Comparison of a three-quarter electrode band configuration with a full electrode band configuration for impedance cardiography

Impedance cardiography is a technique commonly used in psychophysiological studies. However, concerns about the utility of full circumferential band electrodes (FB) have been raised. The current study was designed to compare FB with a three‐quarter circumferential band configuration (PB). A total of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychophysiology 2010-11, Vol.47 (6), p.1087-1093
Hauptverfasser: Bacon, Simon L., Keller, Avril J., Lavoie, Kim L., Campbell, Tavis S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1093
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1087
container_title Psychophysiology
container_volume 47
creator Bacon, Simon L.
Keller, Avril J.
Lavoie, Kim L.
Campbell, Tavis S.
description Impedance cardiography is a technique commonly used in psychophysiological studies. However, concerns about the utility of full circumferential band electrodes (FB) have been raised. The current study was designed to compare FB with a three‐quarter circumferential band configuration (PB). A total of 47 participants (66% female, mean [SD] age=20.4 [3.0] years) underwent 2 testing sessions, once using FB and once using PB. Session order was randomized and balanced. Each session consisted of 5 min of rest, math task, recovery, and cold pressor test. Average baseline and task pre‐ejection period (PEP), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) was calculated from impedance cardiography and blood pressure monitoring. Participants were are asked to rate measures of comfort after each session. There were no significant difference between the mean levels of PEP, SV, CO, HR, and TPR for the PB versus the FB configurations. However, both systolic BP and diastolic BP were higher during the FB session. Intraclass correlations were high (ricc=.63–.93) between PB and FB. Bland‐Altman analyses revealed a low level of bias (≤5%) between the configurations. Based on limits of agreement between ±30%, there was equivalence in PEP between the 2 configurations, and SV, CO, and TPR were close to reaching equivalence. Participants clearly indicated greater comfort with the PB configuration compared to the FB. The current study provides incremental evidence that suggests a three‐quarter PB configuration may be utilized for standard psychophysiological testing instead of the standard FB configuration. However, further studies are needed to validate the PB configuration against other techniques.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01010.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_763258236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2192297101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4340-d90af33ea5145b06f1f0d67b97c9f50439b1e31da0e8880c63445adcaf1d68943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v0zAchy0EYmXwFVDEhVO6v2MnsS9IqBob2jSKACFOluOX1SWJMzvR2guffQ4dPXBAWPKL7Of3k6UHoQzDEqdxtl1iWvGccVYtC0i3aaZ19wQtjg9P0QKAsrys6-IEvYhxCwAcF8VzdFIABQ6YL9Cvle8GGVz0feZtJrNxE4zJ7yYZRhMy0xo1Bq9N1sheZ8r31t1OQY4u8fdu3KSEndr236D1IXPdYLTslcmUDNr52yCHzf4lemZlG82rx_0Ufftw_nV1mV9_uvi4en-dK0oo5JqDtIQYWWJaNlBZbEFXdcNrxW0JlPAGG4K1BMMYA1URSkuplbRYV4xTcoreHnqH4O8mE0fRuahM28re-CmKuiJFyQpSJfLNX-TWT6FPnxMMagqk4DxB7ACp4GMMxoohuE6GvcAgZkNiK2YRYhYhZkPityGxS9HXj_1T0xl9DP5RkoB3B-DetWb_38Vi_eXHej6mgvxQ4OJodscCGX6KqiZ1Kb7fXIibz-ur8nJ9JQh5ACtmsF0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807403299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of a three-quarter electrode band configuration with a full electrode band configuration for impedance cardiography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bacon, Simon L. ; Keller, Avril J. ; Lavoie, Kim L. ; Campbell, Tavis S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bacon, Simon L. ; Keller, Avril J. ; Lavoie, Kim L. ; Campbell, Tavis S.</creatorcontrib><description>Impedance cardiography is a technique commonly used in psychophysiological studies. However, concerns about the utility of full circumferential band electrodes (FB) have been raised. The current study was designed to compare FB with a three‐quarter circumferential band configuration (PB). A total of 47 participants (66% female, mean [SD] age=20.4 [3.0] years) underwent 2 testing sessions, once using FB and once using PB. Session order was randomized and balanced. Each session consisted of 5 min of rest, math task, recovery, and cold pressor test. Average baseline and task pre‐ejection period (PEP), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) was calculated from impedance cardiography and blood pressure monitoring. Participants were are asked to rate measures of comfort after each session. There were no significant difference between the mean levels of PEP, SV, CO, HR, and TPR for the PB versus the FB configurations. However, both systolic BP and diastolic BP were higher during the FB session. Intraclass correlations were high (ricc=.63–.93) between PB and FB. Bland‐Altman analyses revealed a low level of bias (≤5%) between the configurations. Based on limits of agreement between ±30%, there was equivalence in PEP between the 2 configurations, and SV, CO, and TPR were close to reaching equivalence. Participants clearly indicated greater comfort with the PB configuration compared to the FB. The current study provides incremental evidence that suggests a three‐quarter PB configuration may be utilized for standard psychophysiological testing instead of the standard FB configuration. However, further studies are needed to validate the PB configuration against other techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01010.