Results of a feasibility study for a psycho-educational intervention in head and neck cancer
Background: With survival rates for people with head and neck (H&N) cancers static during the past 30 years and the enormous burden of psychosocial impacts they suffer well documented, the testing of psychosocial interventions in this group is a priority. Objective: To test the feasibility of pr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2004-07, Vol.13 (7), p.482-485 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 485 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 482 |
| container_title | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Allison, P.J. Edgar, L. Nicolau, B. Archer, J. Black, M. Hier, M. |
| description | Background: With survival rates for people with head and neck (H&N) cancers static during the past 30 years and the enormous burden of psychosocial impacts they suffer well documented, the testing of psychosocial interventions in this group is a priority.
Objective: To test the feasibility of providing a psycho‐educational intervention for people with H&N cancer.
Methodology: A prospective non‐randomised design was used. Subjects were patients with H&N cancer. They were offered the Nucare coping strategies program in one of three formats: small group and one‐to‐one formats with therapists; and a home format, with material for home use, without a therapist. Outcomes measures (quality of life (QOL) and anxiety and depression) were collected at baseline and following the intervention. Analyses were performed using non‐parametric stastistics.
Results: Of 128 people invited to participate, 66 agreed, 59 completed the intervention and 50 had outcomes data. Following the intervention, there were significant improvements in physical and social functioning and global QOL, and reduced fatigue, sleep disturbance and depressive symptoms.
Conclusions: These data suggest that the intervention is desired by the target group, feasible to deliver after cancer therapy and may have some beneficial effects, although an appropriately designed study is required to confirm this. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pon.816 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764240454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66662258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-64d05b4dc382e622c2cb769c2be89d0898f0872790200d651e19a241568b16483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V1rFDEUBuAgiv1Q_AcSvNCLMjXJ5PNSi67SpZWq9EYImeQMTTs7syYztfPvzbKLhYKam-SEh5eQF6EXlBxTQtjb9dAfayofoX1KjKmopPTx5ixUZRg3e-gg52tCijXyKdqjgjGlqNpHPy4gT92Y8dBih1twOTaxi-OM8ziFGbdDKvfrPPuroYIweTfGoXcdjv0I6Rb6zVgGfAUuYNcH3IO_wd71HtIz9KR1XYbnu_0Qff_44dvJp2p5vvh88m5Zec6prCQPRDQ8-FozkIx55hsljWcNaBOINrolWjFlCCMkSEGBGsc4FVI3VHJdH6I329x1Gn5OkEe7itlD17kehilbJTnjhAte5Ot_SlkWY0L_FwpFuFRGFPjqAbweplR-KFtWPllSLer7B_o05JygtesUVy7NlhK7KdCWAm0psMiXu7ipWUG4d7vGCjjagl-xg_lvOfbL-dk2rtrqmEe4-6NdurFS1UrYy7OFfb84ZfRieWm_1r8BTy2wsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222761853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results of a feasibility study for a psycho-educational intervention in head and neck cancer</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Blackwell Single Titles</source><creator>Allison, P.J. ; Edgar, L. ; Nicolau, B. ; Archer, J. ; Black, M. ; Hier, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allison, P.J. ; Edgar, L. ; Nicolau, B. ; Archer, J. ; Black, M. ; Hier, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: With survival rates for people with head and neck (H&N) cancers static during the past 30 years and the enormous burden of psychosocial impacts they suffer well documented, the testing of psychosocial interventions in this group is a priority.
Objective: To test the feasibility of providing a psycho‐educational intervention for people with H&N cancer.
Methodology: A prospective non‐randomised design was used. Subjects were patients with H&N cancer. They were offered the Nucare coping strategies program in one of three formats: small group and one‐to‐one formats with therapists; and a home format, with material for home use, without a therapist. Outcomes measures (quality of life (QOL) and anxiety and depression) were collected at baseline and following the intervention. Analyses were performed using non‐parametric stastistics.
Results: Of 128 people invited to participate, 66 agreed, 59 completed the intervention and 50 had outcomes data. Following the intervention, there were significant improvements in physical and social functioning and global QOL, and reduced fatigue, sleep disturbance and depressive symptoms.
Conclusions: These data suggest that the intervention is desired by the target group, feasible to deliver after cancer therapy and may have some beneficial effects, although an appropriately designed study is required to confirm this. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pon.816</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15227717</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POJCEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Canada ; Cancer ; Feasibility ; Feasibility Studies ; Head ; Head and neck cancer ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - psychology ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - therapy ; Health Education ; Humans ; Neck ; Patient education ; Psychoeducational treatment ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2004-07, Vol.13 (7), p.482-485</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jul 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-64d05b4dc382e622c2cb769c2be89d0898f0872790200d651e19a241568b16483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-64d05b4dc382e622c2cb769c2be89d0898f0872790200d651e19a241568b16483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpon.816$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpon.816$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15227717$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allison, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgar, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolau, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hier, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Results of a feasibility study for a psycho-educational intervention in head and neck cancer</title><title>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><description>Background: With survival rates for people with head and neck (H&N) cancers static during the past 30 years and the enormous burden of psychosocial impacts they suffer well documented, the testing of psychosocial interventions in this group is a priority.
