Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses
Several studies have been published listing sources of practice knowledge used by nurses. However, the authors located no studies that asked clinicians to describe comprehensively and categorize the kinds of knowledge needed to practice or in which the researchers attempted to understand how clinici...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Qualitative health research 2005-04, Vol.15 (4), p.460-476 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 476 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 460 |
container_title | Qualitative health research |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Estabrooks, Carole A. Rutakumwa, William O’Leary, Katherine A. Profetto-McGrath, Joanne Milner, Margaret Levers, Merry Jo Scott-Findlay, Shannon |
description | Several studies have been published listing sources of practice knowledge used by nurses. However, the authors located no studies that asked clinicians to describe comprehensively and categorize the kinds of knowledge needed to practice or in which the researchers attempted to understand how clinicians privilege various knowledge sources. In this article, the authors report findings from two large ethnographic case studies in which sources of practice knowledge was a subsidiary theme. They draw on data from individual and card sort interviews, as well as participant observations, to identify nurses’ sources of practice knowledge. Their findings demonstrate that nurses categorize their sources of practice knowledge into four broad groupings: social interactions, experiential knowledge, documents, and a priori knowledge. The insights gained add new understanding about sources of knowledge used by nurses and challenge the disproportionate weight that proponents of the evidence-based movement ascribe to research knowledge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1049732304273702 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764255765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1049732304273702</sage_id><sourcerecordid>67507124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-9d21cc9bc5d5bed6cda0d8642e73ddeec8f7563ad30a0dce591b324d2fbb3233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvnmTxoCCsTpLNpjmW4hcWFex9ySazpWV3U5Mu0v_elBYKBT3NwPvNG94j5JLCPaVSPlDIlOSMQ8Ykl8COSJ8KwVIphDyOe5TTjd4jZyEsAEAC56ekR4XMKSjeJ3dfrvMGQ-Kq5NNrs5obTN5a91OjnWEyalw7S947HzCck5NK1wEvdnNApk-P0_FLOvl4fh2PJqnhKlulyjJqjCqNsKJEmxurwQ7zjKHk1iKaYSVFzrXlEAWDQtGSs8yyqoyT8wG53douvfvuMKyKZh4M1rVu0XWhkNEqxstFJG_-JXMpQFKWRfD6AFzE1G0MUTAGbJgxRSMEW8h4F4LHqlj6eaP9uqBQbNouDtuOJ1c7365s0O4PdvVGIN0CQc9w__RPw187RITz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220284291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Estabrooks, Carole A. ; Rutakumwa, William ; O’Leary, Katherine A. ; Profetto-McGrath, Joanne ; Milner, Margaret ; Levers, Merry Jo ; Scott-Findlay, Shannon</creator><creatorcontrib>Estabrooks, Carole A. ; Rutakumwa, William ; O’Leary, Katherine A. ; Profetto-McGrath, Joanne ; Milner, Margaret ; Levers, Merry Jo ; Scott-Findlay, Shannon</creatorcontrib><description>Several studies have been published listing sources of practice knowledge used by nurses. However, the authors located no studies that asked clinicians to describe comprehensively and categorize the kinds of knowledge needed to practice or in which the researchers attempted to understand how clinicians privilege various knowledge sources. In this article, the authors report findings from two large ethnographic case studies in which sources of practice knowledge was a subsidiary theme. They draw on data from individual and card sort interviews, as well as participant observations, to identify nurses’ sources of practice knowledge. Their findings demonstrate that nurses categorize their sources of practice knowledge into four broad groupings: social interactions, experiential knowledge, documents, and a priori knowledge. The insights gained add new understanding about sources of knowledge used by nurses and challenge the disproportionate weight that proponents of the evidence-based movement ascribe to research knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049732304273702</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15761093</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QHREEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alberta ; Anthropology, Cultural ; Case studies ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Nurses ; Ontario ; Organizational Case Studies ; Qualitative research</subject><ispartof>Qualitative health research, 2005-04, Vol.15 (4), p.460-476</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-9d21cc9bc5d5bed6cda0d8642e73ddeec8f7563ad30a0dce591b324d2fbb3233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-9d21cc9bc5d5bed6cda0d8642e73ddeec8f7563ad30a0dce591b324d2fbb3233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049732304273702$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732304273702$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,30997,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15761093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Estabrooks, Carole A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutakumwa, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Profetto-McGrath, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levers, Merry Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott-Findlay, Shannon</creatorcontrib><title>Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses</title><title>Qualitative health research</title><addtitle>Qual Health Res</addtitle><description>Several studies have been published listing sources of practice