Absent voices compromise the effectiveness of nursing home regulation: a critique of regulatory reform in the UK nursing home industry
Over the last decade there has been consistent pressure for the healthcare services in the UK to become more accountable to users. Now over half the healthcare beds in England are in the privatised nursing home sector, and regulation of the sector is under reform. Yet requirements for user accountab...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Health & social care in the community 2001-11, Vol.9 (6), p.490-494 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 494 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 490 |
| container_title | Health & social care in the community |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Kerrison, Susan H. Pollock, Allyson M. |
| description | Over the last decade there has been consistent pressure for the healthcare services in the UK to become more accountable to users. Now over half the healthcare beds in England are in the privatised nursing home sector, and regulation of the sector is under reform. Yet requirements for user accountability have not been reflected in these reforms. In other sectors, consumer involvement in regulatory agencies and processes is seen as important to the success of the regulatory enterprise. But in the care sector neither users nor their representatives have been given legal rights of involvement in the National Care Standards Commission or in regulatory processes. This paper argues that failure to involve users not only places the regulation enterprise at risk of capture by the industry, but will also weaken the legitimacy of the new Commission. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00329.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764135749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71281478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5739-5d69e8ae61fd57cc5908e1f6b5c694bb2a7ae0c9c780207b186b079e7031de793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxi0EotvCKyCLA5wS7Dj-h7hUK2gRSxGCAjcr8U5aL0lc7KTdfQGeG2d3VQQHymlGmt_3aWb0IYQpySkpxYtVTpngWcGLMi8IoTkhrND5-h6a3Q7uoxnRQmSkpOQAHca4SiAriHyIDihVpVCFmqGfx3WEfsDX3lmI2PruKvjORcDDJWBoGrCDu4YeYsS-wf0Yousv8KXvAAe4GNtqcL5_iStsgxvcjxEmbD_xYZPaxocOu35reP7uTwvXL8c4hM0j9KCp2giP9_UInb95_Xl-mi0-nLydHy8yyyXTGV8KDaoCQZsll9ZyTRTQRtTcCl3WdVHJCojVViqSLq2pEjWRGiRhdAlSsyP0fOebrky7xsGkWy20bdWDH6ORoqSMy3Iin_2bpIWipVR3goKWiknB7wS55IoqKRP49C9w5cfQp78YqpXkWm33UzvIBh9j-rK5Cq6rwsZQYqaQmJWZsmCmLJgpJGYbErNO0id7_7HuYPlbuE9FAl7tgBvXwua_jc3pp3lqkjzbyV0cYH0rr8J3IyST3Hw9OzFfFt8-lmf6vWHsF_qD2tE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198759849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Absent voices compromise the effectiveness of nursing home regulation: a critique of regulatory reform in the UK nursing home industry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kerrison, Susan H. ; Pollock, Allyson M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kerrison, Susan H. ; Pollock, Allyson M.</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last decade there has been consistent pressure for the healthcare services in the UK to become more accountable to users. Now over half the healthcare beds in England are in the privatised nursing home sector, and regulation of the sector is under reform. Yet requirements for user accountability have not been reflected in these reforms. In other sectors, consumer involvement in regulatory agencies and processes is seen as important to the success of the regulatory enterprise. But in the care sector neither users nor their representatives have been given legal rights of involvement in the National Care Standards Commission or in regulatory processes. This paper argues that failure to involve users not only places the regulation enterprise at risk of capture by the industry, but will also weaken the legitimacy of the new Commission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00329.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11846828</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HSCCEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Community Participation ; Facility Regulation and Control - legislation & jurisprudence ; Health Care Services ; Humans ; Nursing Homes ; Nursing Homes - legislation & jurisprudence ; Nursing Homes - standards ; Patient Rights ; Private Sector - legislation & jurisprudence ; Private Sector - standards ; Privatization ; Quality of Health Care ; Reforms ; Regulation ; Social Responsibility ; State Medicine ; United Kingdom ; User involvement ; users</subject><ispartof>Health & social care in the community, 2001-11, Vol.9 (6), p.490-494</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd. Nov 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5739-5d69e8ae61fd57cc5908e1f6b5c694bb2a7ae0c9c780207b186b079e7031de793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5739-5d69e8ae61fd57cc5908e1f6b5c694bb2a7ae0c9c780207b186b079e7031de793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2524.2001.00329.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2524.2001.00329.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,31000,33775,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11846828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kerrison, Susan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Allyson M.</creatorcontrib><title>Absent voices compromise the effectiveness of nursing home regulation: a critique of regulatory reform in the UK nursing home industry</title><title>Health & social care in the community</title><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><description>Over the last decade there has been consistent pressure for the healthcare services in the UK to become more accountable to users. Now over half the healthcare beds in England are in the privatised nursing home sector, and regulation of the sector is under reform. Yet requirements for user accountability have not been reflected in these reforms. In other sectors, consumer involvement in regulatory agencies and processes is seen as important to the success of the regulatory enterprise. But in the care sector neither users nor their representatives have been given legal rights of involvement in the National Care Standards Commission or in regulatory processes. This paper argues that failure to involve users not only places the regulation enterprise at risk of capture by the industry, but will also weaken the legitimacy of the new Commission.