this study was to develop a hospital-based palliative care consultation team standard. We adopted a modified Delphi method to develop a standard. Twenty-seven multiprofessional panelists were selected according to two criteria: adequate experience as part of a palliative care consultation team and representative of 16 palliative care-related organizations. Panelists rated the appropriateness of 33 statements in a provisional standard, which was generated by the authors, using a nine-point Likert-type scale in a first-round survey. We set two criteria for agreement: the median value was 8 or more, and the difference between the minimum and maximum was 4 or less. There were 15 disagreements in the first-round survey. Based on discussions through e-mails and a panel meeting, these 15 statements were dealt with as follows: one was rejected, one was combined with another statement, three were unmodified, and 10 underwent minor revisions. Moreover, two statements that generated agreement were divided into two statements each. Consequently, the number of statements was 37. In a second-round survey, three statements engendered disagreement and were modified. At the end of the process, there were 37 statements in four areas: “philosophy and policy,” “structure for care provision,” “contents of activities,” and “quality assurance and care improvements.” This standard may be useful as a clinical activity guide as well as a method to evaluate palliative care consultation teams.</description><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Consultation teams</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Hospitals - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Organizational</subject><subject>modified Delphi method</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Pain - prevention & control</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Palliative Care - standards</subject><subject>palliative care consultation team</subject><subject>Patient Care Team - standards</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - standards</subject><subject>Revisions</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EosvCX0DhAJwS_BEn8QUJtkCRWoHU9mw59oR6cezUTlbaf49XuwLEAbjYkvW8MyM_g9ALgiuCSfNmW20nZX3aj6PyFcVYVJhUGLcP0Ip0LSsbTthDtMJdx0smaH2GnqS0xRhz1rDH6IyIjlLa1ivkz2EHLkwj-LkIQ6GK61l5o6IphhCLi5AmOytXvlcJTPFVOWfVbHdQbFTMR_BpcXN-Cb64ATWm4jZZ_y2XuQrGDjZnzsFNd7a4gvkumKfo0aBcgmene41uP3642VyUl18-fd68uyx1U5O5ZAQIBVLzlhjTYdYR3mtG-rYfGs47TmtFhRiAaqaw6gfRg2hzpOZKGCCardHrY90phvsF0ixHmzQ4pzyEJcm2qZngnNT_JlmNc0OCM_nqryRvGW1JLTIojqCOIaUIg5yiHVXcS4LlQaDcyt8EyoNAiYnMAnP2-anJ0o9gfiVPxjLw8gSopJUbovLapp8cpZhTkT2v0ebIQf7mnYUok7bgNRgbQc_SBPtf47z9o4p21tvc-DvsIW3DEn32KIlMVGJ5fdi4w8JhkdOYCfYDc4rT6g</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Sasahara, Tomoyo, RN, PhD</creator><creator>Kizawa, Yoshiyuki, MD</creator><creator>Morita, Tatsuya, MD</creator><creator>Iwamitsu, Yuumi, PhD</creator><creator>Otaki, Junji, MD, DMedSc</creator><creator>Okamura, Hitoshi, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Takahashi, Mikako, RN, MS</creator><creator>Takenouchi, Sayaka, RN, MPH</creator><creator>Bito, Seiji, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Development of a Standard for Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Teams Using a Modified Delphi Method</title><author>Sasahara, Tomoyo, RN, PhD ; Kizawa, Yoshiyuki, MD ; Morita, Tatsuya, MD ; Iwamitsu, Yuumi, PhD ; Otaki, Junji, MD, DMedSc ; Okamura, Hitoshi, MD, PhD ; Takahashi, Mikako, RN, MS ; Takenouchi, Sayaka, RN, MPH ; Bito, Seiji, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-31e12e14571dd803815bc31b7bf6558524a299fe2c3a0abf9be97e1245a9de1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Consultation teams</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Hospitals - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Organizational</topic><topic>modified Delphi method</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Pain - prevention & control</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Palliative Care - standards</topic><topic>palliative care consultation team</topic><topic>Patient Care Team - standards</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - standards</topic><topic>Revisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sasahara, Tomoyo, RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kizawa, Yoshiyuki, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morita, Tatsuya, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwamitsu, Yuumi, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otaki, Junji, MD, DMedSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Hitoshi, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Mikako, RN, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takenouchi, Sayaka, RN, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bito, Seiji, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sasahara, Tomoyo, RN, PhD</au><au>Kizawa, Yoshiyuki, MD</au><au>Morita, Tatsuya, MD</au><au>Iwamitsu, Yuumi, PhD</au><au>Otaki, Junji, MD, DMedSc</au><au>Okamura, Hitoshi, MD, PhD</au><au>Takahashi, Mikako, RN, MS</au><au>Takenouchi, Sayaka, RN, MPH</au><au>Bito, Seiji, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of a Standard for Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Teams Using a Modified Delphi Method</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>496</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>496-504</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><coden>JSPME2</coden><abstract>Abstract Although palliative care consultation teams are rapidly being disseminated throughout Japan as a result of government policy, the role of these teams has not been standardized. The aim of this study was to develop a hospital-based palliative care consultation team standard. We adopted a modified Delphi method to develop a standard. Twenty-seven multiprofessional panelists were selected according to two criteria: adequate experience as part of a palliative care consultation team and representative of 16 palliative care-related organizations. Panelists rated the appropriateness of 33 statements in a provisional standard, which was generated by the authors, using a nine-point Likert-type scale in a first-round survey. We set two criteria for agreement: the median value was 8 or more, and the difference between the minimum and maximum was 4 or less. There were 15 disagreements in the first-round survey. Based on discussions through e-mails and a panel meeting, these 15 statements were dealt with as follows: one was rejected, one was combined with another statement, three were unmodified, and 10 underwent minor revisions. Moreover, two statements that generated agreement were divided into two statements each. Consequently, the number of statements was 37. In a second-round survey, three statements engendered disagreement and were modified. At the end of the process, there were 37 statements in four areas: “philosophy and policy,” “structure for care provision,” “contents of activities,” and “quality assurance and care improvements.” This standard may be useful as a clinical activity guide as well as a method to evaluate palliative care consultation teams.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19822274</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.01.007</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-3924 |
ispartof | Journal of pain and symptom management, 2009-10, Vol.38 (4), p.496-504 |
issn | 0885-3924 1873-6513 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764395514 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Biological and medical sciences cancer Consultation teams Delphi method Hospitals - standards Humans Japan Medical sciences Models, Organizational modified Delphi method Ontario Pain - prevention & control Pain Medicine Palliative care Palliative Care - standards palliative care consultation team Patient Care Team - standards Pharmacology. Drug treatments Policy making Practice Guidelines as Topic Program Evaluation Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards Referral and Consultation - standards Revisions |
title | Development of a Standard for Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Teams Using a Modified Delphi Method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A32%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20a%20Standard%20for%20Hospital-Based%20Palliative%20Care%20Consultation%20Teams%20Using%20a%20Modified%20Delphi%20Method&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Sasahara,%20Tomoyo,%20RN,%20PhD&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=496&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=496-504&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft.coden=JSPME2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.01.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734085210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57327149&rft_id=info:pmid/19822274&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0885392409007039&rfr_iscdi=true |