Evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of three different alcohol hand rubs against 57 clinical isolates of S. aureus

Summary We tested the efficacy of three alcohol hand rubs (AHRs) used in two local Welsh intensive therapy units (ITUs) against Staphylococcus aureus . The test protocol was based on a carrier test and parameters (concentration, contact time) were chosen following observation of hand-sanitising prac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 2009-08, Vol.72 (4), p.319-325
Hauptverfasser: Cheeseman, K.E, Denyer, S.P, Hosein, I.K, Williams, G.J, Maillard, J.-Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 325
container_issue 4
container_start_page 319
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 72
creator Cheeseman, K.E
Denyer, S.P
Hosein, I.K
Williams, G.J
Maillard, J.-Y
description Summary We tested the efficacy of three alcohol hand rubs (AHRs) used in two local Welsh intensive therapy units (ITUs) against Staphylococcus aureus . The test protocol was based on a carrier test and parameters (concentration, contact time) were chosen following observation of hand-sanitising practices in the ITUs. Following AHR exposure, surviving bacteria were enumerated using a standard plate count method plus a Bioscreen C Microbial Growth Analyser. The AHRs demonstrated variable efficacy against the clinical isolates: the mean log10 reduction after 10 s exposure to Soft Care Med H5, Cutan and Guest Medical AHRs was 2.67, 0.696 and 1.96, respectively, and after 30 s exposure was 4.58, 1.74 and 3.60, respectively. Since the average time taken by healthcare workers (HCWs) to rub AHR onto their hands was 11 s and 15 s at the two hospitals, the efficacy of these AHRs may be significantly limited against the S. aureus isolates under the conditions observed in practice. In addition, differences observed in log10 reduction in bacterial number post-exposure using the Bioscreen compared to the plate count method provided evidence that S. aureus may be able to recover following Guest Medical AHR treatment within 2 min exposure, whereas after 5 min exposure bacterial damage caused by the AHR was irreversible. Although the introduction of AHRs improved hand hygiene compliance among HCWs, our observations highlighted that contact time is an important factor to ensure the efficacy of these products.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764392353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S019567010900190X</els_id><sourcerecordid>21029249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-7cdd9f797b89b6b9232653f048f9b9f8aad9e94be212258d4a7842c113a820b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk-L1DAYh4so7uzqF_Aguain1vxtGpAFWXZVWPCwCt5CmrxxUjPtmrQD8-1NmVHBw3pKSJ7fj_A-qaoXBDcEk_bt0AzbMDYUY9Vg3mDSPao2RDBaU8XU42qDiRJ1KzE5q85zHnABmRJPq7Nyrlqu6KbaX-9NXMwcphFNHs1bQL2xM6RggzMRgffBGns4XiYA5IL3kGCckYl22k4Rbc3oUFr6jMx3E8Y8IyGRjWEsyYhCnqKZIa8Ndw0yS4IlP6ueeBMzPD-tF9XXm-svVx_r288fPl29v62twHSupXVOealk36m-7RVltBXMY9551SvfGeMUKN4DJZSKznEjO04tIcx0FPcdu6jeHHvv0_RzgTzrXcgWYjQjTEvWsuWstApWyNcPkq0UVDKO_wtSgqmiXBWQHkGbppwTeH2fws6kgyZYrwL1oFeBehWoMddFYAm9PLUv_Q7c38jJWAFenQCTy3h9MqMN-Q9HSSc7IdrCvTtyUMa7D5B0tgFGCy4ksLN2U3j4HZf_xH8L_QEHyMO0pLGI00RnqrG-W7_a-tOwwmWLv7FfP7XN0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21029249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of three different alcohol hand rubs against 57 clinical isolates of S. aureus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Cheeseman, K.E ; Denyer, S.P ; Hosein, I.K ; Williams, G.J ; Maillard, J.-Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheeseman, K.E ; Denyer, S.P ; Hosein, I.K ; Williams, G.J ; Maillard, J.-Y</creatorcontrib><description>Summary We tested the efficacy of three alcohol hand rubs (AHRs) used in two local Welsh intensive therapy units (ITUs) against Staphylococcus aureus . The test protocol was based on a carrier test and parameters (concentration, contact time) were chosen following observation of hand-sanitising practices in the ITUs. Following AHR exposure, surviving bacteria were enumerated using a standard plate count method plus a Bioscreen C Microbial Growth Analyser. The AHRs demonstrated variable efficacy against the clinical isolates: the mean log10 reduction after 10 s exposure to Soft Care Med H5, Cutan and Guest Medical AHRs was 2.67, 0.696 and 1.96, respectively, and after 30 s exposure was 4.58, 1.74 and 3.60, respectively. Since the average time taken by healthcare workers (HCWs) to rub AHR onto their hands was 11 s and 15 s at the two hospitals, the efficacy of these AHRs may be significantly limited against the S. aureus isolates under the conditions observed in practice. In addition, differences observed in log10 reduction in bacterial number post-exposure using the