Domoic acid uptake and elimination kinetics in oysters and mussels in relation to body size and anatomical distribution of toxin
Toxin accumulation by suspension-feeding qualifier depends on a balance between processes regulating toxin uptake (i.e. ingestion and absorption of toxic cells) and elimination (i.e. egestion, exchange among tissues, excretion, degradation and/or biotransformation) during exposure to toxic blooms. T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquatic toxicology 2010-10, Vol.100 (1), p.17-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 29 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | Aquatic toxicology |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Mafra, Luiz L. Bricelj, V. Monica Fennel, Katja |
description | Toxin accumulation by suspension-feeding qualifier depends on a balance between processes regulating toxin uptake (i.e. ingestion and absorption of toxic cells) and elimination (i.e. egestion, exchange among tissues, excretion, degradation and/or biotransformation) during exposure to toxic blooms. This laboratory study compares the size-specific uptake and elimination kinetics of domoic acid (DA) from
Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries in two co-occurring bivalves, the oyster
Crassostrea virginica and the mussel
Mytilus edulis. Domoic acid concentrations were measured in visceral and non-visceral tissues of different-sized oysters and mussels during simultaneous long-term exposure to toxic
P. multiseries cells in the laboratory, followed by depuration on a non-toxic algal diet. Mussels attained 7–17-fold higher DA concentrations than oysters, depending on the body size and exposure time, and also detoxified DA at higher rates (1.4–1.6
d
−1) than oysters (0.25–0.88
d
−1) of a comparable size. Small oysters attained markedly higher weight-specific DA concentrations (maximum
=
78.6
μg
g
−1) than large, market-sized individuals (≤13
μg
g
−1), but no clear relationship was found between body size and DA concentration in mussels (maximum
=
460
μg
g
−1). Therefore, differential DA accumulation by the two species was, on average, ∼3-fold more pronounced for large bivalves. An inverse relationship between DA elimination rate and body size was established for oysters but not mussels. Elimination of DA was faster in viscera than in other tissues of both bivalves; DA exchange rate from the former to the latter was higher in oysters. The contribution of viscera to the total DA burden of mussels was consistently greater than that of other tissues during both uptake (>80%) and depuration (>65%) phases, whereas it rapidly decreased from 70–80% to 30–40% in oysters, and this occurred faster in smaller individuals. Residual DA concentrations (≤0.25
μg
g
−1) were detected at later depuration stages (up to 14
d), mainly in viscera of oysters and non-visceral tissues of mussels, suggesting that a second, slower-detoxifying toxin compartment exists in both species. However, a simple exponential decay model was found to adequately describe DA elimination kinetics in these bivalves. The lower capacity for DA accumulation in oysters compared to mussels can thus only be explained by the former's comparatively low toxin intake rather than faster toxin elimination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.07.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762266868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166445X10002390</els_id><sourcerecordid>762266868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-99961685a393a3efadf09c012896318a05653f113c605628b84042a2de19d0e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1v1DAQBmALgehS-AlALojTLraTOPYJofIpVeIAlbhZs_YEzTaJt7aDupz46bibBY74Ymv0zIz1MvZU8I3gQr3abeBmhhxuN5KXGu82nMt7bCV0Z9aiFc19tipOrZum_XbGHqW04-XIxjxkZ5KrrjFGrNivt2EM5Cpw5Kt5n-EaK5h8hQONNEGmMFXXNGEmlyqaqnBIGWM6mnFOCYdjOeKw2ByqbfCHKtHPZRCUIWEkB0PlKeVI2_kIQ1_sLU2P2YMehoRPTvc5u3r_7uvFx_Xl5w-fLt5crl2rZF4bY5RQuoXa1FBjD77nxnEhtVG10MBb1da9ELVT5Sn1Vje8kSA9CuM5yvqcvVzm7mO4mTFlO1JyOAwwYZiT7ZSUSmmli2wX6WJIKWJv95FGiAcruL3L3u7sKXt7l73lnS3Blr5npw3zdkT_t-tP2AW8OAFIJY8-wuQo_XO11J0WbXHPF9dDsPA9FnP1pWyqudDacNUU8XoRJX78QRhtcoSTQ08RXbY-0H8--xv4tq98</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>762266868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Domoic acid uptake and elimination kinetics in oysters and mussels in relation to body size and anatomical distribution of toxin</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mafra, Luiz L. ; Bricelj, V. Monica ; Fennel, Katja</creator><creatorcontrib>Mafra, Luiz L. ; Bricelj, V. Monica ; Fennel, Katja</creatorcontrib><description>Toxin accumulation by suspension-feeding qualifier depends on a balance between processes regulating toxin uptake (i.e. ingestion and absorption of toxic cells) and elimination (i.e. egestion, exchange among tissues, excretion, degradation and/or biotransformation) during exposure to toxic blooms. This laboratory study compares the size-specific uptake and elimination kinetics of domoic acid (DA) from
Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries in two co-occurring bivalves, the oyster
Crassostrea virginica and the mussel
Mytilus edulis. Domoic acid concentrations were measured in visceral and non-visceral tissues of different-sized oysters and mussels during simultaneous long-term exposure to toxic
P. multiseries cells in the laboratory, followed by depuration on a non-toxic algal diet. Mussels attained 7–17-fold higher DA concentrations than oysters, depending on the body size and exposure time, and also detoxified DA at higher rates (1.4–1.6
d
−1) than oysters (0.25–0.88
d
−1) of a comparable size. Small oysters attained markedly higher weight-specific DA concentrations (maximum
=
78.6
μg
g
−1) than large, market-sized individuals (≤13
μg
g
−1), but no clear relationship was found between body size and DA concentration in mussels (maximum
=
460
μg
g
−1). Therefore, differential DA accumulation by the two species was, on average, ∼3-fold more pronounced for large bivalves. An inverse relationship between DA elimination rate and body size was established for oysters but not mussels. Elimination of DA was faster in viscera than in other tissues of both bivalves; DA exchange rate from the former to the latter was higher in oysters. The contribution of viscera to the total DA burden of mussels was consistently greater than that of other tissues during both uptake (>80%) and depuration (>65%) phases, whereas it rapidly decreased from 70–80% to 30–40% in oysters, and this occurred faster in smaller individuals. Residual DA concentrations (≤0.25
μg
g
−1) were detected at later depuration stages (up to 14
d), mainly in viscera of oysters and non-visceral tissues of mussels, suggesting that a second, slower-detoxifying toxin compartment exists in both species. However, a simple exponential decay model was found to adequately describe DA elimination kinetics in these bivalves. The lower capacity for DA accumulation in oysters compared to mussels can thus only be explained by the former's comparatively low toxin intake rather than faster toxin elimination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-445X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.07.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20674991</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AQTODG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Size ; Crassostrea - anatomy & histology ; Crassostrea - metabolism ; Crassostrea virginica ; Depuration ; Detoxification ; Domoic acid accumulation ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Invertebrates ; Kainic Acid - analogs & derivatives ; Kainic Acid - metabolism ; Kinetics ; Marine ; Marine Toxins - metabolism ; Models, Biological ; Mollusca ; Mytilus edulis ; Mytilus edulis - anatomy & histology ; Mytilus edulis - metabolism ; Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries ; Toxin kinetics model ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Aquatic toxicology, 2010-10, Vol.100 (1), p.17-29</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-99961685a393a3efadf09c012896318a05653f113c605628b84042a2de19d0e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-99961685a393a3efadf09c012896318a05653f113c605628b84042a2de19d0e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.07.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23287815$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20674991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mafra, Luiz L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bricelj, V. Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fennel, Katja</creatorcontrib><title>Domoic acid uptake and elimination kinetics in oysters and mussels in relation to body size and anatomical distribution of toxin</title><title>Aquatic toxicology</title><addtitle>Aquat Toxicol</addtitle><description>Toxin accumulation by suspension-feeding qualifier depends on a balance between processes regulating toxin uptake (i.e. ingestion and absorption of toxic cells) and elimination (i.e. egestion, exchange among tissues, excretion, degradation and/or biotransformation) during exposure to toxic blooms. This laboratory study compares the size-specific uptake and elimination kinetics of domoic acid (DA) from
Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries in two co-occurring bivalves, the oyster
Crassostrea virginica and the mussel
Mytilus edulis. Domoic acid concentrations were measured in visceral and non-visceral tissues of different-sized oysters and mussels during simultaneous long-term exposure to toxic
