The long-term fate of fresh and frozen orthotopic bone allografts in genetically defined rats

Fresh and frozen orthotopic iliac crest bone grafts in rats were studied histologically for determination of the long-term effects of histocompatibility matching and the freezing process on orthotopic bone graft incorporation. Grafts exchanged between groups of inbred rats, syngeneic or differing wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1985-07, Vol.197 (197), p.245-254
Hauptverfasser: BOS, G. D, GOLDBERG, V. M, GORDON, N. H, DOLLINGER, B. M, ZIKA, J. M, POWELL, A. E, HEIPLE, K. G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 254
container_issue 197
container_start_page 245
container_title Clinical orthopaedics and related research
container_volume 197
creator BOS, G. D
GOLDBERG, V. M
GORDON, N. H
DOLLINGER, B. M
ZIKA, J. M
POWELL, A. E
HEIPLE, K. G
description Fresh and frozen orthotopic iliac crest bone grafts in rats were studied histologically for determination of the long-term effects of histocompatibility matching and the freezing process on orthotopic bone graft incorporation. Grafts exchanged between groups of inbred rats, syngeneic or differing with respect to major or minor histocompatibility loci, were studied histologically at 20, 30, 40, 50, and 150 days after bone transplantation. A numerical histologic scoring system was developed and used by three observers for evaluation of coded hematoxylin and eosin sections. All frozen graft groups had the same fate regardless of histocompatibility relations between donors and recipients, and all grafts were inferior to fresh syngeneic grafts. Both fresh allograft groups received similar scores and initially at 20 and 30 days had scores similar to those of the fresh syngeneic groups. In the later intervals, however, the fresh allografts were inferior to the fresh syngeneic grafts and similar to the frozen groups. This is consistent with an older model describing two distinct phases of osteogenesis. In the long term, frozen syngeneic and fresh and frozen allografts across major and minor histocompatibility barriers were comparable, but all were significantly inferior to fresh syngeneic bone grafts.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00003086-198507000-00031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76209923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76209923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-5a1072952be2bd011eef04c47a9dbca05261bbd3ae559bc7dde4d25a800d52e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWj9-gpCDeFvNx6abHKX4BQUvCl5kySaTdmU3qUl6qL_eVGvnMjPvvDMDD0KYkhtKVHNLSnAipxVVUpCmdNVWoQdoQgWTFaWcHaJJ0VSlGH0_QacpfW4ttWDH6JhLxSWTE_TxugQ8BL-oMsQRO50BB4ddhLTE2ttShW_wOMS8DDmseoO74AHrYQiLqF1OuPd4AR5yb4q4wRZc78HiqHM6R0dODwkudvkMvT3cv86eqvnL4_Psbl4ZzlWuhKakYUqwDlhnCaUAjtSmbrSyndFEsCntOss1CKE601gLtWVCS0KsYNDwM3T9d3cVw9caUm7HPhkYBu0hrFPbTBlRivFilH9GE0NKEVy7iv2o46alpN2Sbf_Jtnuy7S_Zsnq5-7HuRrD7xR3KMr_azXUqJFzU3vRpb5O1qFXD-Q9W44Gc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76209923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The long-term fate of fresh and frozen orthotopic bone allografts in genetically defined rats</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>BOS, G. D ; GOLDBERG, V. M ; GORDON, N. H ; DOLLINGER, B. M ; ZIKA, J. M ; POWELL, A. E ; HEIPLE, K. G</creator><creatorcontrib>BOS, G. D ; GOLDBERG, V. M ; GORDON, N. H ; DOLLINGER, B. M ; ZIKA, J. M ; POWELL, A. E ; HEIPLE, K. G</creatorcontrib><description>Fresh and frozen orthotopic iliac crest bone grafts in rats were studied histologically for determination of the long-term effects of histocompatibility matching and the freezing process on orthotopic bone graft incorporation. Grafts exchanged between groups of inbred rats, syngeneic or differing with respect to major or minor histocompatibility loci, were studied histologically at 20, 30, 40, 50, and 150 days after bone transplantation. A numerical histologic scoring system was developed and used by three observers for evaluation of coded hematoxylin and eosin sections. All frozen graft groups had the same fate regardless of histocompatibility relations between donors and recipients, and all grafts were inferior to fresh syngeneic grafts. Both fresh allograft groups received similar scores and initially at 20 and 30 days had scores similar to those of the fresh syngeneic groups. In the later intervals, however, the fresh allografts were inferior to the fresh syngeneic grafts and similar to the frozen groups. This is consistent with an older model describing two distinct phases of osteogenesis. In the long term, frozen syngeneic and fresh and frozen allografts across major and minor histocompatibility barriers were comparable, but all were significantly