Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses

Several studies have been published listing sources of practice knowledge used by nurses. However, the authors located no studies that asked clinicians to describe comprehensively and categorize the kinds of knowledge needed to practice or in which the researchers attempted to understand how clinici...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Qualitative health research 2005-04, Vol.15 (4), p.460-476
Hauptverfasser: Estabrooks, Carole A., Rutakumwa, William, O’Leary, Katherine A., Profetto-McGrath, Joanne, Milner, Margaret, Levers, Merry Jo, Scott-Findlay, Shannon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 476
container_issue 4
container_start_page 460
container_title Qualitative health research
container_volume 15
creator Estabrooks, Carole A.
Rutakumwa, William
O’Leary, Katherine A.
Profetto-McGrath, Joanne
Milner, Margaret
Levers, Merry Jo
Scott-Findlay, Shannon
description Several studies have been published listing sources of practice knowledge used by nurses. However, the authors located no studies that asked clinicians to describe comprehensively and categorize the kinds of knowledge needed to practice or in which the researchers attempted to understand how clinicians privilege various knowledge sources. In this article, the authors report findings from two large ethnographic case studies in which sources of practice knowledge was a subsidiary theme. They draw on data from individual and card sort interviews, as well as participant observations, to identify nurses’ sources of practice knowledge. Their findings demonstrate that nurses categorize their sources of practice knowledge into four broad groupings: social interactions, experiential knowledge, documents, and a priori knowledge. The insights gained add new understanding about sources of knowledge used by nurses and challenge the disproportionate weight that proponents of the evidence-based movement ascribe to research knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1049732304273702
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764255765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1049732304273702</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67507124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-9d21cc9bc5d5bed6cda0d8642e73ddeec8f7563ad30a0dce591b324d2fbb3233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvnmTxoCCsTpLNpjmW4hcWFex9ySazpWV3U5Mu0v_elBYKBT3NwPvNG94j5JLCPaVSPlDIlOSMQ8Ykl8COSJ8KwVIphDyOe5TTjd4jZyEsAEAC56ekR4XMKSjeJ3dfrvMGQ-Kq5NNrs5obTN5a91OjnWEyalw7S947HzCck5NK1wEvdnNApk-P0_FLOvl4fh2PJqnhKlulyjJqjCqNsKJEmxurwQ7zjKHk1iKaYSVFzrXlEAWDQtGSs8yyqoyT8wG53douvfvuMKyKZh4M1rVu0XWhkNEqxstFJG_-JXMpQFKWRfD6AFzE1G0MUTAGbJgxRSMEW8h4F4LHqlj6eaP9uqBQbNouDtuOJ1c7365s0O4PdvVGIN0CQc9w__RPw187RITz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220284291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Estabrooks, Carole A. ; Rutakumwa, William ; O’Leary, Katherine A. ; Profetto-McGrath, Joanne ; Milner, Margaret ; Levers, Merry Jo ; Scott-Findlay, Shannon</creator><creatorcontrib>Estabrooks, Carole A. ; Rutakumwa, William ; O’Leary, Katherine A. ; Profetto-McGrath, Joanne ; Milner, Margaret ; Levers, Merry Jo ; Scott-Findlay, Shannon</creatorcontrib><description>Several studies have been published listing sources of practice knowledge used by nurses. However, the authors located no studies that asked clinicians to describe comprehensively and categorize the kinds of knowledge needed to practice or in which the researchers attempted to understand how clinicians privilege various knowledge sources. In this article, the authors report findings from two large ethnographic case studies in which sources of practice knowledge was a subsidiary theme. They draw on data from individual and card sort interviews, as well as participant observations, to identify nurses’ sources of practice knowledge. Their findings demonstrate that nurses categorize their sources of practice knowledge into four broad groupings: social interactions, experiential knowledge, documents, and a priori knowledge. The insights gained add new understanding about sources of knowledge used by nurses and challenge the disproportionate weight that proponents of the evidence-based movement ascribe to research knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049732304273702</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15761093</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QHREEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alberta ; Anthropology, Cultural ; Case studies ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Nurses ; Ontario ; Organizational Case Studies ; Qualitative research</subject><ispartof>Qualitative health research, 2005-04, Vol.15 (4), p.460-476</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-9d21cc9bc5d5bed6cda0d8642e73ddeec8f7563ad30a0dce591b324d2fbb3233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-9d21cc9bc5d5bed6cda0d8642e73ddeec8f7563ad30a0dce591b324d2fbb3233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049732304273702$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732304273702$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,30997,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15761093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Estabrooks, Carole A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutakumwa, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Profetto-McGrath, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levers, Merry Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott-Findlay, Shannon</creatorcontrib><title>Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses</title><title>Qualitative health research</title><addtitle>Qual Health