A statistical comparison of three sets of normative data from which to derive standards for craniofacial measurement
The present investigation was performed to test statistically for differences between cephalometric measurements taken from three different populations. The samples tested were broken down for age and sex and selected at random from Manchester, England; Nymegen, Holland; and Michigan, North America....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of orthodontics 1985-08, Vol.7 (3), p.193-200 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 200 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 193 |
| container_title | European journal of orthodontics |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Trenouth, M. J. Davies, P. H. J. Johnson, J. S. |
| description | The present investigation was performed to test statistically for differences between cephalometric measurements taken from three different populations. The samples tested were broken down for age and sex and selected at random from Manchester, England; Nymegen, Holland; and Michigan, North America. The means of some of the cephalometric measurements of the different samples showed statistically significant differences reflecting underlying differences in the populations from which they were drawn. The greatest differences were observed between the Manchester and Nymegen groups (10 skeletal and 9 dental). The Nymegen group was skeletal Class II relative to the Manchester group and had a higher lower incisor angle. The next greatest differences was between the Nymegen and Michigan groups (6 skeletal and 12 dental) and the least difference between the Manchester and Michigan groups (3 skeletal and 8 dental). The only consistent difference was the greater upper incisor angle in the Michigan group in both instances. The Manchester and Michigan groups were closer to each other than either were to the Nymegen group. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ejo/7.3.193 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76379072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76379072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-2a6e98f44f6fafd221951cd09da2acf5aa8a36e5b0b722269ac690777a5ceff33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFrGzEQRkVpSZ20p54LOvVS1pE0u9LuMZg4CTikh7aUXsRYO8KbeleuJKfNv4-MTU7D8L35YB5jn6SYS9HBJT2GSzOHuezgDZvJWotKKSnespmQtawaaM17dp7SoxAC2tqcsTNotWo6mLF8xVPGPKQ8ONxyF8YdxiGFiQfP8yYS8UQ5HbYpxLGQT8R7zMh9DCP_txnchufAe4qHpHRNPcY-cR8idxGnIXh0Q6keCdM-0khT_sDeedwm-niaF-zH8vr74rZaPdzcLa5WlQMBuVKoqWt9XXvt0fflp66RrhddjwqdbxBbBE3NWqyNUkp36HQnjDHYOPIe4IJ9OfbuYvi7p5TtOCRH2y1OFPbJGg2mHKgCfj2CLoaUInm7i8OI8dlKYQ-ObXFsjQVbHBf686l2vx6pf2VPUkteHfNilf6_xhj_WG3ANPb212_b3ixX3xbw097DCxZIiag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76379072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A statistical comparison of three sets of normative data from which to derive standards for craniofacial measurement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><creator>Trenouth, M. J. ; Davies, P. H. J. ; Johnson, J. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trenouth, M. J. ; Davies, P. H. J. ; Johnson, J. S.</creatorcontrib><description>The present investigation was performed to test statistically for differences between cephalometric measurements taken from three different populations. The samples tested were broken down for age and sex and selected at random from Manchester, England; Nymegen, Holland; and Michigan, North America. The means of some of the cephalometric measurements of the different samples showed statistically significant differences reflecting underlying differences in the populations from which they were drawn. The greatest differences were observed between the Manchester and Nymegen groups (10 skeletal and 9 dental). The Nymegen group was skeletal Class II relative to the Manchester group and had a higher lower incisor angle. The next greatest differences was between the Nymegen and Michigan groups (6 skeletal and 12 dental) and the least difference between the Manchester and Michigan groups (3 skeletal and 8 dental). The only consistent difference was the greater upper incisor angle in the Michigan group in both instances. The Manchester and Michigan groups were closer to each other than either were to the Nymegen group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-5387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ejo/7.3.193</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3862593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Cephalometry ; Child ; Dentistry ; England ; Ethnic Groups ; Facial Bones - anatomy & histology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Michigan ; Netherlands ; Statistics as Topic ; Tooth - anatomy & histology</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthodontics, 1985-08, Vol.7 (3), p.193-200</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-2a6e98f44f6fafd221951cd09da2acf5aa8a36e5b0b722269ac690777a5ceff33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3862593$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trenouth, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, P. H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, J. S.