A qualitative study of women's perspectives of antenatal care in a rural area of Zimbabwe
to describe the perspectives and experiences of women in their use of antenatal care and in their reasoning on specific antenatal care routines. two qualitative methods including focus group discussions and individual interviews were combined. a rural district in Zimbabwe where a randomised control...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Midwifery 2004-06, Vol.20 (2), p.122-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 132 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 122 |
container_title | Midwifery |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Mathole, Thubelihle Lindmark, Gunilla Majoko, Franz Ahlberg, Beth Maina |
description | to describe the perspectives and experiences of women in their use of antenatal care and in their reasoning on specific antenatal care routines.
two qualitative methods including focus group discussions and individual interviews were combined.
a rural district in Zimbabwe where a randomised control trial had been undertaken to introduce a new antenatal care package.
forty-four women and twenty-four men participated in the study.
women were observed to take actions contrary to those assumed professionally acceptable in antenatal care generally and in some specific changed routines. Visits were to be reduced and weighing was to be omitted, but women, especially younger women, said they preferred more than the stipulated five goal oriented visits. One reason for this was the importance of being assured that the fetus was growing well. They considered that visits spaced too widely would make it difficult for service providers to help, should complications develop. On the other hand, older women (above 35 years old), a group professionally considered to be at high risk, were not so concerned with the visits. All the women said they wanted to be weighed at all the visits. The antenatal care visits are simply known as ‘going for scale’. The health care providers complied by weighing the women without recording. Cultural beliefs had great influence, especially on the time a pregnancy is acknowledged and reported. It is believed that pregnant women and the pregnancy are vulnerable to witchcraft during the early period of pregnancy.
we concluded that, whether in its traditional or new form, antenatal care ignores the experiences and views of women and the way they make sense of pregnancy and the care of pregnancy. The importance of understanding the perspectives of different stakeholders as the key to effective change is underlined. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.midw.2003.10.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764222364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S026661380300086X</els_id><sourcerecordid>764222364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-18b204ce903d685c4d920fb369623e09d14ef866f90e6676fd8ad7409cb0e4423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1rHDEQxUVIiM9O_oEUQVVc7WX0uStIY4wdBwxp7CJphFaaBR37cZZ2ffi_t5Y7SOdUj3nzm1fMI-QLgy0Dpr_vtkMMhy0HEMXYFnlHNkwJXgkw5j3ZANe60kw0Z-Q85x0AGAn1R3LGFKvrRqkN-XNFnxbXx9nN8RlpnpfwQqeOHqYBx8tM95jyHv26zKvvxhlHN7ueepeQxpE6mpZU5jK6lfgbh9a1B_xEPnSuz_j5pBfk8fbm4fquuv_989f11X3lJVNzxZqWg_RoQATdKC-D4dC1QhvNBYIJTGLXaN0ZQK1r3YXGhVqC8S2glFxckMtj7j5NTwvm2Q4xe-x7N-K0ZFtryTkXWhby29skM6bmtf4vqGoQ3ChVQH4EfZpyTtjZfYqDSy-WgV07sju7dmTXjlavSDn6ekpf2gHDv5NTKQX4cQSwvO05YrLZRxw9hphKFTZM8a38V4_noXc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57032955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A qualitative study of women's perspectives of antenatal care in a rural area of Zimbabwe</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mathole, Thubelihle ; Lindmark, Gunilla ; Majoko, Franz ; Ahlberg, Beth Maina</creator><creatorcontrib>Mathole, Thubelihle ; Lindmark, Gunilla ; Majoko, Franz ; Ahlberg, Beth Maina</creatorcontrib><description>to describe the perspectives and experiences of women in their use of antenatal care and in their reasoning on specific antenatal care routines.
two qualitative methods including focus group discussions and individual interviews were combined.
a rural district in Zimbabwe where a randomised control trial had been undertaken to introduce a new antenatal care package.
forty-four women and twenty-four men participated in the study.
