Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic
Title. Consumers’ and professionals’ perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic Aim. This paper is a report of a study to explore the healthcare needs of women attending consultant‐led breast cancer review clinics from their own perspectives, how these healthcare needs were being met, and health...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of advanced nursing 2007-11, Vol.60 (4), p.419-426 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 426 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 419 |
container_title | Journal of advanced nursing |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | McCaughan, Eilis McSorley, Oonagh |
description | Title. Consumers’ and professionals’ perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic
Aim. This paper is a report of a study to explore the healthcare needs of women attending consultant‐led breast cancer review clinics from their own perspectives, how these healthcare needs were being met, and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of ways in which the service could be delivered more efficiently and effectively.
Background. The value of routine medical follow‐up both in terms of detection of recurrence and patient satisfaction has been questioned. However traditional, where routine follow‐up continues, there are rising numbers of women with breast cancer attending review clinics.
Methods. A qualitative approach was adopted, using non‐participant observation during seven outpatient oncology/surgical breast review sessions. Interviews were carried out in 2005 with a convenience sample of 21 women clinic attenders, two outpatient nurses, three breast care nurses, four oncologists, three surgeons and an outpatient sister.
Findings. Although women saw themselves as having returned to a precancer state, they still had fears of recurrence and a need for reassurance. This need was generally met through the review clinic but many psychosocial needs were unaddressed. However, nurses seemed to be under‐used as a potential source of support. Medical and nursing staff perceived that women needed to be reviewed but acknowledged that appropriately prepared nurses could deliver a more holistic and efficient service.
Conclusion. The number of women with breast cancer requiring ongoing review is likely to increase, but the current review service is not meeting all their needs. A nurse‐led follow‐up service could be an attractive alternative to routine medical follow‐up. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04404.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764337517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68354083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-bbf0dc5d3238f8f02e23ead65732381dd15fe34ed84e86ed4b17111282cdb1dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV0AWB3pKGP_3HjhUCxSqUi4guFmOPZGyZJPF3tDtt6_DrorEAeGLPePfG9nvEUIZ1Kys1-uaCa0qrqWtOYCpQUqQ9f4RWTxcPCYLELCsuAR-Qk5zXgMwwTl_Sk6YsQr4Ui_I1Woc8rTBlM-pHyLdprHFnLtx8H1pbTEF3O5KmenYUk-bhD7vaPBDwEQT_urwloa-G7rwjDxpiwifH_cz8vX9uy-rD9X158uPq4vrKkgtZdU0LcSgouDCtrYFjlygj1qZucNiZKpFITFaiVZjlA0z5c_c8hAbFoM4I-eHueWtPyfMO7fpcsC-9wOOU3ZGSyGMYqaQr_5JaiuUBCsK-PIvcD1OabbAccHlUhkJBbIHKKQx54St26Zu49OdY-DmWNzaze672X03x-J-x-L2RfriOH9qNhj_CI85FODNAbjterz778Hu6uJmPhV9ddB3eYf7B71PP5w2xQz37ebSqe-Wv1UW3CdxD7JKqTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232495740</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>McCaughan, Eilis ; McSorley, Oonagh</creator><creatorcontrib>McCaughan, Eilis ; McSorley, Oonagh</creatorcontrib><description>Title. Consumers’ and professionals’ perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic
Aim. This paper is a report of a study to explore the healthcare needs of women attending consultant‐led breast cancer review clinics from their own perspectives, how these healthcare needs were being met, and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of ways in which the service could be delivered more efficiently and effectively.
Background. The value of routine medical follow‐up both in terms of detection of recurrence and patient satisfaction has been questioned. However traditional, where routine follow‐up continues, there are rising numbers of women with breast cancer attending review clinics.
Methods. A qualitative approach was adopted, using non‐participant observation during seven outpatient oncology/surgical breast review sessions. Interviews were carried out in 2005 with a convenience sample of 21 women clinic attenders, two outpatient nurses, three breast care nurses, four oncologists, three surgeons and an outpatient sister.
Findings. Although women saw themselves as having returned to a precancer state, they still had fears of recurrence and a need for reassurance. This need was generally met through the review clinic but many psychosocial needs were unaddressed. However, nurses seemed to be under‐used as a potential source of support. Medical and nursing staff perceived that women needed to be reviewed but acknowledged that appropriately prepared nurses could deliver a more holistic and efficient service.
Conclusion. The number of women with breast cancer requiring ongoing review is likely to increase, but the current review service is not meeting all their needs. A nurse‐led follow‐up service could be an attractive alternative to routine medical follow‐up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-2402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04404.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17850296</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ambulatory Care Facilities ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - nursing ; Breast Neoplasms - psychology ; consumer perceptions ; empirical research report ; Female ; follow-up care ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health care ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Nurse-Patient Relations - ethics ; Nursing ; Oncology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Perceptions ; Qualitative Research ; Referral and Consultation - standards ; staff perceptions ; Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced nursing, 2007-11, Vol.60 (4), p.419-426</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Nov 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-bbf0dc5d3238f8f02e23ead65732381dd15fe34ed84e86ed4b17111282cdb1dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-bbf0dc5d3238f8f02e23ead65732381dd15fe34ed84e86ed4b17111282cdb1dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2648.2007.04404.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2648.2007.04404.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17850296$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCaughan, Eilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSorley, Oonagh</creatorcontrib><title>Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic</title><title>Journal of advanced nursing</title><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><description>Title. Consumers’ and professionals’ perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic
Aim. This paper is a report of a study to explore the healthcare needs of women attending consultant‐led breast cancer review clinics from their own perspectives, how these healthcare needs were being met, and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of ways in which the service could be delivered more efficiently and effectively.
