Coal cinder filtration as pretreatment with biological processes to treat pharmaceutical wastewater
This study aims at coupling coal cinder filter with biological process to improve pharmaceutical wastewater quality and reduce the disposal cost. In the coal cinder filter, the removal efficiencies of COD, BOD(5), SS and color were 90+/-2%, 72+/-2%, 95+/-2% and 80+/-2%, respectively. The results att...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 2010-01, Vol.62 (1), p.15-20 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 20 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 15 |
| container_title | Water science and technology |
| container_volume | 62 |
| creator | Zheng, Wei Li, Xiao-ming Hao, Zhi-ming Wang, Dong-bo Yang, Qi Zeng, Guang-ming |
| description | This study aims at coupling coal cinder filter with biological process to improve pharmaceutical wastewater quality and reduce the disposal cost. In the coal cinder filter, the removal efficiencies of COD, BOD(5), SS and color were 90+/-2%, 72+/-2%, 95+/-2% and 80+/-2%, respectively. The results attribute to the big specific surface area and strong adsorption ability. Coal cinder filter removes a large portion of the pollutants in the influent wastewater, which would strongly stable the effluent waste water quality, and reduce the load of follow-up biological treatment process. The average removal efficiencies for COD, BOD(5), SS and color of the combined process were about 99.7+/-3%, 98.2+/-4%, 98.5+/-3% and 96.3+/-2%, respectively, with the average effluent quality of COD 16+/-1 mg/L, BOD(5) 11+/-1 mg/L, SS 10+/-0.6 mg/L and color 22+/-1 (multiple), which are consistent with the national requirements of the waste pollutants for pharmaceutical industry of chinese traditional medicine discharge standard (GB 21906-2008). The results indicated that the combined procedure could offer an attractive solution for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment with considerable low cost. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2010.244 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762271065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>762271065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-7fb7bf407a28b07ff36fdc30c89a9f49cc3c511e6941340bfadb3dbaa23e03413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTtPwzAQgC0EoqWwMSNLDCyk-JHY9YgqXlIlFpgtxzlDUBIX21HFv8eFwsDCdLrTd6e7-xA6pWTOqBBXm5jmjGyzstxDU6qUKJTkbB9NCZO8oIzxCTqK8Y0QInlJDtGEkUpVslxMkV1602HbDg0E7NouBZNaP2AT8TpACmBSD0PCmza94rr1nX9pbe5YB28hRog4efyF4fWrCb2xMKYvYmNigo1JEI7RgTNdhJNdnKHn25un5X2xerx7WF6vCssrkgrpalm7kkjDFjWRznHhGsuJXSijXKms5baiFIQqaT6jdqapeVMbwzgQnmszdPE9Ny_3PkJMum-jha4zA_gxaikYk5SI6n-Sc8GUyG-cofM_5Jsfw5DP0FSVXIgq_zRTl9-UDT7GAE6vQ9ub8KEp0VtLOlvSW0s6W8r42W7oWPfQ_MI_WvgnlxuPFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943665073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coal cinder filtration as pretreatment with biological processes to treat pharmaceutical wastewater</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Zheng, Wei ; Li, Xiao-ming ; Hao, Zhi-ming ; Wang, Dong-bo ; Yang, Qi ; Zeng, Guang-ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Wei ; Li, Xiao-ming ; Hao, Zhi-ming ; Wang, Dong-bo ; Yang, Qi ; Zeng, Guang-ming</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims at coupling coal cinder filter with biological process to improve pharmaceutical wastewater quality and reduce the disposal cost. In the coal cinder filter, the removal efficiencies of COD, BOD(5), SS and color were 90+/-2%, 72+/-2%, 95+/-2% and 80+/-2%, respectively. The results attribute to the big specific surface area and strong adsorption ability. Coal cinder filter removes a large portion of the pollutants in the influent wastewater, which would strongly stable the effluent waste water quality, and reduce the load of follow-up biological treatment process. The average removal efficiencies for COD, BOD(5), SS and color of the combined process were about 99.7+/-3%, 98.2+/-4%, 98.5+/-3% and 96.3+/-2%, respectively, with the average effluent quality of COD 16+/-1 mg/L, BOD(5) 11+/-1 mg/L, SS 10+/-0.6 mg/L and color 22+/-1 (multiple), which are consistent with the national requirements of the waste pollutants for pharmaceutical industry of chinese traditional medicine discharge standard (GB 21906-2008). The results indicated that the combined procedure could offer an attractive solution for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment with considerable low cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.244</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20595748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Aluminum Oxide - chemistry ; Biofiltration ; Biological activity ; Biological treatment ; Coal ; Color ; Colour ; Effluents ; Filtration - methods ; Hydrolysis ; Industrial Waste ; Influents ; Low cost ; Medical sciences ; Medical wastes ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceutical industry wastes ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism ; Pharmaceuticals ; Pollutants ; Pretreatment ; Removal ; Silicon Dioxide - chemistry ; Waste disposal ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2010-01, Vol.62 (1), p.15-20</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Jul 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-7fb7bf407a28b07ff36fdc30c89a9f49cc3c511e6941340bfadb3dbaa23e03413</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20595748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiao-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Zhi-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dong-bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Guang-ming</creatorcontrib><title>Coal cinder filtration as pretreatment with biological processes to treat pharmaceutical wastewater</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>This study aims at coupling coal cinder filter with biological process to improve pharmaceutical wastewater quality and reduce the disposal cost. In the coal cinder filter, the removal efficiencies of COD, BOD(5), SS and color were 90+/-2%, 72+/-2%, 95+/-2% and 80+/-2%, respectively. The results attribute to the big specific surface area and strong adsorption ability. Coal cinder filter removes a large portion of the pollutants in the influent wastewater, which would strongly stable the effluent waste water quality, and reduce the load of follow-up biological treatment process. The average removal efficiencies for COD, BOD(5), SS and color of the combined process were about 99.7+/-3%, 98.2+/-4%, 98.5+/-3% and 96.3+/-2%, respectively, with the average effluent quality of COD 16+/-1 mg/L, BOD(5) 11+/-1 mg/L, SS 10+/-0.6 mg/L and color 22+/-1 (multiple), which are consistent with the national requirements of the waste pollutants for pharmaceutical industry of chinese traditional medicine discharge standard (GB 21906-2008). The results indicated that the combined procedure could offer an attractive solution for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment with considerable low cost.