women were observed to take actions contrary to those assumed professionally acceptable in antenatal care generally and in some specific changed routines. Visits were to be reduced and weighing was to be omitted, but women, especially younger women, said they preferred more than the stipulated five goal oriented visits. One reason for this was the importance of being assured that the fetus was growing well. They considered that visits spaced too widely would make it difficult for service providers to help, should complications develop. On the other hand, older women (above 35 years old), a group professionally considered to be at high risk, were not so concerned with the visits. All the women said they wanted to be weighed at all the visits. The antenatal care visits are simply known as ‘going for scale’. The health care providers complied by weighing the women without recording. Cultural beliefs had great influence, especially on the time a pregnancy is acknowledged and reported. It is believed that pregnant women and the pregnancy are vulnerable to witchcraft during the early period of pregnancy.
we concluded that, whether in its traditional or new form, antenatal care ignores the experiences and views of women and the way they make sense of pregnancy and the care of pregnancy. The importance of understanding the perspectives of different stakeholders as the key to effective change is underlined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-6138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2003.10.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15177855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Antenatal care ; Appointments and Schedules ; Attitude to Health ; Experiences ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Midwifery - standards ; Mothers - psychology ; Nursing ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Care - methods ; Qualitative research ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Rural areas ; Women ; Women's Health ; Zimbabwe</subject><ispartof>Midwifery, 2004-06, Vol.20 (2), p.122-132</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-18b204ce903d685c4d920fb369623e09d14ef866f90e6676fd8ad7409cb0e4423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-18b204ce903d685c4d920fb369623e09d14ef866f90e6676fd8ad7409cb0e4423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026661380300086X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30977,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15177855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mathole, Thubelihle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindmark, Gunilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majoko, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahlberg, Beth Maina</creatorcontrib><title>A qualitative study of women's perspectives of antenatal care in a rural area of Zimbabwe</title><title>Midwifery</title><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><description>to describe the perspectives and experiences of women in their use of antenatal care and in their reasoning on specific antenatal care routines.
two qualitative methods including focus group discussions and individual interviews were combined.
a rural district in Zimbabwe where a randomised control trial had been undertaken to introduce a new antenatal care package.
forty-four women and twenty-four men participated in the study.
women were observed to take actions contrary to those assumed professionally acceptable in antenatal care generally and in some specific changed routines. Visits were to be reduced and weighing was to be omitted, but women, especially younger women, said they preferred more than the stipulated five goal oriented visits. One reason for this was the importance of being assured that the fetus was growing well. They considered that visits spaced too widely would make it difficult for service providers to help, should complications develop. On the other hand, older women (above 35 years old), a group professionally considered to be at high risk, were not so concerned with the visits. All the women said they wanted to be weighed at all the visits. The antenatal care visits are simply known as ‘going for scale’. The health care providers complied by weighing the women without recording. Cultural beliefs had great influence, especially on the time a pregnancy is acknowledged and reported. It is believed that pregnant women and the pregnancy are vulnerable to witchcraft during the early period of pregnancy.
