Is there a distinct African sexuality? A critical response to Caldwell

In the current HIV debate there are diverse opinions about the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa and the reasons for it. Caldwell and his colleagues, for example, argue that the whole of Africa has a distinct sexuality which is inherently permissive. They claim moreover that no religious moral value is a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Africa (London. 1928) 1994-01, Vol.64 (2), p.220-242
1. Verfasser: Ahlberg, Beth Maina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 242
container_issue 2
container_start_page 220
container_title Africa (London. 1928)
container_volume 64
creator Ahlberg, Beth Maina
description In the current HIV debate there are diverse opinions about the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa and the reasons for it. Caldwell and his colleagues, for example, argue that the whole of Africa has a distinct sexuality which is inherently permissive. They claim moreover that no religious moral value is attached to sexual activity, and Christianity has thus not succeeded in changing matters. They find in this failure the reason for the failure of the fertility control programme in sub-Saharan Africa, and they argue that HIV/AIDS control efforts will fail similarly unless the fear it generates forces Africans to adopt the Eurasian model, with its religious, moral value. The article re-examines Caldwell et al.'s conceptualisation of the role of moral value in social change. Without considering the internal expressions, mechanisms and social contexts within and through which moral value is maintained and changed, they assume that Christian moral values could lead to a change in sexual behaviour from permissive (as they see it) African sexuality to the Eurasian model. In making such an assumption they ignore the ethical and behavioural contradictions generally inherent in moral systems. Moreover they pay little attention to the process of change in Western societies, where Christian morality has lost a great deal of its control over behaviour. But even if we assume that internal contradictions and processes of change do not exist, the christianisation process in Africa fundamentally transformed local customs in ways that delinked their role in regulating behaviour, including sexual behaviour. For discussions and decisions on options and strategies for the prevention and control of HIV/AIDS, identifying the nature and impact of that transformation is essential. Dans le débat actuel sur le HIV, il y a des opinions diverses au sujet de la propagation du HIV/SIDA en Afrique et les raisons pour ceci. Caldwell et ses collègues, par exemple, affirment que l'Afrique toute entière a une sexualité distincte qui est fondamentalement permissive. De plus, ils prétendent qu'il n'y a pas de valeurs religieuses ou morales attachées à l'activité sexuelle, et que le christianisme n'a done pas réussi à changer ces attitudes. Ils voient dans cet échec la raison pour un autre échec, celui du programme de contrôle de fertilité au sous-Sahara africain, et ils soutiennent que de la même manière les efforts visant à controller le HIV/SIDA échoueront à moins que la peur qu'il engendre force
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1160981
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76320448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_1160981</cupid><galeid>A16227930</galeid><jstor_id>1160981</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A16227930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-e530085852d7cf49dbb4c027422466f6ff9dab6b546ec691293b5a6e9ecd18853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModl3FPyAyKCiCo_n-uJJlsdtisbTodchkztRZZ2fWJIPbf29khi0UxKtw8j7Jec95EXpO8AfKsPpIiMRGkwdoQZTAJSaaP0QLjDEpjaL4BD2JcZsrooV-jE4IZRRjrRbo9DwW6QcEKFxRtzG1vU_Fqgmtd30R4TC6rk23n4pV4UOb8m1XBIj7oY9QpKFYu67-DV33FD1qXBfh2Xwu0ffTz9_WZ-XF5eZ8vbooPTcslSBYbiu0oLXyDTd1VXGPqeKUcikb2TSmdpWsBJfgpSHUsEo4CQZ8TbQWbIneTP_uw_BrhJjsro0-G3A9DGO0SubBONf_BZmW0mhFMvj6HrgdxtDnISyVhCrKRd7WEr36J0WY5MIwlqH3E3TjOrB5k0Of4JD80HVwAzYvYn1pV0RSqgzDGX874T4MMQZo7D60OxduLcH2b6p2TjWTL-fuY7WD-o6bY8zAiwnYxjSEO_34vpzkHDAcjrILP61UTAkrN1f26tp83Xy5PrM88-9mZ25XhbbO5o_j3vf2B5O4vPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213645933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there a distinct African sexuality? A critical response to Caldwell</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ahlberg, Beth Maina</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahlberg, Beth Maina</creatorcontrib><description>In the current HIV debate there are diverse opinions about the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa and the reasons for it. Caldwell and his colleagues, for example, argue that the whole of Africa has a distinct sexuality which is inherently permissive. They claim moreover that no religious moral value is attached to sexual activity, and Christianity has thus not succeeded in changing matters. They find in this failure the reason for the failure of the fertility control programme in sub-Saharan Africa, and they argue that HIV/AIDS control efforts will fail similarly unless the fear it generates forces Africans to adopt the Eurasian model, with its religious, moral value. The article re-examines Caldwell et al.'s conceptualisation of the role of moral value in social change. Without considering the internal expressions, mechanisms and social contexts