Social health outcomes following thermal injuries: a retrospective matched cohort study

Introduction:Over 50% of children admitted with burns are aged under 3 years. US studies suggest that up to 26% of childhood burns are non-accidental, although UK reports are lower (1–16%).Objectives:To determine the social health outcomes of burned children as regards the number of children abused,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of disease in childhood 2009-09, Vol.94 (9), p.663-667
Hauptverfasser: James-Ellison, M, Barnes, P, Maddocks, A, Wareham, K, Drew, P, Dickson, W, Lyons, R A, Hutchings, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 667
container_issue 9
container_start_page 663
container_title Archives of disease in childhood
container_volume 94
creator James-Ellison, M
Barnes, P
Maddocks, A
Wareham, K
Drew, P
Dickson, W
Lyons, R A
Hutchings, H
description Introduction:Over 50% of children admitted with burns are aged under 3 years. US studies suggest that up to 26% of childhood burns are non-accidental, although UK reports are lower (1–16%).Objectives:To determine the social health outcomes of burned children as regards the number of children abused, neglected or “in need” before the age of 6 years compared with matched controls.Methods:A retrospective matched cohort study. 145 children aged under 3 years admitted for burns in 1994–1997 were matched with controls for sex, age and enumeration district and followed up until 2003. Electronic routine databases provided study data on local authority care episodes and Social Services referrals by age 6 years.Results:89.0% of cases had accidental burns and four cases (2.8%) had non-accidental burns. No case was attributed to neglect. By their sixth birthday cases were statistically more likely to have been referred to Social Services with 14 (9.7%) of the burned children having been abused or neglected versus two (1.4%) controls (95% CI 0.030 to 0.13, p = 0.004). Forty six (32%) cases versus 26 (18%) controls were defined as “in need” (95% CI 0.047 to 0.23, p = 0.006).Conclusion:Although most burns were deemed accidental, 2.8% were categorised as non-accidental at presentation. Almost a third of the burned children went on to be “in need”. Children with a burn appear to be at higher risk of further abuse or neglect compared with controls. A burn therefore could be a surrogate marker indicating need for closer supervision and follow-up by professionals.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/adc.2008.143727
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764393019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A214944588</galeid><sourcerecordid>A214944588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b534t-3b33975283176d7cb443a70df3554353e27506e46857dd653977c8958c343c9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0cFv0zAUBvAIgVgZnLmhSAiQkNLZfnbs7DYVBkyDHQbsaLnOa5vixMV2gP33eEq1SRyAkw_-2Xrv-4riKSVzSqE-Mq2dM0LUnHKQTN4rZpTXqmKE8_vFjBACVaOUOigexbglhDKl4GFxQBsBVDAxK64uve2MKzdoXNqUfkzW9xjLlXfO_-yGdZk2GPosumE7hg7jcWnKgCn4uEObuh9Y9ibZDbal9RsfUhnT2F4_Lh6sjIv4ZH8eFl9O335evK_OL959WJycV0sBPFWwBGikYAqorFtpl5yDkaRdgRAcBCCTgtSYdxKybWuRsbSqEcoCB9sgHBavpn93wX8fMSbdd9Gic2ZAP0Ytaw4NENpk-fKvspaiyZGSDJ__Abd-DEPeQlPFVC2bnGNW1aTWxqHuBuuHhL9yes7hGnVecnGhTxjlDecip_6_nhKQlMnsjyZvc9Ix4ErvQtebcK0p0Tfd69y9vuleT93nF8_2c4_LHts7vy87gxd7YKI1bhXMYLt46xhVQASQu1G7mEe8vTfhWw4JpNCfvi706cczenWm3ujL7F9Pftlv_znlbwdXzws</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828679012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social health outcomes following thermal injuries: a retrospective matched cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>James-Ellison, M ; Barnes, P ; Maddocks, A ; Wareham, K ; Drew, P ; Dickson, W ; Lyons, R A ; Hutchings, H</creator><creatorcontrib>James-Ellison, M ; Barnes, P ; Maddocks, A ; Wareham, K ; Drew, P ; Dickson, W ; Lyons, R A ; Hutchings, H</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction:Over 50% of children admitted with burns are aged under 3 years. US studies suggest that up to 26% of childhood burns are non-accidental, although UK reports are lower (1–16%).Objectives:To determine the social health outcomes of burned children as regards the number of children abused, neglected or “in need” before the age of 6 years compared with matched controls.Methods:A retrospective matched cohort study. 145 children aged under 3 years admitted for burns in 1994–1997 were matched with controls for sex, age and enumeration district and followed up until 2003. Electronic routine databases provided study data on local authority care episodes and Social Services referrals by age 6 years.Results:89.0% of cases had accidental burns and four cases (2.8%) had non-accidental burns. No case was attributed to neglect. By their sixth birthday cases were statistically more likely to have been referred to Social Services with 14 (9.7%) of the burned children having been abused or neglected versus two (1.4%) controls (95% CI 0.030 to 0.13, p = 0.004). Forty six (32%) cases versus 26 (18%) controls were defined as “in need” (95% CI 0.047 to 0.23, p = 0.006).Conclusion:Although most burns were deemed accidental, 2.8% were categorised as non-accidental at presentation. Almost a third of the burned children went on to be “in need”. Children with a burn appear to be at higher risk of further abuse or neglect compared with controls. A burn therefore could be a surrogate marker indicating need for closer supervision and follow-up by