Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: analysis of studies published between 2002 and 2005
As the most recent guidelines for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs) were published four years ago, a systematic review was conducted to determine whether any recently published articles should further influence existing guidelines. Articles published between 2002 an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hospital infection 2006-12, Vol.64 (4), p.326-335 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 335 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 326 |
container_title | The Journal of hospital infection |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Gastmeier, P. Geffers, C. |
description | As the most recent guidelines for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs) were published four years ago, a systematic review was conducted to determine whether any recently published articles should further influence existing guidelines. Articles published between 2002 and 2005 dealing with infection control measures for prevention of CR-BSI were evaluated in order to identify evidence for the possible modification of routine practice. Special emphasis was placed on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and studies applying multi-module interventions. Thirty-three RCTs and 10 meta-analyses or systematic reviews were retrieved. In addition, 10 cohort studies were identified where multi-module programmes were introduced for reducing CR-BSI rates. It was found that RCTs and meta-analyses only have a minor influence on the existing guidelines for the prevention of CR-BSIs and confirm the earlier recommendations on several points. Studies investigating multi-module programmes, however, found a substantial reduction in CR-BSIs ranging from 29% to 95%. The data show that many CR-BSIs are preventable and that there is room for improvement in many institutions. Simple interventions are often useful for reducing CR-BSI rates and the opportunities to decrease CR-BSI rates appear to be greatest when multi-module programmes are applied. An average reduction of more than 50% seems to be possible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.07.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764307740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670106003422</els_id><sourcerecordid>68132497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-1c4e4c610a59bd5f6def82f9c94015130b1f88731ba7fe2c4042ca17b63c44f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERZfCH-CAcgFOSccfsRPEBVV8SZXaA5wtxx5rHWWTxXaK-u9xtCv11pMt63nHM_MQ8o5CQ4HK67EZ92FuGIBsQDUA7Quyoy1nNet5_5LsgPZtLRXQS_I6pREAynv7ilxS2XeiA7kj433EB5xzWOZq8ZU1eY8ZYx1xMhldNUzL4lKOaA5VmD3ajUyfKzOb6TGFtIVSXl3AVB3XYQppv6Uw_0Ocq9IaK6jbLu0bcuHNlPDt-bwif75_-33zs769-_Hr5uttbQWVuaZWoLCSgmn7wbVeOvQd873tBdCWchio7zrF6WCUR2YFCGYNVYPkVghP-RX5dKp7jMvfFVPWh5AsTpOZcVmTVlJwUEpAIT8-S8qOciZ6VUB2Am1cUoro9TGGg4mPmoLeXOhRby705kKD0mXcEnp_rr4OB3RPkfPyC_DhDJhkzeSjmW1IT1zHizG1_f7lxGHZ2kPAqJMNOFt0IRYh2i3huT7-A3HOpys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68132497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: analysis of studies published between 2002 and 2005</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gastmeier, P. ; Geffers, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gastmeier, P. ; Geffers, C.</creatorcontrib><description>As the most recent guidelines for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs) were published four years ago, a systematic review was conducted to determine whether any recently published articles should further influence existing guidelines. Articles published between 2002 and 2005 dealing with infection control measures for prevention of CR-BSI were evaluated in order to identify evidence for the possible modification of routine practice. Special emphasis was placed on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and studies applying multi-module interventions. Thirty-three RCTs and 10 meta-analyses or systematic reviews were retrieved. In addition, 10 cohort studies were identified where multi-module programmes were introduced for reducing CR-BSI rates. It was found that RCTs and meta-analyses only have a minor influence on the existing guidelines for the prevention of CR-BSIs and confirm the earlier recommendations on several points. Studies investigating multi-module programmes, however, found a substantial reduction in CR-BSIs ranging from 29% to 95%. The data show that many CR-BSIs are preventable and that there is room for improvement in many institutions. Simple interventions are often useful for reducing CR-BSI rates and the opportunities to decrease CR-BSI rates appear to be greatest when multi-module programmes are applied. An average reduction of more than 50% seems to be possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.07.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16984806</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacteremia - microbiology ; Bacteremia - prevention & control ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial sepsis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheterization - adverse effects ; Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology ; Cross Infection - prevention & control ; General aspects ; Human bacterial diseases ; Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models ; Humans ; Infection Control - methods ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prevention ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Sentinel Surveillance ; Sepsis ; Surveillance ; Vascular catheter</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2006-12, Vol.64 (4), p.326-335</ispartof><rights>2006 The Hospital Infection Society</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-1c4e4c610a59bd5f6def82f9c94015130b1f88731ba7fe2c4042ca17b63c44f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-1c4e4c610a59bd5f6def82f9c94015130b1f88731ba7fe2c4042ca17b63c44f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670106003422$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18300077$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16984806$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gastmeier, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geffers, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: analysis of studies published between 2002 and 2005</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>As the most recent guidelines