</description><subject>Aluminum Oxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Biofiltration</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biological treatment</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Colour</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Filtration - methods</subject><subject>Hydrolysis</subject><subject>Industrial Waste</subject><subject>Influents</subject><subject>Low cost</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical wastes</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry wastes</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTtPwzAQgC0EoqWwMSNLDCyk-JHY9YgqXlIlFpgtxzlDUBIX21HFv8eFwsDCdLrTd6e7-xA6pWTOqBBXm5jmjGyzstxDU6qUKJTkbB9NCZO8oIzxCTqK8Y0QInlJDtGEkUpVslxMkV1602HbDg0E7NouBZNaP2AT8TpACmBSD0PCmza94rr1nX9pbe5YB28hRog4efyF4fWrCb2xMKYvYmNigo1JEI7RgTNdhJNdnKHn25un5X2xerx7WF6vCssrkgrpalm7kkjDFjWRznHhGsuJXSijXKms5baiFIQqaT6jdqapeVMbwzgQnmszdPE9Ny_3PkJMum-jha4zA_gxaikYk5SI6n-Sc8GUyG-cofM_5Jsfw5DP0FSVXIgq_zRTl9-UDT7GAE6vQ9ub8KEp0VtLOlvSW0s6W8r42W7oWPfQ_MI_WvgnlxuPFQ</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Zheng, Wei</creator><creator>Li, Xiao-ming</creator><creator>Hao, Zhi-ming</creator><creator>Wang, Dong-bo</creator><creator>Yang, Qi</creator><creator>Zeng, Guang-ming</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Coal cinder filtration as pretreatment with biological processes to treat pharmaceutical wastewater</title><author>Zheng, Wei ; Li, Xiao-ming ; Hao, Zhi-ming ; Wang, Dong-bo ; Yang, Qi ; Zeng, Guang-ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-7fb7bf407a28b07ff36fdc30c89a9f49cc3c511e6941340bfadb3dbaa23e03413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aluminum Oxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Biofiltration</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biological treatment</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Colour</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Filtration - methods</topic><topic>Hydrolysis</topic><topic>Industrial Waste</topic><topic>Influents</topic><topic>Low cost</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical wastes</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry wastes</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiao-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Zhi-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dong-bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Guang-ming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zheng, Wei</au><au>Li, Xiao-ming</au><au>Hao, Zhi-ming</au><au>Wang, Dong-bo</au><au>Yang, Qi</au><au>Zeng, Guang-ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coal cinder filtration as pretreatment with biological processes to treat pharmaceutical wastewater</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>15-20</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>This study aims at coupling coal cinder filter with biological process to improve pharmaceutical wastewater quality and reduce the disposal cost. In the coal cinder filter, the removal efficiencies of COD, BOD(5), SS and color were 90+/-2%, 72+/-2%, 95+/-2% and 80+/-2%, respectively. The results attribute to the big specific surface area and strong adsorption ability. Coal cinder filter removes a large portion of the pollutants in the influent wastewater, which would strongly stable the effluent waste water quality, and reduce the load of follow-up biological treatment process. The average removal efficiencies for COD, BOD(5), SS and color of the combined process were about 99.7+/-3%, 98.2+/-4%, 98.5+/-3% and 96.3+/-2%, respectively, with the average effluent quality of COD 16+/-1 mg/L, BOD(5) 11+/-1 mg/L, SS 10+/-0.6 mg/L and color 22+/-1 (multiple), which are consistent with the national requirements of the waste pollutants for pharmaceutical industry of chinese traditional medicine discharge standard (GB 21906-2008). The results indicated that the combined procedure could offer an attractive solution for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment with considerable low cost.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>20595748</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2010.244</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
| ispartof | Water science and technology, 2010-01, Vol.62 (1), p.15-20 |
| issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762271065 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Aluminum Oxide - chemistry Biofiltration Biological activity Biological treatment Coal Color Colour Effluents Filtration - methods Hydrolysis Industrial Waste Influents Low cost Medical sciences Medical wastes Oxidation-Reduction Pharmaceutical industry Pharmaceutical industry wastes Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism Pharmaceuticals Pollutants Pretreatment Removal Silicon Dioxide - chemistry Waste disposal Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Wastewater Wastewater treatment Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism Water quality |
| title | Coal cinder filtration as pretreatment with biological processes to treat pharmaceutical wastewater |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A54%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coal%20cinder%20filtration%20as%20pretreatment%20with%20biological%20processes%20to%20treat%20pharmaceutical%20wastewater&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Zheng,%20Wei&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=15-20&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2010.244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E762271065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943665073&rft_id=info:pmid/20595748&rfr_iscdi=true |