Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients

Evoked potential (EP) tests were obtained in 110 neurologically normal first‐degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Visual EP tests were performed in all relatives; brainstem auditory and median nerve somatosensory EP tests were performed in 67 relatives. The relatives had a mean visu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of neurology 1985-07, Vol.18 (1), p.30-34
Hauptverfasser: Nuwer, Marc R., Visscher, Barbara R., Packwood, James W., Namerow, Norman S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 30
container_title Annals of neurology
container_volume 18
creator Nuwer, Marc R.
Visscher, Barbara R.
Packwood, James W.
Namerow, Norman S.
description Evoked potential (EP) tests were obtained in 110 neurologically normal first‐degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Visual EP tests were performed in all relatives; brainstem auditory and median nerve somatosensory EP tests were performed in 67 relatives. The relatives had a mean visual EP P100 latency that was significantly longer than that for normal subjects controlled for age and gender. Asymmetries were seen in results from individual MS relatives, including interocular visual EP P100 differences of up to 14 ms, and interarm somatosensory Erb‐N18 differences of up to 3.0 ms. We identified 19 pairs of patients and relatives who were HLA identical and 18 other pairs who were HLA double nonmatched. EP asymmetries were seen more often in the HLA identical siblings than in the HLA double nonmatched siblings. This suggests that subclinical, focal, and electrophysiological changes do occur in relatives of MS patients, especially if they share HLA types with the patients. Since less than 2% of siblings of MS patients would be expected to eventually develop clinical MS, these small subclinical electrophysiological changes are not expected to be a sign of the future appearance of clinical MS. Clinicians should be aware not to overinterpret small EP changes in relatives of MS patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ana.410180106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76371072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76371072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4036-920a514fc4d90caf4672b903426981ba0c8e338f81757e96089b0913fbf54b673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EgrIcOSLlgLiljGPHy7FiKUhQJASCm-W4NjK4SYhTln-PUaOKE6c5vO_NvHkIHWIYY4DiVNd6TDFgARjYBhrhkuBcFFRuohEQRvMSE7qDdmN8BQDJMGyjbQqEcypG6Pzio3mz86xtelv3Xoest7H39Uvm66yzQff-w8ascdliGXrfBptFE2zXRB-zNqnJFffRltMh2oNh7qHHy4uHs6v85m56fTa5yU26x3JZgC4xdYbOJRjtKONFJYHQgkmBKw1GWEKEE5iX3EoGQlYgMXGVK2nFONlDJ6u9bde8L1NOtfDR2BB0bZtlVJwRjoEXCcxXoElBY2edaju_0N23wqB-W1OpNbVuLfFHw-JltbDzNT3UlPTjQdfR6OA6XRsf15igtBDiF-Mr7NMH-_3_TTWZTf4GGAL72NuvtVN3byr9zUv1NJuq59nz5e39PVYF-QF_FpMV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76371072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nuwer, Marc R. ; Visscher, Barbara R. ; Packwood, James W. ; Namerow, Norman S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nuwer, Marc R. ; Visscher, Barbara R. ; Packwood, James W. ; Namerow, Norman S.</creatorcontrib><description>Evoked potential (EP) tests were obtained in 110 neurologically normal first‐degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Visual EP tests were performed in all relatives; brainstem auditory and median nerve somatosensory EP tests were performed in 67 relatives. The relatives had a mean visual EP P100 latency that was significantly longer than that for normal subjects controlled for age and gender. Asymmetries were seen in results from individual MS relatives, including interocular visual EP P100 differences of up to 14 ms, and interarm somatosensory Erb‐N18 differences of up to 3.0 ms. We identified 19 pairs of patients and relatives who were HLA identical and 18 other pairs who were HLA double nonmatched. EP asymmetries were seen more often in the HLA identical siblings than in the HLA double nonmatched siblings. This suggests that subclinical, focal, and electrophysiological changes do occur in relatives of MS patients, especially if they share HLA types with the patients. Since less than 2% of siblings of MS patients would be expected to eventually develop clinical MS, these small subclinical electrophysiological changes are not expected to be a sign of the future appearance of clinical MS. Clinicians should be aware not to overinterpret small EP changes in relatives of MS patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-5134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-8249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ana.410180106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4037748</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANNED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Little, Brown and Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain Stem - physiopathology ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory ; Evoked Potentials, Visual ; Female ; HLA Antigens - classification ; Humans ; Male ; Median Nerve - physiopathology ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Sclerosis - genetics ; Multiple Sclerosis - immunology ; Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology ; Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis ; Neurology ; Reaction Time</subject><ispartof>Annals of neurology, 1985-07, Vol.18 (1), p.30-34</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1985 American Neurological Association</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4036-920a514fc4d90caf4672b903426981ba0c8e338f81757e96089b0913fbf54b673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4036-920a514fc4d90caf4672b903426981ba0c8e338f81757e96089b0913fbf54b673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fana.410180106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fana.410180106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8442888$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4037748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nuwer, Marc R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visscher, Barbara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packwood, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namerow, Norman S.