knowledge used by nurses. However, the authors located no studies that asked clinicians to describe comprehensively and categorize the kinds of knowledge needed to practice or in which the researchers attempted to understand how clinicians privilege various knowledge sources. In this article, the authors report findings from two large ethnographic case studies in which sources of practice knowledge was a subsidiary theme. They draw on data from individual and card sort interviews, as well as participant observations, to identify nurses’ sources of practice knowledge. Their findings demonstrate that nurses categorize their sources of practice knowledge into four broad groupings: social interactions, experiential knowledge, documents, and a priori knowledge. The insights gained add new understanding about sources of knowledge used by nurses and challenge the disproportionate weight that proponents of the evidence-based movement ascribe to research knowledge.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alberta</subject><subject>Anthropology, Cultural</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Organizational Case Studies</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><issn>1049-7323</issn><issn>1552-7557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvnmTxoCCsTpLNpjmW4hcWFex9ySazpWV3U5Mu0v_elBYKBT3NwPvNG94j5JLCPaVSPlDIlOSMQ8Ykl8COSJ8KwVIphDyOe5TTjd4jZyEsAEAC56ekR4XMKSjeJ3dfrvMGQ-Kq5NNrs5obTN5a91OjnWEyalw7S947HzCck5NK1wEvdnNApk-P0_FLOvl4fh2PJqnhKlulyjJqjCqNsKJEmxurwQ7zjKHk1iKaYSVFzrXlEAWDQtGSs8yyqoyT8wG53douvfvuMKyKZh4M1rVu0XWhkNEqxstFJG_-JXMpQFKWRfD6AFzE1G0MUTAGbJgxRSMEW8h4F4LHqlj6eaP9uqBQbNouDtuOJ1c7365s0O4PdvVGIN0CQc9w__RPw187RITz</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>Estabrooks, Carole A.</creator><creator>Rutakumwa, William</creator><creator>O’Leary, Katherine A.</creator><creator>Profetto-McGrath, Joanne</creator><creator>Milner, Margaret</creator><creator>Levers, Merry Jo</creator><creator>Scott-Findlay, Shannon</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses</title><author>Estabrooks, Carole A. ; Rutakumwa, William ; O’Leary, Katherine A. ; Profetto-McGrath, Joanne ; Milner, Margaret ; Levers, Merry Jo ; Scott-Findlay, Shannon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-9d21cc9bc5d5bed6cda0d8642e73ddeec8f7563ad30a0dce591b324d2fbb3233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alberta</topic><topic>Anthropology, Cultural</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Organizational Case Studies</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Estabrooks, Carole A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutakumwa, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Profetto-McGrath, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levers, Merry Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott-Findlay, Shannon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Qualitative health research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Estabrooks, Carole A.</au><au>Rutakumwa, William</au><au>O’Leary, Katherine A.</au><au>Profetto-McGrath, Joanne</au><au>Milner, Margaret</au><au>Levers, Merry Jo</au><au>Scott-Findlay, Shannon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative health research</jtitle><addtitle>Qual Health Res</addtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>476</epage><pages>460-476</pages><issn>1049-7323</issn><eissn>1552-7557</eissn><coden>QHREEM</coden><abstract>Several studies have been published listing sources of practice knowledge used by nurses. However, the authors located no studies that asked clinicians to describe comprehensively and categorize the kinds of knowledge needed to practice or in which the researchers attempted to understand how clinicians privilege various knowledge sources. In this article, the authors report findings from two large ethnographic case studies in which sources of practice knowledge was a subsidiary theme. They draw on data from individual and card sort interviews, as well as participant observations, to identify nurses’ sources of practice knowledge. Their findings demonstrate that nurses categorize their sources of practice knowledge into four broad groupings: social interactions, experiential knowledge, documents, and a priori knowledge. The insights gained add new understanding about sources of knowledge used by nurses and challenge the disproportionate weight that proponents of the evidence-based movement ascribe to research knowledge.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>15761093</pmid><doi>10.1177/1049732304273702</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-7323 |
ispartof | Qualitative health research, 2005-04, Vol.15 (4), p.460-476 |
issn | 1049-7323 1552-7557 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764255765 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Adult Alberta Anthropology, Cultural Case studies Health technology assessment Humans Knowledge Nurses Ontario Organizational Case Studies Qualitative research |
title | Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A13%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sources%20of%20Practice%20Knowledge%20Among%20Nurses&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20health%20research&rft.au=Estabrooks,%20Carole%20A.&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=476&rft.pages=460-476&rft.issn=1049-7323&rft.eissn=1552-7557&rft.coden=QHREEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049732304273702&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67507124%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220284291&rft_id=info:pmid/15761093&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049732304273702&rfr_iscdi=true |