Major epidemiological changes in sudden infant death syndrome: a 20-year population-based study in the UK
Results of case-control studies in the past 5 years suggest that the epidemiology of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has changed since the 1991 UK Back to Sleep campaign. The campaign's advice that parents put babies on their back to sleep led to a fall in death rates. We used a longitudina...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2006-01, Vol.367 (9507), p.314-319 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 319 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9507 |
container_start_page | 314 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 367 |
creator | Blair, Peter S Sidebotham, Peter Berry, P Jeremy Evans, Margaret Fleming, Peter J |
description | Results of case-control studies in the past 5 years suggest that the epidemiology of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has changed since the 1991 UK Back to Sleep campaign. The campaign's advice that parents put babies on their back to sleep led to a fall in death rates. We used a longitudinal dataset to assess these potential changes.
Population-based data from home visits have been collected for 369 consecutive unexpected infant deaths (300 SIDS and 69 explained deaths) in Avon over 20 years (1984–2003). Data obtained between 1993 and 1996 from 1300 controls with a chosen “reference” sleep before interview have been used for comparison.
Over the past 20 years, the proportion of children who died from SIDS while co-sleeping with their parents, has risen from 12% to 50% (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67968-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764277136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673606679683</els_id><sourcerecordid>70738898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-a70f1ab01234b51e5b612a23900dcd545fb887f81e0a5202e949c9c789302f713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0buO1DAUBmALgdhh4RFAFgWXInAcO77QILTiJhZRwEp0lmOf7HiUxMFOkObtyeyMQKKAyi6-81s-PyEPGbxgwOTLr8AEVFJx-Qzkc6mM1BW_RTZMKFE1Qn2_TTa_yRm5V8oOAISE5i45Y1IIDlxvSPzsdilTnGLAIaY-XUfveuq3brzGQuNIyxICjuutc-NMA7p5S8t-DDkN-Io6WkO1R5fplKald3NMY9W6goGWeQn7Q8K8RXr16T6507m-4IPTeU6u3r39dvGhuvzy_uPFm8vKC2nmyinomGuB1Vy0DcOmlax2NTcAwYdGNF2rteo0Q3BNDTUaYbzxShsOdacYPydPj7lTTj8WLLMdYvHY927EtBSrpKjV6uQqn_xbguJaG73Cx3_BXVryuP7CMmNAMK7Fipoj8jmVkrGzU46Dy3vLwB4qszeV2UMfFqS9qczyde7RKXxpBwx_pk4dreD1EeC6tZ8Rsy0-4ugxxIx-tiHF_zzxC7tzpFo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199041384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Major epidemiological changes in sudden infant death syndrome: a 20-year population-based study in the UK</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Blair, Peter S ; Sidebotham, Peter ; Berry, P Jeremy ; Evans, Margaret ; Fleming, Peter J</creator><creatorcontrib>Blair, Peter S ; Sidebotham, Peter ; Berry, P Jeremy ; Evans, Margaret ; Fleming, Peter J</creatorcontrib><description>Results of case-control studies in the past 5 years suggest that the epidemiology of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has changed since the 1991 UK Back to Sleep campaign. The campaign's advice that parents put babies on their back to sleep led to a fall in death rates. We used a longitudinal dataset to assess these potential changes.
Population-based data from home visits have been collected for 369 consecutive unexpected infant deaths (300 SIDS and 69 explained deaths) in Avon over 20 years (1984–2003). Data obtained between 1993 and 1996 from 1300 controls with a chosen “reference” sleep before interview have been used for comparison.
Over the past 20 years, the proportion of children who died from SIDS while co-sleeping with their parents, has risen from 12% to 50% (p<0·0001), but the actual number of SIDS deaths in the parental bed has halved (p=0·01). The proportion seems to have increased partly because the Back to Sleep campaign led to fewer deaths in infants sleeping alone—rather than because of a rise in deaths of infants who bed-shared, and partly because of an increase in the number of deaths in infants sleeping with their parents on a sofa. The proportion of deaths in families from deprived socioeconomic backgrounds has risen from 47% to 74% (p=0·003), the prevalence of maternal smoking during pregnancy from 57% to 86% (p=0·0004), and the proportion of pre-term infants from 12% to 34% (p=0·0001). Although many SIDS infants come from large families, first-born infants are now the largest group. The age of infants who bed-share is significantly smaller than that before the campaign, and fewer are breastfed.
