Clinical assessment of risk decision support (CARDS): The development and evaluation of a feasible violence risk assessment for routine psychiatric practice
Background: Adult psychiatric services are increasingly required to assess and manage the risk of violence, but the evidence base to guide clinical practice is limited. Aims: To develop an evidence-based method of assessing risk of violence and to demonstrate its feasibility in routine practice. Met...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England) England), 2004-12, Vol.13 (6), p.569-581 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 581 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 569 |
container_title | Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Watts, David Bindman, Jonathan Slade, Mike Holloway, Frank Rosen, Adrienne Thornicroft, Graham |
description | Background: Adult psychiatric services are increasingly required to assess and manage the risk of violence, but the evidence base to guide clinical practice is limited. Aims: To develop an evidence-based method of assessing risk of violence and to demonstrate its feasibility in routine practice. Methods: Consensus workshops were held to design a form based decision support system, which was refined using a Delphi consultation. The system was introduced into practice in 7 mental health services in England. Its feasibility was measured through assessment of case notes, questionnaires and focus groups of clinical staff. Results: CARDS is a two-stage assessment, with a screen and full assessment stage (at http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/iopweb/virtual/?path = /hsr/prism/cards/). A high degree of consensus was achieved for the structure and content. CARDS met each of the six feasibility criteria: brevity, simplicity, relevance, acceptability, availability and value, though acceptability was only achieved when the assessment of violence risk was supplemented with an assessment of suicide risk. Conclusion: CARDS provides a feasible, evidence-based decision support procedure for assessing risk of violence in patients using adult mental health services. It can help clinicians meet policy requirements to assess risk, though its effect on actual violence is unknown. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09638230400017087 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764237373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57167036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-cd9dae3ff9759d9484b349b4e9c1ea50674105e56f485c7641129a38e4c2f483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuOFCEUhonRxHb0AdwRF14W5UABRZW6mfSoM8kkJtr7ymnqVJqRhhKoNv0uPuzQ0ybe4oQFCef7zgF-Qp5y9pqzlp2yrhFtLZhkjHHNWn2PLLhoWMVUo--TxaFeFUA_JI9Sui5UzWSzID-WznprwFFICVPaos80jDTa9JUOaGyywdM0T1OImb5cnn0-__LqDV1tsFR36MJ0a4AfKO7AzZAPfGkAdERIdu2Q7mxw6A0em_42ZwyRxjBn65FOaW82FnK0hk4RTLYGH5MHI7iET37uJ2T14f1qeVFdffp4uTy7qoxQKldm6AZAMY6dVt3QyVauhezWEjvDERRrtORMoWpG2SqjG8l53YFoUZq6HIkT8uLYdorh24wp91ubDDoHHsOc-mKUjyurkM_vJJXmjWaiKeCzv8DrMEdfHtHXXNVtSeUwlx8hE0NKEcd-inYLcd9z1h9S7f9JtTjvjo715fe28D1EN_QZ9i7EMYIvgfXiLv3tH_oGweWNgYi_Lvh_-wb-WbuE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215280568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical assessment of risk decision support (CARDS): The development and evaluation of a feasible violence risk assessment for routine psychiatric practice</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Watts, David ; Bindman, Jonathan ; Slade, Mike ; Holloway, Frank ; Rosen, Adrienne ; Thornicroft, Graham</creator><creatorcontrib>Watts, David ; Bindman, Jonathan ; Slade, Mike ; Holloway, Frank ; Rosen, Adrienne ; Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Adult psychiatric services are increasingly required to assess and manage the risk of violence, but the evidence base to guide clinical practice is limited. Aims: To develop an evidence-based method of assessing risk of violence and to demonstrate its feasibility in routine practice. Methods: Consensus workshops were held to design a form based decision support system, which was refined using a Delphi consultation. The system was introduced into practice in 7 mental health services in England. Its feasibility was measured through assessment of case notes, questionnaires and focus groups of clinical staff. Results: CARDS is a two-stage assessment, with a screen and full assessment stage (at http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/iopweb/virtual/?path = /hsr/prism/cards/). A high degree of consensus was achieved for the structure and content. CARDS met each of the six feasibility criteria: brevity, simplicity, relevance, acceptability, availability and value, though acceptability was only achieved when the assessment of violence risk was supplemented with an assessment of suicide risk. Conclusion: CARDS provides a feasible, evidence-based decision support procedure for assessing risk of violence in patients using adult mental health services. It can help clinicians meet policy requirements to assess risk, though its effect on actual violence is unknown.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-8237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0567</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09638230400017087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>England ; Evidence based medicine ; Feasibility ; Health risk assessment ; mental disorders ; Psychiatric services ; Psychological tests ; Public policy ; Risk assessment ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England), 2004-12, Vol.13 (6), p.569-581</ispartof><rights>2004 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2004</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Dec 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-cd9dae3ff9759d9484b349b4e9c1ea50674105e56f485c7641129a38e4c2f483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-cd9dae3ff9759d9484b349b4e9c1ea50674105e56f485c7641129a38e4c2f483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09638230400017087$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638230400017087$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977,59620,60409,61194,61375</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watts, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bindman, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slade, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holloway, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Adrienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical assessment of risk decision support (CARDS): The development and evaluation of a feasible violence risk assessment for routine psychiatric practice</title><title>Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England)</title><description>Background: Adult psychiatric services are increasingly required to assess and