An exploratory study in the UK of the effectiveness of three different pain management regimens for post-caesarean section women

to compare the effects of three types of analgesic administration after elective caesarean section on a number of clinical outcome measures. Supplementary aims of the study were to determine the acceptability of, and satisfaction with, the different regimens. a quasi-experimental different subject d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Midwifery 2006-09, Vol.22 (3), p.249-261
Hauptverfasser: Snell, Pamela, Hicks, Carolyn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 261
container_issue 3
container_start_page 249
container_title Midwifery
container_volume 22
creator Snell, Pamela
Hicks, Carolyn
description to compare the effects of three types of analgesic administration after elective caesarean section on a number of clinical outcome measures. Supplementary aims of the study were to determine the acceptability of, and satisfaction with, the different regimens. a quasi-experimental different subject design was used to compare three types of analgesic administration on pain, post-operative nausea and vomiting, analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay and overall satisfaction with pain management. a specialist women's hospital in a large UK city, with around 1500 caesarean sections per annum. 95 women who had undergone elective caesarean section. the women were allocated to one of the three pain management groups: group 1 (oral morphine, Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all self-administered]); group 2 (oral morphine, Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all midwife-administered]); and Group 3 (intra-muscular morphine, oral Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all midwife-administered]). The safety of self-medication was measured by adherence to a safety protocol. data collection was undertaken over the first 3 days after surgery and included visual analogue scale (0–100 mm) pain scores, analgesic consumption, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting, and length of hospital stay. In addition, questionnaires were given to midwives and patients to assess the acceptability of self-medication and patient satisfaction. Data collection took place between June 2002 and June 2003. the results indicated that the outcomes of all three interventions were comparable in terms of pain scores, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting, and overall levels of satisfaction, although intra-muscular morphine was disliked to a degree that deterred some women from requesting it. Consumption of oral morphine was significantly greater than consumption of intramuscular injections of morphine, whereas Co-dydramol use was lower in the self-medicating group; the self-medicating women also went home, on average, a day earlier than women in the other two groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.midw.2005.08.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764289841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266613805000847</els_id><sourcerecordid>68767954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a2ae69d0232d58be0671c4c50cb4b063ca5b2c17bf892130857e8091ab3bb7053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAPsEpYWzHH5G4VBVQRCUu9Gw5zqR4tYmDnW3ZGz8dp7tSb-U049Ezj6x5CXnLoGbA1MdtPYb-vuYAsgZTl_KMbJgUvBLQts_JBrhSlWLCnJFXOW8BoG1AvyRnTAmpFLQb8vdiovhn3sXklpgONC_7_kDDRJdfSG--0zg8dDgM6JdwhxPmfBwmRNqHMk84LXR2ZWd0k7vFcX0nvA2lyXSIic4xL5V3mF1CN9G8quJE72MhXpMXg9tlfHOq5-Tmy-efl1fV9Y-v3y4vrivfNHypHHeo2h644L00HYLSzDdegu-aDpTwTnbcM90NpuVMgJEaDbTMdaLrNEhxTj4cvXOKv_eYFzuG7HG3cxPGfbZaNdy0pmGFfP8kqYxWupXNf0GpQRsBq5EfQZ9izgkHO6cwunSwDOwapd3aNUq7RmnBWHj48LuTfd-N2D-unLIrwKcjgOVsdwGTzT7g5LEPqVzY9jE85f8H9aexGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57078301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An exploratory study in the UK of the effectiveness of three different pain management regimens for post-caesarean section women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Snell, Pamela ; Hicks, Carolyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Snell, Pamela ; Hicks, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><description>to compare the effects of three types of analgesic administration after elective caesarean section on a number of clinical outcome measures. Supplementary aims of the study were to determine the acceptability of, and satisfaction with, the different regimens. a quasi-experimental different subject design was used to compare three types of analgesic administration on pain, post-operative nausea and vomiting, analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay and overall satisfaction with pain management. a specialist women's hospital in a large UK city, with around 1500 caesarean sections per annum. 