Reasons underlying negative mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer
It is well recognized that a negative mammogram report does not exclude the presence of breast carcinoma. This study examines the accuracy of mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer. In particular, the study evaluates the reasons underlying negative mammography in breast cancer. All pati...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical radiology 1994-02, Vol.49 (2), p.123-125 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 125 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 123 |
| container_title | Clinical radiology |
| container_volume | 49 |
| creator | Coveney, E.C. Geraghty, J.G. O'Laoide, R. Hourihane, J.B. O'Higgins, N.J. |
| description | It is well recognized that a negative mammogram report does not exclude the presence of breast carcinoma. This study examines the accuracy of mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer. In particular, the study evaluates the reasons underlying negative mammography in breast cancer. All patients with Pagets' disease, carcinoma
in situ lesions or lesions infiltrating skin were excluded. A total of 291 patients presenting with palpable breast carcinoma underwent mammography prior to biopsy. False negative reports occurred in 16.5% (48). The sensitivity of mammography increased with age, from 70% (14/20) in 31–40-year-olds to 91% (113/124) in women over 60 years. Retrospective review of false negative mammograms showed that 30% of these were deemed normal while 20% were obvious oversights. The remaining 50% showed subtle radiographic abnormalities, consistent with but not diagnostic of malignancy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)83454-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76389934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0009926005834543</els_id><sourcerecordid>76389934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3df03caeb72197e769312eaff93e19aec6a77a63f7a50260089860cfbaab6bc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtrwzAMx83Y6LrHRyjkMMZ2yGbHiROfxih7QaGwB-xmFEfpPPKanXb0289pS687CUl__SX9CJkwesMoE7dvlFIZykjQK5pcZzxO4pAfkDHjIgmjSH4ekvFeckxOnPse0jiKR2SUsSjOJB2T-SuCaxsXLJsCbbU2zSJocAG9WWFQQ123Cwvd1zowTdD5Kja9C35N_-WzqoO8wiC33qIPNDQa7Rk5KqFyeL6Lp-Tj8eF9-hzO5k8v0_tZqHkm-5AXJeUaME8jJlNMheQsQihLyZFJQC0gTUHwMoWE-vtpJjNBdZkD5CLXMT8ll1vfzrY_S3S9qo3TWFXQYLt0KhV-j-SDMNkKtW2ds1iqzpoa7FoxqgaQagNSDZQUTdQGpOJ-brJbsMxrLPZTO3K-f7Hrg9NQlda_b9xexiWPYjrY3G1l6GGsDFrltIeosTAWda-K1vxzyB8m9ZCa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76389934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reasons underlying negative mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Coveney, E.C. ; Geraghty, J.G. ; O'Laoide, R. ; Hourihane, J.B. ; O'Higgins, N.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Coveney, E.C. ; Geraghty, J.G. ; O'Laoide, R. ; Hourihane, J.B. ; O'Higgins, N.J.</creatorcontrib><description>It is well recognized that a negative mammogram report does not exclude the presence of breast carcinoma. This study examines the accuracy of mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer. In particular, the study evaluates the reasons underlying negative mammography in breast cancer. All patients with Pagets' disease, carcinoma
in situ lesions or lesions infiltrating skin were excluded. A total of 291 patients presenting with palpable breast carcinoma underwent mammography prior to biopsy. False negative reports occurred in 16.5% (48). The sensitivity of mammography increased with age, from 70% (14/20) in 31–40-year-olds to 91% (113/124) in women over 60 years. Retrospective review of false negative mammograms showed that 30% of these were deemed normal while 20% were obvious oversights. The remaining 50% showed subtle radiographic abnormalities, consistent with but not diagnostic of malignancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-229X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)83454-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8124890</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLRAAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Genital system. Mammary gland ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Mammography ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Palpation ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Clinical radiology, 1994-02, Vol.49 (2), p.123-125</ispartof><rights>1994</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3df03caeb72197e769312eaff93e19aec6a77a63f7a50260089860cfbaab6bc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3df03caeb72197e769312eaff93e19aec6a77a63f7a50260089860cfbaab6bc43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926005834543$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3932403$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8124890$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coveney, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geraghty, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Laoide, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hourihane, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Higgins, N.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reasons underlying negative mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer</title><title>Clinical radiology</title><addtitle>Clin Radiol</addtitle><description>It is well recognized that a negative mammogram report does not exclude the presence of breast carcinoma. This study examines the accuracy of mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer. In particular, the study evaluates the reasons underlying negative mammography in breast cancer. All patients with Pagets' disease, carcinoma