Factors that contribute to SIDS have changed in their importance over the past 20 years. Although the reasons for the rise in deaths when a parent sleeps with their infant on a sofa are still unclear, we strongly recommend that parents avoid this sleeping environment. Most SIDS deaths now occur in deprived families. To better understand contributory factors and plan preventive measures we need control data from similarly deprived families, and particularly, infant sleep environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67968-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16443038</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Case-Control Studies ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Male ; Population studies ; Population Surveillance - methods ; Poverty ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; SIDS ; Single Parent ; Sleep ; Social Class ; Sudden Infant Death - epidemiology ; Sudden Infant Death - etiology ; Sudden Infant Death - prevention & control ; Sudden infant death syndrome ; Supine Position ; United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2006-01, Vol.367 (9507), p.314-319</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Jan 28-Feb 3, 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-a70f1ab01234b51e5b612a23900dcd545fb887f81e0a5202e949c9c789302f713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-a70f1ab01234b51e5b612a23900dcd545fb887f81e0a5202e949c9c789302f713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/199041384?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16443038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blair, Peter S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidebotham, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, P Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Peter J</creatorcontrib><title>Major epidemiological changes in sudden infant death syndrome: a 20-year population-based study in the UK</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Results of case-control studies in the past 5 years suggest that the epidemiology of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has changed since the 1991 UK Back to Sleep campaign. The campaign's advice that parents put babies on their back to sleep led to a fall in death rates. We used a longitudinal dataset to assess these potential changes.
Population-based data from home visits have been collected for 369 consecutive unexpected infant deaths (300 SIDS and 69 explained deaths) in Avon over 20 years (1984–2003). Data obtained between 1993 and 1996 from 1300 controls with a chosen “reference” sleep before interview have been used for comparison.
Over the past 20 years, the proportion of children who died from SIDS while co-sleeping with their parents, has risen from 12% to 50% (p<0·0001), but the actual number of SIDS deaths in the parental bed has halved (p=0·01). The proportion seems to have increased partly because the Back to Sleep campaign led to fewer deaths in infants sleeping alone—rather than because of a rise in deaths of infants who bed-shared, and partly because of an increase in the number of deaths in infants sleeping with their parents on a sofa. The proportion of deaths in families from deprived socioeconomic backgrounds has risen from 47% to 74% (p=0·003), the prevalence of maternal smoking during pregnancy from 57% to 86% (p=0·0004), and the proportion of pre-term infants from 12% to 34% (p=0·0001). Although many SIDS infants come from large families, first-born infants are now the largest group. The age of infants who bed-share is significantly smaller than that before the campaign, and fewer are breastfed.
Factors that contribute to SIDS have changed in their importance over the past 20 years. Although the reasons for the rise in deaths when a parent sleeps with their infant on a sofa are still unclear, we strongly recommend that parents avoid this sleeping environment. Most SIDS deaths now occur in deprived families. To better understand contributory factors and plan preventive measures we need control data from similarly deprived families, and particularly, infant sleep environments.</description><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population Surveillance - methods</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>SIDS</subject><subject>Single Parent</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Sudden Infant Death - epidemiology</subject><subject>Sudden Infant Death - etiology</subject><subject>Sudden Infant Death - prevention & control</subject><subject>Sudden infant death syndrome</subject><subject>Supine Position</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0buO1DAUBmALgdhh4RFAFgWXInAcO77QILTiJhZRwEp0lmOf7HiUxMFOkObtyeyMQKKAyi6-81s-PyEPGbxgwOTLr8AEVFJx-Qzkc6mM1BW_RTZMKFE1Qn2_TTa_yRm5V8oOAISE5i45Y1IIDlxvSPzsdilTnGLAIaY-XUfveuq3brzGQuNIyxICjuutc-NMA7p5S8t-DDkN-Io6WkO1R5fplKald3NMY9W6goGWeQn7Q8K8RXr16T6507m-4IPTeU6u3r39dvGhuvzy_uPFm8vKC2nmyinomGuB1Vy0DcOmlax2NTcAwYdGNF2rteo0Q3BNDTUaYbzxShsOdacYPydPj7lTTj8WLLMdYvHY927EtBSrpKjV6uQqn_xbguJaG73Cx3_BXVryuP7CMmNAMK7Fipoj8jmVkrGzU46Dy3vLwB4qszeV2UMfFqS9qczyde7RKXxpBwx_pk4dreD1EeC6tZ8Rsy0-4ugxxIx-tiHF_zzxC7tzpFo</recordid><startdate>20060128</startdate><enddate>20060128</enddate><creator>Blair, Peter S</creator><creator>Sidebotham, Peter</creator><creator>Berry, P