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Community Participation</subject><subject>Facility Regulation and Control - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Nursing Homes - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Nursing Homes - standards</subject><subject>Patient Rights</subject><subject>Private Sector - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Private Sector - standards</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Social Responsibility</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>User involvement</subject><subject>users</subject><issn>0966-0410</issn><issn>1365-2524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxi0EotvCKyCLA5wS7Dj-h7hUK2gRSxGCAjcr8U5aL0lc7KTdfQGeG2d3VQQHymlGmt_3aWb0IYQpySkpxYtVTpngWcGLMi8IoTkhrND5-h6a3Q7uoxnRQmSkpOQAHca4SiAriHyIDihVpVCFmqGfx3WEfsDX3lmI2PruKvjORcDDJWBoGrCDu4YeYsS-wf0Yousv8KXvAAe4GNtqcL5_iStsgxvcjxEmbD_xYZPaxocOu35reP7uTwvXL8c4hM0j9KCp2giP9_UInb95_Xl-mi0-nLydHy8yyyXTGV8KDaoCQZsll9ZyTRTQRtTcCl3WdVHJCojVViqSLq2pEjWRGiRhdAlSsyP0fOebrky7xsGkWy20bdWDH6ORoqSMy3Iin_2bpIWipVR3goKWiknB7wS55IoqKRP49C9w5cfQp78YqpXkWm33UzvIBh9j-rK5Cq6rwsZQYqaQmJWZsmCmLJgpJGYbErNO0id7_7HuYPlbuE9FAl7tgBvXwua_jc3pp3lqkjzbyV0cYH0rr8J3IyST3Hw9OzFfFt8-lmf6vWHsF_qD2tE</recordid><startdate>200111</startdate><enddate>200111</enddate><creator>Kerrison, Susan H.</creator><creator>Pollock, Allyson M.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200111</creationdate><title>Absent voices compromise the effectiveness of nursing home regulation: a critique of regulatory reform in the UK nursing home industry</title><author>Kerrison, Susan H. ; Pollock, Allyson M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5739-5d69e8ae61fd57cc5908e1f6b5c694bb2a7ae0c9c780207b186b079e7031de793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Community Participation</topic><topic>Facility Regulation and Control - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Nursing Homes - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Nursing Homes - standards</topic><topic>Patient Rights</topic><topic>Private Sector - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Private Sector - standards</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Social Responsibility</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>User involvement</topic><topic>users</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kerrison, Susan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, Allyson M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health & social care in the community</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kerrison, Susan H.</au><au>Pollock, Allyson M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Absent voices compromise the effectiveness of nursing home regulation: a critique of regulatory reform in the UK nursing home industry</atitle><jtitle>Health & social care in the community</jtitle><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><date>2001-11</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>494</epage><pages>490-494</pages><issn>0966-0410</issn><eissn>1365-2524</eissn><coden>HSCCEL</coden><abstract>Over the last decade there has been consistent pressure for the healthcare services in the UK to become more accountable to users. Now over half the healthcare beds in England are in the privatised nursing home sector, and regulation of the sector is under reform. Yet requirements for user accountability have not been reflected in these reforms. In other sectors, consumer involvement in regulatory agencies and processes is seen as important to the success of the regulatory enterprise. But in the care sector neither users nor their representatives have been given legal rights of involvement in the National Care Standards Commission or in regulatory processes. This paper argues that failure to involve users not only places the regulation enterprise at risk of capture by the industry, but will also weaken the legitimacy of the new Commission.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>11846828</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00329.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0966-0410 |
| ispartof | Health & social care in the community, 2001-11, Vol.9 (6), p.490-494 |
| issn | 0966-0410 1365-2524 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764135749 |
| source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Accountability Community Participation Facility Regulation and Control - legislation & jurisprudence Health Care Services Humans Nursing Homes Nursing Homes - legislation & jurisprudence Nursing Homes - standards Patient Rights Private Sector - legislation & jurisprudence Private Sector - standards Privatization Quality of Health Care Reforms Regulation Social Responsibility State Medicine United Kingdom User involvement users |
| title | Absent voices compromise the effectiveness of nursing home regulation: a critique of regulatory reform in the UK nursing home industry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T16%3A13%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Absent%20voices%20compromise%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20nursing%20home%20regulation:%20a%20critique%20of%20regulatory%20reform%20in%20the%20UK%20nursing%20home%20industry&rft.jtitle=Health%20&%20social%20care%20in%20the%20community&rft.au=Kerrison,%20Susan%20H.&rft.date=2001-11&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=494&rft.pages=490-494&rft.issn=0966-0410&rft.eissn=1365-2524&rft.coden=HSCCEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00329.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71281478%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198759849&rft_id=info:pmid/11846828&rfr_iscdi=true |