Randomised controlled trial to evaluate a new double-layer air-cell overlay for elderly patients requiring head elevation

A clinical investigation was conducted concerning the effects of a newly designed double-layer air-cell overlay in preventing the onset of pressure ulcers for patients with a Braden scale score of ≤16, and who require a head-elevated position of 45° or higher. A randomised controlled trial was under...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of tissue viability 2003-07, Vol.13 (3), p.112-121
Hauptverfasser: Sanada, Hiromi, Sugama, Junko, Matsui, Yuko, Konya, Chizuko, Kitagawa, Atsuko, Okuwa, Mayumi, Omote, Shizuko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121
container_issue 3
container_start_page 112
container_title Journal of tissue viability
container_volume 13
creator Sanada, Hiromi
Sugama, Junko
Matsui, Yuko
Konya, Chizuko
Kitagawa, Atsuko
Okuwa, Mayumi
Omote, Shizuko
description A clinical investigation was conducted concerning the effects of a newly designed double-layer air-cell overlay in preventing the onset of pressure ulcers for patients with a Braden scale score of ≤16, and who require a head-elevated position of 45° or higher. A randomised controlled trial was undertaken involving 82 patients from a general hospital ward using one of the following three support surfaces: a double-layer air-cell overlay, a single-layer air-cell overlay or a standard hospital mattress. A significantly lower percentage of patients using the double-layer air-cell overlay developed pressure ulcers (3.4%) compared to 19.2% and 37.0% for those patients using the single-layer air-cell overlay and standard mattress respectively. Based on these findings, a doublelayer air-cell overlay should be more effective in preventing the onset of pressure ulcers than either a single-layer air-cell overlay or a standard hospital mattress for subjects requiring head elevation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0965-206X(03)80016-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764186211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0965206X03800165</els_id><sourcerecordid>764186211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-60a671d6d57ecd52a279873ae2cf3fe00e4435f5aa5229e25707efac86ddf58f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuPFCEUhVlonHH0J2hY-ViUXqCgqJUxE1_JJCY-EneEgYti6KIHqDb976WnO7rTFXD47r1wDiGPGLxgwNTLzzArOXBQ356BeK6ha4O8Q87_yGfkfq0_ARSAZPfIGeNaz2LW52T_yS4-b2JFT11eWskp9W0r0SbaMsWdTattSC1d8Bf1eb1OOCS7x0JtLIPDlGjeYekSDblQTL4f9nRrW8SlVVrwZo0lLt_pD7S-3_eWLeblAbkbbKr48LRekK9v33y5fD9cfXz34fL11eAE6DYosGpiXnk5ofOSWz7NehIWuQsiIACOo5BBWis5n5HLCSYM1mnlfZA6iAvy9Nh3W_LNirWZ_tvDs-2Cea1mUiPTijPWySf_JoXk4zhCB-URdCXXWjCYbYkbW_aGgTkkYm4TMQfrDQhzm4iRve7xacB6vUH_t-oURwdeHQHshuwiFlNdd9GhjwVdMz7H_4z4DcSgn_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73524440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomised controlled trial to evaluate a new double-layer air-cell overlay for elderly patients requiring head elevation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sanada, Hiromi ; Sugama, Junko ; Matsui, Yuko ; Konya, Chizuko ; Kitagawa, Atsuko ; Okuwa, Mayumi ; Omote, Shizuko</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanada, Hiromi ; Sugama, Junko ; Matsui, Yuko ; Konya, Chizuko ; Kitagawa, Atsuko ; Okuwa, Mayumi ; Omote, Shizuko</creatorcontrib><description>A clinical investigation was conducted concerning the effects of a newly designed double-layer air-cell overlay in preventing the onset of pressure ulcers for patients with a Braden scale score of ≤16, and who require a head-elevated position of 45° or higher. A randomised controlled trial was undertaken involving 82 patients from a general hospital ward using one of the following three support surfaces: a double-layer air-cell overlay, a single-layer air-cell overlay or a standard hospital mattress. A significantly lower percentage of patients using the double-layer air-cell overlay developed pressure ulcers (3.4%) compared to 19.2% and 37.0% for those patients using the single-layer air-cell overlay and standard mattress respectively. Based on these findings, a doublelayer air-cell overlay should be more effective in preventing the onset of pressure ulcers than either a single-layer air-cell overlay or a standard hospital mattress for subjects requiring head elevation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-206X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0965-206X(03)80016-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12889398</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Air ; Analysis of