Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow

Seasonal patterns of atmospheric mercury (Hg) fluxes measured over vegetated terrestrial systems can provide insight into the underlying process controlling emission and deposition of Hg to vegetated surfaces. Gaseous elemental Hg fluxes were measured for week-long periods in each season (spring, su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric environment (1994) 2010-06, Vol.44 (18), p.2176-2185
Hauptverfasser: Converse, A.D., Riscassi, A.L., Scanlon, T.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2185
container_issue 18
container_start_page 2176
container_title Atmospheric environment (1994)
container_volume 44
creator Converse, A.D.
Riscassi, A.L.
Scanlon, T.M.
description Seasonal patterns of atmospheric mercury (Hg) fluxes measured over vegetated terrestrial systems can provide insight into the underlying process controlling emission and deposition of Hg to vegetated surfaces. Gaseous elemental Hg fluxes were measured for week-long periods in each season (spring, summer, fall, and winter) over an uncontaminated high-elevation wetland meadow in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia using micrometeorological methods. Mean net deposition was observed in the spring (−4.8 ng m −2 h −1), emission in the summer (2.5 ng m −2 h −1), near zero flux in the fall (0.3 ng m −2 h −1), and emission in the winter (4.1 ng m −2 h −1). Nighttime deposition (when stomata are closed) and the poor correlation between Hg fluxes and canopy conductance during periods of active vegetation growth suggest that stomatal processes are not the dominant mechanism for ecosystem-level GEM exchange at this site. The strong springtime deposition relative to summer implies that young vegetation is better at scavenging Hg, with the highest deposition occurring at night possibly via a cuticular pathway. These results suggest that spring is a period of GEM deposition while other seasons exhibit net emission, emphasizing the importance of capturing GEM flux seasonality when determining total Hg budgets.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762265344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1352231010002311</els_id><sourcerecordid>1777134671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f91d5182fbe6c457f6ae3c77791178165fa7364af48dcd79846f4d02436be2b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCygbBJsUv2KnO1DFS6qExGNtTZ1x6ypNip0U-vckamEJm_HYPjN35hJyzuiIUaaulyNoVnXEajPitHukYkS5PCADlmuR8lzKwy4XGU-5YPSYnMS4pJQKPdYD8vKKEOsKymQDwcPMl77ZJr5K5hCxbmOywmDbsE1c2X5hf4XYBix6BJKFny9SLHEDja-r_rOoP0_JkYMy4tn-HJL3-7u3yWM6fX54mtxOUyupblI3ZkXGcu5mqKzMtFOAwmqtx4zpnKnMgRZKgpN5YQs9zqVysug2E2qGfCbFkFzu-q5D_dFibMzKR4tlCVU_udGKc5UJ2ZNXf5KsU2VCqi4MidqhNtQxBnRmHfwKwtYwanq7zdL82G16uw0Vph9qSC72GhAtlC5AZX38reY873alquNudhx21mw8BhOtx8pi4QPaxhS1_0_qG6RomYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777134671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Converse, A.D. ; Riscassi, A.L. ; Scanlon, T.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Converse, A.D. ; Riscassi, A.L. ; Scanlon, T.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Seasonal patterns of atmospheric mercury (Hg) fluxes measured over vegetated terrestrial systems can provide insight into the underlying process controlling emission and deposition of Hg to vegetated surfaces. Gaseous elemental Hg fluxes were measured for week-long periods in each season (spring, summer, fall, and winter) over an uncontaminated high-elevation wetland meadow in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia using micrometeorological methods. Mean net deposition was observed in the spring (−4.8 ng m −2 h −1), emission in the summer (2.5 ng m −2 h −1), near zero flux in the fall (0.3 ng m −2 h −1), and emission in the winter (4.1 ng m −2 h −1). Nighttime deposition (when stomata are closed) and the poor correlation between Hg fluxes and canopy conductance during periods of active vegetation growth suggest that stomatal processes are not the dominant mechanism for ecosystem-level GEM exchange at this site. The strong springtime deposition relative to summer implies that young vegetation is better at scavenging Hg, with the highest deposition occurring at night possibly via a cuticular pathway. These results suggest that spring is a period of GEM deposition while other seasons exhibit net emission, emphasizing the importance of capturing GEM flux seasonality when determining total Hg budgets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Atmospherics ; Continental surface waters ; Cuticular pathway ; Deposition ; Elemental mercury ; Emission ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluxes ; GEM ; Mercury ; Micrometeorological methods ; Natural water pollution ; Pollution ; Seasons ; Springs ; Stomatal exchange ; Summer ; Water treatment and pollution ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 2010-06, Vol.44 (18), p.2176-2185</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f91d5182fbe6c457f6ae3c77791178165fa7364af48dcd79846f4d02436be2b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f91d5182fbe6c457f6ae3c77791178165fa7364af48dcd79846f4d02436be2b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22818206$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Converse, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riscassi, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanlon, T.