Operating theatre ventilation standards and the risk of postoperative infection
Some form of specialized ventilation has been a feature of operating theatres for over 60 years, and ultraclean ventilation has been shown to reduce postoperative infection after prosthetic joint surgery. However, controversy remains over the contribution of plenum (conventional) ventilation to the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Hospital Infection 2002-02, Vol.50 (2), p.85-90 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 90 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | Journal of Hospital Infection |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Humphreys, H. Taylor, E.W. |
description | Some form of specialized ventilation has been a feature of operating theatres for over 60 years, and ultraclean ventilation has been shown to reduce postoperative infection after prosthetic joint surgery. However, controversy remains over the contribution of plenum (conventional) ventilation to the prevention of infection after surgery in which there is no prosthetic implant. A previous survey in Great Britain and Ireland indicated the continued use of non-ventilated theatres for minor surgery. Laparoscopic and other forms of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have become more common in the last decade, and offer the advantages of reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stay. However, it is not clear whether such surgery requires the same standard of ventilation facilities as open surgery and, in particular, whether all MIS procedures should be performed in a plenum-ventilated theatre. Furthermore, there are many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures currently performed in cardiac and radiology departments where only natural ventilation is available. The Hospital Infection Society (HIS) Working Party on Infection Control and Operating Theatres is attempting to assess the ventilation facilities currently utilized for a wide variety of MIS procedures. This review should form the basis of future HIS guidance on minimum standards in this area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/jhin.2001.1126 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764148260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670101911260</els_id><sourcerecordid>764148260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-da7e9363705c8b2b5cd562bc47a0a71dc8bc15713e8d8bcbe58efc54f69902b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LwzAYxoMobk6vHqUX8dSajyZtjzL8gsEueg5p8tZldulMuoH_vSkt7OTpDQ-_5yH8ELolOCOYs8ftxrqMYkwyQqg4Q3PCGU1pxapzNMek4qkoMJmhqxC2GOOY80s0I6TMBWf5HK3Xe_Cqt-4r6Tegeg_JEVxv25h1Lgm9ckZ5E5J4ByLxNnwnXZPsu9B3Y_cIiXUN6KFxjS4a1Qa4me4Cfb48fyzf0tX69X35tEp1jmmfGlVAxQQrMNdlTWuuDRe01nmhsCqIiaEmvCAMShOfNfASGs3zRlQVpjVmC_Qw7u5993OA0MudDRraVjnoDkEWIid5ScVAZiOpfReCh0buvd0p_ysJloNDOTiUg0M5OIyFu2n6UO_AnPBJWgTuJ0AFrdrGK6dtOHGMEyH4MFSOHEQRRwteBm3BaTDWR1vSdPa_P_wBaJOOeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>764148260</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Operating theatre ventilation standards and the risk of postoperative infection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Humphreys, H. ; Taylor, E.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, H. ; Taylor, E.W.</creatorcontrib><description>Some form of specialized ventilation has been a feature of operating theatres for over 60 years, and ultraclean ventilation has been shown to reduce postoperative infection after prosthetic joint surgery. However, controversy remains over the contribution of plenum (conventional) ventilation to the prevention of infection after surgery in which there is no prosthetic implant. A previous survey in Great Britain and Ireland indicated the continued use of non-ventilated theatres for minor surgery. Laparoscopic and other forms of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have become more common in the last decade, and offer the advantages of reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stay. However, it is not clear whether such surgery requires the same standard of ventilation facilities as open surgery and, in particular, whether all MIS procedures should be performed in a plenum-ventilated theatre. Furthermore, there are many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures currently performed in cardiac and radiology departments where only natural ventilation is available. The Hospital Infection Society (HIS) Working Party on Infection Control and Operating Theatres is attempting to assess the ventilation facilities currently utilized for a wide variety of MIS procedures. This review should form the basis of future HIS guidance on minimum standards in this area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1126</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11846534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement ; Biological and medical sciences ; Epidemiology. Vaccinations ; General aspects ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Operating Rooms - standards ; Operating theatres, minimally invasive surgery, surgical site infection, ventilation, joint replacement ; Risk ; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology ; Ventilation - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of Hospital Infection, 2002-02, Vol.50 (2), p.85-90</ispartof><rights>2002 The Hospital Infection Society</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 The Hospital Infection Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-da7e9363705c8b2b5cd562bc47a0a71dc8bc15713e8d8bcbe58efc54f69902b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-da7e9363705c8b2b5cd562bc47a0a71dc8bc15713e8d8bcbe58efc54f69902b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2001.1126$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,315,782,786,794,3552,27929,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13516656$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11846534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, E.