Quality of rheumatoid arthritis care: the patient’s perspective

Objective. To identify health care aspects of inadequate quality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care from the perspective of patients, and to study to what extent patients’ perspectives on quality of care are associated with patient characteristics. Design. Cross-sectional questionnaire survey perform...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal for quality in health care 2004-02, Vol.16 (1), p.73-81
Hauptverfasser: Jacobi, Catharina E., Boshuizen, Hendriek C., Rupp, Ines, Dinant, Huibert J., Van Den Bos, Geertrudis A. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 81
container_issue 1
container_start_page 73
container_title International journal for quality in health care
container_volume 16
creator Jacobi, Catharina E.
Boshuizen, Hendriek C.
Rupp, Ines
Dinant, Huibert J.
Van Den Bos, Geertrudis A. M.
description Objective. To identify health care aspects of inadequate quality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care from the perspective of patients, and to study to what extent patients’ perspectives on quality of care are associated with patient characteristics. Design. Cross-sectional questionnaire survey performed in 1999. Setting. Secondary and tertiary rheumatology outpatient clinics. Study participants. A random sample (n = 683) of patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis according to the 1987 revised American College of Rheumatology criteria. Patients varied widely with respect to age (mean 61.5 years) and disease duration (mean 10.7 years). Main outcome measures. Using the method of the Quote-questionnaire, patients’ were asked to rate the importance to them of 29 aspects of care, and to rate the performance of five different health care providers [i.e. rheumatologist, general practitioner (GP), physiotherapist, home nurse, and formal home help] relating to these aspects. To identify aspects of inadequate quality, patients’ performance ratings were weighted by importance ratings within each health care service. Inadequate performance on an extremely important aspect was found to be a more serious quality problem than an inadequate performance on an aspect that was less important to patients. Using regression analyses, the association between patients’ quality ratings and patient characteristics was assessed. Results. Several aspects of inadequate quality were identified, namely in the field of knowledge of rheumatism and particularly for GPs, physiotherapists, home nurses, and formal home help, and in the field of information on medication and treatment for rheumatologists and GPs. Furthermore, for the majority of the importance and performance ratings, we found no association with patient-related characteristics. Conclusions. Our study demonstrated that the quality of care could be improved further from the perspective of patients. These findings may be used for making health care more responsive to patients’ needs.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/intqhc/mzh009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764211944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45126954</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45126954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-26a0ecbe42b2fd6b0f1edadec193e8de77537eefa6fb8b27c002707f7e75c0823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c1O3DAQB3CrAgFdOPbYKuqhPaWMvze9AS0fElKF1IqqF8txJoqXzSbYDiqceI2-Xp-ErLICqYeePNL8NGP7T8gbCp8oFPzQr9Jt4w7bhwageEX2qFAi50rrrbHmkudCgtwlr2NcAFDFpdohu1QCA6n4Hjm6GuzSp_usq7PQ4NDa1PkqsyE1wScfM2cDfs5Sg1lvk8dV-vv4J2Y9htijS_4O98l2bZcRDzbnjPw4_fr95Dy__HZ2cXJ0mTshdMqZsoCuRMFKVleqhJpiZSt0tOA4r1BryTVibVVdzkumHQDToGuNWjqYMz4jH6e5fehuB4zJtD46XC7tCrshGq0Eo7QQYpQf_i-pZpIVa_j-H7johrAaX2EYsIIV60vNSD4hF7oYA9amD7614d5QMOsIzBSBmSIY_bvN0KFssXrRmz8fwdsJLGLqwnNfSMpUIcXLQh8T_n7u23BjlOZamvOfv8wXdX1Mr0-FkfwJ3-yd0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202929775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of rheumatoid arthritis care: the patient’s perspective</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Jacobi, Catharina E. ; Boshuizen, Hendriek C. ; Rupp, Ines ; Dinant, Huibert J. ; Van Den Bos, Geertrudis A. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobi, Catharina E. ; Boshuizen, Hendriek C. ; Rupp, Ines ; Dinant, Huibert J. ; Van Den Bos, Geertrudis A. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To identify health care aspects of inadequate quality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care from the perspective of patients, and to study to what extent patients’ perspectives on quality of care are associated with patient characteristics. Design. Cross-sectional questionnaire survey performed in 1999. Setting. Secondary and tertiary rheumatology outpatient clinics. Study participants. A random sample (n = 683) of patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis according to the 1987 revised American College of Rheumatology criteria. Patients varied widely with respect to age (mean 61.5 years) and disease duration (mean 10.7 years). Main outcome measures. Using the method of the Quote-questionnaire, patients’ were asked to rate the importance to them of 29 aspects of care, and to rate the performance of five different health care providers [i.e. rheumatologist, general practitioner (GP), physiotherapist, home nurse, and formal home help] relating to these aspects. To identify aspects of inadequate