An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making
This study analyses the types and frequencies of ethical dilemmas and the rationale of ethical decision making in student nurses; it also evaluates their decision making. One hundred senior student nurses who were enrolled in a two-credit course in nursing ethics were asked to provide an informal de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nursing ethics 2000-03, Vol.7 (2), p.113-123 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 123 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 113 |
container_title | Nursing ethics |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Han, Sung-Suk Ahn, Sung-Hee |
description | This study analyses the types and frequencies of ethical dilemmas and the rationale of ethical decision making in student nurses; it also evaluates their decision making. One hundred senior student nurses who were enrolled in a two-credit course in nursing ethics were asked to provide an informal description of a dilemma that they had experienced during their clinical practice. The results were as follows. The ethical dilemmas identified fell into four categories and were of 27 types. Those most frequently experienced were ‘family giving up on a patient because he or she could not be cured’, and ‘not telling the truth to the patient’. The Korean Nurses’ Code of Ethics was applied, in particular the preamble, and the third, fourth, seventh and tenth clauses. The most common rule of ethics and principle applied in these nurses’ ethical decision making were veracity and nonmaleficence. With regard to the moral reasoning process, the primary concern was the welfare of the patients. These students were equipped with the ability to exercise critical and reflective thought when they experienced ethical dilemmas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/096973300000700204 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764090971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_096973300000700204</sage_id><sourcerecordid>72259825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-66441afadcc162d2ebeb19e28b5d85890fdfc4ee324c8068e2890fe17627be803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctKxDAUBuAgijNeXsCFZKWr6kna5rIcxvEC3kAFdyVNT8eMnXZsWsGdr-Hr-SS21IUgaDaBc77zb35C9hgcMSblMWihZRhC_yQAh2iNjFkkZQBa6XUy7kHQixHZ8n7RM67kJhmxDggdijF5nJR0UprizTtPTZnR2aspWtO4qqRVTu-aNsOyoddt7dF_vn_QW1M3zrrVQFxJZ82Ts6agJ2id72dX5tmV8x2ykZvC4-73v00eTmf30_Pg8ubsYjq5DGwE0ARCRBEzucmsZYJnHFNMmUau0jhTsdKQZ7mNEEMeWQVCdZtuhkwKLlNUEG6TwyF3VVcvLfomWTpvsShMiVXrEyki0KAl6-TB35LzWCse_wtjGSsA1kM-QFtX3teYJ6vaLU39ljBI-oqS3xV1R_vf6W26xOzHydBJB44H4M0ck0XV1l0__q_IL4bdmUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57580015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Han, Sung-Suk ; Ahn, Sung-Hee</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Sung-Suk ; Ahn, Sung-Hee</creatorcontrib><description>This study analyses the types and frequencies of ethical dilemmas and the rationale of ethical decision making in student nurses; it also evaluates their decision making. One hundred senior student nurses who were enrolled in a two-credit course in nursing ethics were asked to provide an informal description of a dilemma that they had experienced during their clinical practice. The results were as follows. The ethical dilemmas identified fell into four categories and were of 27 types. Those most frequently experienced were ‘family giving up on a patient because he or she could not be cured’, and ‘not telling the truth to the patient’. The Korean Nurses’ Code of Ethics was applied, in particular the preamble, and the third, fourth, seventh and tenth clauses. The most common rule of ethics and principle applied in these nurses’ ethical decision making were veracity and nonmaleficence. With regard to the moral reasoning process, the primary concern was the welfare of the patients. These students were equipped with the ability to exercise critical and reflective thought when they experienced ethical dilemmas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-7330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0989</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/096973300000700204</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10986936</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Bioethical Issues ; Bioethics ; Codes of Ethics ; Conflict (Psychology) ; Decision Making ; Decision Support Techniques ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate ; Ethics, Clinical ; Ethics, Nursing ; Evaluation ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Korea ; Moral decision making ; Nursing ; Nursing Methodology Research ; Participation ; Problem Solving ; Qualitative Research ; Students ; Students, Nursing - psychology</subject><ispartof>Nursing ethics, 2000-03, Vol.7 (2), p.113-123</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-66441afadcc162d2ebeb19e28b5d85890fdfc4ee324c8068e2890fe17627be803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-66441afadcc162d2ebeb19e28b5d85890fdfc4ee324c8068e2890fe17627be803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/096973300000700204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/096973300000700204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30977,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10986936$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Sung-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Sung-Hee</creatorcontrib><title>An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making</title><title>Nursing ethics</title><addtitle>Nurs Ethics</addtitle><description>This study analyses the types and frequencies of ethical dilemmas and the rationale of ethical decision making in student nurses; it also evaluates their decision making. One hundred senior student nurses who were enrolled in a two-credit course in nursing ethics were asked to provide an informal description of a dilemma that they had experienced during their clinical practice. The results were as follows. The ethical dilemmas identified fell into four categories and were of 27 types. Those most frequently experienced were ‘family giving up on a patient because he or she could not be cured’, and ‘not telling the truth to the patient’. The Korean Nurses’ Code of Ethics was applied, in particular the preamble, and the third, fourth, seventh and tenth clauses. The most common rule of ethics and principle applied in these nurses’ ethical decision making were veracity and nonmaleficence. With regard to the moral reasoning process, the primary concern was the welfare of the patients. These students were equipped with the ability to exercise critical and reflective thought when they experienced ethical dilemmas.