within and through which moral value is maintained and changed, they assume that Christian moral values could lead to a change in sexual behaviour from permissive (as they see it) African sexuality to the Eurasian model. In making such an assumption they ignore the ethical and behavioural contradictions generally inherent in moral systems. Moreover they pay little attention to the process of change in Western societies, where Christian morality has lost a great deal of its control over behaviour. But even if we assume that internal contradictions and processes of change do not exist, the christianisation process in Africa fundamentally transformed local customs in ways that delinked their role in regulating behaviour, including sexual behaviour. For discussions and decisions on options and strategies for the prevention and control of HIV/AIDS, identifying the nature and impact of that transformation is essential. Dans le débat actuel sur le HIV, il y a des opinions diverses au sujet de la propagation du HIV/SIDA en Afrique et les raisons pour ceci. Caldwell et ses collègues, par exemple, affirment que l'Afrique toute entière a une sexualité distincte qui est fondamentalement permissive. De plus, ils prétendent qu'il n'y a pas de valeurs religieuses ou morales attachées à l'activité sexuelle, et que le christianisme n'a done pas réussi à changer ces attitudes. Ils voient dans cet échec la raison pour un autre échec, celui du programme de contrôle de fertilité au sous-Sahara africain, et ils soutiennent que de la même manière les efforts visant à controller le HIV/SIDA échoueront à moins que la peur qu'il engendre force les africains à adopter le modéle eurasien avec ses valeurs religieuses et morales. Cet article examine de nouveau la conceptualisation de Caldwell et autres, quant au rôle des valeurs morales dans les changements sociaux. Sans considérer les expressions internes, les mécanismes et les contextes sociaux au sein desquels et à travers lesquels les valeurs morales sont maintenues et changées, ils présument que les valeurs morales chrétiennes pourraient aboutir à un changement dans l'attitude sexuelle, passant de la sexualité africaine permissive (selon eux) au modèle eurasien. En faisant une telle supposition, ils ignorent les contradictions au niveau de I'éthique et du comportement qui sont généralement inhérentes aux systèmes moraux. De plus, ils ne prêtent que peu d'attention aux processus de changement dans les sociétés occidentales, où la moralité chrétienne a perdu une grande partie de son contrôle sur les attitudes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-9720</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-0184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1160981</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12320087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ; Adolescents ; Africa ; African Christianity ; African culture ; Africans ; Applied anthropology ; Attitude ; Attitudes ; Behavior ; Christian missionaries ; Christian morality ; Christianity ; Communities ; Concept formation ; Developing Countries ; Disease ; Ethics ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Family Planning Services ; Health Planning ; HIV ; HIV Infections ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Human sexual behavior ; Men ; Morality ; Personality ; Population ; Program Evaluation ; Psychology ; Religion ; Sexual Behavior ; Sexual ethics ; Sexuality ; Sexuality, HIV and Divorce ; Social change ; Virus Diseases</subject><ispartof>Africa (London. 1928), 1994-01, Vol.64 (2), p.220-242</ispartof><rights>Copyright © International African Institute 1994</rights><rights>Copyright 1994 International African Institute</rights><rights>excerpt</rights><rights>Copyright Edinburgh University Press 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-e530085852d7cf49dbb4c027422466f6ff9dab6b546ec691293b5a6e9ecd18853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-e530085852d7cf49dbb4c027422466f6ff9dab6b546ec691293b5a6e9ecd18853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1160981$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1160981$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12320087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahlberg, Beth Maina</creatorcontrib><title>Is there a distinct African sexuality? A critical response to Caldwell</title><title>Africa (London. 1928)</title><addtitle>Africa</addtitle><description>In the current HIV debate there are diverse opinions about the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa and the reasons for it. Caldwell and his colleagues, for example, argue that the whole of Africa has a distinct sexuality which is inherently permissive. They claim moreover that no religious moral value is attached to sexual activity, and Christianity has thus not succeeded in changing matters. They find in this failure the reason for the failure of the fertility control programme in sub-Saharan Africa, and they argue that HIV/AIDS control efforts will fail similarly unless the fear it generates forces Africans to adopt the Eurasian model, with its religious, moral value. The article re-examines Caldwell et al.'s conceptualisation of the role of moral value in social change. Without considering the internal expressions, mechanisms and social contexts within and through which moral value is maintained and changed, they assume that Christian moral values could lead to a change in sexual