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Operating theatre ventilation standards and the risk of postoperative infection</title><title>Journal of Hospital Infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>Some form of specialized ventilation has been a feature of operating theatres for over 60 years, and ultraclean ventilation has been shown to reduce postoperative infection after prosthetic joint surgery. However, controversy remains over the contribution of plenum (conventional) ventilation to the prevention of infection after surgery in which there is no prosthetic implant. A previous survey in Great Britain and Ireland indicated the continued use of non-ventilated theatres for minor surgery. Laparoscopic and other forms of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have become more common in the last decade, and offer the advantages of reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stay. However, it is not clear whether such surgery requires the same standard of ventilation facilities as open surgery and, in particular, whether all MIS procedures should be performed in a plenum-ventilated theatre. Furthermore, there are many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures currently performed in cardiac and radiology departments where only natural ventilation is available. The Hospital Infection Society (HIS) Working Party on Infection Control and Operating Theatres is attempting to assess the ventilation facilities currently utilized for a wide variety of MIS procedures. This review should form the basis of future HIS guidance on minimum standards in this area.</description><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Operating Rooms - standards</subject><subject>Operating theatres, minimally invasive surgery, surgical site infection, ventilation, joint replacement</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Ventilation - standards</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LwzAYxoMobk6vHqUX8dSajyZtjzL8gsEueg5p8tZldulMuoH_vSkt7OTpDQ-_5yH8ELolOCOYs8ftxrqMYkwyQqg4Q3PCGU1pxapzNMek4qkoMJmhqxC2GOOY80s0I6TMBWf5HK3Xe_Cqt-4r6Tegeg_JEVxv25h1Lgm9ckZ5E5J4ByLxNnwnXZPsu9B3Y_cIiXUN6KFxjS4a1Qa4me4Cfb48fyzf0tX69X35tEp1jmmfGlVAxQQrMNdlTWuuDRe01nmhsCqIiaEmvCAMShOfNfASGs3zRlQVpjVmC_Qw7u5993OA0MudDRraVjnoDkEWIid5ScVAZiOpfReCh0buvd0p_ysJloNDOTiUg0M5OIyFu2n6UO_AnPBJWgTuJ0AFrdrGK6dtOHGMEyH4MFSOHEQRRwteBm3BaTDWR1vSdPa_P_wBaJOOeg</recordid><startdate>20020201</startdate><enddate>20020201</enddate><creator>Humphreys, H.</creator><creator>Taylor, E.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020201</creationdate><title>Operating theatre ventilation standards and the risk of postoperative infection</title><author>Humphreys, H. ; Taylor, E.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-da7e9363705c8b2b5cd562bc47a0a71dc8bc15713e8d8bcbe58efc54f69902b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Operating Rooms - standards</topic><topic>Operating theatres, minimally invasive surgery, surgical site infection, ventilation, joint replacement</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Ventilation - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, E.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of Hospital Infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Humphreys, H.</au><au>Taylor, E.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Operating theatre ventilation standards and the risk of postoperative infection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Hospital Infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2002-02-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>85-90</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Some form of specialized ventilation has been a feature of operating theatres for over 60 years, and ultraclean ventilation has been shown to reduce postoperative infection after prosthetic joint surgery. However, controversy remains over the contribution of plenum (conventional) ventilation to the prevention of infection after surgery in which there is no prosthetic implant. A previous survey in Great Britain and Ireland indicated the continued use of non-ventilated theatres for minor surgery. Laparoscopic and other forms of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have become more common in the last decade, and offer the advantages of reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stay. However, it is not clear whether such surgery requires the same standard of ventilation facilities as open surgery and, in particular, whether all MIS procedures should be performed in a plenum-ventilated theatre. Furthermore, there are many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures currently performed in cardiac and radiology departments where only natural ventilation is available. The Hospital Infection Society (HIS) Working Party on Infection Control and Operating Theatres is attempting to assess the ventilation facilities currently utilized for a wide variety of MIS procedures. This review should form the basis of future HIS guidance on minimum standards in this area.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11846534</pmid><doi>10.1053/jhin.2001.1126</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6701 |
ispartof | Journal of Hospital Infection, 2002-02, Vol.50 (2), p.85-90 |
issn | 0195-6701 1532-2939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764148260 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Air Pollution, Indoor - adverse effects Arthroplasty, Replacement Biological and medical sciences Epidemiology. Vaccinations General aspects Humans Infectious diseases Medical sciences Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Operating Rooms - standards Operating theatres, minimally invasive surgery, surgical site infection, ventilation, joint replacement Risk Surgical Wound Infection - etiology Ventilation - standards |
title | Operating theatre ventilation standards and the risk of postoperative infection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T02%3A33%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Operating%20theatre%20ventilation%20standards%20and%20the%20risk%20of%20postoperative%20infection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Hospital%20Infection&rft.au=Humphreys,%20H.&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=85-90&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/jhin.2001.1126&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E764148260%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=764148260&rft_id=info:pmid/11846534&rft_els_id=S0195670101911260&rfr_iscdi=true |