Outcome Assessment of Home Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: What Have We Learned in a Decade of Experience?

Recent improvements in parenteral nutrition and home care delivery systems have made home parenteral nutrition (HPN) a reality for patients with gynecologic malignancies. The records of 61 patients with gynecologic cancers who received HPN between 1981 and 1990 were retrospectively reviewed for outc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 1993-12, Vol.51 (3), p.377-382
Hauptverfasser: King, L.A., Carson, L.F., Konstantinides, N., House, M.S., Adcock, L.L., Prem, K.A., Twiggs, L.B., Cerra, F.B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 382
container_issue 3
container_start_page 377
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 51
creator King, L.A.
Carson, L.F.
Konstantinides, N.
House, M.S.
Adcock, L.L.
Prem, K.A.
Twiggs, L.B.
Cerra, F.B.
description Recent improvements in parenteral nutrition and home care delivery systems have made home parenteral nutrition (HPN) a reality for patients with gynecologic malignancies. The records of 61 patients with gynecologic cancers who received HPN between 1981 and 1990 were retrospectively reviewed for outcome, complications, survival, and quality of life. Indications for HPN included mechanical bowel obstruction, short bowel syndrome, malnutrition during cancer therapy, or complications of cancer therapy. Ninety-two percent of patients had disease present at initiation of HPN. Fifty-six percent of patients bad ovarian cancer; the remainder had other gynecologic malignancies. The vast majority of patients had prior surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy before receiving HPN. Sixty-four percent of patients underwent cancer treatment (chemotherapy, surgery, or radiation) during HPN. Median survival for ovarian cancer patients on HPN was 72 days and 52.5 days for nonovarian patients (not statistically significant, P = 0.95). Minimal complications were noted from HPN with 9% of hospitalizations due to HPN. Nutritional parameters initially improved in most patients on HPN but then decreased prior to death. Quality of life parameters improved significantly in patients on HPN as compared to pre-HPN status (P < 0.05). In conclusion, HPN is a viable option in gynecologic cancer patients and offers improved quality of life even during the terminal phase of their illness.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/gyno.1993.1307
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76236353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825883713077</els_id><sourcerecordid>76236353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-fc22f14f298b8c8bb115a333a0d4f8c7a2f700ffafb72ccbe7383dcb25b96c0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1u1DAURi0EKkNhyw7JC8Qug38micMGVaV0kKYtC1CXlnNzPTVK4sF2CvMKfWocZtRdV5bvd-5n6xDylrMlZ6z6uN2PfsmbRi65ZPUzsuCsKYtKlc1zsmCsYYUSpXpJXsX4izEmGRcn5ERxLqpVsyAPN1MCPyA9ixFjHHBM1Fu6nkffTchXDKan11MKLjk_UjfmeXI5iPSPS3f0cj8i-N5vHdAr07vtaEZwGD_R2zuT6NrcI71FukETRuzmfUO_IJgO54cu_u4w5DbAz6_JC2v6iG-O5yn5-fXix_m62Nxcfjs_2xQgK5UKC0JYvrKiUa0C1bacl0ZKaVi3sgpqI2zNmLXGtrUAaLGWSnbQirJtKmCdPCUfDr274H9PGJMeXATsezOin6KuKyErWcoMLg8gBB9jQKt3wQ0m7DVnepavZ_l6lq9n-Xnh3bF5agfsHvGj7Zy_P-YmgultmE3FR0w2slwxkTF1wDBbuHcYdIT_ijoXEJLuvHvqB_8Ats2iYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76236353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome Assessment of Home Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: What Have We Learned in a Decade of Experience?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>King, L.A. ; Carson, L.F. ; Konstantinides, N. ; House, M.S. ; Adcock, L.L. ; Prem, K.A. ; Twiggs, L.B. ; Cerra, F.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>King, L.A. ; Carson, L.F. ; Konstantinides, N. ; House, M.S. ; Adcock, L.L. ; Prem, K.A. ; Twiggs, L.B. ; Cerra, F.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent improvements in parenteral nutrition and home care delivery systems have made home parenteral nutrition (HPN) a reality for patients with gynecologic malignancies. The records of 61 patients with gynecologic cancers who received HPN between 1981 and 1990 were retrospectively reviewed for outcome, complications, survival, and quality of life. Indications for HPN included mechanical bowel obstruction, short bowel syndrome, malnutrition during cancer therapy, or complications of cancer therapy. Ninety-two percent of patients had disease present at initiation of HPN. Fifty-six percent of patients bad ovarian cancer; the remainder had other gynecologic malignancies. The vast majority of patients had prior surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy before receiving HPN. Sixty-four percent of patients underwent cancer treatment (chemotherapy, surgery, or