Randomized clinical trial of a quality improvement intervention in nursing homes

The purpose of the study was to determine if simply providing nursing facilities with comparative quality performance information and education about quality improvement would improve clinical practices and subsequently improve resident outcomes, or if a stronger intervention, expert clinical consul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Gerontologist 2001-08, Vol.41 (4), p.525-538
Hauptverfasser: Rantz, M J, Popejoy, L, Petroski, G F, Madsen, R W, Mehr, D R, Zwygart-Stauffacher, M, Hicks, L L, Grando, V, Wipke-Tevis, D D, Bostick, J, Porter, R, Conn, V S, Maas, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 538
container_issue 4
container_start_page 525
container_title The Gerontologist
container_volume 41
creator Rantz, M J
Popejoy, L
Petroski, G F
Madsen, R W
Mehr, D R
Zwygart-Stauffacher, M
Hicks, L L
Grando, V
Wipke-Tevis, D D
Bostick, J
Porter, R
Conn, V S
Maas, M
description The purpose of the study was to determine if simply providing nursing facilities with comparative quality performance information and education about quality improvement would improve clinical practices and subsequently improve resident outcomes, or if a stronger intervention, expert clinical consultation with nursing facility staff, is needed. Nursing facilities (n = 113) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: workshop and feedback reports only, workshop and feedback reports with clinical consultation, and control. Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quality Indicator (QI) feedback reports were prepared and sent quarterly to each facility in intervention groups for a year. Clinical consultation by a gerontological clinical nurse specialist (GCNS) was offered to those in the second group. With the exception of MDS QI 27 (little or no activity), no significant differences in resident assessment measures were detected between the groups of facilities. However, outcomes of residents in nursing homes that actually took advantage of the clinical consultation of the GCNS demonstrated trends in improvements in QIs measuring falls, behavioral symptoms, little or no activity, and pressure ulcers (overall and for low-risk residents). Simply providing comparative performance feedback is not enough to improve resident outcomes. It appears that only those nursing homes that sought the additional intensive support of the GCNS were able to effect enough change in clinical practice to improve resident outcomes significantly.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/geront/41.4.525
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764132519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71065346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8ae7dba2344b470a0bad53a62f2268976c8b4aa1b63fdb35afaa0265e4a9c01e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAQgIMouj7O3qR40FN3M3l1exTxBYIieg7TNl0jbaJJK6y_3uguCB70ksnAN8PMfIQcAp0CLflsYYJ3w0zAVEwlkxtkAoWc55IL2CQTSkHlJQW-Q3ZjfKEpZ6zYJjsAoqRUwoTcP6BrfG8_TJPVnXW2xi4bgk2vbzPM3kbs7LDMbP8a_LvpjRsy6wYT3tPPepeSzI0hWrfInn1v4j7ZarGL5mAd98jT5cXj-XV-e3d1c352m9eCiSGfoymaChkXohIFRVphIzkq1jKm5mWh6nklEKFSvG0qLrFFpExJI7CsKRi-R05XfdNcb6OJg-5trE3XoTN-jLpQAjiTUCby5G8SqEoHU_-CCtK06hs8_gW--DG4tK5mSYsCCjRBsxVUBx9jMK1-DbbHsNRA9Zc8vZKnBWihk7xUcbRuO1a9aX74tS3-Ce6llq8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210961010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized clinical trial of a quality improvement intervention in nursing homes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Rantz, M J ; Popejoy, L ; Petroski, G F ; Madsen, R W ; Mehr, D R ; Zwygart-Stauffacher, M ; Hicks, L L ; Grando, V ; Wipke-Tevis, D D ; Bostick, J ; Porter, R ; Conn, V S ; Maas, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Rantz, M J ; Popejoy, L ; Petroski, G F ; Madsen, R W ; Mehr, D R ; Zwygart-Stauffacher, M ; Hicks, L L ; Grando, V ; Wipke-Tevis, D D ; Bostick, J ; Porter, R ; Conn, V S ; Maas, M</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the study was to determine if simply providing nursing facilities with comparative quality performance information and education about quality improvement would improve clinical practices and subsequently improve resident outcomes, or if a stronger intervention, expert clinical consultation with nursing facility staff, is needed. Nursing facilities (n = 113) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: workshop and feedback reports only, workshop and feedback reports with clinical consultation, and control. Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quality Indicator (QI) feedback reports were prepared and sent quarterly to each facility in intervention groups for a year. Clinical consultation by a gerontological clinical nurse specialist (GCNS) was offered to those in the second group. With the exception of MDS QI 27 (little or no activity), no significant differences in resident assessment measures were detected between the groups of facilities. However, outcomes of residents in nursing homes that actually took advantage of the clinical consultation of the GCNS demonstrated trends in improvements in QIs measuring falls, behavioral symptoms, little or no activity, and pressure ulcers (overall and for low-risk residents). Simply providing comparative performance feedback is not enough to improve resident outcomes. It appears that only those nursing homes that sought the additional intensive support of the GCNS were able to effect enough change in clinical practice to improve resident outcomes significantly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-9013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geront/41.4.525</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11490051</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GRNTA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Consultants ; Education ; Educational services ; Feedback ; Health facilities ; Homes for the Aged ; Humans ; Nurses ; Nursing Homes ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Total Quality Management</subject><ispartof>The Gerontologist, 2001-08, Vol.41 (4), p.525-538</ispartof><rights>Copyright Gerontological Society of America, Incorporated Aug 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8ae7dba2344b470a0bad53a62f2268976c8b4aa1b63fdb35afaa0265e4a9c01e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8ae7dba2344b470a0bad53a62f2268976c8b4aa1b63fdb35afaa0265e4a9c01e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33773,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11490051$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rantz, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popejoy, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petroski, G F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, R W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehr, D R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwygart-Stauffacher, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, L L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grando, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wipke-Tevis, D D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bostick, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conn, V S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, M</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized clinical trial of a quality improvement intervention in nursing homes</title><title>The Gerontologist</title><addtitle>Gerontologist</addtitle><description>The purpose of the study was to determine if simply providing nursing facilities with comparative quality performance information and education about quality improvement would improve clinical practices and subsequently improve resident outcomes, or if a stronger intervention, expert clinical consultation with nursing facility staff, is needed. Nursing facilities (n = 113) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: workshop and feedback reports only, workshop and feedback reports with clinical consultation, and control. Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quality Indicator (QI) feedback reports were prepared and sent quarterly to each facility in intervention groups for a year. Clinical consultation by a gerontological clinical nurse specialist (GCNS) was offered to those in the second group. With the exception of MDS QI 27 (little or no activity), no significant differences in resident assessment measures were detected between the groups of facilities. However, outcomes of residents in nursing homes that actually took advantage of the clinical consultation of the GCNS demonstrated trends in improvements in QIs measuring falls, behavioral symptoms, little or no activity, and pressure ulcers (overall and for low-risk residents). Simply providing comparative performance feedback is not enough to improve resident outcomes. It appears that only those nursing homes that sought the additional intensive support of the GCNS were able to effect enough change in clinical practice to improve resident outcomes significantly.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Consultants</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational services</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Homes for the Aged</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care</subject><subject>Total Quality Management</subject><issn>0016-9013</issn><issn>1758-5341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAQgIMouj7O3qR40FN3M3l1exTxBYIieg7TNl0jbaJJK6y_3uguCB70ksnAN8PMfIQcAp0CLflsYYJ3w0zAVEwlkxtkAoWc55IL2CQTSkHlJQW-Q3ZjfKEpZ6zYJjsAoqRUwoTcP6BrfG8_TJPVnXW2xi4bgk2vbzPM3kbs7LDMbP8a_LvpjRsy6wYT3tPPepeSzI0hWrfInn1v4j7ZarGL5mAd98jT5cXj-XV-e3d1c352m9eCiSGfoymaChkXohIFRVphIzkq1jKm5mWh6nklEKFSvG0qLrFFpExJI7CsKRi-R05XfdNcb6OJg-5trE3XoTN-jLpQAjiTUCby5G8SqEoHU_-CCtK06hs8_gW--DG4tK5mSYsCCjRBsxVUBx9jMK1-DbbHsNRA9Zc8vZKnBWihk7xUcbRuO1a9aX74tS3-Ce6llq8</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Rantz, M J</creator><creator>Popejoy, L</creator><creator>Petroski, G F</creator><creator>Madsen, R W</creator><creator>Mehr, D R</creator><creator>Zwygart-Stauffacher, M</creator><creator>Hicks, L L</creator><creator>Grando, V</creator><creator>Wipke-Tevis, D