The Relation of Faculty Academic Activity to Financing Sources in a Department of Medicine
To the Editor: To paraphrase Disraeli, There are three kinds of lies — lies, damned lies, and cost accounting. With the pages of the Journal looking more and more like the Harvard Business Review, I would like to make a plea to the editors and reviewers to apply the same standards to medical economi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1985-08, Vol.313 (9), p.584-586 |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 586 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 584 |
| container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
| container_volume | 313 |
| description | To the Editor:
To paraphrase Disraeli, There are three kinds of lies — lies, damned lies, and cost accounting. With the pages of the
Journal
looking more and more like the
Harvard Business Review,
I would like to make a plea to the editors and reviewers to apply the same standards to medical economics articles as they do to scientific papers. Results should justify conclusions. Critical editorials putting a paper in perspective should be freely used.
An example is the recent Special Article by Chin et al. (April 18 issue).* In this paper, the authors tackle the very difficult task . . . |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJM198508293130920 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76232875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76232875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-84839b31dfa8d6c838f3ce45b3cb6b0d944a0a1050dc91ba276b5e848e1745003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRtFZ_gQh78iLR2Y8ku0eprR-0ClovXsJmM9GVfNRsIvTfu9LiSZzLDDPv-8C8hJwwuGAQJ5cP0_sF0yoGxbVgAjSHHTJisRCRlJDskhEAV5FMtTggh95_QCgm9T7Zl8A5aDUir8t3pE9Ymd61DW1LOjN2qPo1vbKmwNrZMPTuy4VN39KZa0xjXfNGn9uhs-ipa6ih17gyXV9j0_8QFli4oMEjsleayuPxto_Jy2y6nNxG88ebu8nVPLJcJX2kpBI6F6wojSoSq4QqhUUZ58LmSQ6FltKACQ9DYTXLDU-TPMbgQpbKGECMydmGu-razwF9n9XOW6wq02A7-CxNuOAqjYNQbIS2a73vsMxWnatNt84YZD-JZn8kGlynW_yQ11j8erYRhvv55l7XPmvwo_6X9g2XaHxK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76232875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Relation of Faculty Academic Activity to Financing Sources in a Department of Medicine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><description>To the Editor:
To paraphrase Disraeli, There are three kinds of lies — lies, damned lies, and cost accounting. With the pages of the
Journal
looking more and more like the
Harvard Business Review,
I would like to make a plea to the editors and reviewers to apply the same standards to medical economics articles as they do to scientific papers. Results should justify conclusions. Critical editorials putting a paper in perspective should be freely used.
An example is the recent Special Article by Chin et al. (April 18 issue).* In this paper, the authors tackle the very difficult task . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198508293130920</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4022098</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Faculty, Medical ; Humans ; Income ; Research Support as Topic - economics ; Schools, Medical - economics ; United States</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1985-08, Vol.313 (9), p.584-586</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-84839b31dfa8d6c838f3ce45b3cb6b0d944a0a1050dc91ba276b5e848e1745003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64387</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4022098$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><title>The Relation of Faculty Academic Activity to Financing Sources in a Department of Medicine</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>To the Editor:
To paraphrase Disraeli, There are three kinds of lies — lies, damned lies, and cost accounting. With the pages of the
Journal
looking more and more like the
Harvard Business Review,
I would like to make a plea to the editors and reviewers to apply the same standards to medical economics articles as they do to scientific papers. Results should justify conclusions. Critical editorials putting a paper in perspective should be freely used.
An example is the recent Special Article by Chin et al. (April 18 issue).* In this paper, the authors tackle the very difficult task . . .</description><subject>Faculty, Medical</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Research Support as Topic - economics</subject><subject>Schools, Medical - economics</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRtFZ_gQh78iLR2Y8ku0eprR-0ClovXsJmM9GVfNRsIvTfu9LiSZzLDDPv-8C8hJwwuGAQJ5cP0_sF0yoGxbVgAjSHHTJisRCRlJDskhEAV5FMtTggh95_QCgm9T7Zl8A5aDUir8t3pE9Ymd61DW1LOjN2qPo1vbKmwNrZMPTuy4VN39KZa0xjXfNGn9uhs-ipa6ih17gyXV9j0_8QFli4oMEjsleayuPxto_Jy2y6nNxG88ebu8nVPLJcJX2kpBI6F6wojSoSq4QqhUUZ58LmSQ6FltKACQ9DYTXLDU-TPMbgQpbKGECMydmGu-razwF9n9XOW6wq02A7-CxNuOAqjYNQbIS2a73vsMxWnatNt84YZD-JZn8kGlynW_yQ11j8erYRhvv55l7XPmvwo_6X9g2XaHxK</recordid><startdate>19850829</startdate><enddate>19850829</enddate><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850829</creationdate><title>The Relation of Faculty Academic Activity to Financing Sources in a Department of Medicine</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-84839b31dfa8d6c838f3ce45b3cb6b0d944a0a1050dc91ba276b5e848e1745003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Faculty, Medical</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Research Support as Topic - economics</topic><topic>Schools, Medical - economics</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Relation of Faculty Academic Activity to Financing Sources in a Department of Medicine</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1985-08-29</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>313</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>584</spage><epage>586</epage><pages>584-586</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>To the Editor:
To paraphrase Disraeli, There are three kinds of lies — lies, damned lies, and cost accounting. With the pages of the
Journal
looking more and more like the
Harvard Business Review,
I would like to make a plea to the editors and reviewers to apply the same standards to medical economics articles as they do to scientific papers. Results should justify conclusions. Critical editorials putting a paper in perspective should be freely used.
An example is the recent Special Article by Chin et al. (April 18 issue).* In this paper, the authors tackle the very difficult task . . .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>4022098</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM198508293130920</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
| ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 1985-08, Vol.313 (9), p.584-586 |
| issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76232875 |
| source | MEDLINE; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Faculty, Medical Humans Income Research Support as Topic - economics Schools, Medical - economics United States |
| title | The Relation of Faculty Academic Activity to Financing Sources in a Department of Medicine |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A02%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Relation%20of%20Faculty%20Academic%20Activity%20to%20Financing%20Sources%20in%20a%20Department%20of%20Medicine&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.date=1985-08-29&rft.volume=313&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=584&rft.epage=586&rft.pages=584-586&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM198508293130920&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76232875%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76232875&rft_id=info:pmid/4022098&rfr_iscdi=true |