Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test
The Bender Gestalt Test was administered to 25 children referred for neuropsychological assessment and scored using the Koppitz system and the Watkins system. Although the scores obtained using the two different sets of criteria were highly correlated, the Watkins rules produced generally better per...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of learning disabilities 1985-08, Vol.18 (7), p.377-378 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 378 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 377 |
container_title | Journal of learning disabilities |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Johnston, Cris W. Lanak, Brenda |
description | The Bender Gestalt Test was administered to 25 children referred for neuropsychological assessment and scored using the Koppitz system and the Watkins system. Although the scores obtained using the two different sets of criteria were highly correlated, the Watkins rules produced generally better performance. Review of the documentation provided for each scoring system reveals that this appears to be primarily a consequence of the normative populations involved in the standardization of the two scoring methods. Consequently, if a subject misses an equivalent percentage of scorable items for each system, that subject will appear to be performing at a higher level if the standard for interpretation is the Watkins normative data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/002221948501800701 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76281877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_002221948501800701</sage_id><sourcerecordid>76281877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-ad53f5d902a10e950c9375cb7b550b262c351d38b5ff7eb9359e1f6a054fe64d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLwzAcxYMoc06_gCDkIN7q_kmapj3q0CkKIpt4LGmazM62qUl7mJ_e1o1dBE_v8H7vPXgInRO4JkSIKQCllCRhzIHEAALIARoTzuIgFDEcovEABANxjE68XwNASEU0QqMQGIlYOEavM1s10hXe1tga3H5o_GSbpmi_saxz_C7bz6L2eKGsK-oVXmx8qyuPjXW_7K2uc-3wXPtWli1e9nqKjowsvT7b6QS93d8tZw_B88v8cXbzHCgWiTaQOWeG5wlQSUAnHFTCBFeZyDiHjEZUMU5yFmfcGKGzhPFEExNJ4KHRUZizCbra9jbOfnX9cFoVXumylLW2nU9FRGMSC9GDdAsqZ7132qSNKyrpNimBdPgx_ftjH7rYtXdZpfN9ZHdc71_ufOmVLI2TtSr8HosFDyM61Ey3mJcrna5t5-r-k_-GfwB5qoZ3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76281877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Johnston, Cris W. ; Lanak, Brenda</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Cris W. ; Lanak, Brenda</creatorcontrib><description>The Bender Gestalt Test was administered to 25 children referred for neuropsychological assessment and scored using the Koppitz system and the Watkins system. Although the scores obtained using the two different sets of criteria were highly correlated, the Watkins rules produced generally better performance. Review of the documentation provided for each scoring system reveals that this appears to be primarily a consequence of the normative populations involved in the standardization of the two scoring methods. Consequently, if a subject misses an equivalent percentage of scorable items for each system, that subject will appear to be performing at a higher level if the standard for interpretation is the Watkins normative data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/002221948501800701</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4031634</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLDIAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bender-Gestalt Test ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child clinical studies ; Communication disorders ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reference Values</subject><ispartof>Journal of learning disabilities, 1985-08, Vol.18 (7), p.377-378</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-ad53f5d902a10e950c9375cb7b550b262c351d38b5ff7eb9359e1f6a054fe64d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/002221948501800701$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002221948501800701$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8754621$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4031634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Cris W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanak, Brenda</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test</title><title>Journal of learning disabilities</title><addtitle>J Learn Disabil</addtitle><description>The Bender Gestalt Test was administered to 25 children referred for neuropsychological assessment and scored using the Koppitz system and the Watkins system. Although the scores obtained using the two different sets of criteria were highly correlated, the Watkins rules produced generally better performance. Review of the documentation provided for each scoring system reveals that this appears to be primarily a consequence of the normative populations involved in the standardization of the two scoring methods. Consequently, if a subject misses an equivalent percentage of scorable items for each system, that subject will appear to be performing at a higher level if the standard for interpretation is the Watkins normative data.</description><subject>Bender-Gestalt Test</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child clinical studies</subject><subject>Communication disorders</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><issn>0022-2194</issn><issn>1538-4780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLwzAcxYMoc06_gCDkIN7q_kmapj3q0CkKIpt4LGmazM62qUl7mJ_e1o1dBE_v8H7vPXgInRO4JkSIKQCllCRhzIHEAALIARoTzuIgFDEcovEABANxjE68XwNASEU0QqMQGIlYOEavM1s10hXe1tga3H5o_GSbpmi_saxz_C7bz6L2eKGsK-oVXmx8qyuPjXW_7K2uc-3wXPtWli1e9nqKjowsvT7b6QS93d8tZw_B88v8cXbzHCgWiTaQOWeG5wlQSUAnHFTCBFeZyDiHjEZUMU5yFmfcGKGzhPFEExNJ4KHRUZizCbra9jbOfnX9cFoVXumylLW2nU9FRGMSC9GDdAsqZ7132qSNKyrpNimBdPgx_ftjH7rYtXdZpfN9ZHdc71_ufOmVLI2TtSr8HosFDyM61Ey3mJcrna5t5-r-k_-GfwB5qoZ3</recordid><startdate>198508</startdate><enddate>198508</enddate><creator>Johnston, Cris W.</creator><creator>Lanak, Brenda</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198508</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test</title><author>Johnston, Cris W. ; Lanak, Brenda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-ad53f5d902a10e950c9375cb7b550b262c351d38b5ff7eb9359e1f6a054fe64d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Bender-Gestalt Test</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child clinical studies</topic><topic>Communication disorders</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Cris W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanak, Brenda</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnston, Cris W.</au><au>Lanak, Brenda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of learning disabilities</jtitle><addtitle>J Learn Disabil</addtitle><date>1985-08</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>377-378</pages><issn>0022-2194</issn><eissn>1538-4780</eissn><coden>JLDIAD</coden><abstract>The Bender Gestalt Test was administered to 25 children referred for neuropsychological assessment and scored using the Koppitz system and the Watkins system. Although the scores obtained using the two different sets of criteria were highly correlated, the Watkins rules produced generally better performance. Review of the documentation provided for each scoring system reveals that this appears to be primarily a consequence of the normative populations involved in the standardization of the two scoring methods. Consequently, if a subject misses an equivalent percentage of scorable items for each system, that subject will appear to be performing at a higher level if the standard for interpretation is the Watkins normative data.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>4031634</pmid><doi>10.1177/002221948501800701</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2194 |
ispartof | Journal of learning disabilities, 1985-08, Vol.18 (7), p.377-378 |
issn | 0022-2194 1538-4780 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76281877 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Bender-Gestalt Test Biological and medical sciences Child Child clinical studies Communication disorders Humans Medical sciences Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reference Values |
title | Comparison of the Koppitz and Watkins Scoring Systems for the Bender Gestalt Test |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A20%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Koppitz%20and%20Watkins%20Scoring%20Systems%20for%20the%20Bender%20Gestalt%20Test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20learning%20disabilities&rft.au=Johnston,%20Cris%20W.&rft.date=1985-08&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=377-378&rft.issn=0022-2194&rft.eissn=1538-4780&rft.coden=JLDIAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/002221948501800701&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76281877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76281877&rft_id=info:pmid/4031634&rft_sage_id=10.1177_002221948501800701&rfr_iscdi=true |