95 women who had undergone elective caesarean section. the women were allocated to one of the three pain management groups: group 1 (oral morphine, Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all self-administered]); group 2 (oral morphine, Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all midwife-administered]); and Group 3 (intra-muscular morphine, oral Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all midwife-administered]). The safety of self-medication was measured by adherence to a safety protocol. data collection was undertaken over the first 3 days after surgery and included visual analogue scale (0–100 mm) pain scores, analgesic consumption, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting, and length of hospital stay. In addition, questionnaires were given to midwives and patients to assess the acceptability of self-medication and patient satisfaction. Data collection took place between June 2002 and June 2003. the results indicated that the outcomes of all three interventions were comparable in terms of pain scores, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting, and overall levels of satisfaction, although intra-muscular morphine was disliked to a degree that deterred some women from requesting it. Consumption of oral morphine was significantly greater than consumption of intramuscular injections of morphine, whereas Co-dydramol use was lower in the self-medicating group; the self-medicating women also went home, on average, a day earlier than women in the other two groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-6138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2005.08.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16356609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods ; Analgesics ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration &amp; dosage ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage ; Caesarean section ; Cesarean Section - adverse effects ; Clinical outcomes ; Diclofenac - administration &amp; dosage ; Drug Administration Routes ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Morphine ; Morphine - administration &amp; dosage ; Nursing ; Pain management ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Pain, Postoperative - etiology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postoperative pain ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Self Administration - methods ; Self-medication ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Midwifery, 2006-09, Vol.22 (3), p.249-261</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a2ae69d0232d58be0671c4c50cb4b063ca5b2c17bf892130857e8091ab3bb7053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a2ae69d0232d58be0671c4c50cb4b063ca5b2c17bf892130857e8091ab3bb7053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613805000847$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,30979,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snell, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><title>An exploratory study in the UK of the effectiveness of three different pain management regimens for post-caesarean section women</title><title>Midwifery</title><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><description>to compare the effects of three types of analgesic administration after elective caesarean section on a number of clinical outcome measures. Supplementary aims of the study were to determine the acceptability of, and satisfaction with, the different regimens. a quasi-experimental different subject design was used to compare three types of analgesic administration on pain, post-operative nausea and vomiting, analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay and overall satisfaction with pain management. a specialist women's hospital in a large UK city, with around 1500 caesarean sections per annum. 95 women who had undergone elective caesarean section. the women were allocated to one of the three pain management groups: group 1 (oral morphine, Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all self-administered]); group 2 (oral morphine, Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all midwife-administered]); and Group 3 (intra-muscular morphine, oral Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all midwife-administered]). The safety of self-medication was measured by adherence to a safety protocol. data collection was undertaken over the first 3 days after surgery and included visual analogue scale (0–100 mm) pain scores, analgesic consumption, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting, and length of hospital stay. In addition, questionnaires were given to midwives and patients to assess the acceptability of self-medication and patient satisfaction. Data collection took place between June 2002 and June 2003. the results indicated that the outcomes of all three interventions were comparable in terms of pain scores, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting, and overall levels of satisfaction, although intra-muscular morphine was disliked to a degree that deterred some women from requesting it. Consumption of oral morphine was significantly greater than consumption of intramuscular injections of morphine, whereas Co-dydramol use was lower in the self-medicating group; the self-medicating women also went home, on average, a day earlier than women in the other two groups.