Changing roles of grass-root level health workers in Kerala, India
Objective: Multipurpose health workers (MPWs) are envisioned as key personnel in the delivery of primary health care. We evaluated their role and participation in implementing different national health programmes in Kerala, India. Design: Cross-sectional, community-based survey. Participants: We sel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health policy and planning 2001-06, Vol.16 (2), p.171-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 171 |
container_title | Health policy and planning |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Nair, VM Thankappan, KR Sarma, PS Vasan, RS |
description | Objective: Multipurpose health workers (MPWs) are envisioned as key personnel in the delivery of primary health care. We evaluated their role and participation in implementing different national health programmes in Kerala, India. Design: Cross-sectional, community-based survey. Participants: We selected three out of the 14 districts in Kerala. Three-hundred and twenty-six MPWs (95 male and 231 female) from 44 randomly selected primary health centres from the three districts were questioned using a structured pre-tested questionnaire that sought information regarding the provision of health services by the MPWs to eligible beneficiaries in the community. We randomly selected 90 subcentres (30 from each district) and 750 households using a cluster sampling technique, and conducted household surveys to compare the actual delivery of services at the doorstep with that reported by the MPWs. Work sampling of MPWs was also performed to examine the fieldwork time spent by them on implementing individual national health programmes. These data were supplemented with focus group discussions and personal interviews of MPWs and household members. Results: MPWs consistently ‘over-reported’ their performance when self-reported information was compared with that obtained from household surveys. Male MPWs concentrated on the National Malaria Eradication Programme and health education while female workers focused on the family welfare and immunization programmes. Key national health programmes (such as for tuberculosis and acute respiratory infection) were neglected by all MPWs. MPWs were aware of health problems of the elderly, but were not adequately trained nor officially expected to deliver any services in these fields. Conclusions: Grass-root level workers apportion more time to select national health programmes to the detriment of other health programmes, thereby negating their multipurpose role. Our study emphasizes the need for interventions to derive ‘multipurpose benefits’ from the MPWs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/heapol/16.2.171 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764120495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45089682</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45089682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-169c3d0079f76a84f58eef37fc900a47171eeb9f5a7989bc02c8f78077da595d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1vEzEQBmALgWgonDmBLA70wibjb_sIEf1QKzgAUsXFcnbtZNPNOrU30P77utqoSD3Qkw_zeOyZF6G3BKYEDJutvNvGbkbklE6JIs_QhHAJFaVMPUcToFJXBDQcoFc5rwEI51y8RAeEMKEN0RP0Zb5y_bLtlzjFzmccA14ml3OVYhxw5__4DpdHumGF_8Z05VPGbY_PfXKd-4TP-qZ1r9GL4Lrs3-zPQ_Tr-OvP-Wl18f3kbP75oqoFEUNFpKlZA6BMUNJpHoT2PjAVagPguCrf935hgnDKaLOogdY6KA1KNU4Y0bBDdDT23aZ4vfN5sJs2177rXO_jLlslOaHAjSjy4_8laKEZyCehUNIoyumTkGkqmBG8wA-P4DruUl_2YmlJgpoyf0GzEdUp5px8sNvUbly6tQTsfa52zNUSaaktiyk33u_b7hYb3_zz-yALeDeCdR5ieqhzAdpIfT9ANdbbPPibh7pLV1YqpoQ9vfxtT6T4diwvf1jN7gDtEbVn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210829079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changing roles of grass-root level health workers in Kerala, India</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nair, VM ; Thankappan, KR ; Sarma, PS ; Vasan, RS</creator><creatorcontrib>Nair, VM ; Thankappan, KR ; Sarma, PS ; Vasan, RS</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Multipurpose health workers (MPWs) are envisioned as key personnel in the delivery of primary health care. We evaluated their role and participation in implementing different national health programmes in Kerala, India. Design: Cross-sectional, community-based survey. Participants: We selected three out of the 14 districts in Kerala. Three-hundred and twenty-six MPWs (95 male and 231 female) from 44 randomly selected primary health centres from the three districts were questioned using a structured pre-tested questionnaire that sought information regarding the provision of health services by the MPWs to eligible beneficiaries in the community. We randomly selected 90 subcentres (30 from each district) and 750 households using a cluster sampling technique, and conducted household surveys to compare the actual delivery of services at the doorstep with that reported by the MPWs. Work sampling of MPWs was also performed to examine the fieldwork time spent by them on implementing individual national health programmes. These data were supplemented with focus group discussions and personal interviews of MPWs and household members. Results: MPWs consistently ‘over-reported’ their performance when self-reported information was compared with that obtained from household surveys. Male MPWs concentrated on the National Malaria Eradication Programme and health education while female workers focused on the family welfare and immunization programmes. Key national health programmes (such as for tuberculosis and acute respiratory infection) were neglected by all MPWs. MPWs were aware of health problems of the elderly, but were not adequately trained nor officially expected to deliver any services in these fields. Conclusions: Grass-root level workers apportion more time to select national health programmes to