Community participation: need, excuse, or strategy? What are we talking about when we refer to community participation?

This paper evaluates the strategy of including community participation in health care and health promotion programs, taking into account three dimensions: the pertinence of the practice, the characteristics of its implementation, and the results generated by it. After doing a critical review of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cadernos de saúde pública 1994-01, Vol.10 (1), p.111-122
Hauptverfasser: Bronfman, M, Gleizer, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue 1
container_start_page 111
container_title Cadernos de saúde pública
container_volume 10
creator Bronfman, M
Gleizer, M
description This paper evaluates the strategy of including community participation in health care and health promotion programs, taking into account three dimensions: the pertinence of the practice, the characteristics of its implementation, and the results generated by it. After doing a critical review of the bibliography on the issue, we came to the conclusion that many heterogeneous programs are grouped under the term "community participation". This requires a specification of what king of community participation is being talked about. As a consequence, the study proposes a classification of the different practices grouped under this heading. The following criteria were used in the classification: 1) theoretical and ideological conceptions underlying the practice of community participation; 2) aspects to be implemented and subjects to be influenced by intervention; and 3) forms that community participation takes in practice. The study also analyzes the articulation between these three aspects. Finally, the role of social research and qualitative methodology in the implementation of community participation for health care programs is considered. The study also considers challenges that overall proposals must face in order for strategies to develop successfully, beyond their differences in conception and implementation.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76321033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76321033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p544-3e24ab81014cbc8b48706915b3344f361e09c2f734f7dfccca8f8c1084aa20693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1KAzEYRbNQbK2-gmTlqgP5mz83RQatQsFNQXfDN-mXNjozGZMMtW9vxbpzdeFwOIt7RqaMM5FIzt8m5DKEd8aEFDK9IBOeslKVQk3JvnJdN_Y2HugAPlptB4jW9Xe0R9zMKX7pMeCcOk9D9BBxe1jQ1x1ECh7pHmmE9sP2WwqNGyPd77D_oR4Nehod1f_nF1fk3EAb8Pq0M7J-fFhXT8nqZflc3a-SIVUqkSgUNAVnXOlGF40qcpaVPG2kVMrIjCMrtTC5VCbfGK01FKbQnBUKQBxNOSO3v9nBu88RQ6w7GzS2LfToxlDnmRScSXkUb07i2HS4qQdvO_CH-u8p-Q0bKmVf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76321033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community participation: need, excuse, or strategy? What are we talking about when we refer to community participation?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bronfman, M ; Gleizer, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bronfman, M ; Gleizer, M</creatorcontrib><description>This paper evaluates the strategy of including community participation in health care and health promotion programs, taking into account three dimensions: the pertinence of the practice, the characteristics of its implementation, and the results generated by it. After doing a critical review of the bibliography on the issue, we came to the conclusion that many heterogeneous programs are grouped under the term "community participation". This requires a specification of what king of community participation is being talked about. As a consequence, the study proposes a classification of the different practices grouped under this heading. The following criteria were used in the classification: 1) theoretical and ideological conceptions underlying the practice of community participation; 2) aspects to be implemented and subjects to be influenced by intervention; and 3) forms that community participation takes in practice. The study also analyzes the articulation between these three aspects. Finally, the role of social research and qualitative methodology in the implementation of community participation for health care programs is considered. The study also considers challenges that overall proposals must face in order for strategies to develop successfully, beyond their differences in conception and implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0102-311X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15094924</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><ispartof>Cadernos de saúde pública, 1994-01, Vol.10 (1), p.111-122</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15094924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bronfman, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleizer, M</creatorcontrib><title>Community participation: need, excuse, or strategy? What are we talking about when we refer to community participation?