radiation) during HPN. Median survival for ovarian cancer patients on HPN was 72 days and 52.5 days for nonovarian patients (not statistically significant, P = 0.95). Minimal complications were noted from HPN with 9% of hospitalizations due to HPN. Nutritional parameters initially improved in most patients on HPN but then decreased prior to death. Quality of life parameters improved significantly in patients on HPN as compared to pre-HPN status (P &lt; 0.05). In conclusion, HPN is a viable option in gynecologic cancer patients and offers improved quality of life even during the terminal phase of their illness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1307</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8112649</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GYNOA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Genital Neoplasms, Female - diet therapy ; Genital Neoplasms, Female - epidemiology ; Genital Neoplasms, Female - mortality ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Parenteral Nutrition, Home ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 1993-12, Vol.51 (3), p.377-382</ispartof><rights>1993 Academic Press</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-fc22f14f298b8c8bb115a333a0d4f8c7a2f700ffafb72ccbe7383dcb25b96c0d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1993.1307$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>310,311,315,782,786,791,792,3552,23937,23938,25147,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3935402$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8112649$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, L.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, L.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinides, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adcock, L.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prem, K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twiggs, L.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerra, F.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome Assessment of Home Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: What Have We Learned in a Decade of Experience?</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>Recent improvements in parenteral nutrition and home care delivery systems have made home parenteral nutrition (HPN) a reality for patients with gynecologic malignancies. The records of 61 patients with gynecologic cancers who received HPN between 1981 and 1990 were retrospectively reviewed for outcome, complications, survival, and quality of life. Indications for HPN included mechanical bowel obstruction, short bowel syndrome, malnutrition during cancer therapy, or complications of cancer therapy. Ninety-two percent of patients had disease present at initiation of HPN. Fifty-six percent of patients bad ovarian cancer; the remainder had other gynecologic malignancies. The vast majority of patients had prior surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy before receiving HPN. Sixty-four percent of patients underwent cancer treatment (chemotherapy, surgery, or radiation) during HPN. Median survival for ovarian cancer patients on HPN was 72 days and 52.5 days for nonovarian patients (not statistically significant, P = 0.95). Minimal complications were noted from HPN with 9% of hospitalizations due to HPN. Nutritional parameters initially improved in most patients on HPN but then decreased prior to death. Quality of life parameters improved significantly in patients on HPN as compared to pre-HPN status (P &lt; 0.05). In conclusion, HPN is a viable option in gynecologic cancer patients and offers improved quality of life even during the terminal phase of their illness.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Genital Neoplasms, Female - diet therapy</subject><subject>Genital Neoplasms, Female - epidemiology</subject><subject>Genital Neoplasms, Female - mortality</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Parenteral Nutrition, Home</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1u1DAURi0EKkNhyw7JC8Qug38micMGVaV0kKYtC1CXlnNzPTVK4sF2CvMKfWocZtRdV5bvd-5n6xDylrMlZ6z6uN2PfsmbRi65ZPUzsuCsKYtKlc1zsmCsYYUSpXpJXsX4izEmGRcn5ERxLqpVsyAPN1MCPyA9ixFjHHBM1Fu6nkffTchXDKan11MKLjk_UjfmeXI5iPSPS3f0cj8i-N5vHdAr07vtaEZwGD_R2zuT6NrcI71FukETRuzmfUO_IJgO54cu_u4w5DbAz6_JC2v6iG-O5yn5-fXix_m62Nxcfjs_2xQgK5UKC0JYvrKiUa0C1bacl0ZKaVi3sgpqI2zNmLXGtrUAaLGWSnbQirJtKmCdPCUfDr274H9PGJMeXATsezOin6KuKyErWcoMLg8gBB9jQKt3wQ0m7DVnepavZ_l6lq9n-Xnh3bF5agfsHvGj7Zy_P-YmgultmE3FR0w2slwxkTF1wDBbuHcYdIT_ijoXEJLuvHvqB_8Ats2iYQ</recordid><startdate>19931201</startdate><enddate>19931201</enddate><creator>King, L.A.</creator><creator>Carson, L.F.</creator><creator>Konstantinides, N.</creator><creator>House, M.S.</creator><creator>Adcock, L.L.</creator><creator>Prem, K.A.