Testicular self-examination: a test of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour
The aim of this study was to test the utility and efficiency of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the health belief model (HBM) in predicting testicular self-examination (TSE) behaviour. A questionnaire was administered to an opportunistic sample of 195 undergraduates aged 18-39 years. Struc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Health education research 2007-04, Vol.22 (2), p.272-284 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 284 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 272 |
| container_title | Health education research |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | McClenahan, Carol Shevlin, Mark Adamson, Gary Bennett, Cara O'Neill, Brenda |
| description | The aim of this study was to test the utility and efficiency of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the health belief model (HBM) in predicting testicular self-examination (TSE) behaviour. A questionnaire was administered to an opportunistic sample of 195 undergraduates aged 18-39 years. Structural equation modelling indicated that, on the basis of all the fit indices, the TPB model was the better model, however, the quality of the models was very similar. The TPB explained 50% of the variance in intention and 22% in behaviour while the HBM (with self-efficacy) accounted for 56 and 21%, respectively. Self-efficacy was the most important predictor of TSE behavioural intention across both models. These findings contribute to the growing literature on the testing of multiple models in the health psychology domain. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/her/cyl076 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764329908</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ914981</ericid><jstor_id>45110346</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/her/cyl076</oup_id><sourcerecordid>45110346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-9d3ddea9daa72fa6901e98d8f11bcd906d6c1bead6a21f885e819f58d1b4f3813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc-L1DAYhoMo7rh68axSBBWEuvmaH028ybi6yoosriBeQtp8ZTrbNmPSys5_b2Y7jOBhPYQcnoc335eXkMdA3wDV7GSF4aTedrSUd8gCuBQ5k1zdJQtaSJUDCHZEHsS4phSkhvI-OQKplCgoW5DqEuPY1lNnQxaxa3K8tn072LH1w9vMZmPCmW-ycYXZCm03rrIKuxabrPcOu8wO7oal48N2Z246Owzokrayv1s_hYfkXmO7iI_29zH5_uH0cnmWn3_9-Gn57jyvRVGMuXbMObTaWVsWjZWaAmrlVANQ1U5T6WQNFVonbQFNmh8V6EYoBxVvmAJ2TF7NuZvgf01pbtO3scYuzYN-iqaUnBVaU5XMl7ebtBCyYPBfUZRABehd4vN_xHXafEjrGtBaSKo4S9LrWaqDjzFgYzah7W3YGqBm16RJTZq5ySQ_2ydOVY_ur7qvLglPZgFDWx_w6WcNXN_8xosZ-2lz-ztPZ28dRx8OJhcAlPEdz2fexhGvD9yGKyNLVgpz9uOn4e_5xfLbhTRf2B8r9cjI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199560843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testicular self-examination: a test of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McClenahan, Carol ; Shevlin, Mark ; Adamson, Gary ; Bennett, Cara ; O'Neill, Brenda</creator><creatorcontrib>McClenahan, Carol ; Shevlin, Mark ; Adamson, Gary ; Bennett, Cara ; O'Neill, Brenda</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to test the utility and efficiency of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the health belief model (HBM) in predicting testicular self-examination (TSE) behaviour. A questionnaire was administered to an opportunistic sample of 195 undergraduates aged 18-39 years. Structural equation modelling indicated that, on the basis of all the fit indices, the TPB model was the better model, however, the quality of the models was very similar. The TPB explained 50% of the variance in intention and 22% in behaviour while the HBM (with self-efficacy) accounted for 56 and 21%, respectively. Self-efficacy was the most important predictor of TSE behavioural intention across both models. These findings contribute to the growing literature on the testing of multiple models in the health psychology domain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1153</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/her/cyl076</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16885203</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HRTPE2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Behavior Theories ; Beliefs ; Cancer ; College Students ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Health Behavior ; Health beliefs ; Health Promotion ; Health technology assessment ; Human Body ; Humans ; Intention ; Male ; Males ; Measurement Techniques ; Motivation ; ORIGINAL ARTICLES ; Planned behaviour theory ; Prediction ; Predictor Variables ; Questionnaires ; Research Design ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Self Efficacy ; Self-Examination - psychology ; Selfefficacy ; Selfexamination ; Social Cognition ; Social Influences ; Statistical Data ; Structural Equation Models ; Testicular cancer ; Testis ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Health education research, 2007-04, Vol.22 (2), p.272-284</ispartof><rights>Oxford University Press 2007</rights><rights>The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Apr 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-9d3ddea9daa72fa6901e98d8f11bcd906d6c1bead6a21f885e819f58d1b4f3813</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45110346$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45110346$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1578,27901,27902,30976,30977,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ914981$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16885203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McClenahan, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shevlin, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Cara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Brenda</creatorcontrib><title>Testicular self-examination: a test of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour</title><title>Health education research</title><addtitle>Health Educ Res</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to test the utility and efficiency of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the health belief model (HBM) in predicting testicular self-examination (TSE) behaviour. A questionnaire was administered to an opportunistic sample of 195 undergraduates aged 18-39 years. Structural equation modelling indicated that, on the basis of all the fit indices, the TPB model was the better model, however, the quality of the models was very similar. The TPB explained 50% of the variance in intention and 22% in behaviour while the HBM (with self-efficacy) accounted for 56 and 21%, respectively. Self-efficacy was the most important predictor of TSE behavioural intention across both models. These findings contribute to the growing literature on the testing of multiple models in the health psychology domain.