The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients
Objective. To determine the clinical and financial outcomes of a highly structured multidisciplinary care model for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. The structured model outcomes (protocol group) are compared with the preprotocol outcomes. Design...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal for quality in health care 1998-02, Vol.10 (1), p.15-26 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 26 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15 |
container_title | International journal for quality in health care |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Young, Michael P. Gooder, Valerie J. Oltermann, Mark H. Bohman, Connie B. French, Thomas K. James, Brent C. |
description | Objective. To determine the clinical and financial outcomes of a highly structured multidisciplinary care model for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. The structured model outcomes (protocol group) are compared with the preprotocol outcomes. Design. Descriptive study with financial analysis. Setting. A twelve-bed medical–surgical ICU in a non-teaching tertiary referral center in Ogden, Utah. Study participants. During a 54-month period, 469 consecutive intensive care patients requiring mechanical ventilation for longer than 72 hours who did not meet exclusion criteria were studied. Interventions. A multidisciplinary team was formed to coordinate the care of ventilator-dependent patients. Care was integrated by daily collaborative bedside rounds, monthly meetings, and implementation of numerous guidelines and protocols. Patients were followed from the time of ICU admission until the day of hospital discharge. Main outcome measures. Patients were assigned APACHE II scores on admission to the ICU, and were divided into eight diagnostic categories. ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, costs, charges, reimbursement, and in-hospital mortality were measured. Results. Mortality in the preprotocol and protocol group, after adjustment for APACHE II scores, remained statistically unchanged (21–23%). After we implemented the new care model, we demonstrated significant decreases in the mean survivor's ICU length of stay (19.8 days to 14.7 days, P=0.001), hospital length of stay (34.6 days to 25.9 days, P=0.001), charges (US$102 500 to US$78 500, P=0.001), and costs (US$71 900 to US$58 000, P=0.001). Conclusions. Implementation of a structured multidisciplinary care model to care for a heterogeneous population of ventilator-dependent ICU patients was associated with significant reductions in ICU and hospital lengths of stay, charges, and costs. Mortality rates were unaffected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/intqhc/10.1.15 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764051234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45125354</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45125354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3385-e0abe44bded20473d861ca73ff6e048366cb37672e14547acb3a7df0c14ded283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMo1tfWnZKVrqYmvXlMl1LUioqIVcRNSDMZG52XyVT035txpLhyde_hfPdyOAjtUzKkZAwnrmrfF-akk0PK19AWZYIlIKRcjztwSBgnfIC2Q3glhArgYhMNKCFAZApb6HG2sNiVjTYtrnOscbksWpe5YFxTuEr7L6ybxtfaLHBdYaO9q15wXnv8YavWFbqtfZLZxlZZ1LjRrYsz7KKNXBfB7v3OHfRwfjabTJPr24vLyel1YgBSnlii55axeWazEWESslRQoyXkubCEpSCEmYMUcmQp40zqqLTMcmIo605S2EHH_d8Y8X1pQ6vKGN0Wha5svQxKCkY4HQGL5NG_pBhTKfiYR3DYg8bXIXibq8a7MhahKFFd56rv_Ecq2h0c_n5ezkub_cH7kiNw0AOvIba18lkMxoF30ZLed6G1nytf-zclJEiupk_Pajo6v5nd312pG_gGNG-YEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69176595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Young, Michael P. ; Gooder, Valerie J. ; Oltermann, Mark H. ; Bohman, Connie B. ; French, Thomas K. ; James, Brent C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Michael P. ; Gooder, Valerie J. ; Oltermann, Mark H. ; Bohman, Connie B. ; French, Thomas K. ; James, Brent C.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To determine the clinical and financial outcomes of a highly structured multidisciplinary care model for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. The structured model outcomes (protocol group) are compared with the preprotocol outcomes. Design. Descriptive study with financial analysis. Setting. A twelve-bed medical–surgical ICU in a non-teaching tertiary referral center in Ogden, Utah. Study participants. During a 54-month period, 469 consecutive intensive care patients requiring mechanical ventilation for longer than 72 hours who did not meet exclusion criteria were studied. Interventions. A multidisciplinary team was formed to coordinate the care of ventilator-dependent patients. Care was integrated by daily collaborative bedside rounds, monthly meetings, and implementation of numerous guidelines and protocols. Patients were followed from the time of ICU admission until the day of hospital discharge. Main outcome measures. Patients were assigned APACHE II scores on admission to the ICU, and were divided into eight diagnostic categories. ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, costs, charges, reimbursement, and in-hospital mortality were measured. Results. Mortality in the preprotocol and protocol group, after adjustment for APACHE II scores, remained statistically unchanged (21–23%). After we implemented the new care model, we demonstrated significant decreases in the mean survivor's ICU length of stay (19.8 days to 14.7 days, P=0.001), hospital length of stay (34.6 days to 25.9 days, P=0.001), charges (US$102 500 to US$78 500, P=0.001), and costs (US$71 900 to US$58 000, P=0.001). Conclusions. Implementation of a structured multidisciplinary care model to care for a heterogeneous population of ventilator-dependent ICU patients was associated with significant reductions in ICU and hospital lengths of stay, charges, and costs. Mortality rates were unaffected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-4505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/10.1.15</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10030783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; APACHE ; APACHE II ; charges ; chronic ; Chronic Disease ; collaboration ; costs ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Critical Care - classification ; Critical Care - economics ; Critical Care - organization & administration ; Female ; Humans ; intensive care unit ; Intensive Care Units - economics ; Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data ; Length of Stay ; Linear Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; mortality ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Care Team ; Prospective Studies ; protocols ; quality ; Respiration, Artificial - economics ; Respiration, Artificial - mortality ; Utah ; ventilator dependent</subject><ispartof>International journal for quality in health care, 1998-02, Vol.10 (1), p.15-26</ispartof><rights>International Society for Quality in Health Care 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3385-e0abe44bded20473d861ca73ff6e048366cb37672e14547acb3a7df0c14ded283</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45125354$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45125354$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10030783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooder, Valerie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oltermann, Mark H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohman, Connie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Thomas K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Brent C.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients</title><title>International journal for quality in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Qual Health Care</addtitle><description>Objective. To determine the clinical and financial outcomes of a highly structured multidisciplinary care model for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. The structured model outcomes (protocol group) are compared with the preprotocol outcomes. Design. Descriptive study with financial analysis. Setting. A twelve-bed medical–surgical ICU in a non-teaching tertiary referral center in Ogden, Utah. Study participants. During a 54-month period, 469 consecutive intensive care patients requiring mechanical ventilation for longer than 72 hours who did not meet exclusion criteria were studied. Interventions. A multidisciplinary team was formed to coordinate the care of ventilator-dependent patients. Care was integrated by daily collaborative bedside rounds, monthly meetings, and implementation of numerous guidelines and protocols. Patients were followed from the time of ICU admission until the day of hospital discharge. Main outcome measures. Patients were assigned APACHE II scores on admission to the ICU, and were divided into eight diagnostic categories. ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, costs, charges, reimbursement, and in-hospital mortality were measured. Results. Mortality in the preprotocol and protocol group, after adjustment for APACHE II scores, remained statistically unchanged (21–23%). After we implemented the new care model, we demonstrated significant decreases in the mean survivor's ICU length of stay (19.8 days to 14.7 days, P=0.001), hospital length of stay (34.6 days to 25.9 days, P=0.001), charges (US$102 500 to US$78 500, P=0.001), and costs (US$71 900 to US$58 000, P=0.001). Conclusions. Implementation of a structured multidisciplinary care model to care for a heterogeneous population of ventilator-dependent ICU patients was associated with significant reductions in ICU and hospital lengths of stay, charges, and costs. Mortality rates were unaffected.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>APACHE</subject><subject>APACHE II</subject><subject>charges</subject><subject>chronic</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>collaboration</subject><subject>costs</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Critical Care - classification</subject><subject>Critical Care - economics</subject><subject>Critical Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intensive care unit</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - economics</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>protocols</subject><subject>quality</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - economics</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - mortality</subject><subject>Utah</subject><subject>ventilator dependent</subject><issn>1353-4505</issn><issn>1464-3677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMo1tfWnZKVrqYmvXlMl1LUioqIVcRNSDMZG52XyVT035txpLhyde_hfPdyOAjtUzKkZAwnrmrfF-akk0PK19AWZYIlIKRcjztwSBgnfIC2Q3glhArgYhMNKCFAZApb6HG2sNiVjTYtrnOscbksWpe5YFxTuEr7L6ybxtfaLHBdYaO9q15wXnv8YavWFbqtfZLZxlZZ1LjRrYsz7KKNXBfB7v3OHfRwfjabTJPr24vLyel1YgBSnlii55axeWazEWESslRQoyXkubCEpSCEmYMUcmQp40zqqLTMcmIo605S2EHH_d8Y8X1pQ6vKGN0Wha5svQxKCkY4HQGL5NG_pBhTKfiYR3DYg8bXIXibq8a7MhahKFFd56rv_Ecq2h0c_n5ezkub_cH7kiNw0AOvIba18lkMxoF30ZLed6G1nytf-zclJEiupk_Pajo6v5nd312pG_gGNG-YEw</recordid><startdate>199802</startdate><enddate>199802</enddate><creator>Young, Michael P.</creator><creator>Gooder, Valerie J.</creator><creator>Oltermann, Mark H.</creator><creator>Bohman, Connie B.</creator><creator>French, Thomas K.</creator><creator>James, Brent C.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199802</creationdate><title>The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients</title><author>Young, Michael P. ; Gooder, Valerie J. ; Oltermann, Mark H. ; Bohman, Connie B. ; French, Thomas K. ; James, Brent C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3385-e0abe44bded20473d861ca73ff6e048366cb37672e14547acb3a7df0c14ded283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>APACHE</topic><topic>APACHE II</topic><topic>charges</topic><topic>chronic</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>collaboration</topic><topic>costs</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Critical Care - classification</topic><topic>Critical Care - economics</topic><topic>Critical Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intensive care unit</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - economics</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>protocols</topic><topic>quality</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - economics</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - mortality</topic><topic>Utah</topic><topic>ventilator dependent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooder, Valerie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oltermann, Mark H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohman, Connie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Thomas K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Brent C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>International journal for quality in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Michael P.</au><au>Gooder, Valerie J.</au><au>Oltermann, Mark H.</au><au>Bohman, Connie B.</au><au>French, Thomas K.</au><au>James, Brent C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients</atitle><jtitle>International journal for quality in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Qual Health Care</addtitle><date>1998-02</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>15-26</pages><issn>1353-4505</issn><eissn>1464-3677</eissn><abstract>Objective. To determine the clinical and financial outcomes of a highly structured multidisciplinary care model for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. The structured model outcomes (protocol group) are compared with the preprotocol outcomes. Design. Descriptive study with financial analysis. Setting. A twelve-bed medical–surgical ICU in a non-teaching tertiary referral center in Ogden, Utah. Study participants. During a 54-month period, 469 consecutive intensive care patients requiring mechanical ventilation for longer than 72 hours who did not meet exclusion criteria were studied. Interventions. A multidisciplinary team was formed to coordinate the care of ventilator-dependent patients. Care was integrated by daily collaborative bedside rounds, monthly meetings, and implementation of numerous guidelines and protocols. Patients were followed from the time of ICU admission until the day of hospital discharge. Main outcome measures. Patients were assigned APACHE II scores on admission to the ICU, and were divided into eight diagnostic categories. ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, costs, charges, reimbursement, and in-hospital mortality were measured. Results. Mortality in the preprotocol and protocol group, after adjustment for APACHE II scores, remained statistically unchanged (21–23%). After we implemented the new care model, we demonstrated significant decreases in the mean survivor's ICU length of stay (19.8 days to 14.7 days, P=0.001), hospital length of stay (34.6 days to 25.9 days, P=0.001), charges (US$102 500 to US$78 500, P=0.001), and costs (US$71 900 to US$58 000, P=0.001). Conclusions. Implementation of a structured multidisciplinary care model to care for a heterogeneous population of ventilator-dependent ICU patients was associated with significant reductions in ICU and hospital lengths of stay, charges, and costs. Mortality rates were unaffected.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>10030783</pmid><doi>10.1093/intqhc/10.1.15</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1353-4505 |
ispartof | International journal for quality in health care, 1998-02, Vol.10 (1), p.15-26 |
issn | 1353-4505 1464-3677 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764051234 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged APACHE APACHE II charges chronic Chronic Disease collaboration costs Costs and Cost Analysis Critical Care - classification Critical Care - economics Critical Care - organization & administration Female Humans intensive care unit Intensive Care Units - economics Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data Length of Stay Linear Models Male Middle Aged Models, Theoretical mortality Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Patient Care Team Prospective Studies protocols quality Respiration, Artificial - economics Respiration, Artificial - mortality Utah ventilator dependent |
title | The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20a%20multidisciplinary%20approach%20on%20caring%20for%20ventilator-dependent%20patients&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20quality%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Young,%20Michael%20P.&rft.date=1998-02&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=15-26&rft.issn=1353-4505&rft.eissn=1464-3677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/intqhc/10.1.15&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45125354%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69176595&rft_id=info:pmid/10030783&rft_jstor_id=45125354&rfr_iscdi=true |