The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients

Objective. To determine the clinical and financial outcomes of a highly structured multidisciplinary care model for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. The structured model outcomes (protocol group) are compared with the preprotocol outcomes. Design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal for quality in health care 1998-02, Vol.10 (1), p.15-26
Hauptverfasser: Young, Michael P., Gooder, Valerie J., Oltermann, Mark H., Bohman, Connie B., French, Thomas K., James, Brent C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title International journal for quality in health care
container_volume 10
creator Young, Michael P.
Gooder, Valerie J.
Oltermann, Mark H.
Bohman, Connie B.
French, Thomas K.
James, Brent C.
description Objective. To determine the clinical and financial outcomes of a highly structured multidisciplinary care model for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. The structured model outcomes (protocol group) are compared with the preprotocol outcomes. Design. Descriptive study with financial analysis. Setting. A twelve-bed medical–surgical ICU in a non-teaching tertiary referral center in Ogden, Utah. Study participants. During a 54-month period, 469 consecutive intensive care patients requiring mechanical ventilation for longer than 72 hours who did not meet exclusion criteria were studied. Interventions. A multidisciplinary team was formed to coordinate the care of ventilator-dependent patients. Care was integrated by daily collaborative bedside rounds, monthly meetings, and implementation of numerous guidelines and protocols. Patients were followed from the time of ICU admission until the day of hospital discharge. Main outcome measures. Patients were assigned APACHE II scores on admission to the ICU, and were divided into eight diagnostic categories. ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, costs, charges, reimbursement, and in-hospital mortality were measured. Results. Mortality in the preprotocol and protocol group, after adjustment for APACHE II scores, remained statistically unchanged (21–23%). After we implemented the new care model, we demonstrated significant decreases in the mean survivor's ICU length of stay (19.8 days to 14.7 days, P=0.001), hospital length of stay (34.6 days to 25.9 days, P=0.001), charges (US$102 500 to US$78 500, P=0.001), and costs (US$71 900 to US$58 000, P=0.001). Conclusions. Implementation of a structured multidisciplinary care model to care for a heterogeneous population of ventilator-dependent ICU patients was associated with significant reductions in ICU and hospital lengths of stay, charges, and costs. Mortality rates were unaffected.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/intqhc/10.1.15
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764051234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45125354</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45125354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3385-e0abe44bded20473d861ca73ff6e048366cb37672e14547acb3a7df0c14ded283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMo1tfWnZKVrqYmvXlMl1LUioqIVcRNSDMZG52XyVT035txpLhyde_hfPdyOAjtUzKkZAwnrmrfF-akk0PK19AWZYIlIKRcjztwSBgnfIC2Q3glhArgYhMNKCFAZApb6HG2sNiVjTYtrnOscbksWpe5YFxTuEr7L6ybxtfaLHBdYaO9q15wXnv8YavWFbqtfZLZxlZZ1LjRrYsz7KKNXBfB7v3OHfRwfjabTJPr24vLyel1YgBSnlii55axeWazEWESslRQoyXkubCEpSCEmYMUcmQp40zqqLTMcmIo605S2EHH_d8Y8X1pQ6vKGN0Wha5svQxKCkY4HQGL5NG_pBhTKfiYR3DYg8bXIXibq8a7MhahKFFd56rv_Ecq2h0c_n5ezkub_cH7kiNw0AOvIba18lkMxoF30ZLed6G1nytf-zclJEiupk_Pajo6v5nd312pG_gGNG-YEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69176595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Young, Michael P. ; Gooder, Valerie J. ; Oltermann, Mark H. ; Bohman, Connie B. ; French, Thomas K. ; James, Brent C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Michael P. ; Gooder, Valerie J. ; Oltermann, Mark H. ; Bohman, Connie B. ; French, Thomas K. ; James, Brent C.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To determine the clinical and financial outcomes of a highly structured multidisciplinary care model for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. The structured model outcomes (protocol group) are compared with the preprotocol outcomes. Design. Descriptive study with financial analysis. Setting. A twelve-bed medical–surgical ICU in a non-teaching tertiary referral center in Ogden, Utah. Study participants. During a 54-month period, 469 consecutive intensive care patients requiring mechanical ventilation for longer than 72 hours who did not meet exclusion criteria were studied. Interventions. A multidisciplinary team was formed to coordinate the care of ventilator-dependent patients. Care was integrated by daily collaborative bedside rounds, monthly meetings, and implementation of numerous guidelines and protocols. Patients were followed from the time of ICU admission until the day of hospital discharge. Main outcome measures. Patients were assigned APACHE II scores on admission to the ICU, and were divided into eight diagnostic categories. ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, costs, charges, reimbursement, and in-hospital mortality were measured. Results. Mortality in the preprotocol and protocol group, after adjustment for APACHE II scores, remained statistically unchanged (21–23%). After we implemented the new care model, we demonstrated significant decreases in the mean survivor's ICU length of stay (19.8 days to 14.7 days, P=0.001), hospital length of stay (34.6 days to 25.9 days, P=0.001), charges (US$102 500 to US$78 500, P=0.001), and costs (US$71 900 to US$58 000, P=0.001). Conclusions. Implementation of a structured multidisciplinary care model to care for a heterogeneous population of ventilator-dependent ICU patients was associated with significant reductions in ICU and hospital lengths of stay, charges, and costs. Mortality rates were unaffected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-4505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/10.1.15</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10030783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; APACHE ; APACHE II ; charges ; chronic ; Chronic Disease ; collaboration ; costs ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Critical Care - classification ; Critical Care - economics ; Critical Care - organization &amp; administration ; Female ; Humans ; intensive care unit ; Intensive Care Units - economics ; Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Length of Stay ; Linear Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; mortality ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Care Team ; Prospective Studies ; protocols ; quality ; Respiration, Artificial - economics ; Respiration, Artificial - mortality ; Utah ; ventilator dependent</subject><ispartof>International journal for quality in health care, 1998-02, Vol.10 (1), p.15-26</ispartof><rights>International Society for Quality in Health Care 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3385-e0abe44bded20473d861ca73ff6e048366cb37672e14547acb3a7df0c14ded283</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45125354$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45125354$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10030783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooder, Valerie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oltermann, Mark H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohman, Connie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Thomas K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Brent C.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients</title><title>International journal for quality in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Qual Health Care</addtitle><description>Objective. To determine the clinical and financial outcomes of a highly structured multidisciplinary care model for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. The structured model outcomes (protocol group) are compared with the preprotocol outcomes. Design. Descriptive study with financial analysis. Setting. A twelve-bed medical–surgical ICU in a non-teaching tertiary referral center in Ogden, Utah. Study participants. During a 54-month period, 469 consecutive intensive care patients requiring mechanical ventilation for longer than 72 hours who did not meet exclusion criteria were studied. Interventions. A multidisciplinary team was formed to coordinate the care of ventilator-dependent patients. Care was integrated by daily collaborative bedside rounds, monthly meetings, and implementation of numerous guidelines and protocols. Patients were followed from the time of ICU admission until the day of hospital discharge. Main outcome measures. Patients were assigned APACHE II scores on admission to the ICU, and were divided into eight diagnostic categories. ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, costs, charges, reimbursement, and in-hospital mortality were measured. Results. Mortality in the preprotocol and protocol group, after adjustment for APACHE II scores, remained statistically unchanged (21–23%). After we implemented the new care model, we demonstrated significant decreases in the mean survivor's ICU length of stay (19.8 days to 14.7 days, P=0.001), hospital length of stay (34.6 days to 25.9 days, P=0.001), charges (US$102 500 to US$78 500, P=0.001), and costs (US$71 900 to US$58 000, P=0.001). Conclusions. Implementation of a structured multidisciplinary care model to care for a heterogeneous population of ventilator-dependent ICU patients was associated with significant reductions in ICU and hospital lengths of stay, charges, and costs. Mortality rates were unaffected.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>APACHE</subject><subject>APACHE II</subject><subject>charges</subject><subject>chronic</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>collaboration</subject><subject>costs</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Critical Care - classification</subject><subject>Critical Care - economics</subject><subject>Critical Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intensive care unit</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - economics</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>protocols</subject><subject>quality</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - economics</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - mortality</subject><subject>Utah</subject><subject>ventilator dependent</subject><issn>1353-4505</issn><issn>1464-3677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMo1tfWnZKVrqYmvXlMl1LUioqIVcRNSDMZG52XyVT035txpLhyde_hfPdyOAjtUzKkZAwnrmrfF-akk0PK19AWZYIlIKRcjztwSBgnfIC2Q3glhArgYhMNKCFAZApb6HG2sNiVjTYtrnOscbksWpe5YFxTuEr7L6ybxtfaLHBdYaO9q15wXnv8YavWFbqtfZLZxlZZ1LjRrYsz7KKNXBfB7v3OHfRwfjabTJPr24vLyel1YgBSnlii55axeWazEWESslRQoyXkubCEpSCEmYMUcmQp40zqqLTMcmIo605S2EHH_d8Y8X1pQ6vKGN0Wha5svQxKCkY4HQGL5NG_pBhTKfiYR3DYg8bXIXibq8a7MhahKFFd56rv_Ecq2h0c_n5ezkub_cH7kiNw0AOvIba18lkMxoF30ZLed6G1nytf-zclJEiupk_Pajo6v5nd312pG_gGNG-YEw</recordid><startdate>199802</startdate><enddate>199802</enddate><creator>Young, Michael P.</creator><creator>Gooder, Valerie J.</creator><creator>Oltermann, Mark H.</creator><creator>Bohman, Connie B.</creator><creator>French, Thomas K.</creator><creator>James, Brent C.