Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test

The Bender Gestalt Test was administered to 25 children referred for neuropsychological assessment and scored using the Koppitz system and the Watkins system. Although the scores obtained using the two different sets of criteria were highly correlated, the Watkins rules produced generally better per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of learning disabilities 1985-08, Vol.18 (7), p.377-378
Hauptverfasser: Johnston, Cris W., Lanak, Brenda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 378
container_issue 7
container_start_page 377
container_title Journal of learning disabilities
container_volume 18
creator Johnston, Cris W.
Lanak, Brenda
description The Bender Gestalt Test was administered to 25 children referred for neuropsychological assessment and scored using the Koppitz system and the Watkins system. Although the scores obtained using the two different sets of criteria were highly correlated, the Watkins rules produced generally better performance. Review of the documentation provided for each scoring system reveals that this appears to be primarily a consequence of the normative populations involved in the standardization of the two scoring methods. Consequently, if a subject misses an equivalent percentage of scorable items for each system, that subject will appear to be performing at a higher level if the standard for interpretation is the Watkins normative data.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/002221948501800701
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76281877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_002221948501800701</sage_id><sourcerecordid>76281877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-ad53f5d902a10e950c9375cb7b550b262c351d38b5ff7eb9359e1f6a054fe64d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAcxYMoc06_gCDkIN7q_kmapj3q0CkKIpt4LGmazM62qUl7mJ_e1o1dBE_v8H7vPXgInRO4JkSIKQCllCRhzIHEAALIARoTzuIgFDEcovEABANxjE68XwNASEU0QqMQGIlYOEavM1s10hXe1tga3H5o_GSbpmi_saxz_C7bz6L2eKGsK-oVXmx8qyuPjXW_7K2uc-3wXPtWli1e9nqKjowsvT7b6QS93d8tZw_B88v8cXbzHCgWiTaQOWeG5wlQSUAnHFTCBFeZyDiHjEZUMU5yFmfcGKGzhPFEExNJ4KHRUZizCbra9jbOfnX9cFoVXumylLW2nU9FRGMSC9GDdAsqZ7132qSNKyrpNimBdPgx_ftjH7rYtXdZpfN9ZHdc71_ufOmVLI2TtSr8HosFDyM61Ey3mJcrna5t5-r-k_-GfwB5qoZ3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76281877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Johnston, Cris W. ; Lanak, Brenda</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Cris W. ; Lanak, Brenda</creatorcontrib><description>The Bender Gestalt Test was administered to 25 children referred for neuropsychological assessment and scored using the Koppitz system and the Watkins system. Although the scores obtained using the two different sets of criteria were highly correlated, the Watkins rules produced generally better performance. Review of the documentation provided for each scoring system reveals that this appears to be primarily a consequence of the normative populations involved in the standardization of the two scoring methods. Consequently, if a subject misses an equivalent percentage of scorable items for each system, that subject will appear to be performing at a higher level if the standard for interpretation is the Watkins normative data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/002221948501800701</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4031634</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLDIAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bender-Gestalt Test ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child clinical studies ; Communication disorders ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reference Values</subject><ispartof>Journal of learning disabilities, 1985-08, Vol.18 (7), p.377-378</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-ad53f5d902a10e950c9375cb7b550b262c351d38b5ff7eb9359e1f6a054fe64d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/002221948501800701$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002221948501800701$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8754621$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4031634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Cris W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanak, Brenda</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test</title><title>Journal of learning disabilities</title><addtitle>J Learn Disabil</addtitle><description>The Bender Gestalt Test was administered to 25 children referred for neuropsychological assessment and scored using the Koppitz system and the Watkins system. Although the scores obtained using the two different sets of criteria were highly correlated, the Watkins rules produced generally better performance. Review of the documentation provided for each scoring system reveals that this appears to be primarily a consequence of the normative populations involved in the standardization of the two scoring methods. Consequently, if a subject misses an equivalent percentage of scorable items for each system, that subject will appear to be performing at a higher level if the standard for interpretation is the Watkins normative data.</description><subject>Bender-Gestalt Test</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child clinical studies</subject><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><issn>0022-2194</issn><issn>1538-4780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAcxYMoc06_gCDkIN7q_kmapj3q0CkKIpt4LGmazM62qUl7mJ_e1o1dBE_v8H7vPXgInRO4JkSIKQCllCRhzIHEAALIARoTzuIgFDEcovEABANxjE68XwNASEU0QqMQGIlYOEavM1s10hXe1tga3H5o_GSbpmi_saxz_C7bz6L2eKGsK-oVXmx8qyuPjXW_7K2uc-3wXPtWli1e9nqKjowsvT7b6QS93d8tZw_B88v8cXbzHCgWiTaQOWeG5wlQSUAnHFTCBFeZyDiHjEZUMU5yFmfcGKGzhPFEExNJ4KHRUZizCbra9jbOfnX9cFoVXumylLW2nU9FRGMSC9GDdAsqZ7132qSNKyrpNimBdPgx_ftjH7rYtXdZpfN9ZHdc71_ufOmVLI2TtSr8HosFDyM61Ey3mJcrna5t5-r-k_-GfwB5qoZ3</recordid><startdate>198508</startdate><enddate>198508</enddate><creator>Johnston, Cris W.</creator><creator>Lanak, Brenda</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198508</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test</title><author>Johnston, Cris W. ; Lanak, Brenda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-ad53f5d902a10e950c9375cb7b550b262c351d38b5ff7eb9359e1f6a054fe64d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Bender-Gestalt Test</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child clinical studies</topic><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Cris W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanak, Brenda</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnston, Cris W.</au><au>Lanak, Brenda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle><addtitle>J Learn Disabil</addtitle><date>1985-08</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>377-378</pages><issn>0022-2194</issn><eissn>1538-4780</eissn><coden>JLDIAD</coden><abstract>The Bender Gestalt Test was administered to 25 children referred for neuropsychological assessment and scored using the Koppitz system and the Watkins system. Although the scores obtained using the two different sets of criteria were highly correlated, the Watkins rules produced generally better performance. Review of the documentation provided for each scoring system reveals that this appears to be primarily a consequence of the normative populations involved in the standardization of the two scoring methods. Consequently, if a subject misses an equivalent percentage of scorable items for each system, that subject will appear to be performing at a higher level if the standard for interpretation is the Watkins normative data.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>4031634</pmid><doi>10.1177/002221948501800701</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2194
ispartof Journal of learning disabilities, 1985-08, Vol.18 (7), p.377-378
issn 0022-2194
1538-4780
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76281877
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Bender-Gestalt Test
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child clinical studies
Communication disorders
Humans
Medical sciences
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Reference Values
title Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A20%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Koppitz%20and%20Watkins%20Scoring%20Systems%20for%20the%20Bender%20Gestalt%20Test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20learning%20disabilities&rft.au=Johnston,%20Cris%20W.&rft.date=1985-08&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=377-378&rft.issn=0022-2194&rft.eissn=1538-4780&rft.coden=JLDIAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/002221948501800701&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76281877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76281877&rft_id=info:pmid/4031634&rft_sage_id=10.1177_002221948501800701&rfr_iscdi=true