Variance ; Bed Rest - adverse effects ; Bed Rest - methods ; Bed Rest - nursing ; Beds - standards ; Clinical Nursing Research ; double-layer air-cell overlay ; elderly ; Equipment Design ; Female ; head elevation ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nursing ; Nursing Assessment ; Posture ; Pressure Ulcer - epidemiology ; Pressure Ulcer - etiology ; Pressure Ulcer - prevention &amp; control ; randomised controlled trial ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of tissue viability, 2003-07, Vol.13 (3), p.112-121</ispartof><rights>2003 Tissue Viability Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-60a671d6d57ecd52a279873ae2cf3fe00e4435f5aa5229e25707efac86ddf58f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-60a671d6d57ecd52a279873ae2cf3fe00e4435f5aa5229e25707efac86ddf58f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0965-206X(03)80016-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12889398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanada, Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugama, Junko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsui, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konya, Chizuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagawa, Atsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okuwa, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omote, Shizuko</creatorcontrib><title>Randomised controlled trial to evaluate a new double-layer air-cell overlay for elderly patients requiring head elevation</title><title>Journal of tissue viability</title><addtitle>J Tissue Viability</addtitle><description>A clinical investigation was conducted concerning the effects of a newly designed double-layer air-cell overlay in preventing the onset of pressure ulcers for patients with a Braden scale score of ≤16, and who require a head-elevated position of 45° or higher. A randomised controlled trial was undertaken involving 82 patients from a general hospital ward using one of the following three support surfaces: a double-layer air-cell overlay, a single-layer air-cell overlay or a standard hospital mattress. A significantly lower percentage of patients using the double-layer air-cell overlay developed pressure ulcers (3.4%) compared to 19.2% and 37.0% for those patients using the single-layer air-cell overlay and standard mattress respectively. Based on these findings, a doublelayer air-cell overlay should be more effective in preventing the onset of pressure ulcers than either a single-layer air-cell overlay or a standard hospital mattress for subjects requiring head elevation.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Air</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Bed Rest - adverse effects</subject><subject>Bed Rest - methods</subject><subject>Bed Rest - nursing</subject><subject>Beds - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Nursing Research</subject><subject>double-layer air-cell overlay</subject><subject>elderly</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>head elevation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Assessment</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Pressure Ulcer - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pressure Ulcer - etiology</subject><subject>Pressure Ulcer - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>randomised controlled trial</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0965-206X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuPFCEUhVlonHH0J2hY-ViUXqCgqJUxE1_JJCY-EneEgYti6KIHqDb976WnO7rTFXD47r1wDiGPGLxgwNTLzzArOXBQ356BeK6ha4O8Q87_yGfkfq0_ARSAZPfIGeNaz2LW52T_yS4-b2JFT11eWskp9W0r0SbaMsWdTattSC1d8Bf1eb1OOCS7x0JtLIPDlGjeYekSDblQTL4f9nRrW8SlVVrwZo0lLt_pD7S-3_eWLeblAbkbbKr48LRekK9v33y5fD9cfXz34fL11eAE6DYosGpiXnk5ofOSWz7NehIWuQsiIACOo5BBWis5n5HLCSYM1mnlfZA6iAvy9Nh3W_LNirWZ_tvDs-2Cea1mUiPTijPWySf_JoXk4zhCB-URdCXXWjCYbYkbW_aGgTkkYm4TMQfrDQhzm4iRve7xacB6vUH_t-oURwdeHQHshuwiFlNdd9GhjwVdMz7H_4z4DcSgn_w</recordid><startdate>200307</startdate><enddate>200307</enddate><creator>Sanada, Hiromi</creator><creator>Sugama, Junko</creator><creator>Matsui, Yuko</creator><creator>Konya, Chizuko</creator><creator>Kitagawa, Atsuko</creator><creator>Okuwa, Mayumi</creator><creator>Omote, Shizuko</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200307</creationdate><title>Randomised controlled trial to evaluate a new double-layer air-cell overlay for elderly patients requiring head elevation</title><author>Sanada, Hiromi ; Sugama, Junko ; Matsui, Yuko ; Konya, Chizuko ; Kitagawa, Atsuko ; Okuwa, Mayumi ; Omote, Shizuko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-60a671d6d57ecd52a279873ae2cf3fe00e4435f5aa5229e25707efac86ddf58f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Air</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Bed Rest - adverse effects</topic><topic>Bed Rest - methods</topic><topic>Bed Rest - nursing</topic><topic>Beds - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Nursing Research</topic><topic>double-layer air-cell overlay</topic><topic>elderly</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>head elevation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Assessment</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Pressure Ulcer - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pressure Ulcer - etiology</topic><topic>Pressure Ulcer - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>randomised controlled trial</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanada, Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugama, Junko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsui, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konya, Chizuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagawa, Atsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okuwa, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omote, Shizuko</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of tissue viability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanada, Hiromi</au><au>Sugama, Junko</au><au>Matsui, Yuko</au><au>Konya, Chizuko</au><au>Kitagawa, Atsuko</au><au>Okuwa, Mayumi</au><au>Omote, Shizuko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomised controlled trial to evaluate a new double-layer air-cell overlay for elderly patients requiring head elevation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of tissue viability</jtitle><addtitle>J Tissue Viability</addtitle><date>2003-07</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>112-121</pages><issn>0965-206X</issn><abstract>A clinical investigation was conducted concerning the effects of a newly designed double-layer air-cell overlay in preventing the onset of pressure ulcers for patients with a Braden scale score of ≤16, and who require a head-elevated position of 45° or higher. A randomised controlled trial was undertaken involving 82 patients from a general hospital ward using one of the following three support surfaces: a double-layer air-cell overlay, a single-layer air-cell overlay or a standard hospital mattress. A significantly lower percentage of patients using the double-layer air-cell overlay developed pressure ulcers (3.4%) compared to 19.2% and 37.0% for those patients using the single-layer air-cell overlay and standard mattress respectively. Based on these findings, a doublelayer air-cell overlay should be more effective in preventing the onset of pressure ulcers than either a single-layer air-cell overlay or a standard hospital mattress for subjects requiring head elevation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12889398</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0965-206X(03)80016-5</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0965-206X
ispartof Journal of tissue viability, 2003-07, Vol.13 (3), p.112-121
issn 0965-206X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764186211
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Air
Analysis of Variance
Bed Rest - adverse effects
Bed Rest - methods
Bed Rest - nursing
Beds - standards
Clinical Nursing Research
double-layer air-cell overlay
elderly
Equipment Design
Female
head elevation
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Nursing
Nursing Assessment
Posture
Pressure Ulcer - epidemiology
Pressure Ulcer - etiology
Pressure Ulcer - prevention & control
randomised controlled trial
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
title Randomised controlled trial to evaluate a new double-layer air-cell overlay for elderly patients requiring head elevation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T22%3A07%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomised%20controlled%20trial%20to%20evaluate%20a%20new%20double-layer%20air-cell%20overlay%20for%20elderly%20patients%20requiring%20head%20elevation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20tissue%20viability&rft.au=Sanada,%20Hiromi&rft.date=2003-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=112-121&rft.issn=0965-206X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0965-206X(03)80016-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E764186211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73524440&rft_id=info:pmid/12889398&rft_els_id=S0965206X03800165&rfr_iscdi=true