Childhood Vaccine Risk/Benefit Communication Among Public Health Clinics: A Time-Motion Study

United States law requires that immunization providers use Centers for Disease Control Vaccine Information Statements (VISs) and inform parents about vaccine risks and benefits prior to every childhood immunization. A recent national survey found that public health clinics (PHCs) reported high compl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public health Nursing 2004-05, Vol.21 (3), p.228-236
Hauptverfasser: Davis, Terry C., Fredrickson, Doren D., M. Kennen, Estela, Arnold, Connie, Shoup, Eileen, Sugar, Mackey, Humiston, Sharon G., Bocchini Jr, Joseph A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 236
container_issue 3
container_start_page 228
container_title Public health Nursing
container_volume 21
creator Davis, Terry C.
Fredrickson, Doren D.
M. Kennen, Estela
Arnold, Connie
Shoup, Eileen
Sugar, Mackey
Humiston, Sharon G.
Bocchini Jr, Joseph A.
description United States law requires that immunization providers use Centers for Disease Control Vaccine Information Statements (VISs) and inform parents about vaccine risks and benefits prior to every childhood immunization. A recent national survey found that public health clinics (PHCs) reported high compliance with this law. To further investigate these findings, we conducted an immunization time‐motion study in two PHCs in Kansas and Louisiana. Research assistants observed a convenience sample of 246 child immunization visits to record distribution of the VISs and content and time of vaccine communication. Thirty percent of parents read below a ninth grade level, 53% had Medicaid insurance, and 56% were Black. VISs were given with every dose of vaccine administered in 89% of visits. Public health nurses (PHNs) frequently discussed potential vaccine side effects (91%), treatment of side effects (91%), and the vaccine schedule (93%). Contraindications were screened in 71% of visits. Benefits were discussed in 48% of visits and severe risks in 29%. The national Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was never discussed. The immunization visits lasted for a mean of 20 min. Vaccine communication of side effects, risks, benefits, screening for contraindications, and the next visit lasted for an average of 16 s for all vaccines. PHC compliance with mandated VIS distribution and practical vaccine communication was high. Room for improvement exists in discussion of benefits, serious risks, and the VICP.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.021305.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764223499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19728327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5325-a6f8fc0690a2e44fc0745456d98a244a1805db95586dc23cc17f7f342d2c69203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURi0EokPhL6CwAFZJ_XbMphqi0gFKGUF5bJDlcRzG0yRu40TM_HucZlRYQb3xlXzud698AHiGYIbiOdpkUBCRIgxlhiGkGcSIQJZt74EZYpiliFJ-H8xuqQPwKIQNhJAwzB-CA8QiQbiYgR_F2tXl2vsy-aqNca1NPrlwefTatrZyfVL4phlaZ3TvfJvMG9_-TJbDqnYmWVhd9-ukqF18D6-SeXLhGpt-8Dfo534od4_Bg0rXwT7Z34fgy5uTi2KRnn08fVvMz1LDSFxX8yqvDOQSamwpjaWgjDJeylxjSjXKIStXkrGclwYTY5CoREUoLrHhEkNyCF5OuVedvx5s6FXjgrF1rVvrh6AEpxgTKuVdSSEi-eLfJJKY55L-F0RS4JzgMVFOoOl8CJ2t1FXnGt3tFIJqFKs2alSmRmVqFKsmsWobe5_uhwyrxpZ_OvcmI_B8D-hgdF11ujUu_MXlVBA0ftXxxP1ytd3dfQO1XJzflDEhnRJc6O32NkF3lyruIZj6dn6qxPJdIb-_L5QgvwFuYcsm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19728327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Childhood Vaccine Risk/Benefit Communication Among Public Health Clinics: A Time-Motion Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Davis, Terry C. ; Fredrickson, Doren D. ; M. Kennen, Estela ; Arnold, Connie ; Shoup, Eileen ; Sugar, Mackey ; Humiston, Sharon G. ; Bocchini Jr, Joseph A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Terry C. ; Fredrickson, Doren D. ; M. Kennen, Estela ; Arnold, Connie ; Shoup, Eileen ; Sugar, Mackey ; Humiston, Sharon G. ; Bocchini Jr, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><description>United States law requires that immunization providers use Centers for Disease Control Vaccine Information Statements (VISs) and inform parents about vaccine risks and benefits prior to every childhood immunization. A recent national survey found that public health clinics (PHCs) reported high compliance with this law. To further investigate these findings, we conducted an immunization time‐motion study in two PHCs in Kansas and Louisiana. Research assistants observed a convenience sample of 246 child immunization visits to record distribution of the VISs and content and time of vaccine communication. Thirty percent of parents read below a ninth grade level, 53% had Medicaid insurance, and 56% were Black. VISs were given with every dose of vaccine administered in 89% of visits. Public health nurses (PHNs) frequently discussed potential vaccine side effects (91%), treatment of side effects (91%), and the vaccine schedule (93%). Contraindications were screened in 71% of visits. Benefits were discussed in 48% of visits and severe risks in 29%. The national Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was never discussed. The immunization visits lasted for a mean of 20 min. Vaccine communication of side effects, risks, benefits, screening for contraindications, and the next visit lasted for an average of 16 s for all vaccines. PHC compliance with mandated VIS distribution and practical vaccine communication was high. Room for improvement exists in discussion of benefits, serious risks, and the VICP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-1209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.021305.