Res</addtitle><description>Several studies have been published listing sources of practice knowledge used by nurses. However, the authors located no studies that asked clinicians to describe comprehensively and categorize the kinds of knowledge needed to practice or in which the researchers attempted to understand how clinicians privilege various knowledge sources. In this article, the authors report findings from two large ethnographic case studies in which sources of practice knowledge was a subsidiary theme. They draw on data from individual and card sort interviews, as well as participant observations, to identify nurses’ sources of practice knowledge. Their findings demonstrate that nurses categorize their sources of practice knowledge into four broad groupings: social interactions, experiential knowledge, documents, and a priori knowledge. The insights gained add new understanding about sources of knowledge used by nurses and challenge the disproportionate weight that proponents of the evidence-based movement ascribe to research knowledge.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alberta</subject><subject>Anthropology, Cultural</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Organizational Case Studies</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><issn>1049-7323</issn><issn>1552-7557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvnmTxoCCsTpLNpjmW4hcWFex9ySazpWV3U5Mu0v_elBYKBT3NwPvNG94j5JLCPaVSPlDIlOSMQ8Ykl8COSJ8KwVIphDyOe5TTjd4jZyEsAEAC56ekR4XMKSjeJ3dfrvMGQ-Kq5NNrs5obTN5a91OjnWEyalw7S947HzCck5NK1wEvdnNApk-P0_FLOvl4fh2PJqnhKlulyjJqjCqNsKJEmxurwQ7zjKHk1iKaYSVFzrXlEAWDQtGSs8yyqoyT8wG53douvfvuMKyKZh4M1rVu0XWhkNEqxstFJG_-JXMpQFKWRfD6AFzE1G0MUTAGbJgxRSMEW8h4F4LHqlj6eaP9uqBQbNouDtuOJ1c7365s0O4PdvVGIN0CQc9w__RPw187RITz</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>Estabrooks, Carole A.</creator><creator>Rutakumwa, William</creator><creator>O’Leary, Katherine A.</creator><creator>Profetto-McGrath, Joanne</creator><creator>Milner, Margaret</creator><creator>Levers, Merry Jo</creator><creator>Scott-Findlay, Shannon</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses</title><author>Estabrooks, Carole A. ; Rutakumwa, William ; O’Leary, Katherine A. ; Profetto-McGrath, Joanne ; Milner, Margaret ; Levers, Merry Jo ; Scott-Findlay, Shannon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-9d21cc9bc5d5bed6cda0d8642e73ddeec8f7563ad30a0dce591b324d2fbb3233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alberta</topic><topic>Anthropology, Cultural</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Organizational Case Studies</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Estabrooks, Carole A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutakumwa, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Profetto-McGrath, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levers, Merry Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott-Findlay, Shannon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Qualitative health research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Estabrooks, Carole A.</au><au>Rutakumwa, William</au><au>O’Leary, Katherine A.</au><au>Profetto-McGrath, Joanne</au><au>Milner, Margaret</au><au>Levers, Merry Jo</au><au>Scott-Findlay, Shannon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative health research</jtitle><addtitle>Qual Health Res</addtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>476</epage><pages>460-476</pages><issn>1049-7323</issn><eissn>1552-7557</eissn><coden>QHREEM</coden><abstract>Several studies have been published listing sources of practice knowledge used by nurses. However, the authors located no studies that asked clinicians to describe comprehensively and categorize the kinds of knowledge needed to practice or in which the researchers attempted to understand how clinicians privilege various knowledge sources. In this article, the authors report findings from two large ethnographic case studies in which sources of practice knowledge was a subsidiary theme. They draw on data from individual and card sort interviews, as well as participant observations, to identify nurses’ sources of practice knowledge. Their findings demonstrate that nurses categorize their sources of practice knowledge into four broad groupings: social interactions, experiential knowledge, documents, and a priori knowledge. The insights gained add new understanding about sources of knowledge used by nurses and challenge the disproportionate weight that proponents of the evidence-based movement ascribe to research knowledge.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>15761093</pmid><doi>10.1177/1049732304273702</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-7323
ispartof Qualitative health research, 2005-04, Vol.15 (4), p.460-476
issn 1049-7323
1552-7557
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764255765
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Adult
Alberta
Anthropology, Cultural
Case studies
Health technology assessment
Humans
Knowledge
Nurses
Ontario
Organizational Case Studies
Qualitative research
title Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A13%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sources%20of%20Practice%20Knowledge%20Among%20Nurses&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20health%20research&rft.au=Estabrooks,%20Carole%20A.&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=476&rft.pages=460-476&rft.issn=1049-7323&rft.eissn=1552-7557&rft.coden=QHREEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049732304273702&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67507124%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220284291&rft_id=info:pmid/15761093&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049732304273702&rfr_iscdi=true