The response to challenging behaviour by care staff: emotional responses, attributions of cause and observations of practice

Background  Previous studies have attempted to apply Weiner's attributional model of helping behaviour to care staff who work with service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours by using studies based on vignettes. The aims of the current study were to investigate the a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of intellectual disability research 2006-03, Vol.50 (3), p.199-211
Hauptverfasser: Bailey, B. A., Hare, D. J., Hatton, C., Limb, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 211
container_issue 3
container_start_page 199
container_title Journal of intellectual disability research
container_volume 50
creator Bailey, B. A.
Hare, D. J.
Hatton, C.
Limb, K.
description Background  Previous studies have attempted to apply Weiner's attributional model of helping behaviour to care staff who work with service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours by using studies based on vignettes. The aims of the current study were to investigate the application of Weiner's model to ‘real’ service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours and to observe the care staff's actual responses to challenging behaviours displayed by service users. Also, to compare care staff attributions, emotions, optimism, willingness to help and observed helping behaviours for self‐injurious behaviours in comparison to other forms of challenging behaviours. Method  A total of 27 care staff completed two sets of measures, one set regarding a self‐injurious behaviour and the other regarding other forms of challenging behaviour. An additional 16 staff completed one set of measures. The measures focused on care staff attributions, emotions, optimism and willingness to help. Also, 16 of the care staff were observed interacting with the service users to collect data regarding their responses to challenging behaviours. Results  For both self‐injurious behaviours and other forms of challenging behaviour, associations were found between the care staff internal, stable and uncontrollable attribution scores and care staff negative emotion scores. However, no associations were found between the care staff levels of emotion, optimism and willingness to help. Some associations were found between the care staff levels of willingness to help and observed helping behaviours. There were significant differences between the care staff attribution scores with higher scores being obtained for uncontrollable and stable attributions for other forms of challenging behaviours. No significant differences were found between the care staff emotions, optimism, willingness to help and observed helping behaviours. Conclusions  The results did not provide support for Weiner's attributional model of helping behaviour. However, a preliminary model of negative care staff behaviour was derived from the exploratory analyses completed. This model proposes that there are associations between internal, stable and uncontrollable attributions and negative emotions in care staff and also between negative emotions and negative behaviours displayed by care staff in response to the actions of service users.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00769.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764286146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ732944</ericid><sourcerecordid>764286146</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5459-956bd601785adf9892906a61454988aed38fdb9fd638c57cf255fa3e7bb226383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1v0zAYhSPExMrgHyBkIQE3S_FH_IW4QdNYNyZAqIhLy3Hs1SVNip2MVuLH45Aqk7gAfGNL5zmv7XOyDCA4R2m9Ws8RYTTHXIg5hpDOIeRMznf3stkk3M9mULIix4yQ4-xhjGsIIUMFe5AdI1YQyAmaZT-XKwuCjdu2iRZ0LTArXde2ufHNDSjtSt_6tg-g3AOjgwWx0869BnbTdr5tdD1Z4ynQXRd82Q9CBK1Lhj6N1E0F2jLacKsnZRu06byxj7Ijp-toHx_2k-zLu_Pl2SK__nhxefb2Oje0oDKXlJUVg4gLqisnhcQSMp2-QgsphLYVEa4qpasYEYZy4zClThPLyxKn3wtykr0c525D-723sVMbH42ta93Yto-KswKLIZpEvvg7CTliHNJ_gpSjAhJEEvjsD3CdAk3RRYXTpZJAzBMkRsiENsZgndoGv9FhrxBUQ-NqrYZi1VCsGhpXvxtXu2R9epjflxtb3RkPFSfg-QHQ0ejaBd0YH-84TgURVCbuycjZ4M0kn19xgmVRJPnNKP_wtd3_9_vU1eXndEj2fLT72NndZNfhm2KccKq-frhIgfDlp_cLohbkF1V03yY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>228693027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The response to challenging behaviour by care staff: emotional responses, attributions of cause and observations of practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Bailey, B. A. ; Hare, D. J. ; Hatton, C. ; Limb, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bailey, B. A. ; Hare, D. J. ; Hatton, C. ; Limb, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Background  Previous studies have attempted to apply Weiner's attributional model of helping behaviour to care staff who work with service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours by using studies based on vignettes. The aims of the current study were to investigate the application of Weiner's model to ‘real’ service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours and to observe the care staff's actual responses to challenging behaviours displayed by service users. Also, to compare care staff attributions, emotions, optimism, willingness to help and observed