Surgical hip dressings: a comparison of taping methods
To examine the effectiveness of two methods of preventing blister formation under the taped portion of postoperative hip surgical dressings. Comparative intervention study. Convenience sample of 148 consecutive hip surgery patients in two Connecticut community hospitals. Patients were preoperatively...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Orthopaedic nursing 1999-05, Vol.18 (3), p.37-42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Orthopaedic nursing |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Milne, C T Barrere, C C McLaughlin, T Moore, A |
description | To examine the effectiveness of two methods of preventing blister formation under the taped portion of postoperative hip surgical dressings.
Comparative intervention study.
Convenience sample of 148 consecutive hip surgery patients in two Connecticut community hospitals.
Patients were preoperatively assigned to one of two postoperative surgical hip dressing taping methods or to the control group. The experimental group had the surgical dressing taped to either a hydrocolloid barrier or a nonhydrocolloid barrier 1-inch circumferentially around the surgical incision with the control group having the dressing taped directly to the skin.
The research results found that taping the surgical dressing to a hydrocolloid barrier prevented blister formation. There were no blisters in either experimental group, but evidence of nonblanchable erythema on two patients in the nonhydrocolloid barrier group.
Taping of postoperative surgical hip dressings to a hydrocolloid barrier is superior to taping directly to skin or to a nonhydrocolloid barrier.
A larger scale study to examine potential factors that might place patients at high risk for blister formation is needed. This would aid in identification of patients that would benefit from different surgical dressing taping methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00006416-199905000-00008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764066979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>764066979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-3402fccefe1b137f9f15f899c8e5c221e7952c7ed38712d27bc32c8b56c5024f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC8hiwyowtuMXO1TxkiqxACR2VuLYbaokDnaz4O9JaQGJ2Yzmzpmr0UUIE7gioOU1jCVyIjKitQY-TtlWUgdoSnhOM87U-yGagszzTACFCTpJab1FNJXHaEIIcApUT5F4GeKytkWDV3WPq-hSqrtlusEFtqHti1in0OHg8aboxwVu3WYVqnSKjnzRJHe27zP0dn_3On_MFs8PT_PbRWYpg03GcqDeWucdKQmTXnvCvdLaKsctpcRJzamVrmJKElpRWVpGrSq5sBxo7tkMXe58-xg-Bpc2pq2TdU1TdC4MyUiRgxBa6pG8-EeuwxC78TlDNNdCKAUjpHaQjSGl6LzpY90W8dMQMNtkzU-y5jfZb0mNp-d7_6FsXfV3uI-SfQGEY3IB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195966880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical hip dressings: a comparison of taping methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Milne, C T ; Barrere, C C ; McLaughlin, T ; Moore, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Milne, C T ; Barrere, C C ; McLaughlin, T ; Moore, A</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the effectiveness of two methods of preventing blister formation under the taped portion of postoperative hip surgical dressings.
Comparative intervention study.
Convenience sample of 148 consecutive hip surgery patients in two Connecticut community hospitals.
Patients were preoperatively assigned to one of two postoperative surgical hip dressing taping methods or to the control group. The experimental group had the surgical dressing taped to either a hydrocolloid barrier or a nonhydrocolloid barrier 1-inch circumferentially around the surgical incision with the control group having the dressing taped directly to the skin.
The research results found that taping the surgical dressing to a hydrocolloid barrier prevented blister formation. There were no blisters in either experimental group, but evidence of nonblanchable erythema on two patients in the nonhydrocolloid barrier group.
Taping of postoperative surgical hip dressings to a hydrocolloid barrier is superior to taping directly to skin or to a nonhydrocolloid barrier.
A larger scale study to examine potential factors that might place patients at high risk for blister formation is needed. This would aid in identification of patients that would benefit from different surgical dressing taping methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0744-6020</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-538X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00006416-199905000-00008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11052029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</publisher><subject>Adhesives - adverse effects ; Adhesives - therapeutic use ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - nursing ; Bandages ; Bandages, Hydrocolloid ; Blister - etiology ; Blister - prevention & control ; Clinical Nursing Research ; Colloids - therapeutic use ; Female ; Hip joint ; Humans ; Male ; Medical procedures ; Middle Aged ; Nursing ; Postoperative Care - methods ; Postoperative Care - nursing ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedic nursing, 1999-05, Vol.18 (3), p.37-42</ispartof><rights>Copyright Jannetti Publications, Inc. May/Jun 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11052029$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Milne, C T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrere, C C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, A</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical hip dressings: a comparison of taping methods</title><title>Orthopaedic nursing</title><addtitle>Orthop Nurs</addtitle><description>To examine the effectiveness of two methods of preventing blister formation under the taped portion of postoperative hip surgical dressings.
Comparative intervention study.
Convenience sample of 148 consecutive hip surgery patients in two Connecticut community hospitals.
Patients were preoperatively assigned to one of two postoperative surgical hip dressing taping methods or to the control group. The experimental group had the surgical dressing taped to either a hydrocolloid barrier or a nonhydrocolloid barrier 1-inch circumferentially around the surgical incision with the control group having the dressing taped directly to the skin.