for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs) were published four years ago, a systematic review was conducted to determine whether any recently published articles should further influence existing guidelines. Articles published between 2002 and 2005 dealing with infection control measures for prevention of CR-BSI were evaluated in order to identify evidence for the possible modification of routine practice. Special emphasis was placed on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and studies applying multi-module interventions. Thirty-three RCTs and 10 meta-analyses or systematic reviews were retrieved. In addition, 10 cohort studies were identified where multi-module programmes were introduced for reducing CR-BSI rates. It was found that RCTs and meta-analyses only have a minor influence on the existing guidelines for the prevention of CR-BSIs and confirm the earlier recommendations on several points. Studies investigating multi-module programmes, however, found a substantial reduction in CR-BSIs ranging from 29% to 95%. The data show that many CR-BSIs are preventable and that there is room for improvement in many institutions. Simple interventions are often useful for reducing CR-BSI rates and the opportunities to decrease CR-BSI rates appear to be greatest when multi-module programmes are applied. An average reduction of more than 50% seems to be possible.</description><subject>Bacteremia - microbiology</subject><subject>Bacteremia - prevention & control</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial sepsis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Sentinel Surveillance</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Vascular catheter</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERZfCH-CAcgFOSccfsRPEBVV8SZXaA5wtxx5rHWWTxXaK-u9xtCv11pMt63nHM_MQ8o5CQ4HK67EZ92FuGIBsQDUA7Quyoy1nNet5_5LsgPZtLRXQS_I6pREAynv7ilxS2XeiA7kj433EB5xzWOZq8ZU1eY8ZYx1xMhldNUzL4lKOaA5VmD3ajUyfKzOb6TGFtIVSXl3AVB3XYQppv6Uw_0Ocq9IaK6jbLu0bcuHNlPDt-bwif75_-33zs769-_Hr5uttbQWVuaZWoLCSgmn7wbVeOvQd873tBdCWchio7zrF6WCUR2YFCGYNVYPkVghP-RX5dKp7jMvfFVPWh5AsTpOZcVmTVlJwUEpAIT8-S8qOciZ6VUB2Am1cUoro9TGGg4mPmoLeXOhRby705kKD0mXcEnp_rr4OB3RPkfPyC_DhDJhkzeSjmW1IT1zHizG1_f7lxGHZ2kPAqJMNOFt0IRYh2i3huT7-A3HOpys</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Gastmeier, P.</creator><creator>Geffers, C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: analysis of studies published between 2002 and 2005</title><author>Gastmeier, P. ; Geffers, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-1c4e4c610a59bd5f6def82f9c94015130b1f88731ba7fe2c4042ca17b63c44f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Bacteremia - microbiology</topic><topic>Bacteremia - prevention & control</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial sepsis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Sentinel Surveillance</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Vascular catheter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gastmeier, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geffers, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gastmeier, P.</au><au>Geffers, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: analysis of studies published between 2002 and 2005</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>326-335</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>As the most recent guidelines for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs) were published four years ago, a systematic review was conducted to determine whether any recently published articles should further influence existing guidelines. Articles published between 2002 and 2005 dealing with infection control measures for prevention of CR-BSI were evaluated in order to identify evidence for the possible modification of routine practice. Special emphasis was placed on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and studies applying multi-module interventions. Thirty-three RCTs and 10 meta-analyses or systematic reviews were retrieved. In addition, 10 cohort studies were identified where multi-module programmes were introduced for reducing CR-BSI rates. It was found that RCTs and meta-analyses only have a minor influence on the existing guidelines for the prevention of CR-BSIs and confirm the earlier recommendations on several points. Studies investigating multi-module programmes, however, found a substantial reduction in CR-BSIs ranging from 29% to 95%. The data show that many CR-BSIs are preventable and that there is room for improvement in many institutions. Simple interventions are often useful for reducing CR-BSI rates and the opportunities to decrease CR-BSI rates appear to be greatest when multi-module programmes are applied. An average reduction of more than 50% seems to be possible.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16984806</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2006.07.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6701 |
ispartof | The Journal of hospital infection, 2006-12, Vol.64 (4), p.326-335 |
issn | 0195-6701 1532-2939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764307740 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Bacteremia - microbiology Bacteremia - prevention & control Bacterial diseases Bacterial sepsis Biological and medical sciences Catheterization - adverse effects Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology Cross Infection - prevention & control General aspects Human bacterial diseases Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models Humans Infection Control - methods Infectious diseases Medical sciences Meta-Analysis as Topic Practice Guidelines as Topic Prevention Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Sentinel Surveillance Sepsis Surveillance Vascular catheter |
title | Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections: analysis of studies published between 2002 and 2005 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A37%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevention%20of%20catheter-related%20bloodstream%20infections:%20analysis%20of%20studies%20published%20between%202002%20and%202005&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Gastmeier,%20P.&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=326-335&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2006.07.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68132497%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68132497&rft_id=info:pmid/16984806&rft_els_id=S0195670106003422&rfr_iscdi=true |