Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow
Seasonal patterns of atmospheric mercury (Hg) fluxes measured over vegetated terrestrial systems can provide insight into the underlying process controlling emission and deposition of Hg to vegetated surfaces. Gaseous elemental Hg fluxes were measured for week-long periods in each season (spring, su...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Atmospheric environment (1994) 2010-06, Vol.44 (18), p.2176-2185 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2185 |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 2176 |
container_title | Atmospheric environment (1994) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Converse, A.D. Riscassi, A.L. Scanlon, T.M. |
description | Seasonal patterns of atmospheric mercury (Hg) fluxes measured over vegetated terrestrial systems can provide insight into the underlying process controlling emission and deposition of Hg to vegetated surfaces. Gaseous elemental Hg fluxes were measured for week-long periods in each season (spring, summer, fall, and winter) over an uncontaminated high-elevation wetland meadow in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia using micrometeorological methods. Mean net deposition was observed in the spring (−4.8 ng m
−2 h
−1), emission in the summer (2.5 ng m
−2 h
−1), near zero flux in the fall (0.3 ng m
−2 h
−1), and emission in the winter (4.1 ng m
−2 h
−1). Nighttime deposition (when stomata are closed) and the poor correlation between Hg fluxes and canopy conductance during periods of active vegetation growth suggest that stomatal processes are not the dominant mechanism for ecosystem-level GEM exchange at this site. The strong springtime deposition relative to summer implies that young vegetation is better at scavenging Hg, with the highest deposition occurring at night possibly via a cuticular pathway. These results suggest that spring is a period of GEM deposition while other seasons exhibit net emission, emphasizing the importance of capturing GEM flux seasonality when determining total Hg budgets. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762265344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1352231010002311</els_id><sourcerecordid>1777134671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f91d5182fbe6c457f6ae3c77791178165fa7364af48dcd79846f4d02436be2b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCygbBJsUv2KnO1DFS6qExGNtTZ1x6ypNip0U-vckamEJm_HYPjN35hJyzuiIUaaulyNoVnXEajPitHukYkS5PCADlmuR8lzKwy4XGU-5YPSYnMS4pJQKPdYD8vKKEOsKymQDwcPMl77ZJr5K5hCxbmOywmDbsE1c2X5hf4XYBix6BJKFny9SLHEDja-r_rOoP0_JkYMy4tn-HJL3-7u3yWM6fX54mtxOUyupblI3ZkXGcu5mqKzMtFOAwmqtx4zpnKnMgRZKgpN5YQs9zqVysug2E2qGfCbFkFzu-q5D_dFibMzKR4tlCVU_udGKc5UJ2ZNXf5KsU2VCqi4MidqhNtQxBnRmHfwKwtYwanq7zdL82G16uw0Vph9qSC72GhAtlC5AZX38reY873alquNudhx21mw8BhOtx8pi4QPaxhS1_0_qG6RomYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777134671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Converse, A.D. ; Riscassi, A.L. ; Scanlon, T.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Converse, A.D. ; Riscassi, A.L. ; Scanlon, T.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Seasonal patterns of atmospheric mercury (Hg) fluxes measured over vegetated terrestrial systems can provide insight into the underlying process controlling emission and deposition of Hg to vegetated surfaces. Gaseous elemental Hg fluxes were measured for week-long periods in each season (spring, summer, fall, and winter) over an uncontaminated high-elevation wetland meadow in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia using micrometeorological methods. Mean net deposition was observed in the spring (−4.8 ng m
−2 h
−1), emission in the summer (2.5 ng m
−2 h
−1), near zero flux in the fall (0.3 ng m
−2 h
−1), and emission in the winter (4.1 ng m
−2 h
−1). Nighttime deposition (when stomata are closed) and the poor correlation between Hg fluxes and canopy conductance during periods of active vegetation growth suggest that stomatal processes are not the dominant mechanism for ecosystem-level GEM exchange at this site. The strong springtime deposition relative to summer implies that young vegetation is better at scavenging Hg, with the highest deposition occurring at night possibly via a cuticular pathway. These results suggest that spring is a period of GEM deposition while other seasons exhibit net emission, emphasizing the importance of capturing GEM flux seasonality when determining total Hg budgets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Atmospherics ; Continental surface waters ; Cuticular pathway ; Deposition ; Elemental mercury ; Emission ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluxes ; GEM ; Mercury ; Micrometeorological methods ; Natural water pollution ; Pollution ; Seasons ; Springs ; Stomatal exchange ; Summer ; Water treatment and pollution ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 2010-06, Vol.44 (18), p.2176-2185</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f91d5182fbe6c457f6ae3c77791178165fa7364af48dcd79846f4d02436be2b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f91d5182fbe6c457f6ae3c77791178165fa7364af48dcd79846f4d02436be2b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22818206$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Converse, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riscassi, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanlon, T.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>Seasonal patterns of atmospheric mercury (Hg) fluxes measured over vegetated terrestrial systems can provide insight into the underlying process controlling emission and deposition of Hg to vegetated surfaces. Gaseous elemental Hg fluxes were measured for week-long periods in each season (spring, summer, fall, and winter) over an uncontaminated high-elevation wetland meadow in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia using micrometeorological methods. Mean net deposition was observed in the spring (−4.8 ng m
