Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic

Title.  Consumers’ and professionals’ perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic Aim.  This paper is a report of a study to explore the healthcare needs of women attending consultant‐led breast cancer review clinics from their own perspectives, how these healthcare needs were being met, and health...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of advanced nursing 2007-11, Vol.60 (4), p.419-426
Hauptverfasser: McCaughan, Eilis, McSorley, Oonagh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 426
container_issue 4
container_start_page 419
container_title Journal of advanced nursing
container_volume 60
creator McCaughan, Eilis
McSorley, Oonagh
description Title.  Consumers’ and professionals’ perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic Aim.  This paper is a report of a study to explore the healthcare needs of women attending consultant‐led breast cancer review clinics from their own perspectives, how these healthcare needs were being met, and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of ways in which the service could be delivered more efficiently and effectively. Background.  The value of routine medical follow‐up both in terms of detection of recurrence and patient satisfaction has been questioned. However traditional, where routine follow‐up continues, there are rising numbers of women with breast cancer attending review clinics. Methods.  A qualitative approach was adopted, using non‐participant observation during seven outpatient oncology/surgical breast review sessions. Interviews were carried out in 2005 with a convenience sample of 21 women clinic attenders, two outpatient nurses, three breast care nurses, four oncologists, three surgeons and an outpatient sister. Findings.  Although women saw themselves as having returned to a precancer state, they still had fears of recurrence and a need for reassurance. This need was generally met through the review clinic but many psychosocial needs were unaddressed. However, nurses seemed to be under‐used as a potential source of support. Medical and nursing staff perceived that women needed to be reviewed but acknowledged that appropriately prepared nurses could deliver a more holistic and efficient service. Conclusion.  The number of women with breast cancer requiring ongoing review is likely to increase, but the current review service is not meeting all their needs. A nurse‐led follow‐up service could be an attractive alternative to routine medical follow‐up.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04404.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764337517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68354083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-bbf0dc5d3238f8f02e23ead65732381dd15fe34ed84e86ed4b17111282cdb1dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV0AWB3pKGP_3HjhUCxSqUi4guFmOPZGyZJPF3tDtt6_DrorEAeGLPePfG9nvEUIZ1Kys1-uaCa0qrqWtOYCpQUqQ9f4RWTxcPCYLELCsuAR-Qk5zXgMwwTl_Sk6YsQr4Ui_I1Woc8rTBlM-pHyLdprHFnLtx8H1pbTEF3O5KmenYUk-bhD7vaPBDwEQT_urwloa-G7rwjDxpiwifH_cz8vX9uy-rD9X158uPq4vrKkgtZdU0LcSgouDCtrYFjlygj1qZucNiZKpFITFaiVZjlA0z5c_c8hAbFoM4I-eHueWtPyfMO7fpcsC-9wOOU3ZGSyGMYqaQr_5JaiuUBCsK-PIvcD1OabbAccHlUhkJBbIHKKQx54St26Zu49OdY-DmWNzaze672X03x-J-x-L2RfriOH9qNhj_CI85FODNAbjterz778Hu6uJmPhV9ddB3eYf7B71PP5w2xQz37ebSqe-Wv1UW3CdxD7JKqTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232495740</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>McCaughan, Eilis ; McSorley, Oonagh</creator><creatorcontrib>McCaughan, Eilis ; McSorley, Oonagh</creatorcontrib><description>Title.  Consumers’ and professionals’ perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic Aim.  This paper is a report of a study to explore the healthcare needs of women attending consultant‐led breast cancer review clinics from their own perspectives, how these healthcare needs were being met, and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of ways in which the service could be delivered more efficiently and effectively. Background.  The value of routine medical follow‐up both in terms of detection of recurrence and patient satisfaction has been questioned. However traditional, where routine follow‐up continues, there are rising numbers of women with breast cancer attending review clinics. Methods.  A qualitative approach was adopted, using non‐participant observation during seven outpatient oncology/surgical breast review sessions. Interviews were carried out in 2005 with a convenience sample of 21 women clinic attenders, two outpatient nurses, three breast care nurses, four oncologists, three surgeons and an outpatient sister. Findings.  Although women saw themselves as having returned to a precancer state, they still had fears of recurrence and a need for reassurance. This need was generally met through the review clinic but many psychosocial needs were unaddressed. However, nurses seemed to be under‐used as a potential source of support. Medical and nursing staff perceived that women needed to be reviewed but acknowledged that appropriately prepared nurses could deliver a more holistic and efficient service. Conclusion.  The number of women with breast cancer requiring ongoing review is likely to increase, but the current review service is not meeting all their needs. A nurse‐led follow‐up service could be an attractive alternative to routine medical follow‐up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-2402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04404.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17850296</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ambulatory Care Facilities ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - nursing ; Breast Neoplasms - psychology ; consumer perceptions ; empirical research report ; Female ; follow-up care ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health care ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Nurse-Patient Relations - ethics ; Nursing ; Oncology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Perceptions ; Qualitative Research ; Referral and Consultation - standards ; staff perceptions ; Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced nursing, 2007-11, Vol.60 (4), p.419-426</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Nov 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-bbf0dc5d3238f8f02e23ead65732381dd15fe34ed84e86ed4b17111282cdb1dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-bbf0dc5d3238f8f02e23ead65732381dd15fe34ed84e86ed4b17111282cdb1dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2648.2007.04404.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2648.2007.04404.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17850296$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCaughan, Eilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSorley, Oonagh</creatorcontrib><title>Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic</title><title>Journal of advanced nursing</title><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><description>Title.  Consumers’ and professionals’ perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic Aim.  