An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making

This study analyses the types and frequencies of ethical dilemmas and the rationale of ethical decision making in student nurses; it also evaluates their decision making. One hundred senior student nurses who were enrolled in a two-credit course in nursing ethics were asked to provide an informal de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nursing ethics 2000-03, Vol.7 (2), p.113-123
Hauptverfasser: Han, Sung-Suk, Ahn, Sung-Hee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 123
container_issue 2
container_start_page 113
container_title Nursing ethics
container_volume 7
creator Han, Sung-Suk
Ahn, Sung-Hee
description This study analyses the types and frequencies of ethical dilemmas and the rationale of ethical decision making in student nurses; it also evaluates their decision making. One hundred senior student nurses who were enrolled in a two-credit course in nursing ethics were asked to provide an informal description of a dilemma that they had experienced during their clinical practice. The results were as follows. The ethical dilemmas identified fell into four categories and were of 27 types. Those most frequently experienced were ‘family giving up on a patient because he or she could not be cured’, and ‘not telling the truth to the patient’. The Korean Nurses’ Code of Ethics was applied, in particular the preamble, and the third, fourth, seventh and tenth clauses. The most common rule of ethics and principle applied in these nurses’ ethical decision making were veracity and nonmaleficence. With regard to the moral reasoning process, the primary concern was the welfare of the patients. These students were equipped with the ability to exercise critical and reflective thought when they experienced ethical dilemmas.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/096973300000700204
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764090971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_096973300000700204</sage_id><sourcerecordid>72259825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-66441afadcc162d2ebeb19e28b5d85890fdfc4ee324c8068e2890fe17627be803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctKxDAUBuAgijNeXsCFZKWr6kna5rIcxvEC3kAFdyVNT8eMnXZsWsGdr-Hr-SS21IUgaDaBc77zb35C9hgcMSblMWihZRhC_yQAh2iNjFkkZQBa6XUy7kHQixHZ8n7RM67kJhmxDggdijF5nJR0UprizTtPTZnR2aspWtO4qqRVTu-aNsOyoddt7dF_vn_QW1M3zrrVQFxJZ82Ts6agJ2id72dX5tmV8x2ykZvC4-73v00eTmf30_Pg8ubsYjq5DGwE0ARCRBEzucmsZYJnHFNMmUau0jhTsdKQZ7mNEEMeWQVCdZtuhkwKLlNUEG6TwyF3VVcvLfomWTpvsShMiVXrEyki0KAl6-TB35LzWCse_wtjGSsA1kM-QFtX3teYJ6vaLU39ljBI-oqS3xV1R_vf6W26xOzHydBJB44H4M0ck0XV1l0__q_IL4bdmUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57580015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Han, Sung-Suk ; Ahn, Sung-Hee</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Sung-Suk ; Ahn, Sung-Hee</creatorcontrib><description>This study analyses the types and frequencies of ethical dilemmas and the rationale of ethical decision making in student nurses; it also evaluates their decision making. One hundred senior student nurses who were enrolled in a two-credit course in nursing ethics were asked to provide an informal description of a dilemma that they had experienced during their clinical practice. The results were as follows. The ethical dilemmas identified fell into four categories and were of 27 types. Those most frequently experienced were ‘family giving up on a patient because he or she could not be cured’, and ‘not telling the truth to the patient’. The Korean Nurses’ Code of Ethics was applied, in particular the preamble, and the third, fourth, seventh and tenth clauses. The most common rule of ethics and principle applied in these nurses’ ethical decision making were veracity and nonmaleficence. With regard to the moral reasoning process, the primary concern was the welfare of the patients. These students were equipped with the ability to exercise critical and reflective thought when they experienced ethical dilemmas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-7330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0989</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/096973300000700204</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10986936</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Bioethical Issues ; Bioethics ; Codes of Ethics ; Conflict (Psychology) ; Decision Making ; Decision Support Techniques ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate ; Ethics, Clinical ; Ethics, Nursing ; Evaluation ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Korea ; Moral decision making ; Nursing ; Nursing Methodology Research ; Participation ; Problem Solving ; Qualitative Research ; Students ; Students, Nursing - psychology</subject><ispartof>Nursing ethics, 2000-03, Vol.7 (2), p.113-123</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-66441afadcc162d2ebeb19e28b5d85890fdfc4ee324c8068e2890fe17627be803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-66441afadcc162d2ebeb19e28b5d85890fdfc4ee324c8068e2890fe17627be803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/096973300000700204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/096973300000700204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30977,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10986936$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Sung-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Sung-Hee</creatorcontrib><title>An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making</title><title>Nursing ethics</title><addtitle>Nurs Ethics</addtitle><description>This study analyses the types and frequencies of ethical dilemmas and the rationale of ethical decision making in student nurses; it also evaluates their decision making. One hundred senior student nurses who were enrolled in a two-credit course in nursing ethics were asked to provide an informal description of a dilemma that they had experienced during their clinical practice. The results were as follows. The ethical dilemmas identified fell into four categories and were of 27 types. Those most frequently experienced were ‘family giving up on a patient because he or she could not be cured’, and ‘not telling the truth to the patient’. The Korean Nurses’ Code of Ethics was applied, in particular the preamble, and the third, fourth, seventh and tenth clauses. The most common rule of ethics and principle applied in these nurses’ ethical decision making were veracity and nonmaleficence. With regard to the moral reasoning process, the primary concern was the welfare of the patients. These students were equipped with the ability to exercise critical and reflective thought when they experienced ethical dilemmas.