quality, patients’ performance ratings were weighted by importance ratings within each health care service. Inadequate performance on an extremely important aspect was found to be a more serious quality problem than an inadequate performance on an aspect that was less important to patients. Using regression analyses, the association between patients’ quality ratings and patient characteristics was assessed. Results. Several aspects of inadequate quality were identified, namely in the field of knowledge of rheumatism and particularly for GPs, physiotherapists, home nurses, and formal home help, and in the field of information on medication and treatment for rheumatologists and GPs. Furthermore, for the majority of the importance and performance ratings, we found no association with patient-related characteristics. Conclusions. Our study demonstrated that the quality of care could be improved further from the perspective of patients. These findings may be used for making health care more responsive to patients’ needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-4505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15020563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; health care services ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; importance of aspects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; patient perspective ; Patient Satisfaction ; patient’s view ; Quality of Health Care ; Regression Analysis ; rheumatoid arthritis ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>International journal for quality in health care, 2004-02, Vol.16 (1), p.73-81</ispartof><rights>International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Feb 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-26a0ecbe42b2fd6b0f1edadec193e8de77537eefa6fb8b27c002707f7e75c0823</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45126954$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45126954$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15020563$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobi, Catharina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boshuizen, Hendriek C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rupp, Ines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinant, Huibert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Den Bos, Geertrudis A. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of rheumatoid arthritis care: the patient’s perspective</title><title>International journal for quality in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Qual Health Care</addtitle><description>Objective. To identify health care aspects of inadequate quality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care from the perspective of patients, and to study to what extent patients’ perspectives on quality of care are associated with patient characteristics. Design. Cross-sectional questionnaire survey performed in 1999. Setting. Secondary and tertiary rheumatology outpatient clinics. Study participants. A random sample (n = 683) of patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis according to the 1987 revised American College of Rheumatology criteria. Patients varied widely with respect to age (mean 61.5 years) and disease duration (mean 10.7 years). Main outcome measures. Using the method of the Quote-questionnaire, patients’ were asked to rate the importance to them of 29 aspects of care, and to rate the performance of five different health care providers [i.e. rheumatologist, general practitioner (GP), physiotherapist, home nurse, and formal home help] relating to these aspects. To identify aspects of inadequate quality, patients’ performance ratings were weighted by importance ratings within each health care service. Inadequate performance on an extremely important aspect was found to be a more serious quality problem than an inadequate performance on an aspect that was less important to patients. Using regression analyses, the association between patients’ quality ratings and patient characteristics was assessed. Results. Several aspects of inadequate quality were identified, namely in the field of knowledge of rheumatism and particularly for GPs, physiotherapists, home nurses, and formal home help, and in the field of information on medication and treatment for rheumatologists and GPs. Furthermore, for the majority of the importance and performance ratings, we found no association with patient-related characteristics. Conclusions. Our study demonstrated that the quality of care could be improved further from the perspective of patients. These findings may be used for making health care more responsive to patients’ needs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>health care services</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>importance of aspects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>patient perspective</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>patient’s view</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1353-4505</issn><issn>1464-3677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c1O3DAQB3CrAgFdOPbYKuqhPaWMvze9AS0fElKF1IqqF8txJoqXzSbYDiqceI2-Xp-ErLICqYeePNL8NGP7T8gbCp8oFPzQr9Jt4w7bhwageEX2qFAi50rrrbHmkudCgtwlr2NcAFDFpdohu1QCA6n4Hjm6GuzSp_usq7PQ4NDa1PkqsyE1wScfM2cDfs5Sg1lvk8dV-vv4J2Y9htijS_4O98l2bZcRDzbnjPw4_fr95Dy__HZ2cXJ0mTshdMqZsoCuRMFKVleqhJpiZSt0tOA4r1BryTVibVVdzkumHQDToGuNWjqYMz4jH6e5fehuB4zJtD46XC7tCrshGq0Eo7QQYpQf_i-pZpIVa_j-H7johrAaX2EYsIIV60vNSD4hF7oYA9amD7614d5QMOsIzBSBmSIY_bvN0KFssXrRmz8fwdsJLGLqwnNfSMpUIcXLQh8T_n7u23BjlOZamvOfv8wXdX1Mr0-FkfwJ3-yd0g</recordid><startdate>200402</startdate><enddate>200402</enddate><creator>Jacobi, Catharina E.