−2 h
−1), emission in the summer (2.5 ng m
−2 h
−1), near zero flux in the fall (0.3 ng m
−2 h
−1), and emission in the winter (4.1 ng m
−2 h
−1). Nighttime deposition (when stomata are closed) and the poor correlation between Hg fluxes and canopy conductance during periods of active vegetation growth suggest that stomatal processes are not the dominant mechanism for ecosystem-level GEM exchange at this site. The strong springtime deposition relative to summer implies that young vegetation is better at scavenging Hg, with the highest deposition occurring at night possibly via a cuticular pathway. These results suggest that spring is a period of GEM deposition while other seasons exhibit net emission, emphasizing the importance of capturing GEM flux seasonality when determining total Hg budgets.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>Cuticular pathway</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Elemental mercury</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>GEM</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Micrometeorological methods</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Springs</subject><subject>Stomatal exchange</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCygbBJsUv2KnO1DFS6qExGNtTZ1x6ypNip0U-vckamEJm_HYPjN35hJyzuiIUaaulyNoVnXEajPitHukYkS5PCADlmuR8lzKwy4XGU-5YPSYnMS4pJQKPdYD8vKKEOsKymQDwcPMl77ZJr5K5hCxbmOywmDbsE1c2X5hf4XYBix6BJKFny9SLHEDja-r_rOoP0_JkYMy4tn-HJL3-7u3yWM6fX54mtxOUyupblI3ZkXGcu5mqKzMtFOAwmqtx4zpnKnMgRZKgpN5YQs9zqVysug2E2qGfCbFkFzu-q5D_dFibMzKR4tlCVU_udGKc5UJ2ZNXf5KsU2VCqi4MidqhNtQxBnRmHfwKwtYwanq7zdL82G16uw0Vph9qSC72GhAtlC5AZX38reY873alquNudhx21mw8BhOtx8pi4QPaxhS1_0_qG6RomYk</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Converse, A.D.</creator><creator>Riscassi, A.L.</creator><creator>Scanlon, T.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow</title><author>Converse, A.D. ; Riscassi, A.L. ; Scanlon, T.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-f91d5182fbe6c457f6ae3c77791178165fa7364af48dcd79846f4d02436be2b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>Cuticular pathway</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Elemental mercury</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>GEM</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Micrometeorological methods</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Springs</topic><topic>Stomatal exchange</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Converse, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riscassi, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanlon, T.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Converse, A.D.</au><au>Riscassi, A.L.</au><au>Scanlon, T.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>2176</spage><epage>2185</epage><pages>2176-2185</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>Seasonal patterns of atmospheric mercury (Hg) fluxes measured over vegetated terrestrial systems can provide insight into the underlying process controlling emission and deposition of Hg to vegetated surfaces. Gaseous elemental Hg fluxes were measured for week-long periods in each season (spring, summer, fall, and winter) over an uncontaminated high-elevation wetland meadow in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia using micrometeorological methods. Mean net deposition was observed in the spring (−4.8 ng m
−2 h
−1), emission in the summer (2.5 ng m
−2 h
−1), near zero flux in the fall (0.3 ng m
−2 h
−1), and emission in the winter (4.1 ng m
−2 h
−1). Nighttime deposition (when stomata are closed) and the poor correlation between Hg fluxes and canopy conductance during periods of active vegetation growth suggest that stomatal processes are not the dominant mechanism for ecosystem-level GEM exchange at this site. The strong springtime deposition relative to summer implies that young vegetation is better at scavenging Hg, with the highest deposition occurring at night possibly via a cuticular pathway. These results suggest that spring is a period of GEM deposition while other seasons exhibit net emission, emphasizing the importance of capturing GEM flux seasonality when determining total Hg budgets.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.024</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1352-2310 |
ispartof | Atmospheric environment (1994), 2010-06, Vol.44 (18), p.2176-2185 |
issn | 1352-2310 1873-2844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762265344 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Applied sciences Atmospheric pollution Atmospherics Continental surface waters Cuticular pathway Deposition Elemental mercury Emission Exact sciences and technology Fluxes GEM Mercury Micrometeorological methods Natural water pollution Pollution Seasons Springs Stomatal exchange Summer Water treatment and pollution Winter |
title | Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A45%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonal%20variability%20in%20gaseous%20mercury%20fluxes%20measured%20in%20a%20high-elevation%20meadow&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Converse,%20A.D.&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=2176&rft.epage=2185&rft.pages=2176-2185&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1777134671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777134671&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1352231010002311&rfr_iscdi=true |