D</creator><creator>Bostick, J</creator><creator>Porter, R</creator><creator>Conn, V S</creator><creator>Maas, M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>Randomized clinical trial of a quality improvement intervention in nursing homes</title><author>Rantz, M J ; Popejoy, L ; Petroski, G F ; Madsen, R W ; Mehr, D R ; Zwygart-Stauffacher, M ; Hicks, L L ; Grando, V ; Wipke-Tevis, D D ; Bostick, J ; Porter, R ; Conn, V S ; Maas, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8ae7dba2344b470a0bad53a62f2268976c8b4aa1b63fdb35afaa0265e4a9c01e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Consultants</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational services</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Homes for the Aged</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care</topic><topic>Total Quality Management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rantz, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popejoy, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petroski, G F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, R W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehr, D R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwygart-Stauffacher, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, L L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grando, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wipke-Tevis, D D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bostick, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conn, V S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maas, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Gerontologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rantz, M J</au><au>Popejoy, L</au><au>Petroski, G F</au><au>Madsen, R W</au><au>Mehr, D R</au><au>Zwygart-Stauffacher, M</au><au>Hicks, L L</au><au>Grando, V</au><au>Wipke-Tevis, D D</au><au>Bostick, J</au><au>Porter, R</au><au>Conn, V S</au><au>Maas, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized clinical trial of a quality improvement intervention in nursing homes</atitle><jtitle>The Gerontologist</jtitle><addtitle>Gerontologist</addtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>525</spage><epage>538</epage><pages>525-538</pages><issn>0016-9013</issn><eissn>1758-5341</eissn><coden>GRNTA3</coden><abstract>The purpose of the study was to determine if simply providing nursing facilities with comparative quality performance information and education about quality improvement would improve clinical practices and subsequently improve resident outcomes, or if a stronger intervention, expert clinical consultation with nursing facility staff, is needed. Nursing facilities (n = 113) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: workshop and feedback reports only, workshop and feedback reports with clinical consultation, and control. Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quality Indicator (QI) feedback reports were prepared and sent quarterly to each facility in intervention groups for a year. Clinical consultation by a gerontological clinical nurse specialist (GCNS) was offered to those in the second group. With the exception of MDS QI 27 (little or no activity), no significant differences in resident assessment measures were detected between the groups of facilities. However, outcomes of residents in nursing homes that actually took advantage of the clinical consultation of the GCNS demonstrated trends in improvements in QIs measuring falls, behavioral symptoms, little or no activity, and pressure ulcers (overall and for low-risk residents). Simply providing comparative performance feedback is not enough to improve resident outcomes. It appears that only those nursing homes that sought the additional intensive support of the GCNS were able to effect enough change in clinical practice to improve resident outcomes significantly.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>11490051</pmid><doi>10.1093/geront/41.4.525</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-9013
ispartof The Gerontologist, 2001-08, Vol.41 (4), p.525-538
issn 0016-9013
1758-5341
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764132519
source MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Consultants
Education
Educational services
Feedback
Health facilities
Homes for the Aged
Humans
Nurses
Nursing Homes
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Quality Indicators, Health Care
Total Quality Management
title Randomized clinical trial of a quality improvement intervention in nursing homes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A40%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20clinical%20trial%20of%20a%20quality%20improvement%20intervention%20in%20nursing%20homes&rft.jtitle=The%20Gerontologist&rft.au=Rantz,%20M%20J&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=538&rft.pages=525-538&rft.issn=0016-9013&rft.eissn=1758-5341&rft.coden=GRNTA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geront/41.4.525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71065346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210961010&rft_id=info:pmid/11490051&rfr_iscdi=true