Evaluating Planned Change Theories

Evaluating Planned Change Theories

ABSTRACTA criterion-referenced instrument was developed for determining to what extent a planned change theory meets predetermined criteria of significance, agreement with nursingʼs perspective, clarity and consistency, economy, generality, practicality and testability. These criteria form the basis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nursing management 1994-03, Vol.25 (3), p.54-57
Hauptverfasser: LUTJENS, LOUETTE R. JOHNSON, TIFFANY, CONSTANCE RIMMER
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Agreements
Changes
Health care industry
Management
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing Service, Hospital - organization & administration
Nursing Theory
Organizational Innovation
Planning Techniques
Program Evaluation - methods
Semantics
Validity
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue 3
container_start_page 54
container_title Nursing management
container_volume 25
creator LUTJENS, LOUETTE R. JOHNSON
TIFFANY, CONSTANCE RIMMER
description ABSTRACTA criterion-referenced instrument was developed for determining to what extent a planned change theory meets predetermined criteria of significance, agreement with nursingʼs perspective, clarity and consistency, economy, generality, practicality and testability. These criteria form the basis of a quantitative instrument composed of 31 evaluation questions to determine a planned change theoryʼs suitability for nursing situations. This instrument combines well with qualitative evaluations of theory goodness and with change theoristsʼ ratings of their own theories. Psychometric evaluation of the instrument is in progress.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00006247-199403000-00013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76398091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>882919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-3f48edcec767b7363080548312d569629792e92e1eb1cb7476004059060f42ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLw0AQxxdRaq1-BCH04C06-8g-jlLqAwQ91POSx6RJTZO621j89m5t7UEQl12GYX7_Yea_hEQUrikYdQPhSCZUTI0RwEMWh0f5ERnShOtYSwXHZAhKiFhyKk7JmfeLrcrIZEAGmnIBgg3JePqRNn26rtt59NKkbYtFNKnSdo7RrMLO1ejPyUmZNh4v9nFEXu-ms8lD_PR8_zi5fYpzzgSPeSk0FjnmSqpMcclBQyI0p6xIpJHMKMMwXIoZzTMllAQQkBiQUAqGKR-Rq13flevee_Rru6x9jk2YCrveWyW50WBoAMe_wEXXuzbMZlnYlSZMs_8goEwnAdI7KHed9w5Lu3L1MnWfloLdGm1_jLYHo-230UF6ue_fZ0ssDsK9s6EudvVN16zR-bem36CzFabNurJ__R__AiNXgvM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231401285</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Planned Change Theories</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>LUTJENS, LOUETTE R. JOHNSON ; TIFFANY, CONSTANCE RIMMER</creator><creatorcontrib>LUTJENS, LOUETTE R. JOHNSON ; TIFFANY, CONSTANCE RIMMER</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTA criterion-referenced instrument was developed for determining to what extent a planned change theory meets predetermined criteria of significance, agreement with nursingʼs perspective, clarity and consistency, economy, generality, practicality and testability. These criteria form the basis of a quantitative instrument composed of 31 evaluation questions to determine a planned change theoryʼs suitability for nursing situations. This instrument combines well with qualitative evaluations of theory goodness and with change theoristsʼ ratings of their own theories. Psychometric evaluation of the instrument is in progress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0744-6314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-8670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00006247-199403000-00013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8134042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by Springhouse Corporation</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Changes ; Health care industry ; Management ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration ; Nursing Theory ; Organizational Innovation ; Planning Techniques ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Semantics ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Nursing management, 1994-03, Vol.25 (3), p.54-57</ispartof><rights>1994 by Springhouse Corporation</rights><rights>Copyright Springhouse Corporation Mar 1994</rights><rights>Copyright S-N Publications, Incorporated Mar 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-3f48edcec767b7363080548312d569629792e92e1eb1cb7476004059060f42ea3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8134042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LUTJENS, LOUETTE R. JOHNSON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIFFANY, CONSTANCE RIMMER</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Planned