</creatorcontrib><title>A statistical comparison of three sets of normative data from which to derive standards for craniofacial measurement</title><title>European journal of orthodontics</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><description>The present investigation was performed to test statistically for differences between cephalometric measurements taken from three different populations. The samples tested were broken down for age and sex and selected at random from Manchester, England; Nymegen, Holland; and Michigan, North America. The means of some of the cephalometric measurements of the different samples showed statistically significant differences reflecting underlying differences in the populations from which they were drawn. The greatest differences were observed between the Manchester and Nymegen groups (10 skeletal and 9 dental). The Nymegen group was skeletal Class II relative to the Manchester group and had a higher lower incisor angle. The next greatest differences was between the Nymegen and Michigan groups (6 skeletal and 12 dental) and the least difference between the Manchester and Michigan groups (3 skeletal and 8 dental). The only consistent difference was the greater upper incisor angle in the Michigan group in both instances. The Manchester and Michigan groups were closer to each other than either were to the Nymegen group.</description><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Facial Bones - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Tooth - anatomy & histology</subject><issn>0141-5387</issn><issn>1460-2210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEFrGzEQRkVpSZ20p54LOvVS1pE0u9LuMZg4CTikh7aUXsRYO8KbeleuJKfNv4-MTU7D8L35YB5jn6SYS9HBJT2GSzOHuezgDZvJWotKKSnespmQtawaaM17dp7SoxAC2tqcsTNotWo6mLF8xVPGPKQ8ONxyF8YdxiGFiQfP8yYS8UQ5HbYpxLGQT8R7zMh9DCP_txnchufAe4qHpHRNPcY-cR8idxGnIXh0Q6keCdM-0khT_sDeedwm-niaF-zH8vr74rZaPdzcLa5WlQMBuVKoqWt9XXvt0fflp66RrhddjwqdbxBbBE3NWqyNUkp36HQnjDHYOPIe4IJ9OfbuYvi7p5TtOCRH2y1OFPbJGg2mHKgCfj2CLoaUInm7i8OI8dlKYQ-ObXFsjQVbHBf686l2vx6pf2VPUkteHfNilf6_xhj_WG3ANPb212_b3ixX3xbw097DCxZIiag</recordid><startdate>198508</startdate><enddate>198508</enddate><creator>Trenouth, M. J.</creator><creator>Davies, P. H. J.</creator><creator>Johnson, J. S.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198508</creationdate><title>A statistical comparison of three sets of normative data from which to derive standards for craniofacial measurement</title><author>Trenouth, M. J. ; Davies, P. H. J. ; Johnson, J. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-2a6e98f44f6fafd221951cd09da2acf5aa8a36e5b0b722269ac690777a5ceff33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Facial Bones - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Tooth - anatomy & histology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trenouth, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, P. H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, J. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trenouth, M. J.</au><au>Davies, P. H. J.</au><au>Johnson, J. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A statistical comparison of three sets of normative data from which to derive standards for craniofacial measurement</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><date>1985-08</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>193-200</pages><issn>0141-5387</issn><eissn>1460-2210</eissn><abstract>The present investigation was performed to test statistically for differences between cephalometric measurements taken from three different populations. The samples tested were broken down for age and sex and selected at random from Manchester, England; Nymegen, Holland; and Michigan, North America. The means of some of the cephalometric measurements of the different samples showed statistically significant differences reflecting underlying differences in the populations from which they were drawn. The greatest differences were observed between the Manchester and Nymegen groups (10 skeletal and 9 dental). The Nymegen group was skeletal Class II relative to the Manchester group and had a higher lower incisor angle. The next greatest differences was between the Nymegen and Michigan groups (6 skeletal and 12 dental) and the least difference between the Manchester and Michigan groups (3 skeletal and 8 dental). The only consistent difference was the greater upper incisor angle in the Michigan group in both instances. The Manchester and Michigan groups were closer to each other than either were to the Nymegen group.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>3862593</pmid><doi>10.1093/ejo/7.3.193</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0141-5387 |
| ispartof | European journal of orthodontics, 1985-08, Vol.7 (3), p.193-200 |
| issn | 0141-5387 1460-2210 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76379072 |
| source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy |
| subjects | Cephalometry Child Dentistry England Ethnic Groups Facial Bones - anatomy & histology Female Humans Male Michigan Netherlands Statistics as Topic Tooth - anatomy & histology |
| title | A statistical comparison of three sets of normative data from which to derive standards for craniofacial measurement |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A45%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20statistical%20comparison%20of%20three%20sets%20of%20normative%20data%20from%20which%20to%20derive%20standards%20for%20craniofacial%20measurement&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthodontics&rft.au=Trenouth,%20M.%20J.&rft.date=1985-08&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=193-200&rft.issn=0141-5387&rft.eissn=1460-2210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ejo/7.3.193&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76379072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76379072&rft_id=info:pmid/3862593&rfr_iscdi=true |