The research results found that taping the surgical dressing to a hydrocolloid barrier prevented blister formation. There were no blisters in either experimental group, but evidence of nonblanchable erythema on two patients in the nonhydrocolloid barrier group.
Taping of postoperative surgical hip dressings to a hydrocolloid barrier is superior to taping directly to skin or to a nonhydrocolloid barrier.
A larger scale study to examine potential factors that might place patients at high risk for blister formation is needed. This would aid in identification of patients that would benefit from different surgical dressing taping methods.</description><subject>Adhesives - adverse effects</subject><subject>Adhesives - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - nursing</subject><subject>Bandages</subject><subject>Bandages, Hydrocolloid</subject><subject>Blister - etiology</subject><subject>Blister - prevention & control</subject><subject>Clinical Nursing Research</subject><subject>Colloids - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hip joint</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical procedures</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - nursing</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0744-6020</issn><issn>1542-538X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC8hiwyowtuMXO1TxkiqxACR2VuLYbaokDnaz4O9JaQGJ2Yzmzpmr0UUIE7gioOU1jCVyIjKitQY-TtlWUgdoSnhOM87U-yGagszzTACFCTpJab1FNJXHaEIIcApUT5F4GeKytkWDV3WPq-hSqrtlusEFtqHti1in0OHg8aboxwVu3WYVqnSKjnzRJHe27zP0dn_3On_MFs8PT_PbRWYpg03GcqDeWucdKQmTXnvCvdLaKsctpcRJzamVrmJKElpRWVpGrSq5sBxo7tkMXe58-xg-Bpc2pq2TdU1TdC4MyUiRgxBa6pG8-EeuwxC78TlDNNdCKAUjpHaQjSGl6LzpY90W8dMQMNtkzU-y5jfZb0mNp-d7_6FsXfV3uI-SfQGEY3IB</recordid><startdate>199905</startdate><enddate>199905</enddate><creator>Milne, C T</creator><creator>Barrere, C C</creator><creator>McLaughlin, T</creator><creator>Moore, A</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199905</creationdate><title>Surgical hip dressings: a comparison of taping methods</title><author>Milne, C T ; Barrere, C C ; McLaughlin, T ; Moore, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-3402fccefe1b137f9f15f899c8e5c221e7952c7ed38712d27bc32c8b56c5024f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adhesives - adverse effects</topic><topic>Adhesives - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - nursing</topic><topic>Bandages</topic><topic>Bandages, Hydrocolloid</topic><topic>Blister - etiology</topic><topic>Blister - prevention & control</topic><topic>Clinical Nursing Research</topic><topic>Colloids - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hip joint</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical procedures</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - nursing</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Milne, C T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrere, C C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedic nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Milne, C T</au><au>Barrere, C C</au><au>McLaughlin, T</au><au>Moore, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical hip dressings: a comparison of taping methods</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedic nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop Nurs</addtitle><date>1999-05</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>37-42</pages><issn>0744-6020</issn><eissn>1542-538X</eissn><abstract>To examine the effectiveness of two methods of preventing blister formation under the taped portion of postoperative hip surgical dressings.
Comparative intervention study.
Convenience sample of 148 consecutive hip surgery patients in two Connecticut community hospitals.
Patients were preoperatively assigned to one of two postoperative surgical hip dressing taping methods or to the control group. The experimental group had the surgical dressing taped to either a hydrocolloid barrier or a nonhydrocolloid barrier 1-inch circumferentially around the surgical incision with the control group having the dressing taped directly to the skin.
The research results found that taping the surgical dressing to a hydrocolloid barrier prevented blister formation. There were no blisters in either experimental group, but evidence of nonblanchable erythema on two patients in the nonhydrocolloid barrier group.
Taping of postoperative surgical hip dressings to a hydrocolloid barrier is superior to taping directly to skin or to a nonhydrocolloid barrier.
A larger scale study to examine potential factors that might place patients at high risk for blister formation is needed. This would aid in identification of patients that would benefit from different surgical dressing taping methods.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</pub><pmid>11052029</pmid><doi>10.1097/00006416-199905000-00008</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0744-6020 |
ispartof | Orthopaedic nursing, 1999-05, Vol.18 (3), p.37-42 |
issn | 0744-6020 1542-538X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764066979 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload |
subjects | Adhesives - adverse effects Adhesives - therapeutic use Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - nursing Bandages Bandages, Hydrocolloid Blister - etiology Blister - prevention & control Clinical Nursing Research Colloids - therapeutic use Female Hip joint Humans Male Medical procedures Middle Aged Nursing Postoperative Care - methods Postoperative Care - nursing Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Surgery |
title | Surgical hip dressings: a comparison of taping methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T16%3A50%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20hip%20dressings:%20a%20comparison%20of%20taping%20methods&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedic%20nursing&rft.au=Milne,%20C%20T&rft.date=1999-05&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=37-42&rft.issn=0744-6020&rft.eissn=1542-538X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00006416-199905000-00008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E764066979%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195966880&rft_id=info:pmid/11052029&rfr_iscdi=true |