Change Theories</title><title>Nursing management</title><addtitle>Nurs Manage</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTA criterion-referenced instrument was developed for determining to what extent a planned change theory meets predetermined criteria of significance, agreement with nursingʼs perspective, clarity and consistency, economy, generality, practicality and testability. These criteria form the basis of a quantitative instrument composed of 31 evaluation questions to determine a planned change theoryʼs suitability for nursing situations. This instrument combines well with qualitative evaluations of theory goodness and with change theoristsʼ ratings of their own theories. Psychometric evaluation of the instrument is in progress.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Nursing Theory</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Planning Techniques</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0744-6314</issn><issn>1538-8670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLw0AQxxdRaq1-BCH04C06-8g-jlLqAwQ91POSx6RJTZO621j89m5t7UEQl12GYX7_Yea_hEQUrikYdQPhSCZUTI0RwEMWh0f5ERnShOtYSwXHZAhKiFhyKk7JmfeLrcrIZEAGmnIBgg3JePqRNn26rtt59NKkbYtFNKnSdo7RrMLO1ejPyUmZNh4v9nFEXu-ms8lD_PR8_zi5fYpzzgSPeSk0FjnmSqpMcclBQyI0p6xIpJHMKMMwXIoZzTMllAQQkBiQUAqGKR-Rq13flevee_Rru6x9jk2YCrveWyW50WBoAMe_wEXXuzbMZlnYlSZMs_8goEwnAdI7KHed9w5Lu3L1MnWfloLdGm1_jLYHo-230UF6ue_fZ0ssDsK9s6EudvVN16zR-bem36CzFabNurJ__R__AiNXgvM</recordid><startdate>199403</startdate><enddate>199403</enddate><creator>LUTJENS, LOUETTE R. JOHNSON</creator><creator>TIFFANY, CONSTANCE RIMMER</creator><general>by Springhouse Corporation</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199403</creationdate><title>Evaluating Planned Change Theories</title><author>LUTJENS, LOUETTE R. JOHNSON ; TIFFANY, CONSTANCE RIMMER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-3f48edcec767b7363080548312d569629792e92e1eb1cb7476004059060f42ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Nursing Theory</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Planning Techniques</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LUTJENS, LOUETTE R. JOHNSON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIFFANY, CONSTANCE RIMMER</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nursing management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LUTJENS, LOUETTE R. JOHNSON</au><au>TIFFANY, CONSTANCE RIMMER</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Planned Change Theories</atitle><jtitle>Nursing management</jtitle><addtitle>Nurs Manage</addtitle><date>1994-03</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>54</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>54-57</pages><issn>0744-6314</issn><eissn>1538-8670</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTA criterion-referenced instrument was developed for determining to what extent a planned change theory meets predetermined criteria of significance, agreement with nursingʼs perspective, clarity and consistency, economy, generality, practicality and testability. These criteria form the basis of a quantitative instrument composed of 31 evaluation questions to determine a planned change theoryʼs suitability for nursing situations. This instrument combines well with qualitative evaluations of theory goodness and with change theoristsʼ ratings of their own theories. Psychometric evaluation of the instrument is in progress.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by Springhouse Corporation</pub><pmid>8134042</pmid><doi>10.1097/00006247-199403000-00013</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0744-6314
ispartof Nursing management, 1994-03, Vol.25 (3), p.54-57
issn 0744-6314
1538-8670
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76398091
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Agreements
Changes
Health care industry
Management
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing Service, Hospital - organization & administration
Nursing Theory
Organizational Innovation
Planning Techniques
Program Evaluation - methods
Semantics
Validity
title Evaluating Planned Change Theories
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T13%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Planned%20Change%20Theories&rft.jtitle=Nursing%20management&rft.au=LUTJENS,%20LOUETTE%20R.%20JOHNSON&rft.date=1994-03&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=54&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=54-57&rft.issn=0744-6314&rft.eissn=1538-8670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00006247-199403000-00013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E882919%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231401285&rft_id=info:pmid/8134042&rfr_iscdi=true