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior Theories</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health beliefs</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Human Body</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject><subject>Planned behaviour theory</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Self-Examination - psychology</subject><subject>Selfefficacy</subject><subject>Selfexamination</subject><subject>Social Cognition</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Statistical Data</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><subject>Testicular cancer</subject><subject>Testis</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>0268-1153</issn><issn>1465-3648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc-L1DAYhoMo7rh68axSBBWEuvmaH028ybi6yoosriBeQtp8ZTrbNmPSys5_b2Y7jOBhPYQcnoc335eXkMdA3wDV7GSF4aTedrSUd8gCuBQ5k1zdJQtaSJUDCHZEHsS4phSkhvI-OQKplCgoW5DqEuPY1lNnQxaxa3K8tn072LH1w9vMZmPCmW-ycYXZCm03rrIKuxabrPcOu8wO7oal48N2Z246Owzokrayv1s_hYfkXmO7iI_29zH5_uH0cnmWn3_9-Gn57jyvRVGMuXbMObTaWVsWjZWaAmrlVANQ1U5T6WQNFVonbQFNmh8V6EYoBxVvmAJ2TF7NuZvgf01pbtO3scYuzYN-iqaUnBVaU5XMl7ebtBCyYPBfUZRABehd4vN_xHXafEjrGtBaSKo4S9LrWaqDjzFgYzah7W3YGqBm16RJTZq5ySQ_2ydOVY_ur7qvLglPZgFDWx_w6WcNXN_8xosZ-2lz-ztPZ28dRx8OJhcAlPEdz2fexhGvD9yGKyNLVgpz9uOn4e_5xfLbhTRf2B8r9cjI</recordid><startdate>20070401</startdate><enddate>20070401</enddate><creator>McClenahan, Carol</creator><creator>Shevlin, Mark</creator><creator>Adamson, Gary</creator><creator>Bennett, Cara</creator><creator>O'Neill, Brenda</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070401</creationdate><title>Testicular self-examination: a test of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour</title><author>McClenahan, Carol ; Shevlin, Mark ; Adamson, Gary ; Bennett, Cara ; O'Neill, Brenda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-9d3ddea9daa72fa6901e98d8f11bcd906d6c1bead6a21f885e819f58d1b4f3813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior Theories</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health beliefs</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Human Body</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</topic><topic>Planned behaviour theory</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Self-Examination - psychology</topic><topic>Selfefficacy</topic><topic>Selfexamination</topic><topic>Social Cognition</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Statistical Data</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><topic>Testicular cancer</topic><topic>Testis</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McClenahan, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shevlin, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Cara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Brenda</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Health education research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McClenahan, Carol</au><au>Shevlin, Mark</au><au>Adamson, Gary</au><au>Bennett, Cara</au><au>O'Neill, Brenda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ914981</ericid><atitle>Testicular self-examination: a test of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour</atitle><jtitle>Health education research</jtitle><addtitle>Health Educ Res</addtitle><date>2007-04-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>272</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>272-284</pages><issn>0268-1153</issn><eissn>1465-3648</eissn><coden>HRTPE2</coden><abstract>The aim of this study was to test the utility and efficiency of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the health belief model (HBM) in predicting testicular self-examination (TSE) behaviour. A questionnaire was administered to an opportunistic sample of 195 undergraduates aged 18-39 years. Structural equation modelling indicated that, on the basis of all the fit indices, the TPB model was the better model, however, the quality of the models was very similar. The TPB explained 50% of the variance in intention and 22% in behaviour while the HBM (with self-efficacy) accounted for 56 and 21%, respectively. Self-efficacy was the most important predictor of TSE behavioural intention across both models. These findings contribute to the growing literature on the testing of multiple models in the health psychology domain.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16885203</pmid><doi>10.1093/her/cyl076</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0268-1153 |
| ispartof | Health education research, 2007-04, Vol.22 (2), p.272-284 |
| issn | 0268-1153 1465-3648 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764329908 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Behavior Theories Beliefs Cancer College Students Cross-Sectional Studies Health Behavior Health beliefs Health Promotion Health technology assessment Human Body Humans Intention Male Males Measurement Techniques Motivation ORIGINAL ARTICLES Planned behaviour theory Prediction Predictor Variables Questionnaires Research Design Resistance (Psychology) Self Efficacy Self-Examination - psychology Selfefficacy Selfexamination Social Cognition Social Influences Statistical Data Structural Equation Models Testicular cancer Testis Undergraduate Students |
| title | Testicular self-examination: a test of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A35%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testicular%20self-examination:%20a%20test%20of%20the%20health%20belief%20model%20and%20the%20theory%20of%20planned%20behaviour&rft.jtitle=Health%20education%20research&rft.au=McClenahan,%20Carol&rft.date=2007-04-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=272&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=272-284&rft.issn=0268-1153&rft.eissn=1465-3648&rft.coden=HRTPE2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/her/cyl076&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45110346%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199560843&rft_id=info:pmid/16885203&rft_ericid=EJ914981&rft_jstor_id=45110346&rft_oup_id=10.1093/her/cyl076&rfr_iscdi=true |