helping behaviours for self‐injurious behaviours in comparison to other forms of challenging behaviours. Method  A total of 27 care staff completed two sets of measures, one set regarding a self‐injurious behaviour and the other regarding other forms of challenging behaviour. An additional 16 staff completed one set of measures. The measures focused on care staff attributions, emotions, optimism and willingness to help. Also, 16 of the care staff were observed interacting with the service users to collect data regarding their responses to challenging behaviours. Results  For both self‐injurious behaviours and other forms of challenging behaviour, associations were found between the care staff internal, stable and uncontrollable attribution scores and care staff negative emotion scores. However, no associations were found between the care staff levels of emotion, optimism and willingness to help. Some associations were found between the care staff levels of willingness to help and observed helping behaviours. There were significant differences between the care staff attribution scores with higher scores being obtained for uncontrollable and stable attributions for other forms of challenging behaviours. No significant differences were found between the care staff emotions, optimism, willingness to help and observed helping behaviours. Conclusions  The results did not provide support for Weiner's attributional model of helping behaviour. However, a preliminary model of negative care staff behaviour was derived from the exploratory analyses completed. This model proposes that there are associations between internal, stable and uncontrollable attributions and negative emotions in care staff and also between negative emotions and negative behaviours displayed by care staff in response to the actions of service users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00769.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16430731</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Behavior ; Behavior Problems ; Behavior Therapy ; Behavioural problems ; Biological and medical sciences ; Caregivers ; Carers ; challenging behaviour ; Day Care, Medical ; Emotional Response ; Emotional responses ; Emotions ; Employee Performance Appraisal ; Feedback (Response) ; Female ; Health staff related problems. Vocational training ; Helping Behavior ; Helping Relationship ; Humans ; Intellectual Disability ; Intellectual Disability - psychology ; Intellectual Disability - therapy ; Internal-External Control ; Learning disabilities ; Learning disabled people ; Male ; Measures (Individuals) ; Medical sciences ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Mental Retardation ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Psychological Patterns ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Residential Care ; Self Destructive Behavior ; Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology ; Self-Injurious Behavior - therapy ; self-injurious behaviour ; Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry ; Social Reinforcement ; Staff ; staff behaviour ; staff emotions ; Vignettes ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 2006-03, Vol.50 (3), p.199-211</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Mar 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5459-956bd601785adf9892906a61454988aed38fdb9fd638c57cf255fa3e7bb226383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5459-956bd601785adf9892906a61454988aed38fdb9fd638c57cf255fa3e7bb226383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2005.00769.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2005.00769.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,31006,31007,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ732944$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17583859$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16430731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bailey, B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatton, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limb, K.</creatorcontrib><title>The response to challenging behaviour by care staff: emotional responses, attributions of cause and observations of practice</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>Background  Previous studies have attempted to apply Weiner's attributional model of helping behaviour to care staff who work with service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours by using studies based on vignettes. The aims of the current study were to investigate the application of Weiner's model to ‘real’ service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours and to observe the care staff's actual responses to challenging behaviours displayed by service users. Also, to compare care staff attributions, emotions, optimism, willingness to help and observed helping behaviours for self‐injurious behaviours in comparison to other forms of challenging behaviours. Method  A total of 27 care staff completed two sets of measures, one set regarding a self‐injurious behaviour and the other regarding other forms of challenging behaviour. An additional 16 staff completed one set of measures. The measures focused on care staff attributions, emotions, optimism and willingness to help. Also, 16 of the care staff were