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20409019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Band configurations ; Bias ; Cardiography, Impedance - methods ; Cardiography, Impedance - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Circulatory system ; Cold Temperature ; Comparative studies ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Electrodes ; Female ; Hemodynamics - physiology ; Humans ; Impedance cardiography ; Limits of agreement ; Male ; Medical tests ; Pain Measurement ; Physiological psychology ; Pressure ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Stress, Psychological - physiopathology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychophysiology, 2010-11, Vol.47 (6), p.1087-1093</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4340-d90af33ea5145b06f1f0d67b97c9f50439b1e31da0e8880c63445adcaf1d68943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4340-d90af33ea5145b06f1f0d67b97c9f50439b1e31da0e8880c63445adcaf1d68943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.2010.01010.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.2010.01010.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20409019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bacon, Simon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Avril J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavoie, Kim L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Tavis S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of a three-quarter electrode band configuration with a full electrode band configuration for impedance cardiography</title><title>Psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><description>Impedance cardiography is a technique commonly used in psychophysiological studies. However, concerns about the utility of full circumferential band electrodes (FB) have been raised. The current study was designed to compare FB with a three‐quarter circumferential band configuration (PB). A total of 47 participants (66% female, mean [SD] age=20.4 [3.0] years) underwent 2 testing sessions, once using FB and once using PB. Session order was randomized and balanced. Each session consisted of 5 min of rest, math task, recovery, and cold pressor test. Average baseline and task pre‐ejection period (PEP), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) was calculated from impedance cardiography and blood pressure monitoring. Participants were are asked to rate measures of comfort after each session. There were no significant difference between the mean levels of PEP, SV, CO, HR, and TPR for the PB versus the FB configurations. However, both systolic BP and diastolic BP were higher during the FB session. Intraclass correlations were high (ricc=.63–.93) between PB and FB. Bland‐Altman analyses revealed a low level of bias (≤5%) between the configurations. Based on limits of agreement between ±30%, there was equivalence in PEP between the 2 configurations, and SV, CO, and TPR were close to reaching equivalence. Participants clearly indicated greater comfort with the PB configuration compared to the FB. The current study provides incremental evidence that suggests a three‐quarter PB configuration may be utilized for standard psychophysiological testing instead of the standard FB configuration. However, further studies are needed to validate the PB configuration against other techniques.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Band configurations</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cardiography, Impedance - methods</subject><subject>Cardiography, Impedance - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Circulatory system</subject><subject>Cold Temperature</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impedance cardiography</subject><subject>Limits of agreement</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Physiological psychology</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - physiopathology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0048-5772</issn><issn>1469-8986</issn><issn>1540-5958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v0zAchy0EYmXwFVDEhVO6v2MnsS9IqBob2jSKACFOluOX1SWJMzvR2guffQ4dPXBAWPKL7Of3k6UHoQzDEqdxtl1iWvGccVYtC0i3aaZ19wQtjg9P0QKAsrys6-IEvYhxCwAcF8VzdFIABQ6YL9Cvle8GGVz0feZtJrNxE4zJ7yYZRhMy0xo1Bq9N1sheZ8r31t1OQY4u8fdu3KSEndr236D1IXPdYLTslcmUDNr52yCHzf4lemZlG82rx_0Ufftw_nV1mV9_uvi4en-dK0oo5JqDtIQYWWJaNlBZbEFXdcNrxW0JlPAGG4K1BMMYA1URSkuplbRYV4xTcoreHnqH4O8mE0fRuahM28re-CmKuiJFyQpSJfLNX-TWT6FPnxMMagqk4DxB7ACp4GMMxoohuE6GvcAgZkNiK2YRYhYhZkPityGxS9HXj_1T0xl9DP5RkoB3B-DetWb_38Vi_eXHej6mgvxQ4OJodscCGX6KqiZ1Kb7fXIibz-ur8nJ9JQh5ACtmsF0</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Bacon, Simon L.