behaviour from permissive (as they see it) African sexuality to the Eurasian model. In making such an assumption they ignore the ethical and behavioural contradictions generally inherent in moral systems. Moreover they pay little attention to the process of change in Western societies, where Christian morality has lost a great deal of its control over behaviour. But even if we assume that internal contradictions and processes of change do not exist, the christianisation process in Africa fundamentally transformed local customs in ways that delinked their role in regulating behaviour, including sexual behaviour. For discussions and decisions on options and strategies for the prevention and control of HIV/AIDS, identifying the nature and impact of that transformation is essential. Dans le débat actuel sur le HIV, il y a des opinions diverses au sujet de la propagation du HIV/SIDA en Afrique et les raisons pour ceci. Caldwell et ses collègues, par exemple, affirment que l'Afrique toute entière a une sexualité distincte qui est fondamentalement permissive. De plus, ils prétendent qu'il n'y a pas de valeurs religieuses ou morales attachées à l'activité sexuelle, et que le christianisme n'a done pas réussi à changer ces attitudes. Ils voient dans cet échec la raison pour un autre échec, celui du programme de contrôle de fertilité au sous-Sahara africain, et ils soutiennent que de la même manière les efforts visant à controller le HIV/SIDA échoueront à moins que la peur qu'il engendre force les africains à adopter le modéle eurasien avec ses valeurs religieuses et morales. Cet article examine de nouveau la conceptualisation de Caldwell et autres, quant au rôle des valeurs morales dans les changements sociaux. Sans considérer les expressions internes, les mécanismes et les contextes sociaux au sein desquels et à travers lesquels les valeurs morales sont maintenues et changées, ils présument que les valeurs morales chrétiennes pourraient aboutir à un changement dans l'attitude sexuelle, passant de la sexualité africaine permissive (selon eux) au modèle eurasien. En faisant une telle supposition, ils ignorent les contradictions au niveau de I'éthique et du comportement qui sont généralement inhérentes aux systèmes moraux. De plus, ils ne prêtent que peu d'attention aux processus de changement dans les sociétés occidentales, où la moralité chrétienne a perdu une grande partie de son contrôle sur les attitudes.</description><subject>Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Africa</subject><subject>African Christianity</subject><subject>African culture</subject><subject>Africans</subject><subject>Applied anthropology</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Christian missionaries</subject><subject>Christian morality</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Concept formation</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Family Planning Services</subject><subject>Health Planning</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV Infections</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Human sexual behavior</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Sexual ethics</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Sexuality, HIV and Divorce</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Virus Diseases</subject><issn>0001-9720</issn><issn>1750-0184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModl3FPyAyKCiCo_n-uJJlsdtisbTodchkztRZZ2fWJIPbf29khi0UxKtw8j7Jec95EXpO8AfKsPpIiMRGkwdoQZTAJSaaP0QLjDEpjaL4BD2JcZsrooV-jE4IZRRjrRbo9DwW6QcEKFxRtzG1vU_Fqgmtd30R4TC6rk23n4pV4UOb8m1XBIj7oY9QpKFYu67-DV33FD1qXBfh2Xwu0ffTz9_WZ-XF5eZ8vbooPTcslSBYbiu0oLXyDTd1VXGPqeKUcikb2TSmdpWsBJfgpSHUsEo4CQZ8TbQWbIneTP_uw_BrhJjsro0-G3A9DGO0SubBONf_BZmW0mhFMvj6HrgdxtDnISyVhCrKRd7WEr36J0WY5MIwlqH3E3TjOrB5k0Of4JD80HVwAzYvYn1pV0RSqgzDGX874T4MMQZo7D60OxduLcH2b6p2TjWTL-fuY7WD-o6bY8zAiwnYxjSEO_34vpzkHDAcjrILP61UTAkrN1f26tp83Xy5PrM88-9mZ25XhbbO5o_j3vf2B5O4vPg</recordid><startdate>19940101</startdate><enddate>19940101</enddate><creator>Ahlberg, Beth Maina</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Edinburgh University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940101</creationdate><title>Is there a distinct African sexuality? A critical response to Caldwell</title><author>Ahlberg, Beth Maina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-e530085852d7cf49dbb4c027422466f6ff9dab6b546ec691293b5a6e9ecd18853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Africa</topic><topic>African Christianity</topic><topic>African culture</topic><topic>Africans</topic><topic>Applied anthropology</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Christian missionaries</topic><topic>Christian morality</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Concept formation</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Family Planning Services</topic><topic>Health Planning</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV Infections</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Human sexual behavior</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Sexual ethics</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Sexuality, HIV and Divorce</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Virus Diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahlberg, Beth Maina</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Africa (London. 