observed interacting with the service users to collect data regarding their responses to challenging behaviours. Results  For both self‐injurious behaviours and other forms of challenging behaviour, associations were found between the care staff internal, stable and uncontrollable attribution scores and care staff negative emotion scores. However, no associations were found between the care staff levels of emotion, optimism and willingness to help. Some associations were found between the care staff levels of willingness to help and observed helping behaviours. There were significant differences between the care staff attribution scores with higher scores being obtained for uncontrollable and stable attributions for other forms of challenging behaviours. No significant differences were found between the care staff emotions, optimism, willingness to help and observed helping behaviours. Conclusions  The results did not provide support for Weiner's attributional model of helping behaviour. However, a preliminary model of negative care staff behaviour was derived from the exploratory analyses completed. This model proposes that there are associations between internal, stable and uncontrollable attributions and negative emotions in care staff and also between negative emotions and negative behaviours displayed by care staff in response to the actions of service users.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy</subject><subject>Behavioural problems</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Carers</subject><subject>challenging behaviour</subject><subject>Day Care, Medical</subject><subject>Emotional Response</subject><subject>Emotional responses</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Employee Performance Appraisal</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health staff related problems. Vocational training</subject><subject>Helping Behavior</subject><subject>Helping Relationship</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - psychology</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - therapy</subject><subject>Internal-External Control</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Learning disabled people</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Mental Retardation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Residential Care</subject><subject>Self Destructive Behavior</subject><subject>Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Self-Injurious Behavior - therapy</subject><subject>self-injurious behaviour</subject><subject>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</subject><subject>Social Reinforcement</subject><subject>Staff</subject><subject>staff behaviour</subject><subject>staff emotions</subject><subject>Vignettes</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1v0zAYhSPExMrgHyBkIQE3S_FH_IW4QdNYNyZAqIhLy3Hs1SVNip2MVuLH45Aqk7gAfGNL5zmv7XOyDCA4R2m9Ws8RYTTHXIg5hpDOIeRMznf3stkk3M9mULIix4yQ4-xhjGsIIUMFe5AdI1YQyAmaZT-XKwuCjdu2iRZ0LTArXde2ufHNDSjtSt_6tg-g3AOjgwWx0869BnbTdr5tdD1Z4ynQXRd82Q9CBK1Lhj6N1E0F2jLacKsnZRu06byxj7Ijp-toHx_2k-zLu_Pl2SK__nhxefb2Oje0oDKXlJUVg4gLqisnhcQSMp2-QgsphLYVEa4qpasYEYZy4zClThPLyxKn3wtykr0c525D-723sVMbH42ta93Yto-KswKLIZpEvvg7CTliHNJ_gpSjAhJEEvjsD3CdAk3RRYXTpZJAzBMkRsiENsZgndoGv9FhrxBUQ-NqrYZi1VCsGhpXvxtXu2R9epjflxtb3RkPFSfg-QHQ0ejaBd0YH-84TgURVCbuycjZ4M0kn19xgmVRJPnNKP_wtd3_9_vU1eXndEj2fLT72NndZNfhm2KccKq-frhIgfDlp_cLohbkF1V03yY</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Bailey, B. A.</creator><creator>Hare, D. J.</creator><creator>Hatton, C.</creator><creator>Limb, K.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>The response to challenging behaviour by care staff: emotional responses, attributions of cause and observations of practice</title><author>Bailey, B. A. ; Hare, D. J. ; Hatton, C. ; Limb, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5459-956bd601785adf9892906a61454988aed38fdb9fd638c57cf255fa3e7bb226383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy</topic><topic>Behavioural problems</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Carers</topic><topic>challenging behaviour</topic><topic>Day Care, Medical</topic><topic>Emotional Response</topic><topic>Emotional responses</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Employee Performance Appraisal</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health staff related problems. Vocational training</topic><topic>Helping Behavior</topic><topic>Helping Relationship</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - psychology</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - therapy</topic><topic>Internal-External Control</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Learning disabled people</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Mental Retardation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Residential Care</topic><topic>Self Destructive Behavior</topic><topic>Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Self-Injurious Behavior - therapy</topic><topic>self-injurious behaviour</topic><topic>Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry</topic><topic>Social Reinforcement</topic><topic>Staff</topic><topic>staff behaviour</topic><topic>staff emotions</topic><topic>Vignettes</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bailey, B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatton, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Limb, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bailey, B. A.