</creator><creator>Twiggs, L.B.</creator><creator>Cerra, F.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19931201</creationdate><title>Outcome Assessment of Home Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: What Have We Learned in a Decade of Experience?</title><author>King, L.A. ; Carson, L.F. ; Konstantinides, N. ; House, M.S. ; Adcock, L.L. ; Prem, K.A. ; Twiggs, L.B. ; Cerra, F.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-fc22f14f298b8c8bb115a333a0d4f8c7a2f700ffafb72ccbe7383dcb25b96c0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Genital Neoplasms, Female - diet therapy</topic><topic>Genital Neoplasms, Female - epidemiology</topic><topic>Genital Neoplasms, Female - mortality</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Parenteral Nutrition, Home</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, L.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carson, L.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinides, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adcock, L.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prem, K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twiggs, L.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerra, F.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, L.A.</au><au>Carson, L.F.</au><au>Konstantinides, N.</au><au>House, M.S.</au><au>Adcock, L.L.</au><au>Prem, K.A.</au><au>Twiggs, L.B.</au><au>Cerra, F.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome Assessment of Home Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: What Have We Learned in a Decade of Experience?</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>1993-12-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>382</epage><pages>377-382</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><coden>GYNOA3</coden><abstract>Recent improvements in parenteral nutrition and home care delivery systems have made home parenteral nutrition (HPN) a reality for patients with gynecologic malignancies. The records of 61 patients with gynecologic cancers who received HPN between 1981 and 1990 were retrospectively reviewed for outcome, complications, survival, and quality of life. Indications for HPN included mechanical bowel obstruction, short bowel syndrome, malnutrition during cancer therapy, or complications of cancer therapy. Ninety-two percent of patients had disease present at initiation of HPN. Fifty-six percent of patients bad ovarian cancer; the remainder had other gynecologic malignancies. The vast majority of patients had prior surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy before receiving HPN. Sixty-four percent of patients underwent cancer treatment (chemotherapy, surgery, or radiation) during HPN. Median survival for ovarian cancer patients on HPN was 72 days and 52.5 days for nonovarian patients (not statistically significant, P = 0.95). Minimal complications were noted from HPN with 9% of hospitalizations due to HPN. Nutritional parameters initially improved in most patients on HPN but then decreased prior to death. Quality of life parameters improved significantly in patients on HPN as compared to pre-HPN status (P &lt; 0.05). In conclusion, HPN is a viable option in gynecologic cancer patients and offers improved quality of life even during the terminal phase of their illness.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8112649</pmid><doi>10.1006/gyno.1993.1307</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 1993-12, Vol.51 (3), p.377-382
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76236353
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Female
Female genital diseases
Genital Neoplasms, Female - diet therapy
Genital Neoplasms, Female - epidemiology
Genital Neoplasms, Female - mortality
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Parenteral Nutrition, Home
Quality of Life
Retrospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
Tumors
title Outcome Assessment of Home Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: What Have We Learned in a Decade of Experience?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T13%3A33%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20Assessment%20of%20Home%20Parenteral%20Nutrition%20in%20Patients%20with%20Gynecologic%20Malignancies:%20What%20Have%20We%20Learned%20in%20a%20Decade%20of%20Experience?&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=King,%20L.A.&rft.date=1993-12-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=382&rft.pages=377-382&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft.coden=GYNOA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/gyno.1993.1307&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76236353%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76236353&rft_id=info:pmid/8112649&rft_els_id=S0090825883713077&rfr_iscdi=true