This paper is a report of a study to explore the healthcare needs of women attending consultant‐led breast cancer review clinics from their own perspectives, how these healthcare needs were being met, and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of ways in which the service could be delivered more efficiently and effectively. Background.  The value of routine medical follow‐up both in terms of detection of recurrence and patient satisfaction has been questioned. However traditional, where routine follow‐up continues, there are rising numbers of women with breast cancer attending review clinics. Methods.  A qualitative approach was adopted, using non‐participant observation during seven outpatient oncology/surgical breast review sessions. Interviews were carried out in 2005 with a convenience sample of 21 women clinic attenders, two outpatient nurses, three breast care nurses, four oncologists, three surgeons and an outpatient sister. Findings.  Although women saw themselves as having returned to a precancer state, they still had fears of recurrence and a need for reassurance. This need was generally met through the review clinic but many psychosocial needs were unaddressed. However, nurses seemed to be under‐used as a potential source of support. Medical and nursing staff perceived that women needed to be reviewed but acknowledged that appropriately prepared nurses could deliver a more holistic and efficient service. Conclusion.  The number of women with breast cancer requiring ongoing review is likely to increase, but the current review service is not meeting all their needs. A nurse‐led follow‐up service could be an attractive alternative to routine medical follow‐up.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - nursing</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>consumer perceptions</subject><subject>empirical research report</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>follow-up care</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurse-Patient Relations - ethics</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - standards</subject><subject>staff perceptions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0309-2402</issn><issn>1365-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV0AWB3pKGP_3HjhUCxSqUi4guFmOPZGyZJPF3tDtt6_DrorEAeGLPePfG9nvEUIZ1Kys1-uaCa0qrqWtOYCpQUqQ9f4RWTxcPCYLELCsuAR-Qk5zXgMwwTl_Sk6YsQr4Ui_I1Woc8rTBlM-pHyLdprHFnLtx8H1pbTEF3O5KmenYUk-bhD7vaPBDwEQT_urwloa-G7rwjDxpiwifH_cz8vX9uy-rD9X158uPq4vrKkgtZdU0LcSgouDCtrYFjlygj1qZucNiZKpFITFaiVZjlA0z5c_c8hAbFoM4I-eHueWtPyfMO7fpcsC-9wOOU3ZGSyGMYqaQr_5JaiuUBCsK-PIvcD1OabbAccHlUhkJBbIHKKQx54St26Zu49OdY-DmWNzaze672X03x-J-x-L2RfriOH9qNhj_CI85FODNAbjterz778Hu6uJmPhV9ddB3eYf7B71PP5w2xQz37ebSqe-Wv1UW3CdxD7JKqTA</recordid><startdate>200711</startdate><enddate>200711</enddate><creator>McCaughan, Eilis</creator><creator>McSorley, Oonagh</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200711</creationdate><title>Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic</title><author>McCaughan, Eilis ; McSorley, Oonagh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-bbf0dc5d3238f8f02e23ead65732381dd15fe34ed84e86ed4b17111282cdb1dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - nursing</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>consumer perceptions</topic><topic>empirical research report</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>follow-up care</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurse-Patient Relations - ethics</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - standards</topic><topic>staff perceptions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCaughan, Eilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSorley, Oonagh</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCaughan, Eilis</au><au>McSorley, Oonagh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><date>2007-11</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>426</epage><pages>419-426</pages><issn>0309-2402</issn><eissn>1365-2648</eissn><abstract>Title.  Consumers’ and professionals’ perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic Aim.  This paper is a report of a study to explore the healthcare needs of women attending consultant‐led breast cancer review clinics from their own perspectives, how these healthcare needs were being met, and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of ways in which the service could be delivered more efficiently and effectively. Background.  The value of routine medical follow‐up both in terms of detection of recurrence and patient satisfaction has been questioned. However traditional, where routine follow‐up continues, there are rising numbers of women with breast cancer attending review clinics. Methods.  A qualitative approach was adopted, using non‐participant observation during seven outpatient oncology/surgical breast review sessions. Interviews were carried out in 2005 with a convenience sample of 21 women clinic attenders, two outpatient nurses, three breast care nurses, four oncologists, three surgeons and an outpatient sister. Findings.  Although women saw themselves as having returned to a precancer state, they still had fears of recurrence and a need for reassurance. This need was generally met through the review clinic but many psychosocial needs were unaddressed. However, nurses seemed to be under‐used as a potential source of support. Medical and nursing staff perceived that women needed to be reviewed but acknowledged that appropriately prepared nurses could deliver a more holistic and efficient service. Conclusion.  The number of women with breast cancer requiring ongoing review is likely to increase, but the current review service is not meeting all their needs. A nurse‐led follow‐up service could be an attractive alternative to routine medical follow‐up.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17850296</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04404.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-2402
ispartof Journal of advanced nursing, 2007-11, Vol.60 (4), p.419-426
issn 0309-2402
1365-2648
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764337517
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Attitude of Health Personnel
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - nursing
Breast Neoplasms - psychology
consumer perceptions
empirical research report
Female
follow-up care
Follow-Up Studies
Health care
Humans
Middle Aged
Nurse-Patient Relations - ethics
Nursing
Oncology
Patient Satisfaction
Perceptions
Qualitative Research
Referral and Consultation - standards
staff perceptions
Studies
Treatment Outcome
Women
title Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T17%3A43%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consumers'%20and%20professionals'%20perceptions%20of%20a%20breast%20cancer%20review%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20nursing&rft.au=McCaughan,%20Eilis&rft.date=2007-11&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=426&rft.pages=419-426&rft.issn=0309-2402&rft.eissn=1365-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04404.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68354083%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232495740&rft_id=info:pmid/17850296&rfr_iscdi=true