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15144367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA: Blackwell Science Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child, Preschool ; childhood vaccines ; Educational Status ; Female ; Health Education - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Health Education - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; immunization ; Infant ; Kansas ; Louisiana ; Male ; Mass Vaccination - nursing ; Mass Vaccination - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Nursing ; parent education ; patient ; Patient Participation ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prevention and actions ; Professional-Family Relations ; public health ; Public Health Nursing - methods ; Public Health Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Risk Assessment ; risks and benefits ; Time and Motion Studies ; vaccine communication</subject><ispartof>Public health Nursing, 2004-05, Vol.21 (3), p.228-236</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5325-a6f8fc0690a2e44fc0745456d98a244a1805db95586dc23cc17f7f342d2c69203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5325-a6f8fc0690a2e44fc0745456d98a244a1805db95586dc23cc17f7f342d2c69203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.0737-1209.2004.021305.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.0737-1209.2004.021305.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15847310$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15144367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Terry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fredrickson, Doren D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M. Kennen, Estela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Connie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoup, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugar, Mackey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humiston, Sharon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocchini Jr, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><title>Childhood Vaccine Risk/Benefit Communication Among Public Health Clinics: A Time-Motion Study</title><title>Public health Nursing</title><addtitle>Public Health Nurs</addtitle><description>United States law requires that immunization providers use Centers for Disease Control Vaccine Information Statements (VISs) and inform parents about vaccine risks and benefits prior to every childhood immunization. A recent national survey found that public health clinics (PHCs) reported high compliance with this law. To further investigate these findings, we conducted an immunization time‐motion study in two PHCs in Kansas and Louisiana. Research assistants observed a convenience sample of 246 child immunization visits to record distribution of the VISs and content and time of vaccine communication. Thirty percent of parents read below a ninth grade level, 53% had Medicaid insurance, and 56% were Black. VISs were given with every dose of vaccine administered in 89% of visits. Public health nurses (PHNs) frequently discussed potential vaccine side effects (91%), treatment of side effects (91%), and the vaccine schedule (93%). Contraindications were screened in 71% of visits. Benefits were discussed in 48% of visits and severe risks in 29%. The national Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was never discussed. The immunization visits lasted for a mean of 20 min. Vaccine communication of side effects, risks, benefits, screening for contraindications, and the next visit lasted for an average of 16 s for all vaccines. PHC compliance with mandated VIS distribution and practical vaccine communication was high. Room for improvement exists in discussion of benefits, serious risks, and the VICP.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>childhood vaccines</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Education - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Health Education - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunization</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Kansas</subject><subject>Louisiana</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Vaccination - nursing</subject><subject>Mass Vaccination - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>parent education</subject><subject>patient</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Professional-Family Relations</subject><subject>public health</subject><subject>Public Health Nursing - methods</subject><subject>Public Health Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>risks and benefits</subject><subject>Time and Motion Studies</subject><subject>vaccine communication</subject><issn>0737-1209</issn><issn>1525-1446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURi0EokPhL6CwAFZJ_XbMphqi0gFKGUF5bJDlcRzG0yRu40TM_HucZlRYQb3xlXzud698AHiGYIbiOdpkUBCRIgxlhiGkGcSIQJZt74EZYpiliFJ-H8xuqQPwKIQNhJAwzB-CA8QiQbiYgR_F2tXl2vsy-aqNca1NPrlwefTatrZyfVL4phlaZ3TvfJvMG9_-TJbDqnYmWVhd9-ukqF18D6-SeXLhGpt-8Dfo534od4_Bg0rXwT7Z34fgy5uTi2KRnn08fVvMz1LDSFxX8yqvDOQSamwpjaWgjDJeylxjSjXKIStXkrGclwYTY5CoREUoLrHhEkNyCF5OuVedvx5s6FXjgrF1rVvrh6AEpxgTKuVdSSEi-eLfJJKY55L-F0RS4JzgMVFOoOl8CJ2t1FXnGt3tFIJqFKs2alSmRmVqFKsmsWobe5_uhwyrxpZ_OvcmI_B8D-hgdF11ujUu_MXlVBA0ftXxxP1ytd3dfQO1XJzflDEhnRJc6O32NkF3lyruIZj6dn6qxPJdIb-_L5QgvwFuYcsm</recordid><startdate>200405</startdate><enddate>200405</enddate><creator>Davis, Terry C.</creator><creator>Fredrickson, Doren D.</creator><creator>M. Kennen, Estela</creator><creator>Arnold, Connie</creator><creator>Shoup, Eileen</creator><creator>Sugar, Mackey</creator><creator>Humiston, Sharon G.</creator><creator>Bocchini Jr, Joseph A.