the detriment of other health programmes, thereby negating their multipurpose role. Our study emphasizes the need for interventions to derive ‘multipurpose benefits’ from the MPWs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1080</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2237</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/heapol/16.2.171</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11358918</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HPOPEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Asia ; Beneficiaries ; Community ; Community Health Centers - statistics & numerical data ; Community Health Workers - organization & administration ; Community Health Workers - standards ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Curricula ; Employees ; Family Characteristics ; Female ; Female employees ; Gender differentiation ; Health administration ; Health care ; Health care delivery ; Health facilities ; Health planning ; Health policy ; Health services ; Health Services Research ; Households ; Humans ; Immunization ; India ; Job Description ; Kerala ; Malaria ; Male ; Multipurpose ; National Health Programs - organization & administration ; Population ; Primary care ; Primary health care ; Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Public health ; Random Allocation ; Role ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tuberculosis ; Workers ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Health policy and planning, 2001-06, Vol.16 (2), p.171-179</ispartof><rights>2001 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Jun 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-169c3d0079f76a84f58eef37fc900a47171eeb9f5a7989bc02c8f78077da595d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45089682$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45089682$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27866,27924,27925,30999,31000,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11358918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nair, VM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thankappan, KR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarma, PS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasan, RS</creatorcontrib><title>Changing roles of grass-root level health workers in Kerala, India</title><title>Health policy and planning</title><addtitle>Health Policy Plan</addtitle><description>Objective: Multipurpose health workers (MPWs) are envisioned as key personnel in the delivery of primary health care. We evaluated their role and participation in implementing different national health programmes in Kerala, India. Design: Cross-sectional, community-based survey. Participants: We selected three out of the 14 districts in Kerala. Three-hundred and twenty-six MPWs (95 male and 231 female) from 44 randomly selected primary health centres from the three districts were questioned using a structured pre-tested questionnaire that sought information regarding the provision of health services by the MPWs to eligible beneficiaries in the community. We randomly selected 90 subcentres (30 from each district) and 750 households using a cluster sampling technique, and conducted household surveys to compare the actual delivery of services at the doorstep with that reported by the MPWs. Work sampling of MPWs was also performed to examine the fieldwork time spent by them on implementing individual national health programmes. These data were supplemented with focus group discussions and personal interviews of MPWs and household members. Results: MPWs consistently ‘over-reported’ their performance when self-reported information was compared with that obtained from household surveys. Male MPWs concentrated on the National Malaria Eradication Programme and health education while female workers focused on the family welfare and immunization programmes. Key national health programmes (such as for tuberculosis and acute respiratory infection) were neglected by all MPWs. MPWs were aware of health problems of the elderly, but were not adequately trained nor officially expected to deliver any services in these fields. Conclusions: Grass-root level workers apportion more time to select national health programmes to the detriment of other health programmes, thereby negating their multipurpose role. Our study emphasizes the need for interventions to derive ‘multipurpose benefits’ from the MPWs.</description><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community Health Centers - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Community Health Workers - organization & administration</subject><subject>Community Health Workers - standards</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Family Characteristics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female employees</subject><subject>Gender differentiation</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Health planning</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Job Description</subject><subject>Kerala</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multipurpose</subject><subject>National Health Programs - organization & administration</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0268-1080</issn><issn>1460-2237</issn><issn>1460-2237</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1vEzEQBmALgWgonDmBLA70wibjb_sIEf1QKzgAUsXFcnbtZNPNOrU30P77utqoSD3Qkw_zeOyZF6G3BKYEDJutvNvGbkbklE6JIs_QhHAJFaVMPUcToFJXBDQcoFc5rwEI51y8RAeEMKEN0RP0Zb5y_bLtlzjFzmccA14ml3OVYhxw5__4DpdHumGF_8Z05VPGbY_PfXKd-4TP-qZ1r9GL4Lrs3-zPQ_Tr-OvP-Wl18f3kbP75oqoFEUNFpKlZA6BMUNJpHoT2PjAVagPguCrf935hgnDKaLOogdY6KA1KNU4Y0bBDdDT23aZ4vfN5sJs2177rXO_jLlslOaHAjSjy4_8laKEZyCehUNIoyumTkGkqmBG8wA-P4DruUl_2YmlJgpoyf0GzEdUp5px8sNvUbly6tQTsfa52zNUSaaktiyk33u_b7hYb3_zz-yALeDeCdR5ieqhzAdpIfT9ANdbbPPibh7pLV1YqpoQ9vfxtT6T4diwvf1jN7gDtEbVn</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Nair, VM</creator><creator>Thankappan, KR</creator><creator>Sarma, PS</creator><creator>Vasan, RS</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Changing