</creator><creator>Keller, Avril J.</creator><creator>Lavoie, Kim L.</creator><creator>Campbell, Tavis S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Comparison of a three-quarter electrode band configuration with a full electrode band configuration for impedance cardiography</title><author>Bacon, Simon L. ; Keller, Avril J. ; Lavoie, Kim L. ; Campbell, Tavis S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4340-d90af33ea5145b06f1f0d67b97c9f50439b1e31da0e8880c63445adcaf1d68943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Band configurations</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cardiography, Impedance - methods</topic><topic>Cardiography, Impedance - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Circulatory system</topic><topic>Cold Temperature</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impedance cardiography</topic><topic>Limits of agreement</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Physiological psychology</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - physiopathology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bacon, Simon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Avril J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavoie, Kim L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Tavis S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bacon, Simon L.</au><au>Keller, Avril J.</au><au>Lavoie, Kim L.</au><au>Campbell, Tavis S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of a three-quarter electrode band configuration with a full electrode band configuration for impedance cardiography</atitle><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1087</spage><epage>1093</epage><pages>1087-1093</pages><issn>0048-5772</issn><eissn>1469-8986</eissn><eissn>1540-5958</eissn><abstract>Impedance cardiography is a technique commonly used in psychophysiological studies. However, concerns about the utility of full circumferential band electrodes (FB) have been raised. The current study was designed to compare FB with a three‐quarter circumferential band configuration (PB). A total of 47 participants (66% female, mean [SD] age=20.4 [3.0] years) underwent 2 testing sessions, once using FB and once using PB. Session order was randomized and balanced. Each session consisted of 5 min of rest, math task, recovery, and cold pressor test. Average baseline and task pre‐ejection period (PEP), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) was calculated from impedance cardiography and blood pressure monitoring. Participants were are asked to rate measures of comfort after each session. There were no significant difference between the mean levels of PEP, SV, CO, HR, and TPR for the PB versus the FB configurations. However, both systolic BP and diastolic BP were higher during the FB session. Intraclass correlations were high (ricc=.63–.93) between PB and FB. Bland‐Altman analyses revealed a low level of bias (≤5%) between the configurations. Based on limits of agreement between ±30%, there was equivalence in PEP between the 2 configurations, and SV, CO, and TPR were close to reaching equivalence. Participants clearly indicated greater comfort with the PB configuration compared to the FB. The current study provides incremental evidence that suggests a three‐quarter PB configuration may be utilized for standard psychophysiological testing instead of the standard FB configuration. However, further studies are needed to validate the PB configuration against other techniques.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>20409019</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01010.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5772
ispartof Psychophysiology, 2010-11, Vol.47 (6), p.1087-1093
issn 0048-5772
1469-8986
1540-5958
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_763258236
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Analysis of Variance
Band configurations
Bias
Cardiography, Impedance - methods
Cardiography, Impedance - statistics & numerical data
Circulatory system
Cold Temperature
Comparative studies
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Electrodes
Female
Hemodynamics - physiology
Humans
Impedance cardiography
Limits of agreement
Male
Medical tests
Pain Measurement
Physiological psychology
Pressure
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Stress, Psychological - physiopathology
Young Adult
title Comparison of a three-quarter electrode band configuration with a full electrode band configuration for impedance cardiography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A42%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20a%20three-quarter%20electrode%20band%20configuration%20with%20a%20full%20electrode%20band%20configuration%20for%20impedance%20cardiography&rft.jtitle=Psychophysiology&rft.au=Bacon,%20Simon%20L.&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1087&rft.epage=1093&rft.pages=1087-1093&rft.issn=0048-5772&rft.eissn=1469-8986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01010.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2192297101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807403299&rft_id=info:pmid/20409019&rfr_iscdi=true