Objective: To test the feasibility of providing a psycho‐educational intervention for people with H&N cancer.
Methodology: A prospective non‐randomised design was used. Subjects were patients with H&N cancer. They were offered the Nucare coping strategies program in one of three formats: small group and one‐to‐one formats with therapists; and a home format, with material for home use, without a therapist. Outcomes measures (quality of life (QOL) and anxiety and depression) were collected at baseline and following the intervention. Analyses were performed using non‐parametric stastistics.
Results: Of 128 people invited to participate, 66 agreed, 59 completed the intervention and 50 had outcomes data. Following the intervention, there were significant improvements in physical and social functioning and global QOL, and reduced fatigue, sleep disturbance and depressive symptoms.
Conclusions: These data suggest that the intervention is desired by the target group, feasible to deliver after cancer therapy and may have some beneficial effects, although an appropriately designed study is required to confirm this. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Head and neck cancer</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Health Education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Patient education</subject><subject>Psychoeducational treatment</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>1057-9249</issn><issn>1099-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V1rFDEUBuAgiv1Q_AcSvNCLMjXJ5PNSi67SpZWq9EYImeQMTTs7syYztfPvzbKLhYKam-SEh5eQF6EXlBxTQtjb9dAfayofoX1KjKmopPTx5ixUZRg3e-gg52tCijXyKdqjgjGlqNpHPy4gT92Y8dBih1twOTaxi-OM8ziFGbdDKvfrPPuroYIweTfGoXcdjv0I6Rb6zVgGfAUuYNcH3IO_wd71HtIz9KR1XYbnu_0Qff_44dvJp2p5vvh88m5Zec6prCQPRDQ8-FozkIx55hsljWcNaBOINrolWjFlCCMkSEGBGsc4FVI3VHJdH6I329x1Gn5OkEe7itlD17kehilbJTnjhAte5Ot_SlkWY0L_FwpFuFRGFPjqAbweplR-KFtWPllSLer7B_o05JygtesUVy7NlhK7KdCWAm0psMiXu7ipWUG4d7vGCjjagl-xg_lvOfbL-dk2rtrqmEe4-6NdurFS1UrYy7OFfb84ZfRieWm_1r8BTy2wsQ</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>Allison, P.J.</creator><creator>Edgar, L.</creator><creator>Nicolau, B.</creator><creator>Archer, J.</creator><creator>Black, M.</creator><creator>Hier, M.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>Results of a feasibility study for a psycho-educational intervention in head and neck cancer</title><author>Allison, P.J. ; Edgar, L. ; Nicolau, B. ; Archer, J. ; Black, M. ; Hier, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4416-64d05b4dc382e622c2cb769c2be89d0898f0872790200d651e19a241568b16483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Head and neck cancer</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Health Education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Patient education</topic><topic>Psychoeducational treatment</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allison, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edgar, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolau, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hier, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allison, P.J.</au><au>Edgar, L.</au><au>Nicolau, B.</au><au>Archer, J.</au><au>Black, M.</au><au>Hier, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results of a feasibility study for a psycho-educational intervention in head and neck cancer</atitle><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Psycho-Oncology</addtitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>482</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>482-485</pages><issn>1057-9249</issn><eissn>1099-1611</eissn><coden>POJCEE</coden><abstract>Background: With survival rates for people with head and neck (H&N) cancers static during the past 30 years and the enormous burden of psychosocial impacts they suffer well documented, the testing of psychosocial interventions in this group is a priority.
Objective: To test the feasibility of providing a psycho‐educational intervention for people with H&N cancer.
Methodology: A prospective non‐randomised design was used. Subjects were patients with H&N cancer. They were offered the Nucare coping strategies program in one of three formats: small group and one‐to‐one formats with therapists; and a home format, with material for home use, without a therapist. Outcomes measures (quality of life (QOL) and anxiety and depression) were collected at baseline and following the intervention. Analyses were performed using non‐parametric stastistics.
Results: Of 128 people invited to participate, 66 agreed, 59 completed the intervention and 50 had outcomes data. Following the intervention, there were significant improvements in physical and social functioning and global QOL, and reduced fatigue, sleep disturbance and depressive symptoms.
Conclusions: These data suggest that the intervention is desired by the target group, feasible to deliver after cancer therapy and may have some beneficial effects, although an appropriately designed study is required to confirm this. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>15227717</pmid><doi>10.1002/pon.816</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1057-9249 |
| ispartof | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2004-07, Vol.13 (7), p.482-485 |
| issn | 1057-9249 1099-1611 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764240454 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Blackwell Single Titles |
| subjects | Canada Cancer Feasibility Feasibility Studies Head Head and neck cancer Head and Neck Neoplasms - psychology Head and Neck Neoplasms - therapy Health Education Humans Neck Patient education Psychoeducational treatment Social psychology |
| title | Results of a feasibility study for a psycho-educational intervention in head and neck cancer |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A38%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20of%20a%20feasibility%20study%20for%20a%20psycho-educational%20intervention%20in%20head%20and%20neck%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Allison,%20P.J.&rft.date=2004-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=482&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=482-485&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft.coden=POJCEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pon.816&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E66662258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222761853&rft_id=info:pmid/15227717&rfr_iscdi=true |