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>Seasonal patterns of atmospheric mercury (Hg) fluxes measured over vegetated terrestrial systems can provide insight into the underlying process controlling emission and deposition of Hg to vegetated surfaces. Gaseous elemental Hg fluxes were measured for week-long periods in each season (spring, summer, fall, and winter) over an uncontaminated high-elevation wetland meadow in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia using micrometeorological methods. Mean net deposition was observed in the spring (−4.8 ng m −2 h −1), emission in the summer (2.5 ng m −2 h −1), near zero flux in the fall (0.3 ng m −2 h −1), and emission in the winter (4.1 ng m −2 h −1). Nighttime deposition (when stomata are closed) and the poor correlation between Hg fluxes and canopy conductance during periods of active vegetation growth suggest that stomatal processes are not the dominant mechanism for ecosystem-level GEM exchange at this site. The strong springtime deposition relative to summer implies that young vegetation is better at scavenging Hg, with the highest deposition occurring at night possibly via a cuticular pathway. These results suggest that spring is a period of GEM deposition while other seasons exhibit net emission, emphasizing the importance of capturing GEM flux seasonality when determining total Hg budgets.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>Cuticular pathway</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Elemental mercury</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>GEM</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Micrometeorological methods</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Springs</subject><subject>Stomatal exchange</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCygbBJsUv2KnO1DFS6qExGNtTZ1x6ypNip0U-vckamEJm_HYPjN35hJyzuiIUaaulyNoVnXEajPitHukYkS5PCADlmuR8lzKwy4XGU-5YPSYnMS4pJQKPdYD8vKKEOsKymQDwcPMl77ZJr5K5hCxbmOywmDbsE1c2X5hf4XYBix6BJKFny9SLHEDja-r_rOoP0_JkYMy4tn-HJL3-7u3yWM6fX54mtxOUyupblI3ZkXGcu5mqKzMtFOAwmqtx4zpnKnMgRZKgpN5YQs9zqVysug2E2qGfCbFkFzu-q5D_dFibMzKR4tlCVU_udGKc5UJ2ZNXf5KsU2VCqi4MidqhNtQxBnRmHfwKwtYwanq7zdL82G16uw0Vph9qSC72GhAtlC5AZX38reY873alquNudhx21mw8BhOtx8pi4QPaxhS1_0_qG6RomYk</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Converse, A.D.</creator><creator>Riscassi, A.L.</creator><creator>Scanlon, T.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow</title><author>Converse, A.D. ; Riscassi, A.L. ; Scanlon, T.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f91d5182fbe6c457f6ae3c77791178165fa7364af48dcd79846f4d02436be2b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>Cuticular pathway</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Elemental mercury</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>GEM</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Micrometeorological methods</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Springs</topic><topic>Stomatal exchange</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Converse, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riscassi, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanlon, T.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Converse, A.D.</au><au>Riscassi, A.L.</au><au>Scanlon, T.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>2176</spage><epage>2185</epage><pages>2176-2185</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>Seasonal patterns of atmospheric mercury (Hg) fluxes measured over vegetated terrestrial systems can provide insight into the underlying process controlling emission and deposition of Hg to vegetated surfaces. Gaseous elemental Hg fluxes were measured for week-long periods in each season (spring, summer, fall, and winter) over an uncontaminated high-elevation wetland meadow in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia using micrometeorological methods. Mean net deposition was observed in the spring (−4.8 ng m −2 h −1), emission in the summer (2.5 ng m −2 h −1), near zero flux in the fall (0.3 ng m −2 h −1), and emission in the winter (4.1 ng m −2 h −1). Nighttime deposition (when stomata are closed) and the poor correlation between Hg fluxes and canopy conductance during periods of active vegetation growth suggest that stomatal processes are not the dominant mechanism for ecosystem-level GEM exchange at this site. The strong springtime deposition relative to summer implies that young vegetation is better at scavenging Hg, with the highest deposition occurring at night possibly via a cuticular pathway. These results suggest that spring is a period of GEM deposition while other seasons exhibit net emission, emphasizing the importance of capturing GEM flux seasonality when determining total Hg budgets.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.024</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1352-2310
ispartof Atmospheric environment (1994), 2010-06, Vol.44 (18), p.2176-2185
issn 1352-2310
1873-2844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762265344
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Applied sciences
Atmospheric pollution
Atmospherics
Continental surface waters
Cuticular pathway
Deposition
Elemental mercury
Emission
Exact sciences and technology
Fluxes
GEM
Mercury
Micrometeorological methods
Natural water pollution
Pollution
Seasons
Springs
Stomatal exchange
Summer
Water treatment and pollution
Winter
title Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A45%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonal%20variability%20in%20gaseous%20mercury%20fluxes%20measured%20in%20a%20high-elevation%20meadow&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Converse,%20A.D.&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=2176&rft.epage=2185&rft.pages=2176-2185&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1777134671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777134671&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1352231010002311&rfr_iscdi=true