P. multiseries cells in the laboratory, followed by depuration on a non-toxic algal diet. Mussels attained 7–17-fold higher DA concentrations than oysters, depending on the body size and exposure time, and also detoxified DA at higher rates (1.4–1.6
d
−1) than oysters (0.25–0.88
d
−1) of a comparable size. Small oysters attained markedly higher weight-specific DA concentrations (maximum
=
78.6
μg
g
−1) than large, market-sized individuals (≤13
μg
g
−1), but no clear relationship was found between body size and DA concentration in mussels (maximum
=
460
μg
g
−1). Therefore, differential DA accumulation by the two species was, on average, ∼3-fold more pronounced for large bivalves. An inverse relationship between DA elimination rate and body size was established for oysters but not mussels. Elimination of DA was faster in viscera than in other tissues of both bivalves; DA exchange rate from the former to the latter was higher in oysters. The contribution of viscera to the total DA burden of mussels was consistently greater than that of other tissues during both uptake (>80%) and depuration (>65%) phases, whereas it rapidly decreased from 70–80% to 30–40% in oysters, and this occurred faster in smaller individuals. Residual DA concentrations (≤0.25
μg
g
−1) were detected at later depuration stages (up to 14
d), mainly in viscera of oysters and non-visceral tissues of mussels, suggesting that a second, slower-detoxifying toxin compartment exists in both species. However, a simple exponential decay model was found to adequately describe DA elimination kinetics in these bivalves. The lower capacity for DA accumulation in oysters compared to mussels can thus only be explained by the former's comparatively low toxin intake rather than faster toxin elimination.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Crassostrea - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Crassostrea - metabolism</subject><subject>Crassostrea virginica</subject><subject>Depuration</subject><subject>Detoxification</subject><subject>Domoic acid accumulation</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Kainic Acid - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Kainic Acid - metabolism</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine Toxins - metabolism</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Mollusca</subject><subject>Mytilus edulis</subject><subject>Mytilus edulis - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Mytilus edulis - metabolism</subject><subject>Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries</subject><subject>Toxin kinetics model</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</subject><issn>0166-445X</issn><issn>1879-1514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1v1DAQBmALgehS-AlALojTLraTOPYJofIpVeIAlbhZs_YEzTaJt7aDupz46bibBY74Ymv0zIz1MvZU8I3gQr3abeBmhhxuN5KXGu82nMt7bCV0Z9aiFc19tipOrZum_XbGHqW04-XIxjxkZ5KrrjFGrNivt2EM5Cpw5Kt5n-EaK5h8hQONNEGmMFXXNGEmlyqaqnBIGWM6mnFOCYdjOeKw2ByqbfCHKtHPZRCUIWEkB0PlKeVI2_kIQ1_sLU2P2YMehoRPTvc5u3r_7uvFx_Xl5w-fLt5crl2rZF4bY5RQuoXa1FBjD77nxnEhtVG10MBb1da9ELVT5Sn1Vje8kSA9CuM5yvqcvVzm7mO4mTFlO1JyOAwwYZiT7ZSUSmmli2wX6WJIKWJv95FGiAcruL3L3u7sKXt7l73lnS3Blr5npw3zdkT_t-tP2AW8OAFIJY8-wuQo_XO11J0WbXHPF9dDsPA9FnP1pWyqudDacNUU8XoRJX78QRhtcoSTQ08RXbY-0H8--xv4tq98</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Mafra, Luiz L.</creator><creator>Bricelj, V. Monica</creator><creator>Fennel, Katja</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Domoic acid uptake and elimination kinetics in oysters and mussels in relation to body size and anatomical distribution of toxin</title><author>Mafra, Luiz L. ; Bricelj, V. Monica ; Fennel, Katja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-99961685a393a3efadf09c012896318a05653f113c605628b84042a2de19d0e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Crassostrea - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Crassostrea - metabolism</topic><topic>Crassostrea virginica</topic><topic>Depuration</topic><topic>Detoxification</topic><topic>Domoic acid accumulation</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Kainic Acid - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Kainic Acid - metabolism</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine Toxins - metabolism</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Mollusca</topic><topic>Mytilus edulis</topic><topic>Mytilus edulis - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Mytilus edulis - metabolism</topic><topic>Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries</topic><topic>Toxin kinetics model</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mafra, Luiz L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bricelj, V. Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fennel, Katja</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquatic toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mafra, Luiz L.