</title><title>Cadernos de saúde pública</title><addtitle>Cad Saude Publica</addtitle><description>This paper evaluates the strategy of including community participation in health care and health promotion programs, taking into account three dimensions: the pertinence of the practice, the characteristics of its implementation, and the results generated by it. After doing a critical review of the bibliography on the issue, we came to the conclusion that many heterogeneous programs are grouped under the term "community participation". This requires a specification of what king of community participation is being talked about. As a consequence, the study proposes a classification of the different practices grouped under this heading. The following criteria were used in the classification: 1) theoretical and ideological conceptions underlying the practice of community participation; 2) aspects to be implemented and subjects to be influenced by intervention; and 3) forms that community participation takes in practice. The study also analyzes the articulation between these three aspects. Finally, the role of social research and qualitative methodology in the implementation of community participation for health care programs is considered. The study also considers challenges that overall proposals must face in order for strategies to develop successfully, beyond their differences in conception and implementation.</description><issn>0102-311X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1KAzEYRbNQbK2-gmTlqgP5mz83RQatQsFNQXfDN-mXNjozGZMMtW9vxbpzdeFwOIt7RqaMM5FIzt8m5DKEd8aEFDK9IBOeslKVQk3JvnJdN_Y2HugAPlptB4jW9Xe0R9zMKX7pMeCcOk9D9BBxe1jQ1x1ECh7pHmmE9sP2WwqNGyPd77D_oR4Nehod1f_nF1fk3EAb8Pq0M7J-fFhXT8nqZflc3a-SIVUqkSgUNAVnXOlGF40qcpaVPG2kVMrIjCMrtTC5VCbfGK01FKbQnBUKQBxNOSO3v9nBu88RQ6w7GzS2LfToxlDnmRScSXkUb07i2HS4qQdvO_CH-u8p-Q0bKmVf</recordid><startdate>199401</startdate><enddate>199401</enddate><creator>Bronfman, M</creator><creator>Gleizer, M</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199401</creationdate><title>Community participation: need, excuse, or strategy? What are we talking about when we refer to community participation?</title><author>Bronfman, M ; Gleizer, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p544-3e24ab81014cbc8b48706915b3344f361e09c2f734f7dfccca8f8c1084aa20693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bronfman, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleizer, M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cadernos de saúde pública</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bronfman, M</au><au>Gleizer, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community participation: need, excuse, or strategy? What are we talking about when we refer to community participation?</atitle><jtitle>Cadernos de saúde pública</jtitle><addtitle>Cad Saude Publica</addtitle><date>1994-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>111-122</pages><issn>0102-311X</issn><abstract>This paper evaluates the strategy of including community participation in health care and health promotion programs, taking into account three dimensions: the pertinence of the practice, the characteristics of its implementation, and the results generated by it. After doing a critical review of the bibliography on the issue, we came to the conclusion that many heterogeneous programs are grouped under the term "community participation". This requires a specification of what king of community participation is being talked about. As a consequence, the study proposes a classification of the different practices grouped under this heading. The following criteria were used in the classification: 1) theoretical and ideological conceptions underlying the practice of community participation; 2) aspects to be implemented and subjects to be influenced by intervention; and 3) forms that community participation takes in practice. The study also analyzes the articulation between these three aspects. Finally, the role of social research and qualitative methodology in the implementation of community participation for health care programs is considered. The study also considers challenges that overall proposals must face in order for strategies to develop successfully, beyond their differences in conception and implementation.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>15094924</pmid><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0102-311X
ispartof Cadernos de saúde pública, 1994-01, Vol.10 (1), p.111-122
issn 0102-311X
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76321033
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Community participation: need, excuse, or strategy? What are we talking about when we refer to community participation?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A58%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community%20participation:%20need,%20excuse,%20or%20strategy?%20What%20are%20we%20talking%20about%20when%20we%20refer%20to%20community%20participation?&rft.jtitle=Cadernos%20de%20sa%C3%BAde%20p%C3%BAblica&rft.au=Bronfman,%20M&rft.date=1994-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=111-122&rft.issn=0102-311X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E76321033%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76321033&rft_id=info:pmid/15094924&rfr_iscdi=true