professionals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/adc.2008.143727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19531525</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ADCHAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</publisher><subject>Accidents, Home ; Age ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burns ; Burns - etiology ; Burns and scalds ; Burns and scalds in children ; Case-Control Studies ; Child ; Child Abuse ; Child Health ; Child Rearing ; Child Safety ; Child Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Childrens health ; Computers ; Data collection ; Death ; Ethics ; Female ; Foster Home Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; General aspects ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Infant, Newborn ; Injuries ; Local government ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Outcome Measures ; Parents ; Patient outcomes ; Pediatric injuries ; Poverty ; Preschool Children ; Prevention and actions ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Referral ; Retrospective Studies ; Safety ; Scientific Concepts ; Social aspects ; Social Class ; Social services ; Social Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics ; Studies ; Supervision ; Wales ; Writers ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2009-09, Vol.94 (9), p.663-667</ispartof><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltdand Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltdand Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b534t-3b33975283176d7cb443a70df3554353e27506e46857dd653977c8958c343c9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b534t-3b33975283176d7cb443a70df3554353e27506e46857dd653977c8958c343c9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/94/9/663.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://adc.bmj.com/content/94/9/663.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77343,77374</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21830530$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19531525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>James-Ellison, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddocks, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wareham, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drew, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchings, H</creatorcontrib><title>Social health outcomes following thermal injuries: a retrospective matched cohort study</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><description>Introduction:Over 50% of children admitted with burns are aged under 3 years. US studies suggest that up to 26% of childhood burns are non-accidental, although UK reports are lower (1–16%).Objectives:To determine the social health outcomes of burned children as regards the number of children abused, neglected or “in need” before the age of 6 years compared with matched controls.Methods:A retrospective matched cohort study. 145 children aged under 3 years admitted for burns in 1994–1997 were matched with controls for sex, age and enumeration district and followed up until 2003. Electronic routine databases provided study data on local authority care episodes and Social Services referrals by age 6 years.Results:89.0% of cases had accidental burns and four cases (2.8%) had non-accidental burns. No case was attributed to neglect. By their sixth birthday cases were statistically more likely to have been referred to Social Services with 14 (9.7%) of the burned children having been abused or neglected versus two (1.4%) controls (95% CI 0.030 to 0.13, p = 0.004). Forty six (32%) cases versus 26 (18%) controls were defined as “in need” (95% CI 0.047 to 0.23, p = 0.006).Conclusion:Although most burns were deemed accidental, 2.8% were categorised as non-accidental at presentation. Almost a third of the burned children went on to be “in need”. Children with a burn appear to be at higher risk of further abuse or neglect compared with controls. A burn therefore could be a surrogate marker indicating need for closer supervision and follow-up by professionals.</description><subject>Accidents, Home</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Burns - etiology</subject><subject>Burns and scalds</subject><subject>Burns and scalds in children</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child Health</subject><subject>Child Rearing</subject><subject>Child Safety</subject><subject>Child Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foster Home Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Pediatric injuries</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Referral</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Scientific Concepts</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Social Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Wales</subject><subject>Writers</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0cFv0zAUBvAIgVgZnLmhSAiQkNLZfnbs7DYVBkyDHQbsaLnOa5vixMV2gP33eEq1SRyAkw_-2Xrv-4riKSVzSqE-Mq2dM0LUnHKQTN4rZpTXqmKE8_vFjBACVaOUOigexbglhDKl4GFxQBsBVDAxK64uve2MKzdoXNqUfkzW9xjLlXfO_-yGdZk2GPosumE7hg7jcWnKgCn4uEObuh9Y9ibZDbal9RsfUhnT2F4_Lh6sjIv4ZH8eFl9O335evK_OL959WJycV0sBPFWwBGikYAqorFtpl5yDkaRdgRAcBCCTgtSYdxKybWuRsbSqEcoCB9sgHBavpn93wX8fMSbdd9Gic2ZAP0Ytaw4NENpk-fKvspaiyZGSDJ__Abd-DEPeQlPFVC2bnGNW1aTWxqHuBuuHhL9yes7hGnVecnGhTxjlDecip_6_nhKQlMnsjyZvc9Ix4ErvQtebcK0p0Tfd69y9vuleT93nF8_2c4_LHts7vy87gxd7YKI1bhXMYLt46xhVQASQu1G7mEe8vTfhWw4JpNCfvi706cczenWm3ujL7F9Pftlv_znlbwdXzws</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>James-Ellison, M</creator><creator>Barnes, P</creator><creator>Maddocks, A</creator><creator>Wareham, K</creator><creator>Drew, P</creator><creator>Dickson, W</creator><creator>Lyons, R