roles of grass-root level health workers in Kerala, India</title><author>Nair, VM ; Thankappan, KR ; Sarma, PS ; Vasan, RS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-169c3d0079f76a84f58eef37fc900a47171eeb9f5a7989bc02c8f78077da595d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community Health Centers - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Community Health Workers - organization & administration</topic><topic>Community Health Workers - standards</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Family Characteristics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female employees</topic><topic>Gender differentiation</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Health planning</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Job Description</topic><topic>Kerala</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multipurpose</topic><topic>National Health Programs - organization & administration</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nair, VM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thankappan, KR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarma, PS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasan, RS</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Health policy and planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nair, VM</au><au>Thankappan, KR</au><au>Sarma, PS</au><au>Vasan, RS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changing roles of grass-root level health workers in Kerala, India</atitle><jtitle>Health policy and planning</jtitle><addtitle>Health Policy Plan</addtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>171-179</pages><issn>0268-1080</issn><issn>1460-2237</issn><eissn>1460-2237</eissn><coden>HPOPEV</coden><abstract>Objective: Multipurpose health workers (MPWs) are envisioned as key personnel in the delivery of primary health care. We evaluated their role and participation in implementing different national health programmes in Kerala, India. Design: Cross-sectional, community-based survey. Participants: We selected three out of the 14 districts in Kerala. Three-hundred and twenty-six MPWs (95 male and 231 female) from 44 randomly selected primary health centres from the three districts were questioned using a structured pre-tested questionnaire that sought information regarding the provision of health services by the MPWs to eligible beneficiaries in the community. We randomly selected 90 subcentres (30 from each district) and 750 households using a cluster sampling technique, and conducted household surveys to compare the actual delivery of services at the doorstep with that reported by the MPWs. Work sampling of MPWs was also performed to examine the fieldwork time spent by them on implementing individual national health programmes. These data were supplemented with focus group discussions and personal interviews of MPWs and household members. Results: MPWs consistently ‘over-reported’ their performance when self-reported information was compared with that obtained from household surveys. Male MPWs concentrated on the National Malaria Eradication Programme and health education while female workers focused on the family welfare and immunization programmes. Key national health programmes (such as for tuberculosis and acute respiratory infection) were neglected by all MPWs. MPWs were aware of health problems of the elderly, but were not adequately trained nor officially expected to deliver any services in these fields. Conclusions: Grass-root level workers apportion more time to select national health programmes to the detriment of other health programmes, thereby negating their multipurpose role. Our study emphasizes the need for interventions to derive ‘multipurpose benefits’ from the MPWs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>11358918</pmid><doi>10.1093/heapol/16.2.171</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-1080 |
ispartof | Health policy and planning, 2001-06, Vol.16 (2), p.171-179 |
issn | 0268-1080 1460-2237 1460-2237 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764120495 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Asia Beneficiaries Community Community Health Centers - statistics & numerical data Community Health Workers - organization & administration Community Health Workers - standards Cross-Sectional Studies Curricula Employees Family Characteristics Female Female employees Gender differentiation Health administration Health care Health care delivery Health facilities Health planning Health policy Health services Health Services Research Households Humans Immunization India Job Description Kerala Malaria Male Multipurpose National Health Programs - organization & administration Population Primary care Primary health care Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data Public health Random Allocation Role Surveys and Questionnaires Tuberculosis Workers Workforce |
title | Changing roles of grass-root level health workers in Kerala, India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A04%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing%20roles%20of%20grass-root%20level%20health%20workers%20in%20Kerala,%20India&rft.jtitle=Health%20policy%20and%20planning&rft.au=Nair,%20VM&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=171-179&rft.issn=0268-1080&rft.eissn=1460-2237&rft.coden=HPOPEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/heapol/16.2.171&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45089682%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210829079&rft_id=info:pmid/11358918&rft_jstor_id=45089682&rfr_iscdi=true |