</au><au>Hare, D. J.</au><au>Hatton, C.</au><au>Limb, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ732944</ericid><atitle>The response to challenging behaviour by care staff: emotional responses, attributions of cause and observations of practice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>199-211</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><coden>JIDREN</coden><abstract>Background  Previous studies have attempted to apply Weiner's attributional model of helping behaviour to care staff who work with service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours by using studies based on vignettes. The aims of the current study were to investigate the application of Weiner's model to ‘real’ service users with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours and to observe the care staff's actual responses to challenging behaviours displayed by service users. Also, to compare care staff attributions, emotions, optimism, willingness to help and observed helping behaviours for self‐injurious behaviours in comparison to other forms of challenging behaviours. Method  A total of 27 care staff completed two sets of measures, one set regarding a self‐injurious behaviour and the other regarding other forms of challenging behaviour. An additional 16 staff completed one set of measures. The measures focused on care staff attributions, emotions, optimism and willingness to help. Also, 16 of the care staff were observed interacting with the service users to collect data regarding their responses to challenging behaviours. Results  For both self‐injurious behaviours and other forms of challenging behaviour, associations were found between the care staff internal, stable and uncontrollable attribution scores and care staff negative emotion scores. However, no associations were found between the care staff levels of emotion, optimism and willingness to help. Some associations were found between the care staff levels of willingness to help and observed helping behaviours. There were significant differences between the care staff attribution scores with higher scores being obtained for uncontrollable and stable attributions for other forms of challenging behaviours. No significant differences were found between the care staff emotions, optimism, willingness to help and observed helping behaviours. Conclusions  The results did not provide support for Weiner's attributional model of helping behaviour. However, a preliminary model of negative care staff behaviour was derived from the exploratory analyses completed. This model proposes that there are associations between internal, stable and uncontrollable attributions and negative emotions in care staff and also between negative emotions and negative behaviours displayed by care staff in response to the actions of service users.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>16430731</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00769.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-2633
ispartof Journal of intellectual disability research, 2006-03, Vol.50 (3), p.199-211
issn 0964-2633
1365-2788
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764286146
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source
subjects Adult
Aged
Attitude of Health Personnel
Behavior
Behavior Problems
Behavior Therapy
Behavioural problems
Biological and medical sciences
Caregivers
Carers
challenging behaviour
Day Care, Medical
Emotional Response
Emotional responses
Emotions
Employee Performance Appraisal
Feedback (Response)
Female
Health staff related problems. Vocational training
Helping Behavior
Helping Relationship
Humans
Intellectual Disability
Intellectual Disability - psychology
Intellectual Disability - therapy
Internal-External Control
Learning disabilities
Learning disabled people
Male
Measures (Individuals)
Medical sciences
Mental Disorders - psychology
Mental Disorders - therapy
Mental Retardation
Middle Aged
Motivation
Professional-Patient Relations
Psychological Patterns
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Residential Care
Self Destructive Behavior
Self-Injurious Behavior - psychology
Self-Injurious Behavior - therapy
self-injurious behaviour
Social psychiatry. Ethnopsychiatry
Social Reinforcement
Staff
staff behaviour
staff emotions
Vignettes
Young Children
title The response to challenging behaviour by care staff: emotional responses, attributions of cause and observations of practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T20%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20response%20to%20challenging%20behaviour%20by%20care%20staff:%20emotional%20responses,%20attributions%20of%20cause%20and%20observations%20of%20practice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=Bailey,%20B.%20A.&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=199-211&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft.coden=JIDREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00769.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E764286146%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=228693027&rft_id=info:pmid/16430731&rft_ericid=EJ732944&rfr_iscdi=true