Background. The value of routine medical follow‐up both in terms of detection of recurrence and patient satisfaction has been questioned. However traditional, where routine follow‐up continues, there are rising numbers of women with breast cancer attending review clinics.
Methods. A qualitative approach was adopted, using non‐participant observation during seven outpatient oncology/surgical breast review sessions. Interviews were carried out in 2005 with a convenience sample of 21 women clinic attenders, two outpatient nurses, three breast care nurses, four oncologists, three surgeons and an outpatient sister.
Findings. Although women saw themselves as having returned to a precancer state, they still had fears of recurrence and a need for reassurance. This need was generally met through the review clinic but many psychosocial needs were unaddressed. However, nurses seemed to be under‐used as a potential source of support. Medical and nursing staff perceived that women needed to be reviewed but acknowledged that appropriately prepared nurses could deliver a more holistic and efficient service.
Conclusion. The number of women with breast cancer requiring ongoing review is likely to increase, but the current review service is not meeting all their needs. A nurse‐led follow‐up service could be an attractive alternative to routine medical follow‐up.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - nursing</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>consumer perceptions</subject><subject>empirical research report</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>follow-up care</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurse-Patient Relations - ethics</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - standards</subject><subject>staff perceptions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0309-2402</issn><issn>1365-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV0AWB3pKGP_3HjhUCxSqUi4guFmOPZGyZJPF3tDtt6_DrorEAeGLPePfG9nvEUIZ1Kys1-uaCa0qrqWtOYCpQUqQ9f4RWTxcPCYLELCsuAR-Qk5zXgMwwTl_Sk6YsQr4Ui_I1Woc8rTBlM-pHyLdprHFnLtx8H1pbTEF3O5KmenYUk-bhD7vaPBDwEQT_urwloa-G7rwjDxpiwifH_cz8vX9uy-rD9X158uPq4vrKkgtZdU0LcSgouDCtrYFjlygj1qZucNiZKpFITFaiVZjlA0z5c_c8hAbFoM4I-eHueWtPyfMO7fpcsC-9wOOU3ZGSyGMYqaQr_5JaiuUBCsK-PIvcD1OabbAccHlUhkJBbIHKKQx54St26Zu49OdY-DmWNzaze672X03x-J-x-L2RfriOH9qNhj_CI85FODNAbjterz778Hu6uJmPhV9ddB3eYf7B71PP5w2xQz37ebSqe-Wv1UW3CdxD7JKqTA</recordid><startdate>200711</startdate><enddate>200711</enddate><creator>McCaughan, Eilis</creator><creator>McSorley, Oonagh</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200711</creationdate><title>Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic</title><author>McCaughan, Eilis ; McSorley, Oonagh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4644-bbf0dc5d3238f8f02e23ead65732381dd15fe34ed84e86ed4b17111282cdb1dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - nursing</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>consumer perceptions</topic><topic>empirical research report</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>follow-up care</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurse-Patient Relations - ethics</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - standards</topic><topic>staff perceptions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCaughan, Eilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSorley, Oonagh</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCaughan, Eilis</au><au>McSorley, Oonagh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><date>2007-11</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>426</epage><pages>419-426</pages><issn>0309-2402</issn><eissn>1365-2648</eissn><abstract>Title. Consumers’ and professionals’ perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic
Aim. This paper is a report of a study to explore the healthcare needs of women attending consultant‐led breast cancer review clinics from their own perspectives, how these healthcare needs were being met, and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of ways in which the service could be delivered more efficiently and effectively.
Background. The value of routine medical follow‐up both in terms of detection of recurrence and patient satisfaction has been questioned. However traditional, where routine follow‐up continues, there are rising numbers of women with breast cancer attending review clinics.
Methods. A qualitative approach was adopted, using non‐participant observation during seven outpatient oncology/surgical breast review sessions. Interviews were carried out in 2005 with a convenience sample of 21 women clinic attenders, two outpatient nurses, three breast care nurses, four oncologists, three surgeons and an outpatient sister.
Findings. Although women saw themselves as having returned to a precancer state, they still had fears of recurrence and a need for reassurance. This need was generally met through the review clinic but many psychosocial needs were unaddressed. However, nurses seemed to be under‐used as a potential source of support. Medical and nursing staff perceived that women needed to be reviewed but acknowledged that appropriately prepared nurses could deliver a more holistic and efficient service.
Conclusion. The number of women with breast cancer requiring ongoing review is likely to increase, but the current review service is not meeting all their needs. A nurse‐led follow‐up service could be an attractive alternative to routine medical follow‐up.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17850296</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04404.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-2402 |
ispartof | Journal of advanced nursing, 2007-11, Vol.60 (4), p.419-426 |
issn | 0309-2402 1365-2648 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764337517 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Ambulatory Care Facilities Attitude of Health Personnel Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - nursing Breast Neoplasms - psychology consumer perceptions empirical research report Female follow-up care Follow-Up Studies Health care Humans Middle Aged Nurse-Patient Relations - ethics Nursing Oncology Patient Satisfaction Perceptions Qualitative Research Referral and Consultation - standards staff perceptions Studies Treatment Outcome Women |
title | Consumers' and professionals' perceptions of a breast cancer review clinic |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T17%3A43%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Consumers'%20and%20professionals'%20perceptions%20of%20a%20breast%20cancer%20review%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20nursing&rft.au=McCaughan,%20Eilis&rft.date=2007-11&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=426&rft.pages=419-426&rft.issn=0309-2402&rft.eissn=1365-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04404.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68354083%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232495740&rft_id=info:pmid/17850296&rfr_iscdi=true |