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Bioethical Issues</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Codes of Ethics</subject><subject>Conflict (Psychology)</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</subject><subject>Ethics, Clinical</subject><subject>Ethics, Nursing</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Moral decision making</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Methodology Research</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - psychology</subject><issn>0969-7330</issn><issn>1477-0989</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctKxDAUBuAgijNeXsCFZKWr6kna5rIcxvEC3kAFdyVNT8eMnXZsWsGdr-Hr-SS21IUgaDaBc77zb35C9hgcMSblMWihZRhC_yQAh2iNjFkkZQBa6XUy7kHQixHZ8n7RM67kJhmxDggdijF5nJR0UprizTtPTZnR2aspWtO4qqRVTu-aNsOyoddt7dF_vn_QW1M3zrrVQFxJZ82Ts6agJ2id72dX5tmV8x2ykZvC4-73v00eTmf30_Pg8ubsYjq5DGwE0ARCRBEzucmsZYJnHFNMmUau0jhTsdKQZ7mNEEMeWQVCdZtuhkwKLlNUEG6TwyF3VVcvLfomWTpvsShMiVXrEyki0KAl6-TB35LzWCse_wtjGSsA1kM-QFtX3teYJ6vaLU39ljBI-oqS3xV1R_vf6W26xOzHydBJB44H4M0ck0XV1l0__q_IL4bdmUs</recordid><startdate>200003</startdate><enddate>200003</enddate><creator>Han, Sung-Suk</creator><creator>Ahn, Sung-Hee</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200003</creationdate><title>An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making</title><author>Han, Sung-Suk ; Ahn, Sung-Hee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-66441afadcc162d2ebeb19e28b5d85890fdfc4ee324c8068e2890fe17627be803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Bioethical Issues</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Codes of Ethics</topic><topic>Conflict (Psychology)</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</topic><topic>Ethics, Clinical</topic><topic>Ethics, Nursing</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Moral decision making</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Methodology Research</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Sung-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Sung-Hee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Nursing ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Sung-Suk</au><au>Ahn, Sung-Hee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making</atitle><jtitle>Nursing ethics</jtitle><addtitle>Nurs Ethics</addtitle><date>2000-03</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>113-123</pages><issn>0969-7330</issn><eissn>1477-0989</eissn><abstract>This study analyses the types and frequencies of ethical dilemmas and the rationale of ethical decision making in student nurses; it also evaluates their decision making. One hundred senior student nurses who were enrolled in a two-credit course in nursing ethics were asked to provide an informal description of a dilemma that they had experienced during their clinical practice. The results were as follows. The ethical dilemmas identified fell into four categories and were of 27 types. Those most frequently experienced were ‘family giving up on a patient because he or she could not be cured’, and ‘not telling the truth to the patient’. The Korean Nurses’ Code of Ethics was applied, in particular the preamble, and the third, fourth, seventh and tenth clauses. The most common rule of ethics and principle applied in these nurses’ ethical decision making were veracity and nonmaleficence. With regard to the moral reasoning process, the primary concern was the welfare of the patients. These students were equipped with the ability to exercise critical and reflective thought when they experienced ethical dilemmas.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>10986936</pmid><doi>10.1177/096973300000700204</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-7330
ispartof Nursing ethics, 2000-03, Vol.7 (2), p.113-123
issn 0969-7330
1477-0989
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764090971
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; SAGE Journals
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Bioethical Issues
Bioethics
Codes of Ethics
Conflict (Psychology)
Decision Making
Decision Support Techniques
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate
Ethics, Clinical
Ethics, Nursing
Evaluation
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Korea
Moral decision making
Nursing
Nursing Methodology Research
Participation
Problem Solving
Qualitative Research
Students
Students, Nursing - psychology
title An Analysis and Evaluation of Student Nurses’ Participation in Ethical Decision Making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A36%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Analysis%20and%20Evaluation%20of%20Student%20Nurses%E2%80%99%20Participation%20in%20Ethical%20Decision%20Making&rft.jtitle=Nursing%20ethics&rft.au=Han,%20Sung-Suk&rft.date=2000-03&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=113-123&rft.issn=0969-7330&rft.eissn=1477-0989&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/096973300000700204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72259825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57580015&rft_id=info:pmid/10986936&rft_sage_id=10.1177_096973300000700204&rfr_iscdi=true