Jeremy</creator><creator>Evans, Margaret</creator><creator>Fleming, Peter J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060128</creationdate><title>Major epidemiological changes in sudden infant death syndrome: a 20-year population-based study in the UK</title><author>Blair, Peter S ; Sidebotham, Peter ; Berry, P Jeremy ; Evans, Margaret ; Fleming, Peter J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-a70f1ab01234b51e5b612a23900dcd545fb887f81e0a5202e949c9c789302f713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population Surveillance - methods</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>SIDS</topic><topic>Single Parent</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Sudden Infant Death - epidemiology</topic><topic>Sudden Infant Death - etiology</topic><topic>Sudden Infant Death - prevention & control</topic><topic>Sudden infant death syndrome</topic><topic>Supine Position</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blair, Peter S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidebotham, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, P Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Peter J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blair, Peter S</au><au>Sidebotham, Peter</au><au>Berry, P Jeremy</au><au>Evans, Margaret</au><au>Fleming, Peter J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Major epidemiological changes in sudden infant death syndrome: a 20-year population-based study in the UK</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2006-01-28</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>367</volume><issue>9507</issue><spage>314</spage><epage>319</epage><pages>314-319</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Results of case-control studies in the past 5 years suggest that the epidemiology of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has changed since the 1991 UK Back to Sleep campaign. The campaign's advice that parents put babies on their back to sleep led to a fall in death rates. We used a longitudinal dataset to assess these potential changes.
Population-based data from home visits have been collected for 369 consecutive unexpected infant deaths (300 SIDS and 69 explained deaths) in Avon over 20 years (1984–2003). Data obtained between 1993 and 1996 from 1300 controls with a chosen “reference” sleep before interview have been used for comparison.
Over the past 20 years, the proportion of children who died from SIDS while co-sleeping with their parents, has risen from 12% to 50% (p<0·0001), but the actual number of SIDS deaths in the parental bed has halved (p=0·01). The proportion seems to have increased partly because the Back to Sleep campaign led to fewer deaths in infants sleeping alone—rather than because of a rise in deaths of infants who bed-shared, and partly because of an increase in the number of deaths in infants sleeping with their parents on a sofa. The proportion of deaths in families from deprived socioeconomic backgrounds has risen from 47% to 74% (p=0·003), the prevalence of maternal smoking during pregnancy from 57% to 86% (p=0·0004), and the proportion of pre-term infants from 12% to 34% (p=0·0001). Although many SIDS infants come from large families, first-born infants are now the largest group. The age of infants who bed-share is significantly smaller than that before the campaign, and fewer are breastfed.
Factors that contribute to SIDS have changed in their importance over the past 20 years. Although the reasons for the rise in deaths when a parent sleeps with their infant on a sofa are still unclear, we strongly recommend that parents avoid this sleeping environment. Most SIDS deaths now occur in deprived families. To better understand contributory factors and plan preventive measures we need control data from similarly deprived families, and particularly, infant sleep environments.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16443038</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67968-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2006-01, Vol.367 (9507), p.314-319 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764277136 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Case-Control Studies Epidemiology Female Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Infants Male Population studies Population Surveillance - methods Poverty Prevalence Risk Factors SIDS Single Parent Sleep Social Class Sudden Infant Death - epidemiology Sudden Infant Death - etiology Sudden Infant Death - prevention & control Sudden infant death syndrome Supine Position United Kingdom - epidemiology |
title | Major epidemiological changes in sudden infant death syndrome: a 20-year population-based study in the UK |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A10%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Major%20epidemiological%20changes%20in%20sudden%20infant%20death%20syndrome:%20a%2020-year%20population-based%20study%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Blair,%20Peter%20S&rft.date=2006-01-28&rft.volume=367&rft.issue=9507&rft.spage=314&rft.epage=319&rft.pages=314-319&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67968-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E70738898%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199041384&rft_id=info:pmid/16443038&rft_els_id=S0140673606679683&rfr_iscdi=true |