manage the risk of violence, but the evidence base to guide clinical practice is limited. Aims: To develop an evidence-based method of assessing risk of violence and to demonstrate its feasibility in routine practice. Methods: Consensus workshops were held to design a form based decision support system, which was refined using a Delphi consultation. The system was introduced into practice in 7 mental health services in England. Its feasibility was measured through assessment of case notes, questionnaires and focus groups of clinical staff. Results: CARDS is a two-stage assessment, with a screen and full assessment stage (at http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/iopweb/virtual/?path = /hsr/prism/cards/). A high degree of consensus was achieved for the structure and content. CARDS met each of the six feasibility criteria: brevity, simplicity, relevance, acceptability, availability and value, though acceptability was only achieved when the assessment of violence risk was supplemented with an assessment of suicide risk. Conclusion: CARDS provides a feasible, evidence-based decision support procedure for assessing risk of violence in patients using adult mental health services. It can help clinicians meet policy requirements to assess risk, though its effect on actual violence is unknown.</description><subject>England</subject><subject>Evidence based medicine</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>mental disorders</subject><subject>Psychiatric services</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0963-8237</issn><issn>1360-0567</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuOFCEUhonRxHb0AdwRF14W5UABRZW6mfSoM8kkJtr7ymnqVJqRhhKoNv0uPuzQ0ybe4oQFCef7zgF-Qp5y9pqzlp2yrhFtLZhkjHHNWn2PLLhoWMVUo--TxaFeFUA_JI9Sui5UzWSzID-WznprwFFICVPaos80jDTa9JUOaGyywdM0T1OImb5cnn0-__LqDV1tsFR36MJ0a4AfKO7AzZAPfGkAdERIdu2Q7mxw6A0em_42ZwyRxjBn65FOaW82FnK0hk4RTLYGH5MHI7iET37uJ2T14f1qeVFdffp4uTy7qoxQKldm6AZAMY6dVt3QyVauhezWEjvDERRrtORMoWpG2SqjG8l53YFoUZq6HIkT8uLYdorh24wp91ubDDoHHsOc-mKUjyurkM_vJJXmjWaiKeCzv8DrMEdfHtHXXNVtSeUwlx8hE0NKEcd-inYLcd9z1h9S7f9JtTjvjo715fe28D1EN_QZ9i7EMYIvgfXiLv3tH_oGweWNgYi_Lvh_-wb-WbuE</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Watts, David</creator><creator>Bindman, Jonathan</creator><creator>Slade, Mike</creator><creator>Holloway, Frank</creator><creator>Rosen, Adrienne</creator><creator>Thornicroft, Graham</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>Clinical assessment of risk decision support (CARDS): The development and evaluation of a feasible violence risk assessment for routine psychiatric practice</title><author>Watts, David ; Bindman, Jonathan ; Slade, Mike ; Holloway, Frank ; Rosen, Adrienne ; Thornicroft, Graham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-cd9dae3ff9759d9484b349b4e9c1ea50674105e56f485c7641129a38e4c2f483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>England</topic><topic>Evidence based medicine</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>mental disorders</topic><topic>Psychiatric services</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watts, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bindman, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slade, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holloway, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Adrienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornicroft, Graham</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watts, David</au><au>Bindman, Jonathan</au><au>Slade, Mike</au><au>Holloway, Frank</au><au>Rosen, Adrienne</au><au>Thornicroft, Graham</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical assessment of risk decision support (CARDS): The development and evaluation of a feasible violence risk assessment for routine psychiatric practice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>569</spage><epage>581</epage><pages>569-581</pages><issn>0963-8237</issn><eissn>1360-0567</eissn><abstract>Background: Adult psychiatric services are increasingly required to assess and manage the risk of violence, but the evidence base to guide clinical practice is limited. Aims: To develop an evidence-based method of assessing risk of violence and to demonstrate its feasibility in routine practice. Methods: Consensus workshops were held to design a form based decision support system, which was refined using a Delphi consultation. The system was introduced into practice in 7 mental health services in England. Its feasibility was measured through assessment of case notes, questionnaires and focus groups of clinical staff. Results: CARDS is a two-stage assessment, with a screen and full assessment stage (at http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/iopweb/virtual/?path = /hsr/prism/cards/). A high degree of consensus was achieved for the structure and content. CARDS met each of the six feasibility criteria: brevity, simplicity, relevance, acceptability, availability and value, though acceptability was only achieved when the assessment of violence risk was supplemented with an assessment of suicide risk. Conclusion: CARDS provides a feasible, evidence-based decision support procedure for assessing risk of violence in patients using adult mental health services. It can help clinicians meet policy requirements to assess risk, though its effect on actual violence is unknown.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/09638230400017087</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-8237 |
ispartof | Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England), 2004-12, Vol.13 (6), p.569-581 |
issn | 0963-8237 1360-0567 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764237373 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | England Evidence based medicine Feasibility Health risk assessment mental disorders Psychiatric services Psychological tests Public policy Risk assessment Violence |
title | Clinical assessment of risk decision support (CARDS): The development and evaluation of a feasible violence risk assessment for routine psychiatric practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A30%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20assessment%20of%20risk%20decision%20support%20(CARDS):%20The%20development%20and%20evaluation%20of%20a%20feasible%20violence%20risk%20assessment%20for%20routine%20psychiatric%20practice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mental%20health%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Watts,%20David&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=569&rft.epage=581&rft.pages=569-581&rft.issn=0963-8237&rft.eissn=1360-0567&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09638230400017087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E57167036%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215280568&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |