Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers
We have undertaken a prospective study of the presentation of all 669 ulcers seen in a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic between 1 January 1993 and 1 August 1996, with particular reference to the factors which precipitated ulceration as well as to any delays in referral. Nearly two‐thirds (61...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetic medicine 1997-10, Vol.14 (10), p.867-870 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 870 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 867 |
container_title | Diabetic medicine |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Macfarlane, R.M. Jeffcoate, W.J. |
description | We have undertaken a prospective study of the presentation of all 669 ulcers seen in a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic between 1 January 1993 and 1 August 1996, with particular reference to the factors which precipitated ulceration as well as to any delays in referral. Nearly two‐thirds (61.3 %) of all lesions were first detected by the patient or a relative, and the remainder by a healthcare professional. The median (range) time which elapsed between ulcer onset and first professional review was 4 (0–247) days, and the median time between first review and first referral to the specialist clinic was 15 (0–608) days. Significant delays were judged to have occurred in 39 instances. The most common precipitant of ulceration was rubbing from footwear, which was responsible for 138 (20.6 %). Fifty‐eight (8.7 %) were the result of immobilization from other illness, and a further 24 were the consequence of surgery. Overall, professional factors contributed to the development or deterioration of 106 lesions (15.8 % total). These results should form the basis of strategies designed to minimize the onset of ulceration in those known to be at risk: educational strategies need to be directed at professionals as much as at patients. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199710)14:10<867::AID-DIA475>3.0.CO;2-L |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764025560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>764025560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-bc1118c72c05124b03cf0385a3f95e31db106ab98149494bbf5be4a367f477253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNGK1DAUhoso67DuIwi9ENy96JiTpE07ijp0ndnC4Fy4Mnp1SDKpBjvtmGTQfXtbWuZGQXJxIOc_Hz9fFL0DMgdC6KvrT1VZ3QApsqQAll1DUQggN8AXQN7kmVgsltVtclstuUjfsjmZl9vXNNk8imbnm8fRjAhOE0YEPI2uvLeK9Gia5ZBfRBcFE8BzMover6QOnfOx7trgrDoF236LQxeH7yY-OuNNG2SwXRt3dby3UplgdVx3XYhPjTbOP4ue1LLx5mqal9Hn1Yf78i7ZbNdVudwkmmciTZQGgFwLqkkKlCvCdE1YnkpWF6lhsFdAMqmKHHjRP6XqVBkuWSZqLgRN2WX0cuQeXffzZHzAg_XaNI1sTXfyKDJOaJpmpE_uxqR2nffO1Hh09iDdAwLBwS_i4BcHVzi4wtEvAh8SvV_E3i-OfpEhwXKLFDc9-fnU4aQOZn_mTjb7_YtpL72WTe1kq60_x2jOC8qLPvZ1jP2yjXn4q93_yv2z2_TTs5ORbX0wv89s6X5gJlh_svu4xlUKuy_3d2sE9ge0yLCD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>764025560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Macfarlane, R.M. ; Jeffcoate, W.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Macfarlane, R.M. ; Jeffcoate, W.J.</creatorcontrib><description>We have undertaken a prospective study of the presentation of all 669 ulcers seen in a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic between 1 January 1993 and 1 August 1996, with particular reference to the factors which precipitated ulceration as well as to any delays in referral. Nearly two‐thirds (61.3 %) of all lesions were first detected by the patient or a relative, and the remainder by a healthcare professional. The median (range) time which elapsed between ulcer onset and first professional review was 4 (0–247) days, and the median time between first review and first referral to the specialist clinic was 15 (0–608) days. Significant delays were judged to have occurred in 39 instances. The most common precipitant of ulceration was rubbing from footwear, which was responsible for 138 (20.6 %). Fifty‐eight (8.7 %) were the result of immobilization from other illness, and a further 24 were the consequence of surgery. Overall, professional factors contributed to the development or deterioration of 106 lesions (15.8 % total). These results should form the basis of strategies designed to minimize the onset of ulceration in those known to be at risk: educational strategies need to be directed at professionals as much as at patients. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-3071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199710)14:10<867::AID-DIA475>3.0.CO;2-L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9371480</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DIMEEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Associated diseases and complications ; Biological and medical sciences ; complications of diabetes ; Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance ; Diabetic Foot - diagnosis ; Diabetic Foot - etiology ; Diabetic Foot - prevention & control ; education ; Education, Continuing ; Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases) ; Endocrinopathies ; England ; Family ; foot ulcer ; gangrene ; Health Personnel - education ; Hospitals, Urban ; Humans ; Immobilization ; Medical sciences ; Outpatient Clinics, Hospital ; Patient Care Team ; Patient Education as Topic ; Referral and Consultation ; Risk Factors ; Shoes - adverse effects ; Smoking ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Diabetic medicine, 1997-10, Vol.14 (10), p.867-870</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291096-9136%28199710%2914%3A10%3C867%3A%3AAID-DIA475%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291096-9136%28199710%2914%3A10%3C867%3A%3AAID-DIA475%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2849249$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9371480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macfarlane, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffcoate, W.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers</title><title>Diabetic medicine</title><addtitle>Diabet. Med</addtitle><description>We have undertaken a prospective study of the presentation of all 669 ulcers seen in a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic between 1 January 1993 and 1 August 1996, with particular reference to the factors which precipitated ulceration as well as to any delays in referral. Nearly two‐thirds (61.3 %) of all lesions were first detected by the patient or a relative, and the remainder by a healthcare professional. The median (range) time which elapsed between ulcer onset and first professional review was 4 (0–247) days, and the median time between first review and first referral to the specialist clinic was 15 (0–608) days. Significant delays were judged to have occurred in 39 instances. The most common precipitant of ulceration was rubbing from footwear, which was responsible for 138 (20.6 %). Fifty‐eight (8.7 %) were the result of immobilization from other illness, and a further 24 were the consequence of surgery. Overall, professional factors contributed to the development or deterioration of 106 lesions (15.8 % total). These results should form the basis of strategies designed to minimize the onset of ulceration in those known to be at risk: educational strategies need to be directed at professionals as much as at patients. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Associated diseases and complications</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>complications of diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - etiology</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - prevention & control</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Education, Continuing</subject><subject>Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)</subject><subject>Endocrinopathies</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>foot ulcer</subject><subject>gangrene</subject><subject>Health Personnel - education</subject><subject>Hospitals, Urban</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immobilization</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Outpatient Clinics, Hospital</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Shoes - adverse effects</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0742-3071</issn><issn>1096-9136</issn><issn>1464-5491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNGK1DAUhoso67DuIwi9ENy96JiTpE07ijp0ndnC4Fy4Mnp1SDKpBjvtmGTQfXtbWuZGQXJxIOc_Hz9fFL0DMgdC6KvrT1VZ3QApsqQAll1DUQggN8AXQN7kmVgsltVtclstuUjfsjmZl9vXNNk8imbnm8fRjAhOE0YEPI2uvLeK9Gia5ZBfRBcFE8BzMover6QOnfOx7trgrDoF236LQxeH7yY-OuNNG2SwXRt3dby3UplgdVx3XYhPjTbOP4ue1LLx5mqal9Hn1Yf78i7ZbNdVudwkmmciTZQGgFwLqkkKlCvCdE1YnkpWF6lhsFdAMqmKHHjRP6XqVBkuWSZqLgRN2WX0cuQeXffzZHzAg_XaNI1sTXfyKDJOaJpmpE_uxqR2nffO1Hh09iDdAwLBwS_i4BcHVzi4wtEvAh8SvV_E3i-OfpEhwXKLFDc9-fnU4aQOZn_mTjb7_YtpL72WTe1kq60_x2jOC8qLPvZ1jP2yjXn4q93_yv2z2_TTs5ORbX0wv89s6X5gJlh_svu4xlUKuy_3d2sE9ge0yLCD</recordid><startdate>199710</startdate><enddate>199710</enddate><creator>Macfarlane, R.M.</creator><creator>Jeffcoate, W.J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199710</creationdate><title>Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers</title><author>Macfarlane, R.M. ; Jeffcoate, W.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-bc1118c72c05124b03cf0385a3f95e31db106ab98149494bbf5be4a367f477253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Associated diseases and complications</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>complications of diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - etiology</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - prevention & control</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Education, Continuing</topic><topic>Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)</topic><topic>Endocrinopathies</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>foot ulcer</topic><topic>gangrene</topic><topic>Health Personnel - education</topic><topic>Hospitals, Urban</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immobilization</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Outpatient Clinics, Hospital</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Shoes - adverse effects</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macfarlane, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffcoate, W.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macfarlane, R.M.</au><au>Jeffcoate, W.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers</atitle><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Diabet. Med</addtitle><date>1997-10</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>867</spage><epage>870</epage><pages>867-870</pages><issn>0742-3071</issn><eissn>1096-9136</eissn><eissn>1464-5491</eissn><coden>DIMEEV</coden><abstract>We have undertaken a prospective study of the presentation of all 669 ulcers seen in a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic between 1 January 1993 and 1 August 1996, with particular reference to the factors which precipitated ulceration as well as to any delays in referral. Nearly two‐thirds (61.3 %) of all lesions were first detected by the patient or a relative, and the remainder by a healthcare professional. The median (range) time which elapsed between ulcer onset and first professional review was 4 (0–247) days, and the median time between first review and first referral to the specialist clinic was 15 (0–608) days. Significant delays were judged to have occurred in 39 instances. The most common precipitant of ulceration was rubbing from footwear, which was responsible for 138 (20.6 %). Fifty‐eight (8.7 %) were the result of immobilization from other illness, and a further 24 were the consequence of surgery. Overall, professional factors contributed to the development or deterioration of 106 lesions (15.8 % total). These results should form the basis of strategies designed to minimize the onset of ulceration in those known to be at risk: educational strategies need to be directed at professionals as much as at patients. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>9371480</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199710)14:10<867::AID-DIA475>3.0.CO;2-L</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0742-3071 |
ispartof | Diabetic medicine, 1997-10, Vol.14 (10), p.867-870 |
issn | 0742-3071 1096-9136 1464-5491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764025560 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Associated diseases and complications Biological and medical sciences complications of diabetes Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance Diabetic Foot - diagnosis Diabetic Foot - etiology Diabetic Foot - prevention & control education Education, Continuing Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases) Endocrinopathies England Family foot ulcer gangrene Health Personnel - education Hospitals, Urban Humans Immobilization Medical sciences Outpatient Clinics, Hospital Patient Care Team Patient Education as Topic Referral and Consultation Risk Factors Shoes - adverse effects Smoking Time Factors |
title | Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T07%3A30%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20contributing%20to%20the%20presentation%20of%20diabetic%20foot%20ulcers&rft.jtitle=Diabetic%20medicine&rft.au=Macfarlane,%20R.M.&rft.date=1997-10&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=867&rft.epage=870&rft.pages=867-870&rft.issn=0742-3071&rft.eissn=1096-9136&rft.coden=DIMEEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199710)14:10%3C867::AID-DIA475%3E3.0.CO;2-L&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E764025560%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=764025560&rft_id=info:pmid/9371480&rfr_iscdi=true |