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Bioethical Issues</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Codes of Ethics</subject><subject>Conflict (Psychology)</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</subject><subject>Ethics, Clinical</subject><subject>Ethics, Nursing</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Moral decision making</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Methodology Research</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - psychology</subject><issn>0969-7330</issn><issn>1477-0989</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctKxDAUBuAgijNeXsCFZKWr6kna5rIcxvEC3kAFdyVNT8eMnXZsWsGdr-Hr-SS21IUgaDaBc77zb35C9hgcMSblMWihZRhC_yQAh2iNjFkkZQBa6XUy7kHQixHZ8n7RM67kJhmxDggdijF5nJR0UprizTtPTZnR2aspWtO4qqRVTu-aNsOyoddt7dF_vn_QW1M3zrrVQFxJZ82Ts6agJ2id72dX5tmV8x2ykZvC4-73v00eTmf30_Pg8ubsYjq5DGwE0ARCRBEzucmsZYJnHFNMmUau0jhTsdKQZ7mNEEMeWQVCdZtuhkwKLlNUEG6TwyF3VVcvLfomWTpvsShMiVXrEyki0KAl6-TB35LzWCse_wtjGSsA1kM-QFtX3teYJ6vaLU39ljBI-oqS3xV1R_vf6W26xOzHydBJB44H4M0ck0XV1l0__q_IL4bdmUs</recordid><startdate>200003</startdate><enddate>200003</enddate><creator>Han, Sung-Suk</creator><creator>Ahn, Sung-Hee</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200003</creationdate><title>An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making</title><author>Han, Sung-Suk ; Ahn, Sung-Hee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-66441afadcc162d2ebeb19e28b5d85890fdfc4ee324c8068e2890fe17627be803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Bioethical Issues</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Codes of Ethics</topic><topic>Conflict (Psychology)</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</topic><topic>Ethics, Clinical</topic><topic>Ethics, Nursing</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Moral decision making</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Methodology Research</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Sung-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Sung-Hee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Nursing ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Sung-Suk</au><au>Ahn, Sung-Hee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making</atitle><jtitle>Nursing ethics</jtitle><addtitle>Nurs Ethics</addtitle><date>2000-03</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>113-123</pages><issn>0969-7330</issn><eissn>1477-0989</eissn><abstract>This study analyses the types and frequencies of ethical dilemmas and the rationale of ethical decision making in student nurses; it also evaluates their decision making. One hundred senior student nurses who were enrolled in a two-credit course in nursing ethics were asked to provide an informal description of a dilemma that they had experienced during their clinical practice. The results were as follows. The ethical dilemmas identified fell into four categories and were of 27 types. Those most frequently experienced were ‘family giving up on a patient because he or she could not be cured’, and ‘not telling the truth to the patient’. The Korean Nurses’ Code of Ethics was applied, in particular the preamble, and the third, fourth, seventh and tenth clauses. The most common rule of ethics and principle applied in these nurses’ ethical decision making were veracity and nonmaleficence. With regard to the moral reasoning process, the primary concern was the welfare of the patients. These students were equipped with the ability to exercise critical and reflective thought when they experienced ethical dilemmas.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>10986936</pmid><doi>10.1177/096973300000700204</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-7330 |
ispartof | Nursing ethics, 2000-03, Vol.7 (2), p.113-123 |
issn | 0969-7330 1477-0989 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764090971 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; SAGE Journals |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Bioethical Issues Bioethics Codes of Ethics Conflict (Psychology) Decision Making Decision Support Techniques Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate Ethics, Clinical Ethics, Nursing Evaluation Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Korea Moral decision making Nursing Nursing Methodology Research Participation Problem Solving Qualitative Research Students Students, Nursing - psychology |
title | An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A36%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Analysis%20and%20Evaluation%20of%20Student%20Nurses%E2%80%99%20Participation%20in%20Ethical%20Decision%20Making&rft.jtitle=Nursing%20ethics&rft.au=Han,%20Sung-Suk&rft.date=2000-03&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=113-123&rft.issn=0969-7330&rft.eissn=1477-0989&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/096973300000700204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72259825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57580015&rft_id=info:pmid/10986936&rft_sage_id=10.1177_096973300000700204&rfr_iscdi=true |