Bioscreen compared to the plate count method provided evidence that S. aureus may be able to recover following Guest Medical AHR treatment within 2 min exposure, whereas after 5 min exposure bacterial damage caused by the AHR was irreversible. Although the introduction of AHRs improved hand hygiene compliance among HCWs, our observations highlighted that contact time is an important factor to ensure the efficacy of these products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19596492</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alcohol hand rubs ; Alcohols - pharmacology ; Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bioscreen ; Carrier test ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Disinfectants - pharmacology ; Epidemiology. Vaccinations ; General aspects ; Hand Disinfection - methods ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious Disease ; Infectious diseases ; Intensive Care Units ; Intensive therapy unit ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Viability - drug effects ; Skin disinfection ; Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; Time Factors ; Wales</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2009-08, Vol.72 (4), p.319-325</ispartof><rights>The Hospital Infection Society</rights><rights>2009 The Hospital Infection Society</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-7cdd9f797b89b6b9232653f048f9b9f8aad9e94be212258d4a7842c113a820b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-7cdd9f797b89b6b9232653f048f9b9f8aad9e94be212258d4a7842c113a820b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21878556$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19596492$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheeseman, K.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denyer, S.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosein, I.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maillard, J.-Y</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of three different alcohol hand rubs against 57 clinical isolates of S. aureus</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Summary We tested the efficacy of three alcohol hand rubs (AHRs) used in two local Welsh intensive therapy units (ITUs) against Staphylococcus aureus . The test protocol was based on a carrier test and parameters (concentration, contact time) were chosen following observation of hand-sanitising practices in the ITUs. Following AHR exposure, surviving bacteria were enumerated using a standard plate count method plus a Bioscreen C Microbial Growth Analyser. The AHRs demonstrated variable efficacy against the clinical isolates: the mean log10 reduction after 10 s exposure to Soft Care Med H5, Cutan and Guest Medical AHRs was 2.67, 0.696 and 1.96, respectively, and after 30 s exposure was 4.58, 1.74 and 3.60, respectively. Since the average time taken by healthcare workers (HCWs) to rub AHR onto their hands was 11 s and 15 s at the two hospitals, the efficacy of these AHRs may be significantly limited against the S. aureus isolates under the conditions observed in practice. In addition, differences observed in log10 reduction in bacterial number post-exposure using the Bioscreen compared to the plate count method provided evidence that S. aureus may be able to recover following Guest Medical AHR treatment within 2 min exposure, whereas after 5 min exposure bacterial damage caused by the AHR was irreversible. Although the introduction of AHRs improved hand hygiene compliance among HCWs, our observations highlighted that contact time is an important factor to ensure the efficacy of these products.</description><subject>Alcohol hand rubs</subject><subject>Alcohols - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bioscreen</subject><subject>Carrier test</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Disinfectants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hand Disinfection - methods</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Intensive therapy unit</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Viability - drug effects</subject><subject>Skin disinfection</subject><subject>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Wales</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk-L1DAYh4so7uzqF_Aguain1vxtGpAFWXZVWPCwCt5CmrxxUjPtmrQD8-1NmVHBw3pKSJ7fj_A-qaoXBDcEk_bt0AzbMDYUY9Vg3mDSPao2RDBaU8XU42qDiRJ1KzE5q85zHnABmRJPq7Nyrlqu6KbaX-9NXMwcphFNHs1bQL2xM6RggzMRgffBGns4XiYA5IL3kGCckYl22k4Rbc3oUFr6jMx3E8Y8IyGRjWEsyYhCnqKZIa8Ndw0yS4IlP6ueeBMzPD-tF9XXm-svVx_r288fPl29v62twHSupXVOealk36m-7RVltBXMY9551SvfGeMUKN4DJZSKznEjO04tIcx0FPcdu6jeHHvv0_RzgTzrXcgWYjQjTEvWsuWstApWyNcPkq0UVDKO_wtSgqmiXBWQHkGbppwTeH2fws6kgyZYrwL1oFeBehWoMddFYAm9PLUv_Q7c38jJWAFenQCTy3h9MqMN-Q9HSSc7IdrCvTtyUMa7D5B0tgFGCy4ksLN2U3j4HZf_xH8L_QEHyMO0pLGI00RnqrG-W7_a-tOwwmWLv7FfP7XN0g</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Cheeseman, K.E</creator><creator>Denyer, S.P</creator><creator>Hosein, I.K</creator><creator>Williams, G.J</creator><creator>Maillard, J.