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200405</creationdate><title>Childhood Vaccine Risk/Benefit Communication Among Public Health Clinics: A Time-Motion Study</title><author>Davis, Terry C. ; Fredrickson, Doren D. ; M. Kennen, Estela ; Arnold, Connie ; Shoup, Eileen ; Sugar, Mackey ; Humiston, Sharon G. ; Bocchini Jr, Joseph A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5325-a6f8fc0690a2e44fc0745456d98a244a1805db95586dc23cc17f7f342d2c69203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>childhood vaccines</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Education - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Health Education - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunization</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Kansas</topic><topic>Louisiana</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Vaccination - nursing</topic><topic>Mass Vaccination - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>parent education</topic><topic>patient</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Professional-Family Relations</topic><topic>public health</topic><topic>Public Health Nursing - methods</topic><topic>Public Health Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>risks and benefits</topic><topic>Time and Motion Studies</topic><topic>vaccine communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Terry C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fredrickson, Doren D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M. Kennen, Estela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Connie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoup, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugar, Mackey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humiston, Sharon G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocchini Jr, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Public health Nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Terry C.</au><au>Fredrickson, Doren D.</au><au>M. Kennen, Estela</au><au>Arnold, Connie</au><au>Shoup, Eileen</au><au>Sugar, Mackey</au><au>Humiston, Sharon G.</au><au>Bocchini Jr, Joseph A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Childhood Vaccine Risk/Benefit Communication Among Public Health Clinics: A Time-Motion Study</atitle><jtitle>Public health Nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nurs</addtitle><date>2004-05</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>228</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>228-236</pages><issn>0737-1209</issn><eissn>1525-1446</eissn><abstract>United States law requires that immunization providers use Centers for Disease Control Vaccine Information Statements (VISs) and inform parents about vaccine risks and benefits prior to every childhood immunization. A recent national survey found that public health clinics (PHCs) reported high compliance with this law. To further investigate these findings, we conducted an immunization time‐motion study in two PHCs in Kansas and Louisiana. Research assistants observed a convenience sample of 246 child immunization visits to record distribution of the VISs and content and time of vaccine communication. Thirty percent of parents read below a ninth grade level, 53% had Medicaid insurance, and 56% were Black. VISs were given with every dose of vaccine administered in 89% of visits. Public health nurses (PHNs) frequently discussed potential vaccine side effects (91%), treatment of side effects (91%), and the vaccine schedule (93%). Contraindications were screened in 71% of visits. Benefits were discussed in 48% of visits and severe risks in 29%. The national Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) was never discussed. The immunization visits lasted for a mean of 20 min. Vaccine communication of side effects, risks, benefits, screening for contraindications, and the next visit lasted for an average of 16 s for all vaccines. PHC compliance with mandated VIS distribution and practical vaccine communication was high. Room for improvement exists in discussion of benefits, serious risks, and the VICP.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Inc</pub><pmid>15144367</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.021305.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0737-1209
ispartof Public health Nursing, 2004-05, Vol.21 (3), p.228-236
issn 0737-1209
1525-1446
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764223499
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Ambulatory Care Facilities - statistics & numerical data
Biological and medical sciences
Child, Preschool
childhood vaccines
Educational Status
Female
Health Education - legislation & jurisprudence
Health Education - statistics & numerical data
Humans
immunization
Infant
Kansas
Louisiana
Male
Mass Vaccination - nursing
Mass Vaccination - statistics & numerical data
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Nursing
parent education
patient
Patient Participation
Patient Satisfaction
Prevention and actions
Professional-Family Relations
public health
Public Health Nursing - methods
Public Health Nursing - statistics & numerical data
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Risk Assessment
risks and benefits
Time and Motion Studies
vaccine communication
title Childhood Vaccine Risk/Benefit Communication Among Public Health Clinics: A Time-Motion Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T13%3A19%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Childhood%20Vaccine%20Risk/Benefit%20Communication%20Among%20Public%20Health%20Clinics:%20A%20Time-Motion%20Study&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20Nursing&rft.au=Davis,%20Terry%20C.&rft.date=2004-05&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=228&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=228-236&rft.issn=0737-1209&rft.eissn=1525-1446&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.021305.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19728327%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19728327&rft_id=info:pmid/15144367&rfr_iscdi=true