Influence of air flow rate on emission of DEHP from vinyl flooring in the emission cell FLEC: Measurements and CFD simulation

The emission of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) from one type of vinyl flooring with ∼15% (w/w) DEHP as plasticizer was measured at 22 °C in five FLECs + one blank FLEC (Field and Laboratory Emission Cell). Initially, the flow through all FLECs was 450 ml min −1. After 689 days the flows were chan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric environment (1994) 2010-07, Vol.44 (23), p.2760-2766
Hauptverfasser: Clausen, Per Axel, Liu, Zhe, Xu, Ying, Kofoed-Sørensen, Vivi, Little, John C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2766
container_issue 23
container_start_page 2760
container_title Atmospheric environment (1994)
container_volume 44
creator Clausen, Per Axel
Liu, Zhe
Xu, Ying
Kofoed-Sørensen, Vivi
Little, John C.
description The emission of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) from one type of vinyl flooring with ∼15% (w/w) DEHP as plasticizer was measured at 22 °C in five FLECs + one blank FLEC (Field and Laboratory Emission Cell). Initially, the flow through all FLECs was 450 ml min −1. After 689 days the flows were changed to 1000 ml min −1, 1600 ml min −1, 2300 ml min −1, and 3000 ml min −1, respectively, in four FLECs, and kept at 450 ml min −1 in one FLEC. Air samples were collected from the effluent air at regular intervals. After 1190 days the experiments were terminated and the interior surfaces of all six FLECs were rinsed with methanol to estimate the internal surface concentrations of DEHP. The DEHP air concentration and specific emission rate (SER) at steady state was estimated for the five different flow rates. The steady-state concentrations decreased slightly with increasing air flow with only the two highest flow rates resulting in significantly lower concentrations. In contrast, the SERs increased significantly. Despite large variation, the internal surface concentrations appeared to decrease slightly with increasing FLEC flow. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations suggest that the interior gas and surface concentrations were roughly uniform for the low flow case (450 ml min −1), under which, the partitioning between the FLEC internal surface and chamber air was examined. Although paired t-tests showed no difference between CFD and experimental results for DEHP air concentrations and SERs at steady-state conditions, CFD indicated that the experimental DEHP surface concentrations in the FLECs were underestimated. In conclusion, the experiments showed that the emission of DEHP from vinyl flooring is subject to “external” control and that the SER is strongly and positively dependent on the air exchange rate. However, the increased SER almost compensates for the decrease in gas-phase concentration caused by the increased air exchange.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762264770</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S135223101000302X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1777135211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ceb8e0698d5b1b7217562095dfcb5801151cb4c744a6940230797dbd143f10f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFO3DAQQCNUJCjwC8iXil6yHTtOnHBqtewWpEVw4G45zph6ldhgJ1tx6L_X0UJ7g5NH4zee8bwsO6ewoECrb9uFGgcf0e0WDFIS-AIYHGTHtBZFzmrOP6W4KFnOCgpH2ecYtwBQiEYcZ39unOkndBqJN0TZQEzvf5OgxpRwBAcbo01BurxaXd8TE_xAdta99DPog3WPxDoy_sL_rMa-J-vNanlJblHFKeCAboxEuY4s11ck2mHq1ZjQ0-zQqD7i2et5kj2sVw_L63xz9_Nm-WOTaw5izDW2NULV1F3Z0lYwKsqKQVN2RrdlDZSWVLdcC85V1XBgBaS_dW1HeWEomOIku9g_-xT884RxlGnUeUrl0E9RioqxigsBifz6LkmFEPMqKU1otUd18DEGNPIp2EGFF0lBzmLkVr6JkbMYCVwmManwy2sPFbXqTVBO2_ivmrGmBg5N4r7vOUyb2VkMMmo7m-psQD3KztuPWv0FAi2miA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777135211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of air flow rate on emission of DEHP from vinyl flooring in the emission cell FLEC: Measurements and CFD simulation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Clausen, Per Axel ; Liu, Zhe ; Xu, Ying ; Kofoed-Sørensen, Vivi ; Little, John C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Per Axel ; Liu, Zhe ; Xu, Ying ; Kofoed-Sørensen, Vivi ; Little, John C.</creatorcontrib><description>The emission of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) from one type of vinyl flooring with ∼15% (w/w) DEHP as plasticizer was measured at 22 °C in five FLECs + one blank FLEC (Field and Laboratory Emission Cell). Initially, the flow through all FLECs was 450 ml min −1. After 689 days the flows were changed to 1000 ml min −1, 1600 ml min −1, 2300 ml min −1, and 3000 ml min −1, respectively, in four FLECs, and kept at 450 ml min −1 in one FLEC. Air samples were collected from the effluent air at regular intervals. After 1190 days the experiments were terminated and the interior surfaces of all six FLECs were rinsed with methanol to estimate the internal surface concentrations of DEHP. The DEHP air concentration and specific emission rate (SER) at steady state was estimated for the five different flow rates. The steady-state concentrations decreased slightly with increasing air flow with only the two highest flow rates resulting in significantly lower concentrations. In contrast, the SERs increased significantly. Despite large variation, the internal surface concentrations appeared to decrease slightly with increasing FLEC flow. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations suggest that the interior gas and surface concentrations were roughly uniform for the low flow case (450 ml min −1), under which, the partitioning between the FLEC internal surface and chamber air was examined. Although paired t-tests showed no difference between CFD and experimental results for DEHP air concentrations and SERs at steady-state conditions, CFD indicated that the experimental DEHP surface concentrations in the FLECs were underestimated. In conclusion, the experiments showed that the emission of DEHP from vinyl flooring is subject to “external” control and that the SER is strongly and positively dependent on the air exchange rate. However, the increased SER almost compensates for the decrease in gas-phase concentration caused by the increased air exchange.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-2310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air flow ; Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; CFD ; Chamber ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; DEHP ; Emission ; Exact sciences and technology ; FLEC ; Flooring ; Flow rate ; Mathematical models ; Methyl alcohol ; Partitioning ; Pollution ; PVC</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric environment (1994), 2010-07, Vol.44 (23), p.2760-2766</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ceb8e0698d5b1b7217562095dfcb5801151cb4c744a6940230797dbd143f10f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ceb8e0698d5b1b7217562095dfcb5801151cb4c744a6940230797dbd143f10f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135223101000302X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22980409$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Per Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kofoed-Sørensen, Vivi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, John C.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of air flow rate on emission of DEHP from vinyl flooring in the emission cell FLEC: Measurements and CFD simulation</title><title>Atmospheric environment (1994)</title><description>The emission of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) from one type of vinyl flooring with ∼15% (w/w) DEHP as plasticizer was measured at 22 °C in five FLECs + one blank FLEC (Field and Laboratory Emission Cell). Initially, the flow through all FLECs was 450 ml min −1. After 689 days the flows were changed to 1000 ml min −1, 1600 ml min −1, 2300 ml min −1, and 3000 ml min −1, respectively, in four FLECs, and kept at 450 ml min −1 in one FLEC. Air samples were collected from the effluent air at regular intervals. After 1190 days the experiments were terminated and the interior surfaces of all six FLECs were rinsed with methanol to estimate the internal surface concentrations of DEHP. The DEHP air concentration and specific emission rate (SER) at steady state was estimated for the five different flow rates. The steady-state concentrations decreased slightly with increasing air flow with only the two highest flow rates resulting in significantly lower concentrations. In contrast, the SERs increased significantly. Despite large variation, the internal surface concentrations appeared to decrease slightly with increasing FLEC flow. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations suggest that the interior gas and surface concentrations were roughly uniform for the low flow case (450 ml min −1), under which, the partitioning between the FLEC internal surface and chamber air was examined. Although paired t-tests showed no difference between CFD and experimental results for DEHP air concentrations and SERs at steady-state conditions, CFD indicated that the experimental DEHP surface concentrations in the FLECs were underestimated. In conclusion, the experiments showed that the emission of DEHP from vinyl flooring is subject to “external” control and that the SER is strongly and positively dependent on the air exchange rate. However, the increased SER almost compensates for the decrease in gas-phase concentration caused by the increased air exchange.</description><subject>Air flow</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>CFD</subject><subject>Chamber</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>DEHP</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FLEC</subject><subject>Flooring</subject><subject>Flow rate</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methyl alcohol</subject><subject>Partitioning</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>PVC</subject><issn>1352-2310</issn><issn>1873-2844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFO3DAQQCNUJCjwC8iXil6yHTtOnHBqtewWpEVw4G45zph6ldhgJ1tx6L_X0UJ7g5NH4zee8bwsO6ewoECrb9uFGgcf0e0WDFIS-AIYHGTHtBZFzmrOP6W4KFnOCgpH2ecYtwBQiEYcZ39unOkndBqJN0TZQEzvf5OgxpRwBAcbo01BurxaXd8TE_xAdta99DPog3WPxDoy_sL_rMa-J-vNanlJblHFKeCAboxEuY4s11ck2mHq1ZjQ0-zQqD7i2et5kj2sVw_L63xz9_Nm-WOTaw5izDW2NULV1F3Z0lYwKsqKQVN2RrdlDZSWVLdcC85V1XBgBaS_dW1HeWEomOIku9g_-xT884RxlGnUeUrl0E9RioqxigsBifz6LkmFEPMqKU1otUd18DEGNPIp2EGFF0lBzmLkVr6JkbMYCVwmManwy2sPFbXqTVBO2_ivmrGmBg5N4r7vOUyb2VkMMmo7m-psQD3KztuPWv0FAi2miA</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Clausen, Per