in situ lesions or lesions infiltrating skin were excluded. A total of 291 patients presenting with palpable breast carcinoma underwent mammography prior to biopsy. False negative reports occurred in 16.5% (48). The sensitivity of mammography increased with age, from 70% (14/20) in 31–40-year-olds to 91% (113/124) in women over 60 years. Retrospective review of false negative mammograms showed that 30% of these were deemed normal while 20% were obvious oversights. The remaining 50% showed subtle radiographic abnormalities, consistent with but not diagnostic of malignancy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital system. Mammary gland</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Palpation</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0009-9260</issn><issn>1365-229X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtrwzAMx83Y6LrHRyjkMMZ2yGbHiROfxih7QaGwB-xmFEfpPPKanXb0289pS687CUl__SX9CJkwesMoE7dvlFIZykjQK5pcZzxO4pAfkDHjIgmjSH4ekvFeckxOnPse0jiKR2SUsSjOJB2T-SuCaxsXLJsCbbU2zSJocAG9WWFQQ123Cwvd1zowTdD5Kja9C35N_-WzqoO8wiC33qIPNDQa7Rk5KqFyeL6Lp-Tj8eF9-hzO5k8v0_tZqHkm-5AXJeUaME8jJlNMheQsQihLyZFJQC0gTUHwMoWE-vtpJjNBdZkD5CLXMT8ll1vfzrY_S3S9qo3TWFXQYLt0KhV-j-SDMNkKtW2ds1iqzpoa7FoxqgaQagNSDZQUTdQGpOJ-brJbsMxrLPZTO3K-f7Hrg9NQlda_b9xexiWPYjrY3G1l6GGsDFrltIeosTAWda-K1vxzyB8m9ZCa</recordid><startdate>19940201</startdate><enddate>19940201</enddate><creator>Coveney, E.C.</creator><creator>Geraghty, J.G.</creator><creator>O'Laoide, R.</creator><creator>Hourihane, J.B.</creator><creator>O'Higgins, N.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940201</creationdate><title>Reasons underlying negative mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer</title><author>Coveney, E.C. ; Geraghty, J.G. ; O'Laoide, R. ; Hourihane, J.B. ; O'Higgins, N.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3df03caeb72197e769312eaff93e19aec6a77a63f7a50260089860cfbaab6bc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital system. Mammary gland</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Palpation</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coveney, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geraghty, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Laoide, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hourihane, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Higgins, N.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coveney, E.C.</au><au>Geraghty, J.G.</au><au>O'Laoide, R.</au><au>Hourihane, J.B.</au><au>O'Higgins, N.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reasons underlying negative mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>Clinical radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Radiol</addtitle><date>1994-02-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>123-125</pages><issn>0009-9260</issn><eissn>1365-229X</eissn><coden>CLRAAG</coden><abstract>It is well recognized that a negative mammogram report does not exclude the presence of breast carcinoma. This study examines the accuracy of mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer. In particular, the study evaluates the reasons underlying negative mammography in breast cancer. All patients with Pagets' disease, carcinoma
in situ lesions or lesions infiltrating skin were excluded. A total of 291 patients presenting with palpable breast carcinoma underwent mammography prior to biopsy. False negative reports occurred in 16.5% (48). The sensitivity of mammography increased with age, from 70% (14/20) in 31–40-year-olds to 91% (113/124) in women over 60 years. Retrospective review of false negative mammograms showed that 30% of these were deemed normal while 20% were obvious oversights. The remaining 50% showed subtle radiographic abnormalities, consistent with but not diagnostic of malignancy.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>8124890</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0009-9260(05)83454-3</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0009-9260 |
| ispartof | Clinical radiology, 1994-02, Vol.49 (2), p.123-125 |
| issn | 0009-9260 1365-229X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76389934 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Age Factors Aged Biological and medical sciences Biopsy Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - pathology Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Genital system. Mammary gland Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Mammography Medical sciences Middle Aged Palpation Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Retrospective Studies |
| title | Reasons underlying negative mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T00%3A07%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reasons%20underlying%20negative%20mammography%20in%20patients%20with%20palpable%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20radiology&rft.au=Coveney,%20E.C.&rft.date=1994-02-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=123-125&rft.issn=0009-9260&rft.eissn=1365-229X&rft.coden=CLRAAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0009-9260(05)83454-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76389934%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76389934&rft_id=info:pmid/8124890&rft_els_id=S0009926005834543&rfr_iscdi=true |