</creator><creator>Boshuizen, Hendriek C.</creator><creator>Rupp, Ines</creator><creator>Dinant, Huibert J.</creator><creator>Van Den Bos, Geertrudis A. M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200402</creationdate><title>Quality of rheumatoid arthritis care: the patient’s perspective</title><author>Jacobi, Catharina E. ; Boshuizen, Hendriek C. ; Rupp, Ines ; Dinant, Huibert J. ; Van Den Bos, Geertrudis A. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-26a0ecbe42b2fd6b0f1edadec193e8de77537eefa6fb8b27c002707f7e75c0823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>health care services</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>importance of aspects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>patient perspective</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>patient’s view</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobi, Catharina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boshuizen, Hendriek C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rupp, Ines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinant, Huibert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Den Bos, Geertrudis A. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>International journal for quality in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobi, Catharina E.</au><au>Boshuizen, Hendriek C.</au><au>Rupp, Ines</au><au>Dinant, Huibert J.</au><au>Van Den Bos, Geertrudis A. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of rheumatoid arthritis care: the patient’s perspective</atitle><jtitle>International journal for quality in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Qual Health Care</addtitle><date>2004-02</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>73-81</pages><issn>1353-4505</issn><eissn>1464-3677</eissn><abstract>Objective. To identify health care aspects of inadequate quality in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care from the perspective of patients, and to study to what extent patients’ perspectives on quality of care are associated with patient characteristics. Design. Cross-sectional questionnaire survey performed in 1999. Setting. Secondary and tertiary rheumatology outpatient clinics. Study participants. A random sample (n = 683) of patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis according to the 1987 revised American College of Rheumatology criteria. Patients varied widely with respect to age (mean 61.5 years) and disease duration (mean 10.7 years). Main outcome measures. Using the method of the Quote-questionnaire, patients’ were asked to rate the importance to them of 29 aspects of care, and to rate the performance of five different health care providers [i.e. rheumatologist, general practitioner (GP), physiotherapist, home nurse, and formal home help] relating to these aspects. To identify aspects of inadequate quality, patients’ performance ratings were weighted by importance ratings within each health care service. Inadequate performance on an extremely important aspect was found to be a more serious quality problem than an inadequate performance on an aspect that was less important to patients. Using regression analyses, the association between patients’ quality ratings and patient characteristics was assessed. Results. Several aspects of inadequate quality were identified, namely in the field of knowledge of rheumatism and particularly for GPs, physiotherapists, home nurses, and formal home help, and in the field of information on medication and treatment for rheumatologists and GPs. Furthermore, for the majority of the importance and performance ratings, we found no association with patient-related characteristics. Conclusions. Our study demonstrated that the quality of care could be improved further from the perspective of patients. These findings may be used for making health care more responsive to patients’ needs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>15020563</pmid><doi>10.1093/intqhc/mzh009</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1353-4505
ispartof International journal for quality in health care, 2004-02, Vol.16 (1), p.73-81
issn 1353-4505
1464-3677
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764211944
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
health care services
Health Services Research
Humans
importance of aspects
Male
Middle Aged
patient perspective
Patient Satisfaction
patient’s view
Quality of Health Care
Regression Analysis
rheumatoid arthritis
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Quality of rheumatoid arthritis care: the patient’s perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T22%3A25%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20rheumatoid%20arthritis%20care:%20the%20patient%E2%80%99s%20perspective&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20quality%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Jacobi,%20Catharina%20E.&rft.date=2004-02&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=73-81&rft.issn=1353-4505&rft.eissn=1464-3677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/intqhc/mzh009&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45126954%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202929775&rft_id=info:pmid/15020563&rft_jstor_id=45126954&rfr_iscdi=true