Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients
Evoked potential (EP) tests were obtained in 110 neurologically normal first‐degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Visual EP tests were performed in all relatives; brainstem auditory and median nerve somatosensory EP tests were performed in 67 relatives. The relatives had a mean visu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of neurology 1985-07, Vol.18 (1), p.30-34 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 34 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | Annals of neurology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Nuwer, Marc R. Visscher, Barbara R. Packwood, James W. Namerow, Norman S. |
description | Evoked potential (EP) tests were obtained in 110 neurologically normal first‐degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Visual EP tests were performed in all relatives; brainstem auditory and median nerve somatosensory EP tests were performed in 67 relatives. The relatives had a mean visual EP P100 latency that was significantly longer than that for normal subjects controlled for age and gender. Asymmetries were seen in results from individual MS relatives, including interocular visual EP P100 differences of up to 14 ms, and interarm somatosensory Erb‐N18 differences of up to 3.0 ms. We identified 19 pairs of patients and relatives who were HLA identical and 18 other pairs who were HLA double nonmatched. EP asymmetries were seen more often in the HLA identical siblings than in the HLA double nonmatched siblings. This suggests that subclinical, focal, and electrophysiological changes do occur in relatives of MS patients, especially if they share HLA types with the patients. Since less than 2% of siblings of MS patients would be expected to eventually develop clinical MS, these small subclinical electrophysiological changes are not expected to be a sign of the future appearance of clinical MS. Clinicians should be aware not to overinterpret small EP changes in relatives of MS patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ana.410180106 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76371072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76371072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4036-920a514fc4d90caf4672b903426981ba0c8e338f81757e96089b0913fbf54b673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EgrIcOSLlgLiljGPHy7FiKUhQJASCm-W4NjK4SYhTln-PUaOKE6c5vO_NvHkIHWIYY4DiVNd6TDFgARjYBhrhkuBcFFRuohEQRvMSE7qDdmN8BQDJMGyjbQqEcypG6Pzio3mz86xtelv3Xoest7H39Uvm66yzQff-w8ascdliGXrfBptFE2zXRB-zNqnJFffRltMh2oNh7qHHy4uHs6v85m56fTa5yU26x3JZgC4xdYbOJRjtKONFJYHQgkmBKw1GWEKEE5iX3EoGQlYgMXGVK2nFONlDJ6u9bde8L1NOtfDR2BB0bZtlVJwRjoEXCcxXoElBY2edaju_0N23wqB-W1OpNbVuLfFHw-JltbDzNT3UlPTjQdfR6OA6XRsf15igtBDiF-Mr7NMH-_3_TTWZTf4GGAL72NuvtVN3byr9zUv1NJuq59nz5e39PVYF-QF_FpMV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76371072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nuwer, Marc R. ; Visscher, Barbara R. ; Packwood, James W. ; Namerow, Norman S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nuwer, Marc R. ; Visscher, Barbara R. ; Packwood, James W. ; Namerow, Norman S.</creatorcontrib><description>Evoked potential (EP) tests were obtained in 110 neurologically normal first‐degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Visual EP tests were performed in all relatives; brainstem auditory and median nerve somatosensory EP tests were performed in 67 relatives. The relatives had a mean visual EP P100 latency that was significantly longer than that for normal subjects controlled for age and gender. Asymmetries were seen in results from individual MS relatives, including interocular visual EP P100 differences of up to 14 ms, and interarm somatosensory Erb‐N18 differences of up to 3.0 ms. We identified 19 pairs of patients and relatives who were HLA identical and 18 other pairs who were HLA double nonmatched. EP asymmetries were seen more often in the HLA identical siblings than in the HLA double nonmatched siblings. This suggests that subclinical, focal, and electrophysiological changes do occur in relatives of MS patients, especially if they share HLA types with the patients. Since less than 2% of siblings of MS patients would be expected to eventually develop clinical MS, these small subclinical electrophysiological changes are not expected to be a sign of the future appearance of clinical MS. Clinicians should be aware not to overinterpret small EP changes in relatives of MS patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-5134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-8249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ana.410180106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4037748</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANNED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Little, Brown and Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain Stem - physiopathology ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory ; Evoked Potentials, Visual ; Female ; HLA Antigens - classification ; Humans ; Male ; Median Nerve - physiopathology ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Sclerosis - genetics ; Multiple Sclerosis - immunology ; Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology ; Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis ; Neurology ; Reaction Time</subject><ispartof>Annals of neurology, 1985-07, Vol.18 (1), p.30-34</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1985 American Neurological Association</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4036-920a514fc4d90caf4672b903426981ba0c8e338f81757e96089b0913fbf54b673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4036-920a514fc4d90caf4672b903426981ba0c8e338f81757e96089b0913fbf54b673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fana.410180106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fana.410180106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8442888$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4037748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nuwer, Marc R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visscher, Barbara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packwood, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namerow, Norman S.