Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry
Background Diaton transpalpebral tonometry is a new version of TGDc-01 transpalpebral tonometry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability of this method, and to compare the results with those of corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry (c-GAT), which is the “gold standard” for the clinic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2010-12, Vol.248 (12), p.1765-1770 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1770 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 1765 |
| container_title | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology |
| container_volume | 248 |
| creator | Li, Yuehua Shi, Jingming Duan, Xuanchu Fan, Fang |
| description | Background
Diaton transpalpebral tonometry is a new version of TGDc-01 transpalpebral tonometry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability of this method, and to compare the results with those of corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry (c-GAT), which is the “gold standard” for the clinical measurement of IOP.
Methods
IOP was measured in 212 eyes of 129 subjects by means of two different methods. Measurements with two tonometers were performed in random order, and the measurements of central cornea thickness were performed with ultrasound pachymetry.
Results
The average IOP reading was 15.46 ± 5.68 mmHg for c-GAT and 13.84 ± 5.12 mmHg for Diaton tonometer. The mean difference between c-GAT and Diaton tonometer was 1.62 ± 3.60 mmHg (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00417-009-1243-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762685024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2202705471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6a3f96a6df10ef6c2d287b14312315d7b53407683b344a4b54b7195f84b23ace3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LHTEUhkOx1NurP8CNBDddTc3nJHdZtFVBcGPBXTgzc8aOzCRjkhEu9Mc3l2sVCl2ELM5z3pyTh5ATzr5yxsx5YkxxUzG2qbhQstp-ICuupK4MEw8HZMWM4JWV4uGQfE7piRVcav6JHAqmNtpyuyK_7yP4NMM4YxNhpBNCWiJO6DMNPR18jhDaZYRI54hpV6NLGvwjzb-QXg6Qg6flhAkzRvqCMS2Jpgy-g9jRqzB2E3hPYZ5H8JCHdzxuj8jHHsaEx6_3mvz88f3-4rq6vbu6ufh2W7XSsFzVIPtNDXXXc4Z93YpOWNOURbmQXHem0VIxU1vZSKVANVo1hm90b1UjJLQo1-TLPneO4XnBlN00pBbHMhGGJTlTi9pqVr5wTc7-IZ_CEn0ZzlmuFdPKmgLxPdTGkFLE3s1xmCBuHWduJ8btxbgixu3EuG3pOX0NXpoJu7eOvyYKIPZAKiX_iPH95f-n_gGnBZv9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>815405487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Li, Yuehua ; Shi, Jingming ; Duan, Xuanchu ; Fan, Fang</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Yuehua ; Shi, Jingming ; Duan, Xuanchu ; Fan, Fang</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Diaton transpalpebral tonometry is a new version of TGDc-01 transpalpebral tonometry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability of this method, and to compare the results with those of corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry (c-GAT), which is the “gold standard” for the clinical measurement of IOP.
Methods
IOP was measured in 212 eyes of 129 subjects by means of two different methods. Measurements with two tonometers were performed in random order, and the measurements of central cornea thickness were performed with ultrasound pachymetry.
Results
The average IOP reading was 15.46 ± 5.68 mmHg for c-GAT and 13.84 ± 5.12 mmHg for Diaton tonometer. The mean difference between c-GAT and Diaton tonometer was 1.62 ± 3.60 mmHg (p < 0.05). Compared with c-GAT, 39.6% of IOP readings (84 eyes) by Diaton tonometer was in an interval of ±1 mmHg; 59.4% (126 eyes) was in an interval of ±2 mmHg, and 76.4% (162 eyes) was in an interval of ±3 mmHg. For the subjects whose age was from 20 to 50, the mean difference of IOP readings by two tonometers was 0.53 ± 3.24 mmHg.
Conclusions
We cannot recommend Diaton as a substitute or alternative method for GAT for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with abnormal IOPs, but it may be helpful as a screening tool, especially for subjects whose age is between 20 and 50 years and for healthy subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0721-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-702X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00417-009-1243-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20495818</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Child ; Cornea - anatomy & histology ; Eyelids ; Female ; Glaucoma ; Glaucoma - diagnosis ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure - physiology ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Microscopy, Acoustic ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2010-12, Vol.248 (12), p.1765-1770</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6a3f96a6df10ef6c2d287b14312315d7b53407683b344a4b54b7195f84b23ace3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6a3f96a6df10ef6c2d287b14312315d7b53407683b344a4b54b7195f84b23ace3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00417-009-1243-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00417-009-1243-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20495818$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Yuehua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Xuanchu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Fang</creatorcontrib><title>Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry</title><title>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Background
Diaton transpalpebral tonometry is a new version of TGDc-01 transpalpebral tonometry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability of this method, and to compare the results with those of corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry (c-GAT), which is the “gold standard” for the clinical measurement of IOP.
Methods
IOP was measured in 212 eyes of 129 subjects by means of two different methods. Measurements with two tonometers were performed in random order, and the measurements of central cornea thickness were performed with ultrasound pachymetry.