</au><au>Bricelj, V. Monica</au><au>Fennel, Katja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Domoic acid uptake and elimination kinetics in oysters and mussels in relation to body size and anatomical distribution of toxin</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Aquat Toxicol</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>17-29</pages><issn>0166-445X</issn><eissn>1879-1514</eissn><coden>AQTODG</coden><abstract>Toxin accumulation by suspension-feeding qualifier depends on a balance between processes regulating toxin uptake (i.e. ingestion and absorption of toxic cells) and elimination (i.e. egestion, exchange among tissues, excretion, degradation and/or biotransformation) during exposure to toxic blooms. This laboratory study compares the size-specific uptake and elimination kinetics of domoic acid (DA) from
Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries in two co-occurring bivalves, the oyster
Crassostrea virginica and the mussel
Mytilus edulis. Domoic acid concentrations were measured in visceral and non-visceral tissues of different-sized oysters and mussels during simultaneous long-term exposure to toxic
P. multiseries cells in the laboratory, followed by depuration on a non-toxic algal diet. Mussels attained 7–17-fold higher DA concentrations than oysters, depending on the body size and exposure time, and also detoxified DA at higher rates (1.4–1.6
d
−1) than oysters (0.25–0.88
d
−1) of a comparable size. Small oysters attained markedly higher weight-specific DA concentrations (maximum
=
78.6
μg
g
−1) than large, market-sized individuals (≤13
μg
g
−1), but no clear relationship was found between body size and DA concentration in mussels (maximum
=
460
μg
g
−1). Therefore, differential DA accumulation by the two species was, on average, ∼3-fold more pronounced for large bivalves. An inverse relationship between DA elimination rate and body size was established for oysters but not mussels. Elimination of DA was faster in viscera than in other tissues of both bivalves; DA exchange rate from the former to the latter was higher in oysters. The contribution of viscera to the total DA burden of mussels was consistently greater than that of other tissues during both uptake (>80%) and depuration (>65%) phases, whereas it rapidly decreased from 70–80% to 30–40% in oysters, and this occurred faster in smaller individuals. Residual DA concentrations (≤0.25
μg
g
−1) were detected at later depuration stages (up to 14
d), mainly in viscera of oysters and non-visceral tissues of mussels, suggesting that a second, slower-detoxifying toxin compartment exists in both species. However, a simple exponential decay model was found to adequately describe DA elimination kinetics in these bivalves. The lower capacity for DA accumulation in oysters compared to mussels can thus only be explained by the former's comparatively low toxin intake rather than faster toxin elimination.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>20674991</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.07.002</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0166-445X |
ispartof | Aquatic toxicology, 2010-10, Vol.100 (1), p.17-29 |
issn | 0166-445X 1879-1514 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762266868 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Body Size Crassostrea - anatomy & histology Crassostrea - metabolism Crassostrea virginica Depuration Detoxification Domoic acid accumulation Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Invertebrates Kainic Acid - analogs & derivatives Kainic Acid - metabolism Kinetics Marine Marine Toxins - metabolism Models, Biological Mollusca Mytilus edulis Mytilus edulis - anatomy & histology Mytilus edulis - metabolism Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries Toxin kinetics model Water Pollutants, Chemical - metabolism |
title | Domoic acid uptake and elimination kinetics in oysters and mussels in relation to body size and anatomical distribution of toxin |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A29%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Domoic%20acid%20uptake%20and%20elimination%20kinetics%20in%20oysters%20and%20mussels%20in%20relation%20to%20body%20size%20and%20anatomical%20distribution%20of%20toxin&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20toxicology&rft.au=Mafra,%20Luiz%20L.&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=17-29&rft.issn=0166-445X&rft.eissn=1879-1514&rft.coden=AQTODG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.07.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E762266868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=762266868&rft_id=info:pmid/20674991&rft_els_id=S0166445X10002390&rfr_iscdi=true |