</creatorcontrib><title>Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients</title><title>Annals of neurology</title><addtitle>Ann Neurol</addtitle><description>Evoked potential (EP) tests were obtained in 110 neurologically normal first‐degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Visual EP tests were performed in all relatives; brainstem auditory and median nerve somatosensory EP tests were performed in 67 relatives. The relatives had a mean visual EP P100 latency that was significantly longer than that for normal subjects controlled for age and gender. Asymmetries were seen in results from individual MS relatives, including interocular visual EP P100 differences of up to 14 ms, and interarm somatosensory Erb‐N18 differences of up to 3.0 ms. We identified 19 pairs of patients and relatives who were HLA identical and 18 other pairs who were HLA double nonmatched. EP asymmetries were seen more often in the HLA identical siblings than in the HLA double nonmatched siblings. This suggests that subclinical, focal, and electrophysiological changes do occur in relatives of MS patients, especially if they share HLA types with the patients. Since less than 2% of siblings of MS patients would be expected to eventually develop clinical MS, these small subclinical electrophysiological changes are not expected to be a sign of the future appearance of clinical MS. Clinicians should be aware not to overinterpret small EP changes in relatives of MS patients.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain Stem - physiopathology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Visual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>HLA Antigens - classification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Median Nerve - physiopathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - genetics</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - immunology</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><issn>0364-5134</issn><issn>1531-8249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EgrIcOSLlgLiljGPHy7FiKUhQJASCm-W4NjK4SYhTln-PUaOKE6c5vO_NvHkIHWIYY4DiVNd6TDFgARjYBhrhkuBcFFRuohEQRvMSE7qDdmN8BQDJMGyjbQqEcypG6Pzio3mz86xtelv3Xoest7H39Uvm66yzQff-w8ascdliGXrfBptFE2zXRB-zNqnJFffRltMh2oNh7qHHy4uHs6v85m56fTa5yU26x3JZgC4xdYbOJRjtKONFJYHQgkmBKw1GWEKEE5iX3EoGQlYgMXGVK2nFONlDJ6u9bde8L1NOtfDR2BB0bZtlVJwRjoEXCcxXoElBY2edaju_0N23wqB-W1OpNbVuLfFHw-JltbDzNT3UlPTjQdfR6OA6XRsf15igtBDiF-Mr7NMH-_3_TTWZTf4GGAL72NuvtVN3byr9zUv1NJuq59nz5e39PVYF-QF_FpMV</recordid><startdate>198507</startdate><enddate>198507</enddate><creator>Nuwer, Marc R.</creator><creator>Visscher, Barbara R.</creator><creator>Packwood, James W.</creator><creator>Namerow, Norman S.</creator><general>Little, Brown and Company</general><general>Willey-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198507</creationdate><title>Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients</title><author>Nuwer, Marc R. ; Visscher, Barbara R. ; Packwood, James W. ; Namerow, Norman S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4036-920a514fc4d90caf4672b903426981ba0c8e338f81757e96089b0913fbf54b673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain Stem - physiopathology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Visual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>HLA Antigens - classification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Median Nerve - physiopathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - genetics</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - immunology</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nuwer, Marc R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visscher, Barbara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packwood, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namerow, Norman S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nuwer, Marc R.</au><au>Visscher, Barbara R.</au><au>Packwood, James W.</au><au>Namerow, Norman S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Neurol</addtitle><date>1985-07</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>30-34</pages><issn>0364-5134</issn><eissn>1531-8249</eissn><coden>ANNED3</coden><abstract>Evoked potential (EP) tests were obtained in 110 neurologically normal first‐degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Visual EP tests were performed in all relatives; brainstem auditory and median nerve somatosensory EP tests were performed in 67 relatives. The relatives had a mean visual EP P100 latency that was significantly longer than that for normal subjects controlled for age and gender. Asymmetries were seen in results from individual MS relatives, including interocular visual EP P100 differences of up to 14 ms, and interarm somatosensory Erb‐N18 differences of up to 3.0 ms. We identified 19 pairs of patients and relatives who were HLA identical and 18 other pairs who were HLA double nonmatched. EP asymmetries were seen more often in the HLA identical siblings than in the HLA double nonmatched siblings. This suggests that subclinical, focal, and electrophysiological changes do occur in relatives of MS patients, especially if they share HLA types with the patients. Since less than 2% of siblings of MS patients would be expected to eventually develop clinical MS, these small subclinical electrophysiological changes are not expected to be a sign of the future appearance of clinical MS. Clinicians should be aware not to overinterpret small EP changes in relatives of MS patients.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Little, Brown and Company</pub><pmid>4037748</pmid><doi>10.1002/ana.410180106</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-5134 |
ispartof | Annals of neurology, 1985-07, Vol.18 (1), p.30-34 |
issn | 0364-5134 1531-8249 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76371072 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Brain Stem - physiopathology Evoked Potentials, Auditory Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials, Visual Female HLA Antigens - classification Humans Male Median Nerve - physiopathology Medical sciences Middle Aged Multiple Sclerosis - genetics Multiple Sclerosis - immunology Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis Neurology Reaction Time |
title | Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A33%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evoked%20potential%20testing%20in%20relatives%20of%20multiple%20sclerosis%20patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20neurology&rft.au=Nuwer,%20Marc%20R.&rft.date=1985-07&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=30-34&rft.issn=0364-5134&rft.eissn=1531-8249&rft.coden=ANNED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ana.410180106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76371072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76371072&rft_id=info:pmid/4037748&rfr_iscdi=true |