Results
The average IOP reading was 15.46 ± 5.68 mmHg for c-GAT and 13.84 ± 5.12 mmHg for Diaton tonometer. The mean difference between c-GAT and Diaton tonometer was 1.62 ± 3.60 mmHg (p < 0.05). Compared with c-GAT, 39.6% of IOP readings (84 eyes) by Diaton tonometer was in an interval of ±1 mmHg; 59.4% (126 eyes) was in an interval of ±2 mmHg, and 76.4% (162 eyes) was in an interval of ±3 mmHg. For the subjects whose age was from 20 to 50, the mean difference of IOP readings by two tonometers was 0.53 ± 3.24 mmHg.
Conclusions
We cannot recommend Diaton as a substitute or alternative method for GAT for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with abnormal IOPs, but it may be helpful as a screening tool, especially for subjects whose age is between 20 and 50 years and for healthy subjects.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cornea - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Eyelids</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Microscopy, Acoustic</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0721-832X</issn><issn>1435-702X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LHTEUhkOx1NurP8CNBDddTc3nJHdZtFVBcGPBXTgzc8aOzCRjkhEu9Mc3l2sVCl2ELM5z3pyTh5ATzr5yxsx5YkxxUzG2qbhQstp-ICuupK4MEw8HZMWM4JWV4uGQfE7piRVcav6JHAqmNtpyuyK_7yP4NMM4YxNhpBNCWiJO6DMNPR18jhDaZYRI54hpV6NLGvwjzb-QXg6Qg6flhAkzRvqCMS2Jpgy-g9jRqzB2E3hPYZ5H8JCHdzxuj8jHHsaEx6_3mvz88f3-4rq6vbu6ufh2W7XSsFzVIPtNDXXXc4Z93YpOWNOURbmQXHem0VIxU1vZSKVANVo1hm90b1UjJLQo1-TLPneO4XnBlN00pBbHMhGGJTlTi9pqVr5wTc7-IZ_CEn0ZzlmuFdPKmgLxPdTGkFLE3s1xmCBuHWduJ8btxbgixu3EuG3pOX0NXpoJu7eOvyYKIPZAKiX_iPH95f-n_gGnBZv9</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Li, Yuehua</creator><creator>Shi, Jingming</creator><creator>Duan, Xuanchu</creator><creator>Fan, Fang</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry</title><author>Li, Yuehua ; Shi, Jingming ; Duan, Xuanchu ; Fan, Fang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-6a3f96a6df10ef6c2d287b14312315d7b53407683b344a4b54b7195f84b23ace3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cornea - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Eyelids</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Microscopy, Acoustic</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Yuehua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Xuanchu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Fang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Yuehua</au><au>Shi, Jingming</au><au>Duan, Xuanchu</au><au>Fan, Fang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry</atitle><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>248</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1765</spage><epage>1770</epage><pages>1765-1770</pages><issn>0721-832X</issn><eissn>1435-702X</eissn><abstract>Background
Diaton transpalpebral tonometry is a new version of TGDc-01 transpalpebral tonometry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability of this method, and to compare the results with those of corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry (c-GAT), which is the “gold standard” for the clinical measurement of IOP.
Methods
IOP was measured in 212 eyes of 129 subjects by means of two different methods. Measurements with two tonometers were performed in random order, and the measurements of central cornea thickness were performed with ultrasound pachymetry.
Results
The average IOP reading was 15.46 ± 5.68 mmHg for c-GAT and 13.84 ± 5.12 mmHg for Diaton tonometer. The mean difference between c-GAT and Diaton tonometer was 1.62 ± 3.60 mmHg (p < 0.05). Compared with c-GAT, 39.6% of IOP readings (84 eyes) by Diaton tonometer was in an interval of ±1 mmHg; 59.4% (126 eyes) was in an interval of ±2 mmHg, and 76.4% (162 eyes) was in an interval of ±3 mmHg. For the subjects whose age was from 20 to 50, the mean difference of IOP readings by two tonometers was 0.53 ± 3.24 mmHg.
Conclusions
We cannot recommend Diaton as a substitute or alternative method for GAT for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with abnormal IOPs, but it may be helpful as a screening tool, especially for subjects whose age is between 20 and 50 years and for healthy subjects.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20495818</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00417-009-1243-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0721-832X |
| ispartof | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2010-12, Vol.248 (12), p.1765-1770 |
| issn | 0721-832X 1435-702X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762685024 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Child Cornea - anatomy & histology Eyelids Female Glaucoma Glaucoma - diagnosis Humans Intraocular Pressure - physiology Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Microscopy, Acoustic Middle Aged Ophthalmology Reproducibility of Results Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation Young Adult |
| title | Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T07%3A14%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transpalpebral%20measurement%20of%20intraocular%20pressure%20using%20the%20Diaton%20tonometer%20versus%20standard%20Goldmann%20applanation%20tonometry&rft.jtitle=Graefe's%20archive%20for%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Li,%20Yuehua&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=248&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1765&rft.epage=1770&rft.pages=1765-1770&rft.issn=0721-832X&rft.eissn=1435-702X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00417-009-1243-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2202705471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=815405487&rft_id=info:pmid/20495818&rfr_iscdi=true |