we concluded that, whether in its traditional or new form, antenatal care ignores the experiences and views of women and the way they make sense of pregnancy and the care of pregnancy. The importance of understanding the perspectives of different stakeholders as the key to effective change is underlined.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Antenatal care</subject><subject>Appointments and Schedules</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Experiences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Midwifery - standards</subject><subject>Mothers - psychology</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Care - methods</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women's Health</subject><subject>Zimbabwe</subject><issn>0266-6138</issn><issn>1532-3099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkb1rHDEQxUVIiM9O_oEUQVVc7WX0uStIY4wdBwxp7CJphFaaBR37cZZ2ffi_t5Y7SOdUj3nzm1fMI-QLgy0Dpr_vtkMMhy0HEMXYFnlHNkwJXgkw5j3ZANe60kw0Z-Q85x0AGAn1R3LGFKvrRqkN-XNFnxbXx9nN8RlpnpfwQqeOHqYBx8tM95jyHv26zKvvxhlHN7ueepeQxpE6mpZU5jK6lfgbh9a1B_xEPnSuz_j5pBfk8fbm4fquuv_989f11X3lJVNzxZqWg_RoQATdKC-D4dC1QhvNBYIJTGLXaN0ZQK1r3YXGhVqC8S2glFxckMtj7j5NTwvm2Q4xe-x7N-K0ZFtryTkXWhby29skM6bmtf4vqGoQ3ChVQH4EfZpyTtjZfYqDSy-WgV07sju7dmTXjlavSDn6ekpf2gHDv5NTKQX4cQSwvO05YrLZRxw9hphKFTZM8a38V4_noXc</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>Mathole, Thubelihle</creator><creator>Lindmark, Gunilla</creator><creator>Majoko, Franz</creator><creator>Ahlberg, Beth Maina</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>A qualitative study of women's perspectives of antenatal care in a rural area of Zimbabwe</title><author>Mathole, Thubelihle ; Lindmark, Gunilla ; Majoko, Franz ; Ahlberg, Beth Maina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-18b204ce903d685c4d920fb369623e09d14ef866f90e6676fd8ad7409cb0e4423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Antenatal care</topic><topic>Appointments and Schedules</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Experiences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Midwifery - standards</topic><topic>Mothers - psychology</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Care - methods</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women's Health</topic><topic>Zimbabwe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mathole, Thubelihle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindmark, Gunilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majoko, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahlberg, Beth Maina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mathole, Thubelihle</au><au>Lindmark, Gunilla</au><au>Majoko, Franz</au><au>Ahlberg, Beth Maina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A qualitative study of women's perspectives of antenatal care in a rural area of Zimbabwe</atitle><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>122-132</pages><issn>0266-6138</issn><eissn>1532-3099</eissn><abstract>to describe the perspectives and experiences of women in their use of antenatal care and in their reasoning on specific antenatal care routines.
two qualitative methods including focus group discussions and individual interviews were combined.
a rural district in Zimbabwe where a randomised control trial had been undertaken to introduce a new antenatal care package.
forty-four women and twenty-four men participated in the study.
women were observed to take actions contrary to those assumed professionally acceptable in antenatal care generally and in some specific changed routines. Visits were to be reduced and weighing was to be omitted, but women, especially younger women, said they preferred more than the stipulated five goal oriented visits. One reason for this was the importance of being assured that the fetus was growing well. They considered that visits spaced too widely would make it difficult for service providers to help, should complications develop. On the other hand, older women (above 35 years old), a group professionally considered to be at high risk, were not so concerned with the visits. All the women said they wanted to be weighed at all the visits. The antenatal care visits are simply known as ‘going for scale’. The health care providers complied by weighing the women without recording. Cultural beliefs had great influence, especially on the time a pregnancy is acknowledged and reported. It is believed that pregnant women and the pregnancy are vulnerable to witchcraft during the early period of pregnancy.
we concluded that, whether in its traditional or new form, antenatal care ignores the experiences and views of women and the way they make sense of pregnancy and the care of pregnancy. The importance of understanding the perspectives of different stakeholders as the key to effective change is underlined.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15177855</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.midw.2003.10.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-6138 |
ispartof | Midwifery, 2004-06, Vol.20 (2), p.122-132 |
issn | 0266-6138 1532-3099 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764222364 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Adult Age Factors Antenatal care Appointments and Schedules Attitude to Health Experiences Female Focus Groups Humans Male Middle Aged Midwifery - standards Mothers - psychology Nursing Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data Pregnancy Prenatal Care - methods Qualitative research Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Rural areas Women Women's Health Zimbabwe |
title | A qualitative study of women's perspectives of antenatal care in a rural area of Zimbabwe |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A19%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20qualitative%20study%20of%20women's%20perspectives%20of%20antenatal%20care%20in%20a%20rural%20area%20of%20Zimbabwe&rft.jtitle=Midwifery&rft.au=Mathole,%20Thubelihle&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=122-132&rft.issn=0266-6138&rft.eissn=1532-3099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.midw.2003.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E764222364%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57032955&rft_id=info:pmid/15177855&rft_els_id=S026661380300086X&rfr_iscdi=true |