A</creator><creator>Hutchings, H</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Social health outcomes following thermal injuries: a retrospective matched cohort study</title><author>James-Ellison, M ; Barnes, P ; Maddocks, A ; Wareham, K ; Drew, P ; Dickson, W ; Lyons, R A ; Hutchings, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b534t-3b33975283176d7cb443a70df3554353e27506e46857dd653977c8958c343c9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Home</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Burns - etiology</topic><topic>Burns and scalds</topic><topic>Burns and scalds in children</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child Health</topic><topic>Child Rearing</topic><topic>Child Safety</topic><topic>Child Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foster Home Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Pediatric injuries</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Referral</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Scientific Concepts</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Social Welfare - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Wales</topic><topic>Writers</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>James-Ellison, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddocks, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wareham, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drew, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchings, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>James-Ellison, M</au><au>Barnes, P</au><au>Maddocks, A</au><au>Wareham, K</au><au>Drew, P</au><au>Dickson, W</au><au>Lyons, R A</au><au>Hutchings, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social health outcomes following thermal injuries: a retrospective matched cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>663</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>663-667</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><coden>ADCHAK</coden><abstract>Introduction:Over 50% of children admitted with burns are aged under 3 years. US studies suggest that up to 26% of childhood burns are non-accidental, although UK reports are lower (1–16%).Objectives:To determine the social health outcomes of burned children as regards the number of children abused, neglected or “in need” before the age of 6 years compared with matched controls.Methods:A retrospective matched cohort study. 145 children aged under 3 years admitted for burns in 1994–1997 were matched with controls for sex, age and enumeration district and followed up until 2003. Electronic routine databases provided study data on local authority care episodes and Social Services referrals by age 6 years.Results:89.0% of cases had accidental burns and four cases (2.8%) had non-accidental burns. No case was attributed to neglect. By their sixth birthday cases were statistically more likely to have been referred to Social Services with 14 (9.7%) of the burned children having been abused or neglected versus two (1.4%) controls (95% CI 0.030 to 0.13, p = 0.004). Forty six (32%) cases versus 26 (18%) controls were defined as “in need” (95% CI 0.047 to 0.23, p = 0.006).Conclusion:Although most burns were deemed accidental, 2.8% were categorised as non-accidental at presentation. Almost a third of the burned children went on to be “in need”. Children with a burn appear to be at higher risk of further abuse or neglect compared with controls. A burn therefore could be a surrogate marker indicating need for closer supervision and follow-up by professionals.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</pub><pmid>19531525</pmid><doi>10.1136/adc.2008.143727</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9888
ispartof Archives of disease in childhood, 2009-09, Vol.94 (9), p.663-667
issn 0003-9888
1468-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764393019
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Accidents, Home
Age
Biological and medical sciences
Burns
Burns - etiology
Burns and scalds
Burns and scalds in children
Case-Control Studies
Child
Child Abuse
Child Health
Child Rearing
Child Safety
Child Welfare - statistics & numerical data
Child, Preschool
Children
Children & youth
Childrens health
Computers
Data collection
Death
Ethics
Female
Foster Home Care - statistics & numerical data
General aspects
Humans
Infant
Infant Welfare - statistics & numerical data
Infant, Newborn
Injuries
Local government
Male
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Outcome Measures
Parents
Patient outcomes
Pediatric injuries
Poverty
Preschool Children
Prevention and actions
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Referral
Retrospective Studies
Safety
Scientific Concepts
Social aspects
Social Class
Social services
Social Welfare - statistics & numerical data
Statistical analysis
Statistics
Studies
Supervision
Wales
Writers
Young Children
title Social health outcomes following thermal injuries: a retrospective matched cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A09%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20health%20outcomes%20following%20thermal%20injuries:%20a%20retrospective%20matched%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=James-Ellison,%20M&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=663-667&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft.coden=ADCHAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/adc.2008.143727&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA214944588%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828679012&rft_id=info:pmid/19531525&rft_galeid=A214944588&rfr_iscdi=true