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Caesarean section</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Diclofenac - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Drug Administration Routes</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Postoperative pain</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Self Administration - methods</subject><subject>Self-medication</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0266-6138</issn><issn>1532-3099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAPsEpYWzHH5G4VBVQRCUu9Gw5zqR4tYmDnW3ZGz8dp7tSb-U049Ezj6x5CXnLoGbA1MdtPYb-vuYAsgZTl_KMbJgUvBLQts_JBrhSlWLCnJFXOW8BoG1AvyRnTAmpFLQb8vdiovhn3sXklpgONC_7_kDDRJdfSG--0zg8dDgM6JdwhxPmfBwmRNqHMk84LXR2ZWd0k7vFcX0nvA2lyXSIic4xL5V3mF1CN9G8quJE72MhXpMXg9tlfHOq5-Tmy-efl1fV9Y-v3y4vrivfNHypHHeo2h644L00HYLSzDdegu-aDpTwTnbcM90NpuVMgJEaDbTMdaLrNEhxTj4cvXOKv_eYFzuG7HG3cxPGfbZaNdy0pmGFfP8kqYxWupXNf0GpQRsBq5EfQZ9izgkHO6cwunSwDOwapd3aNUq7RmnBWHj48LuTfd-N2D-unLIrwKcjgOVsdwGTzT7g5LEPqVzY9jE85f8H9aexGg</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Snell, Pamela</creator><creator>Hicks, Carolyn</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>An exploratory study in the UK of the effectiveness of three different pain management regimens for post-caesarean section women</title><author>Snell, Pamela ; Hicks, Carolyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a2ae69d0232d58be0671c4c50cb4b063ca5b2c17bf892130857e8091ab3bb7053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Caesarean section</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Diclofenac - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Drug Administration Routes</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Postoperative pain</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Self Administration - methods</topic><topic>Self-medication</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snell, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snell, Pamela</au><au>Hicks, Carolyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An exploratory study in the UK of the effectiveness of three different pain management regimens for post-caesarean section women</atitle><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>249-261</pages><issn>0266-6138</issn><eissn>1532-3099</eissn><abstract>to compare the effects of three types of analgesic administration after elective caesarean section on a number of clinical outcome measures. Supplementary aims of the study were to determine the acceptability of, and satisfaction with, the different regimens. a quasi-experimental different subject design was used to compare three types of analgesic administration on pain, post-operative nausea and vomiting, analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay and overall satisfaction with pain management. a specialist women's hospital in a large UK city, with around 1500 caesarean sections per annum. 95 women who had undergone elective caesarean section. the women were allocated to one of the three pain management groups: group 1 (oral morphine, Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all self-administered]); group 2 (oral morphine, Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all midwife-administered]); and Group 3 (intra-muscular morphine, oral Co-dydramol and diclofenac [all midwife-administered]). The safety of self-medication was measured by adherence to a safety protocol. data collection was undertaken over the first 3 days after surgery and included visual analogue scale (0–100 mm) pain scores, analgesic consumption, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting, and length of hospital stay. In addition, questionnaires were given to midwives and patients to assess the acceptability of self-medication and patient satisfaction. Data collection took place between June 2002 and June 2003. the results indicated that the outcomes of all three interventions were comparable in terms of pain scores, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting, and overall levels of satisfaction, although intra-muscular morphine was disliked to a degree that deterred some women from requesting it. Consumption of oral morphine was significantly greater than consumption of intramuscular injections of morphine, whereas Co-dydramol use was lower in the self-medicating group; the self-medicating women also went home, on average, a day earlier than women in the other two groups.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16356609</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.midw.2005.08.005</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-6138
ispartof Midwifery, 2006-09, Vol.22 (3), p.249-261
issn 0266-6138
1532-3099
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764289841
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adult
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods
Analgesics
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Caesarean section
Cesarean Section - adverse effects
Clinical outcomes
Diclofenac - administration & dosage
Drug Administration Routes
Elective Surgical Procedures
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Morphine
Morphine - administration & dosage
Nursing
Pain management
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Pain, Postoperative - etiology
Patient Satisfaction
Postoperative pain
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Self Administration - methods
Self-medication
Surveys and Questionnaires
United Kingdom
title An exploratory study in the UK of the effectiveness of three different pain management regimens for post-caesarean section women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T11%3A44%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20exploratory%20study%20in%20the%20UK%20of%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20three%20different%20pain%20management%20regimens%20for%20post-caesarean%20section%20women&rft.jtitle=Midwifery&rft.au=Snell,%20Pamela&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=249-261&rft.issn=0266-6138&rft.eissn=1532-3099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.midw.2005.08.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68767954%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57078301&rft_id=info:pmid/16356609&rft_els_id=S0266613805000847&rfr_iscdi=true