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199802</creationdate><title>The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients</title><author>Young, Michael P. ; Gooder, Valerie J. ; Oltermann, Mark H. ; Bohman, Connie B. ; French, Thomas K. ; James, Brent C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3385-e0abe44bded20473d861ca73ff6e048366cb37672e14547acb3a7df0c14ded283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>APACHE</topic><topic>APACHE II</topic><topic>charges</topic><topic>chronic</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>collaboration</topic><topic>costs</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Critical Care - classification</topic><topic>Critical Care - economics</topic><topic>Critical Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intensive care unit</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - economics</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>protocols</topic><topic>quality</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - economics</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - mortality</topic><topic>Utah</topic><topic>ventilator dependent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooder, Valerie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oltermann, Mark H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohman, Connie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Thomas K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Brent C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>International journal for quality in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Michael P.</au><au>Gooder, Valerie J.</au><au>Oltermann, Mark H.</au><au>Bohman, Connie B.</au><au>French, Thomas K.</au><au>James, Brent C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients</atitle><jtitle>International journal for quality in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Qual Health Care</addtitle><date>1998-02</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>15-26</pages><issn>1353-4505</issn><eissn>1464-3677</eissn><abstract>Objective. To determine the clinical and financial outcomes of a highly structured multidisciplinary care model for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. The structured model outcomes (protocol group) are compared with the preprotocol outcomes. Design. Descriptive study with financial analysis. Setting. A twelve-bed medical–surgical ICU in a non-teaching tertiary referral center in Ogden, Utah. Study participants. During a 54-month period, 469 consecutive intensive care patients requiring mechanical ventilation for longer than 72 hours who did not meet exclusion criteria were studied. Interventions. A multidisciplinary team was formed to coordinate the care of ventilator-dependent patients. Care was integrated by daily collaborative bedside rounds, monthly meetings, and implementation of numerous guidelines and protocols. Patients were followed from the time of ICU admission until the day of hospital discharge. Main outcome measures. Patients were assigned APACHE II scores on admission to the ICU, and were divided into eight diagnostic categories. ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, costs, charges, reimbursement, and in-hospital mortality were measured. Results. Mortality in the preprotocol and protocol group, after adjustment for APACHE II scores, remained statistically unchanged (21–23%). After we implemented the new care model, we demonstrated significant decreases in the mean survivor's ICU length of stay (19.8 days to 14.7 days, P=0.001), hospital length of stay (34.6 days to 25.9 days, P=0.001), charges (US$102 500 to US$78 500, P=0.001), and costs (US$71 900 to US$58 000, P=0.001). Conclusions. Implementation of a structured multidisciplinary care model to care for a heterogeneous population of ventilator-dependent ICU patients was associated with significant reductions in ICU and hospital lengths of stay, charges, and costs. Mortality rates were unaffected.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>10030783</pmid><doi>10.1093/intqhc/10.1.15</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1353-4505
ispartof International journal for quality in health care, 1998-02, Vol.10 (1), p.15-26
issn 1353-4505
1464-3677
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764051234
source MEDLINE; Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
APACHE
APACHE II
charges
chronic
Chronic Disease
collaboration
costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Critical Care - classification
Critical Care - economics
Critical Care - organization & administration
Female
Humans
intensive care unit
Intensive Care Units - economics
Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data
Length of Stay
Linear Models
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
mortality
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Patient Care Team
Prospective Studies
protocols
quality
Respiration, Artificial - economics
Respiration, Artificial - mortality
Utah
ventilator dependent
title The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20a%20multidisciplinary%20approach%20on%20caring%20for%20ventilator-dependent%20patients&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20quality%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Young,%20Michael%20P.&rft.date=1998-02&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=15-26&rft.issn=1353-4505&rft.eissn=1464-3677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/intqhc/10.1.15&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45125354%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69176595&rft_id=info:pmid/10030783&rft_jstor_id=45125354&rfr_iscdi=true