inferior to fresh syngeneic bone grafts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1132</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198507000-00031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3893828</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CORTBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone and Bones - cytology ; Bone Transplantation ; Female ; Freezing ; Major Histocompatibility Complex ; Medical sciences ; Minor Histocompatibility Loci ; Orthopedic surgery ; Rats ; Rats, Inbred ACI - genetics ; Rats, Inbred F344 - genetics ; Rats, Inbred Lew - genetics ; Rats, Inbred Strains - genetics ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Time Factors ; Tissue Preservation ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Transplantation, Isogeneic</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1985-07, Vol.197 (197), p.245-254</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-5a1072952be2bd011eef04c47a9dbca05261bbd3ae559bc7dde4d25a800d52e73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8454973$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3893828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BOS, G. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLDBERG, V. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GORDON, N. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOLLINGER, B. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIKA, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POWELL, A. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEIPLE, K. G</creatorcontrib><title>The long-term fate of fresh and frozen orthotopic bone allografts in genetically defined rats</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>Fresh and frozen orthotopic iliac crest bone grafts in rats were studied histologically for determination of the long-term effects of histocompatibility matching and the freezing process on orthotopic bone graft incorporation. Grafts exchanged between groups of inbred rats, syngeneic or differing with respect to major or minor histocompatibility loci, were studied histologically at 20, 30, 40, 50, and 150 days after bone transplantation. A numerical histologic scoring system was developed and used by three observers for evaluation of coded hematoxylin and eosin sections. All frozen graft groups had the same fate regardless of histocompatibility relations between donors and recipients, and all grafts were inferior to fresh syngeneic grafts. Both fresh allograft groups received similar scores and initially at 20 and 30 days had scores similar to those of the fresh syngeneic groups. In the later intervals, however, the fresh allografts were inferior to the fresh syngeneic grafts and similar to the frozen groups. This is consistent with an older model describing two distinct phases of osteogenesis. In the long term, frozen syngeneic and fresh and frozen allografts across major and minor histocompatibility barriers were comparable, but all were significantly inferior to fresh syngeneic bone grafts.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - cytology</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Major Histocompatibility Complex</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Minor Histocompatibility Loci</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Inbred ACI - genetics</subject><subject>Rats, Inbred F344 - genetics</subject><subject>Rats, Inbred Lew - genetics</subject><subject>Rats, Inbred Strains - genetics</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tissue Preservation</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><subject>Transplantation, Isogeneic</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><issn>1528-1132</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMoWj9-gpCDeFvNx6abHKX4BQUvCl5kySaTdmU3qUl6qL_eVGvnMjPvvDMDD0KYkhtKVHNLSnAipxVVUpCmdNVWoQdoQgWTFaWcHaJJ0VSlGH0_QacpfW4ttWDH6JhLxSWTE_TxugQ8BL-oMsQRO50BB4ddhLTE2ttShW_wOMS8DDmseoO74AHrYQiLqF1OuPd4AR5yb4q4wRZc78HiqHM6R0dODwkudvkMvT3cv86eqvnL4_Psbl4ZzlWuhKakYUqwDlhnCaUAjtSmbrSyndFEsCntOss1CKE601gLtWVCS0KsYNDwM3T9d3cVw9caUm7HPhkYBu0hrFPbTBlRivFilH9GE0NKEVy7iv2o46alpN2Sbf_Jtnuy7S_Zsnq5-7HuRrD7xR3KMr_azXUqJFzU3vRpb5O1qFXD-Q9W44Gc</recordid><startdate>198507</startdate><enddate>198507</enddate><creator>BOS, G. D</creator><creator>GOLDBERG, V. M</creator><creator>GORDON, N. H</creator><creator>DOLLINGER, B. M</creator><creator>ZIKA, J. M</creator><creator>POWELL, A. E</creator><creator>HEIPLE, K. G</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198507</creationdate><title>The long-term fate of fresh and frozen orthotopic bone allografts in genetically defined rats</title><author>BOS, G. D ; GOLDBERG, V. M ; GORDON, N. H ; DOLLINGER, B. M ; ZIKA, J. M ; POWELL, A. E ; HEIPLE, K. G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-5a1072952be2bd011eef04c47a9dbca05261bbd3ae559bc7dde4d25a800d52e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - cytology</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Major Histocompatibility Complex</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Minor Histocompatibility Loci</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Inbred ACI - genetics</topic><topic>Rats, Inbred F344 - genetics</topic><topic>Rats, Inbred Lew - genetics</topic><topic>Rats, Inbred Strains - genetics</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tissue Preservation</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><topic>Transplantation, Isogeneic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BOS, G. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLDBERG, V. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GORDON, N. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOLLINGER, B. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIKA, J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POWELL, A. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEIPLE, K. G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BOS, G. D</au><au>GOLDBERG, V. M</au><au>GORDON, N. H</au><au>DOLLINGER, B. M</au><au>ZIKA, J. M</au><au>POWELL, A. E</au><au>HEIPLE, K. G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The long-term fate of fresh and frozen orthotopic bone allografts in genetically defined rats</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>1985-07</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>197</volume><issue>197</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>245-254</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><eissn>1528-1132</eissn><coden>CORTBR</coden><abstract>Fresh and frozen orthotopic iliac crest bone grafts in rats were studied histologically for determination of the long-term effects of histocompatibility matching and the freezing process on orthotopic bone graft incorporation. Grafts exchanged between groups of inbred rats, syngeneic or differing with respect to major or minor histocompatibility loci, were studied histologically at 20, 30, 40, 50, and 150 days after bone transplantation. A numerical histologic scoring system was developed and used by three observers for evaluation of coded hematoxylin and eosin sections. All frozen graft groups had the same fate regardless of histocompatibility relations between donors and recipients, and all grafts were inferior to fresh syngeneic grafts. Both fresh allograft groups received similar scores and initially at 20 and 30 days had scores similar to those of the fresh syngeneic groups. In the later intervals, however, the fresh allografts were inferior to the fresh syngeneic grafts and similar to the frozen groups. This is consistent with an older model describing two distinct phases of osteogenesis. In the long term, frozen syngeneic and fresh and frozen allografts across major and minor histocompatibility barriers were comparable, but all were significantly inferior to fresh syngeneic bone grafts.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>3893828</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003086-198507000-00031</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-921X
ispartof Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1985-07, Vol.197 (197), p.245-254
issn 0009-921X
1528-1132
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76209923
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Bone and Bones - cytology
Bone Transplantation
Female
Freezing
Major Histocompatibility Complex
Medical sciences
Minor Histocompatibility Loci
Orthopedic surgery
Rats
Rats, Inbred ACI - genetics
Rats, Inbred F344 - genetics
Rats, Inbred Lew - genetics
Rats, Inbred Strains - genetics
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Time Factors
Tissue Preservation
Transplantation, Homologous
Transplantation, Isogeneic
title The long-term fate of fresh and frozen orthotopic bone allografts in genetically defined rats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A46%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20long-term%20fate%20of%20fresh%20and%20frozen%20orthotopic%20bone%20allografts%20in%20genetically%20defined%20rats&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=BOS,%20G.%20D&rft.date=1985-07&rft.volume=197&rft.issue=197&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=245-254&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft.coden=CORTBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003086-198507000-00031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76209923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76209923&rft_id=info:pmid/3893828&rfr_iscdi=true