Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers

We have undertaken a prospective study of the presentation of all 669 ulcers seen in a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic between 1 January 1993 and 1 August 1996, with particular reference to the factors which precipitated ulceration as well as to any delays in referral. Nearly two‐thirds (61...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetic medicine 1997-10, Vol.14 (10), p.867-870
Hauptverfasser: Macfarlane, R.M., Jeffcoate, W.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 870
container_issue 10
container_start_page 867
container_title Diabetic medicine
container_volume 14
creator Macfarlane, R.M.
Jeffcoate, W.J.
description We have undertaken a prospective study of the presentation of all 669 ulcers seen in a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic between 1 January 1993 and 1 August 1996, with particular reference to the factors which precipitated ulceration as well as to any delays in referral. Nearly two‐thirds (61.3 %) of all lesions were first detected by the patient or a relative, and the remainder by a healthcare professional. The median (range) time which elapsed between ulcer onset and first professional review was 4 (0–247) days, and the median time between first review and first referral to the specialist clinic was 15 (0–608) days. Significant delays were judged to have occurred in 39 instances. The most common precipitant of ulceration was rubbing from footwear, which was responsible for 138 (20.6 %). Fifty‐eight (8.7 %) were the result of immobilization from other illness, and a further 24 were the consequence of surgery. Overall, professional factors contributed to the development or deterioration of 106 lesions (15.8 % total). These results should form the basis of strategies designed to minimize the onset of ulceration in those known to be at risk: educational strategies need to be directed at professionals as much as at patients. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199710)14:10<867::AID-DIA475>3.0.CO;2-L
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764025560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>764025560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-bc1118c72c05124b03cf0385a3f95e31db106ab98149494bbf5be4a367f477253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNGK1DAUhoso67DuIwi9ENy96JiTpE07ijp0ndnC4Fy4Mnp1SDKpBjvtmGTQfXtbWuZGQXJxIOc_Hz9fFL0DMgdC6KvrT1VZ3QApsqQAll1DUQggN8AXQN7kmVgsltVtclstuUjfsjmZl9vXNNk8imbnm8fRjAhOE0YEPI2uvLeK9Gia5ZBfRBcFE8BzMover6QOnfOx7trgrDoF236LQxeH7yY-OuNNG2SwXRt3dby3UplgdVx3XYhPjTbOP4ue1LLx5mqal9Hn1Yf78i7ZbNdVudwkmmciTZQGgFwLqkkKlCvCdE1YnkpWF6lhsFdAMqmKHHjRP6XqVBkuWSZqLgRN2WX0cuQeXffzZHzAg_XaNI1sTXfyKDJOaJpmpE_uxqR2nffO1Hh09iDdAwLBwS_i4BcHVzi4wtEvAh8SvV_E3i-OfpEhwXKLFDc9-fnU4aQOZn_mTjb7_YtpL72WTe1kq60_x2jOC8qLPvZ1jP2yjXn4q93_yv2z2_TTs5ORbX0wv89s6X5gJlh_svu4xlUKuy_3d2sE9ge0yLCD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>764025560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Macfarlane, R.M. ; Jeffcoate, W.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Macfarlane, R.M. ; Jeffcoate, W.J.</creatorcontrib><description>We have undertaken a prospective study of the presentation of all 669 ulcers seen in a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic between 1 January 1993 and 1 August 1996, with particular reference to the factors which precipitated ulceration as well as to any delays in referral. Nearly two‐thirds (61.3 %) of all lesions were first detected by the patient or a relative, and the remainder by a healthcare professional. The median (range) time which elapsed between ulcer onset and first professional review was 4 (0–247) days, and the median time between first review and first referral to the specialist clinic was 15 (0–608) days. Significant delays were judged to have occurred in 39 instances. The most common precipitant of ulceration was rubbing from footwear, which was responsible for 138 (20.6 %). Fifty‐eight (8.7 %) were the result of immobilization from other illness, and a further 24 were the consequence of surgery. Overall, professional factors contributed to the development or deterioration of 106 lesions (15.8 % total). These results should form the basis of strategies designed to minimize the onset of ulceration in those known to be at risk: educational strategies need to be directed at professionals as much as at patients. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-3071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199710)14:10&lt;867::AID-DIA475&gt;3.0.CO;2-L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9371480</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DIMEEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Associated diseases and complications ; Biological and medical sciences ; complications of diabetes ; Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance ; Diabetic Foot - diagnosis ; Diabetic Foot - etiology ; Diabetic Foot - prevention &amp; control ; education ; Education, Continuing ; Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases) ; Endocrinopathies ; England ; Family ; foot ulcer ; gangrene ; Health Personnel - education ; Hospitals, Urban ; Humans ; Immobilization ; Medical sciences ; Outpatient Clinics, Hospital ; Patient Care Team ; Patient Education as Topic ; Referral and Consultation ; Risk Factors ; Shoes - adverse effects ; Smoking ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Diabetic medicine, 1997-10, Vol.14 (10), p.867-870</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291096-9136%28199710%2914%3A10%3C867%3A%3AAID-DIA475%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291096-9136%28199710%2914%3A10%3C867%3A%3AAID-DIA475%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2849249$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9371480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macfarlane, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffcoate, W.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers</title><title>Diabetic medicine</title><addtitle>Diabet. Med</addtitle><description>We have undertaken a prospective study of the presentation of all 669 ulcers seen in a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic between 1 January 1993 and 1 August 1996, with particular reference to the factors which precipitated ulceration as well as to any delays in referral. Nearly two‐thirds (61.3 %) of all lesions were first detected by the patient or a relative, and the remainder by a healthcare professional. The median (range) time which elapsed between ulcer onset and first professional review was 4 (0–247) days, and the median time between first review and first referral to the specialist clinic was 15 (0–608) days. Significant delays were judged to have occurred in 39 instances. The most common precipitant of ulceration was rubbing from footwear, which was responsible for 138 (20.6 %). Fifty‐eight (8.7 %) were the result of immobilization from other illness, and a further 24 were the consequence of surgery. Overall, professional factors contributed to the development or deterioration of 106 lesions (15.8 % total). These results should form the basis of strategies designed to minimize the onset of ulceration in those known to be at risk: educational strategies need to be directed at professionals as much as at patients. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Associated diseases and complications</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>complications of diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - etiology</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Education, Continuing</subject><subject>Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)</subject><subject>Endocrinopathies</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>foot ulcer</subject><subject>gangrene</subject><subject>Health Personnel - education</subject><subject>Hospitals, Urban</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immobilization</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Outpatient Clinics, Hospital</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Shoes - adverse effects</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0742-3071</issn><issn>1096-9136</issn><issn>1464-5491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNGK1DAUhoso67DuIwi9ENy96JiTpE07ijp0ndnC4Fy4Mnp1SDKpBjvtmGTQfXtbWuZGQXJxIOc_Hz9fFL0DMgdC6KvrT1VZ3QApsqQAll1DUQggN8AXQN7kmVgsltVtclstuUjfsjmZl9vXNNk8imbnm8fRjAhOE0YEPI2uvLeK9Gia5ZBfRBcFE8BzMover6QOnfOx7trgrDoF236LQxeH7yY-OuNNG2SwXRt3dby3UplgdVx3XYhPjTbOP4ue1LLx5mqal9Hn1Yf78i7ZbNdVudwkmmciTZQGgFwLqkkKlCvCdE1YnkpWF6lhsFdAMqmKHHjRP6XqVBkuWSZqLgRN2WX0cuQeXffzZHzAg_XaNI1sTXfyKDJOaJpmpE_uxqR2nffO1Hh09iDdAwLBwS_i4BcHVzi4wtEvAh8SvV_E3i-OfpEhwXKLFDc9-fnU4aQOZn_mTjb7_YtpL72WTe1kq60_x2jOC8qLPvZ1jP2yjXn4q93_yv2z2_TTs5ORbX0wv89s6X5gJlh_svu4xlUKuy_3d2sE9ge0yLCD</recordid><startdate>199710</startdate><enddate>199710</enddate><creator>Macfarlane, R.M.</creator><creator>Jeffcoate, W.J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199710</creationdate><title>Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers</title><author>Macfarlane, R.M. ; Jeffcoate, W.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-bc1118c72c05124b03cf0385a3f95e31db106ab98149494bbf5be4a367f477253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Associated diseases and complications</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>complications of diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - etiology</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Education, Continuing</topic><topic>Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)</topic><topic>Endocrinopathies</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>foot ulcer</topic><topic>gangrene</topic><topic>Health Personnel - education</topic><topic>Hospitals, Urban</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immobilization</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Outpatient Clinics, Hospital</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Shoes - adverse effects</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macfarlane, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffcoate, W.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macfarlane, R.M.</au><au>Jeffcoate, W.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers</atitle><jtitle>Diabetic medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Diabet. Med</addtitle><date>1997-10</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>867</spage><epage>870</epage><pages>867-870</pages><issn>0742-3071</issn><eissn>1096-9136</eissn><eissn>1464-5491</eissn><coden>DIMEEV</coden><abstract>We have undertaken a prospective study of the presentation of all 669 ulcers seen in a specialist multidisciplinary foot clinic between 1 January 1993 and 1 August 1996, with particular reference to the factors which precipitated ulceration as well as to any delays in referral. Nearly two‐thirds (61.3 %) of all lesions were first detected by the patient or a relative, and the remainder by a healthcare professional. The median (range) time which elapsed between ulcer onset and first professional review was 4 (0–247) days, and the median time between first review and first referral to the specialist clinic was 15 (0–608) days. Significant delays were judged to have occurred in 39 instances. The most common precipitant of ulceration was rubbing from footwear, which was responsible for 138 (20.6 %). Fifty‐eight (8.7 %) were the result of immobilization from other illness, and a further 24 were the consequence of surgery. Overall, professional factors contributed to the development or deterioration of 106 lesions (15.8 % total). These results should form the basis of strategies designed to minimize the onset of ulceration in those known to be at risk: educational strategies need to be directed at professionals as much as at patients. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>9371480</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199710)14:10&lt;867::AID-DIA475&gt;3.0.CO;2-L</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0742-3071
ispartof Diabetic medicine, 1997-10, Vol.14 (10), p.867-870
issn 0742-3071
1096-9136
1464-5491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764025560
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Associated diseases and complications
Biological and medical sciences
complications of diabetes
Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance
Diabetic Foot - diagnosis
Diabetic Foot - etiology
Diabetic Foot - prevention & control
education
Education, Continuing
Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases)
Endocrinopathies
England
Family
foot ulcer
gangrene
Health Personnel - education
Hospitals, Urban
Humans
Immobilization
Medical sciences
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital
Patient Care Team
Patient Education as Topic
Referral and Consultation
Risk Factors
Shoes - adverse effects
Smoking
Time Factors
title Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T07%3A30%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20contributing%20to%20the%20presentation%20of%20diabetic%20foot%20ulcers&rft.jtitle=Diabetic%20medicine&rft.au=Macfarlane,%20R.M.&rft.date=1997-10&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=867&rft.epage=870&rft.pages=867-870&rft.issn=0742-3071&rft.eissn=1096-9136&rft.coden=DIMEEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199710)14:10%3C867::AID-DIA475%3E3.0.CO;2-L&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E764025560%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=764025560&rft_id=info:pmid/9371480&rfr_iscdi=true