1928)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahlberg, Beth Maina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there a distinct African sexuality? A critical response to Caldwell</atitle><jtitle>Africa (London. 1928)</jtitle><addtitle>Africa</addtitle><date>1994-01-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>220</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>220-242</pages><issn>0001-9720</issn><eissn>1750-0184</eissn><abstract>In the current HIV debate there are diverse opinions about the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa and the reasons for it. Caldwell and his colleagues, for example, argue that the whole of Africa has a distinct sexuality which is inherently permissive. They claim moreover that no religious moral value is attached to sexual activity, and Christianity has thus not succeeded in changing matters. They find in this failure the reason for the failure of the fertility control programme in sub-Saharan Africa, and they argue that HIV/AIDS control efforts will fail similarly unless the fear it generates forces Africans to adopt the Eurasian model, with its religious, moral value. The article re-examines Caldwell et al.'s conceptualisation of the role of moral value in social change. Without considering the internal expressions, mechanisms and social contexts within and through which moral value is maintained and changed, they assume that Christian moral values could lead to a change in sexual behaviour from permissive (as they see it) African sexuality to the Eurasian model. In making such an assumption they ignore the ethical and behavioural contradictions generally inherent in moral systems. Moreover they pay little attention to the process of change in Western societies, where Christian morality has lost a great deal of its control over behaviour. But even if we assume that internal contradictions and processes of change do not exist, the christianisation process in Africa fundamentally transformed local customs in ways that delinked their role in regulating behaviour, including sexual behaviour. For discussions and decisions on options and strategies for the prevention and control of HIV/AIDS, identifying the nature and impact of that transformation is essential. Dans le débat actuel sur le HIV, il y a des opinions diverses au sujet de la propagation du HIV/SIDA en Afrique et les raisons pour ceci. Caldwell et ses collègues, par exemple, affirment que l'Afrique toute entière a une sexualité distincte qui est fondamentalement permissive. De plus, ils prétendent qu'il n'y a pas de valeurs religieuses ou morales attachées à l'activité sexuelle, et que le christianisme n'a done pas réussi à changer ces attitudes. Ils voient dans cet échec la raison pour un autre échec, celui du programme de contrôle de fertilité au sous-Sahara africain, et ils soutiennent que de la même manière les efforts visant à controller le HIV/SIDA échoueront à moins que la peur qu'il engendre force les africains à adopter le modéle eurasien avec ses valeurs religieuses et morales. Cet article examine de nouveau la conceptualisation de Caldwell et autres, quant au rôle des valeurs morales dans les changements sociaux. Sans considérer les expressions internes, les mécanismes et les contextes sociaux au sein desquels et à travers lesquels les valeurs morales sont maintenues et changées, ils présument que les valeurs morales chrétiennes pourraient aboutir à un changement dans l'attitude sexuelle, passant de la sexualité africaine permissive (selon eux) au modèle eurasien. En faisant une telle supposition, ils ignorent les contradictions au niveau de I'éthique et du comportement qui sont généralement inhérentes aux systèmes moraux. De plus, ils ne prêtent que peu d'attention aux processus de changement dans les sociétés occidentales, où la moralité chrétienne a perdu une grande partie de son contrôle sur les attitudes.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>12320087</pmid><doi>10.2307/1160981</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-9720
ispartof Africa (London. 1928), 1994-01, Vol.64 (2), p.220-242
issn 0001-9720
1750-0184
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76320448
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Adolescents
Africa
African Christianity
African culture
Africans
Applied anthropology
Attitude
Attitudes
Behavior
Christian missionaries
Christian morality
Christianity
Communities
Concept formation
Developing Countries
Disease
Ethics
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Family Planning Services
Health Planning
HIV
HIV Infections
Human immunodeficiency virus
Human sexual behavior
Men
Morality
Personality
Population
Program Evaluation
Psychology
Religion
Sexual Behavior
Sexual ethics
Sexuality
Sexuality, HIV and Divorce
Social change
Virus Diseases
title Is there a distinct African sexuality? A critical response to Caldwell
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A39%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20a%20distinct%20African%20sexuality?%20A%20critical%20response%20to%20Caldwell&rft.jtitle=Africa%20(London.%201928)&rft.au=Ahlberg,%20Beth%20Maina&rft.date=1994-01-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=220-242&rft.issn=0001-9720&rft.eissn=1750-0184&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1160981&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA16227930%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213645933&rft_id=info:pmid/12320087&rft_galeid=A16227930&rft_cupid=10_2307_1160981&rft_jstor_id=1160981&rfr_iscdi=true