</creatorcontrib><title>Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients</title><title>Annals of neurology</title><addtitle>Ann Neurol</addtitle><description>Evoked potential (EP) tests were obtained in 110 neurologically normal first‐degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Visual EP tests were performed in all relatives; brainstem auditory and median nerve somatosensory EP tests were performed in 67 relatives. The relatives had a mean visual EP P100 latency that was significantly longer than that for normal subjects controlled for age and gender. Asymmetries were seen in results from individual MS relatives, including interocular visual EP P100 differences of up to 14 ms, and interarm somatosensory Erb‐N18 differences of up to 3.0 ms. We identified 19 pairs of patients and relatives who were HLA identical and 18 other pairs who were HLA double nonmatched. EP asymmetries were seen more often in the HLA identical siblings than in the HLA double nonmatched siblings. This suggests that subclinical, focal, and electrophysiological changes do occur in relatives of MS patients, especially if they share HLA types with the patients. Since less than 2% of siblings of MS patients would be expected to eventually develop clinical MS, these small subclinical electrophysiological changes are not expected to be a sign of the future appearance of clinical MS. Clinicians should be aware not to overinterpret small EP changes in relatives of MS patients.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain Stem - physiopathology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Visual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>HLA Antigens - classification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Median Nerve - physiopathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - genetics</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - immunology</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><issn>0364-5134</issn><issn>1531-8249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EgrIcOSLlgLiljGPHy7FiKUhQJASCm-W4NjK4SYhTln-PUaOKE6c5vO_NvHkIHWIYY4DiVNd6TDFgARjYBhrhkuBcFFRuohEQRvMSE7qDdmN8BQDJMGyjbQqEcypG6Pzio3mz86xtelv3Xoest7H39Uvm66yzQff-w8ascdliGXrfBptFE2zXRB-zNqnJFffRltMh2oNh7qHHy4uHs6v85m56fTa5yU26x3JZgC4xdYbOJRjtKONFJYHQgkmBKw1GWEKEE5iX3EoGQlYgMXGVK2nFONlDJ6u9bde8L1NOtfDR2BB0bZtlVJwRjoEXCcxXoElBY2edaju_0N23wqB-W1OpNbVuLfFHw-JltbDzNT3UlPTjQdfR6OA6XRsf15igtBDiF-Mr7NMH-_3_TTWZTf4GGAL72NuvtVN3byr9zUv1NJuq59nz5e39PVYF-QF_FpMV</recordid><startdate>198507</startdate><enddate>198507</enddate><creator>Nuwer, Marc R.</creator><creator>Visscher, Barbara R.</creator><creator>Packwood, James W.</creator><creator>Namerow, Norman S.</creator><general>Little, Brown and Company</general><general>Willey-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198507</creationdate><title>Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients</title><author>Nuwer, Marc R. ; Visscher, Barbara R. ; Packwood, James W. ; Namerow, Norman S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4036-920a514fc4d90caf4672b903426981ba0c8e338f81757e96089b0913fbf54b673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain Stem - physiopathology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Visual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>HLA Antigens - classification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Median Nerve - physiopathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - genetics</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - immunology</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nuwer, Marc R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visscher, Barbara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packwood, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namerow, Norman S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nuwer, Marc R.</au><au>Visscher, Barbara R.</au><au>Packwood, James W.</au><au>Namerow, Norman S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Neurol</addtitle><date>1985-07</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>30-34</pages><issn>0364-5134</issn><eissn>1531-8249</eissn><coden>ANNED3</coden><abstract>Evoked potential (EP) tests were obtained in 110 neurologically normal first‐degree relatives of patients with multiple sclerosis. Visual EP tests were performed in all relatives; brainstem auditory and median nerve somatosensory EP tests were performed in 67 relatives. The relatives had a mean visual EP P100 latency that was significantly longer than that for normal subjects controlled for age and gender. Asymmetries were seen in results from individual MS relatives, including interocular visual EP P100 differences of up to 14 ms, and interarm somatosensory Erb‐N18 differences of up to 3.0 ms. We identified 19 pairs of patients and relatives who were HLA identical and 18 other pairs who were HLA double nonmatched. EP asymmetries were seen more often in the HLA identical siblings than in the HLA double nonmatched siblings. This suggests that subclinical, focal, and electrophysiological changes do occur in relatives of MS patients, especially if they share HLA types with the patients. Since less than 2% of siblings of MS patients would be expected to eventually develop clinical MS, these small subclinical electrophysiological changes are not expected to be a sign of the future appearance of clinical MS. Clinicians should be aware not to overinterpret small EP changes in relatives of MS patients.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Little, Brown and Company</pub><pmid>4037748</pmid><doi>10.1002/ana.410180106</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-5134
ispartof Annals of neurology, 1985-07, Vol.18 (1), p.30-34
issn 0364-5134
1531-8249
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76371072
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Brain Stem - physiopathology
Evoked Potentials, Auditory
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
Evoked Potentials, Visual
Female
HLA Antigens - classification
Humans
Male
Median Nerve - physiopathology
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multiple Sclerosis - genetics
Multiple Sclerosis - immunology
Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology
Multiple sclerosis and variants. Guillain barré syndrome and other inflammatory polyneuropathies. Leukoencephalitis
Neurology
Reaction Time
title Evoked potential testing in relatives of multiple sclerosis patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A33%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evoked%20potential%20testing%20in%20relatives%20of%20multiple%20sclerosis%20patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20neurology&rft.au=Nuwer,%20Marc%20R.&rft.date=1985-07&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=30-34&rft.issn=0364-5134&rft.eissn=1531-8249&rft.coden=ANNED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ana.410180106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76371072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76371072&rft_id=info:pmid/4037748&rfr_iscdi=true