-Y</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of three different alcohol hand rubs against 57 clinical isolates of S. aureus</title><author>Cheeseman, K.E ; Denyer, S.P ; Hosein, I.K ; Williams, G.J ; Maillard, J.-Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-7cdd9f797b89b6b9232653f048f9b9f8aad9e94be212258d4a7842c113a820b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Alcohol hand rubs</topic><topic>Alcohols - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bioscreen</topic><topic>Carrier test</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Disinfectants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hand Disinfection - methods</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Intensive therapy unit</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Viability - drug effects</topic><topic>Skin disinfection</topic><topic>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Wales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheeseman, K.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denyer, S.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosein, I.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maillard, J.-Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheeseman, K.E</au><au>Denyer, S.P</au><au>Hosein, I.K</au><au>Williams, G.J</au><au>Maillard, J.-Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of three different alcohol hand rubs against 57 clinical isolates of S. aureus</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>319-325</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Summary We tested the efficacy of three alcohol hand rubs (AHRs) used in two local Welsh intensive therapy units (ITUs) against Staphylococcus aureus . The test protocol was based on a carrier test and parameters (concentration, contact time) were chosen following observation of hand-sanitising practices in the ITUs. Following AHR exposure, surviving bacteria were enumerated using a standard plate count method plus a Bioscreen C Microbial Growth Analyser. The AHRs demonstrated variable efficacy against the clinical isolates: the mean log10 reduction after 10 s exposure to Soft Care Med H5, Cutan and Guest Medical AHRs was 2.67, 0.696 and 1.96, respectively, and after 30 s exposure was 4.58, 1.74 and 3.60, respectively. Since the average time taken by healthcare workers (HCWs) to rub AHR onto their hands was 11 s and 15 s at the two hospitals, the efficacy of these AHRs may be significantly limited against the S. aureus isolates under the conditions observed in practice. In addition, differences observed in log10 reduction in bacterial number post-exposure using the Bioscreen compared to the plate count method provided evidence that S. aureus may be able to recover following Guest Medical AHR treatment within 2 min exposure, whereas after 5 min exposure bacterial damage caused by the AHR was irreversible. Although the introduction of AHRs improved hand hygiene compliance among HCWs, our observations highlighted that contact time is an important factor to ensure the efficacy of these products.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19596492</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 2009-08, Vol.72 (4), p.319-325
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764392353
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Alcohol hand rubs
Alcohols - pharmacology
Bacterial diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Bioscreen
Carrier test
Colony Count, Microbial
Disinfectants - pharmacology
Epidemiology. Vaccinations
General aspects
Hand Disinfection - methods
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infectious Disease
Infectious diseases
Intensive Care Units
Intensive therapy unit
Medical sciences
Microbial Viability - drug effects
Skin disinfection
Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects
Time Factors
Wales
title Evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of three different alcohol hand rubs against 57 clinical isolates of S. aureus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T23%3A54%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20bactericidal%20efficacy%20of%20three%20different%20alcohol%20hand%20rubs%20against%2057%20clinical%20isolates%20of%20S.%20aureus&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Cheeseman,%20K.E&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=319-325&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21029249%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21029249&rft_id=info:pmid/19596492&rft_els_id=S019567010900190X&rfr_iscdi=true