Axel</creator><creator>Liu, Zhe</creator><creator>Xu, Ying</creator><creator>Kofoed-Sørensen, Vivi</creator><creator>Little, John C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Influence of air flow rate on emission of DEHP from vinyl flooring in the emission cell FLEC: Measurements and CFD simulation</title><author>Clausen, Per Axel ; Liu, Zhe ; Xu, Ying ; Kofoed-Sørensen, Vivi ; Little, John C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ceb8e0698d5b1b7217562095dfcb5801151cb4c744a6940230797dbd143f10f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Air flow</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>CFD</topic><topic>Chamber</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>DEHP</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FLEC</topic><topic>Flooring</topic><topic>Flow rate</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methyl alcohol</topic><topic>Partitioning</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>PVC</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Per Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kofoed-Sørensen, Vivi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, John C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clausen, Per Axel</au><au>Liu, Zhe</au><au>Xu, Ying</au><au>Kofoed-Sørensen, Vivi</au><au>Little, John C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of air flow rate on emission of DEHP from vinyl flooring in the emission cell FLEC: Measurements and CFD simulation</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric environment (1994)</jtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>2760</spage><epage>2766</epage><pages>2760-2766</pages><issn>1352-2310</issn><eissn>1873-2844</eissn><abstract>The emission of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) from one type of vinyl flooring with ∼15% (w/w) DEHP as plasticizer was measured at 22 °C in five FLECs + one blank FLEC (Field and Laboratory Emission Cell). Initially, the flow through all FLECs was 450 ml min −1. After 689 days the flows were changed to 1000 ml min −1, 1600 ml min −1, 2300 ml min −1, and 3000 ml min −1, respectively, in four FLECs, and kept at 450 ml min −1 in one FLEC. Air samples were collected from the effluent air at regular intervals. After 1190 days the experiments were terminated and the interior surfaces of all six FLECs were rinsed with methanol to estimate the internal surface concentrations of DEHP. The DEHP air concentration and specific emission rate (SER) at steady state was estimated for the five different flow rates. The steady-state concentrations decreased slightly with increasing air flow with only the two highest flow rates resulting in significantly lower concentrations. In contrast, the SERs increased significantly. Despite large variation, the internal surface concentrations appeared to decrease slightly with increasing FLEC flow. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations suggest that the interior gas and surface concentrations were roughly uniform for the low flow case (450 ml min −1), under which, the partitioning between the FLEC internal surface and chamber air was examined. Although paired t-tests showed no difference between CFD and experimental results for DEHP air concentrations and SERs at steady-state conditions, CFD indicated that the experimental DEHP surface concentrations in the FLECs were underestimated. In conclusion, the experiments showed that the emission of DEHP from vinyl flooring is subject to “external” control and that the SER is strongly and positively dependent on the air exchange rate. However, the increased SER almost compensates for the decrease in gas-phase concentration caused by the increased air exchange.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.020</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1352-2310
ispartof Atmospheric environment (1994), 2010-07, Vol.44 (23), p.2760-2766
issn 1352-2310
1873-2844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762264770
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Air flow
Applied sciences
Atmospheric pollution
CFD
Chamber
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer simulation
DEHP
Emission
Exact sciences and technology
FLEC
Flooring
Flow rate
Mathematical models
Methyl alcohol
Partitioning
Pollution
PVC
title Influence of air flow rate on emission of DEHP from vinyl flooring in the emission cell FLEC: Measurements and CFD simulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A16%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20air%20flow%20rate%20on%20emission%20of%20DEHP%20from%20vinyl%20flooring%20in%20the%20emission%20cell%20FLEC:%20Measurements%20and%20CFD%20simulation&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20environment%20(1994)&rft.au=Clausen,%20Per%20Axel&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=2760&rft.epage=2766&rft.pages=2760-2766&rft.issn=1352-2310&rft.eissn=1873-2844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1777135211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777135211&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S135223101000302X&rfr_iscdi=true