Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment study of 850 patients

A total of 850 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma seen during the last 8 years were analyzed retrospectively for survival in relation to treatment and disease stage. A new staging scheme based on tumor size, ascites, jaundice and serum albumin was used. Clearly, the prognosis depended on disease...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 1985-08, Vol.56 (4), p.918-928
Hauptverfasser: Okuda, Kunio, Ohtsuki, Toshio, Obata, Hiroshi, Tomimatsu, Masahiko, Okazaki, Nobuo, Hasegawa, Hiroshi, Nakajima, Yukio, Ohnishi, Kunihiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 928
container_issue 4
container_start_page 918
container_title Cancer
container_volume 56
creator Okuda, Kunio
Ohtsuki, Toshio
Obata, Hiroshi
Tomimatsu, Masahiko
Okazaki, Nobuo
Hasegawa, Hiroshi
Nakajima, Yukio
Ohnishi, Kunihiko
description A total of 850 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma seen during the last 8 years were analyzed retrospectively for survival in relation to treatment and disease stage. A new staging scheme based on tumor size, ascites, jaundice and serum albumin was used. Clearly, the prognosis depended on disease stage. The median survival of 229 patients who received no specific treatment was 1.6 months, 0.7 month for Stage III patients, 2.0 months for Stage II, and 8.3 months for Stage I. The median survival of Stage I patients who had hepatic resection (n = 115) was 25.6 months and Stage II patients with resection (n = 42) was 12.2 months. In patients who had a small cancer (≤25% of liver area in size) the median survival was 29.0 months. Survival of the surgically treated patients, which represented a highly selected group, was better than that of medically treated patients of a comparable stage. Median survival of Stage I medically treated patients (n = 124) was 9.4 months, for Stage II (n = 290) 3.5 months, and for Stage III (n = 50) 1.6 months. Medical treatment prolonged survival in Stage II and III patients, but not in Stage I. Transcatheter arterial embolization gave a better survival compared with chemotherapy, whether intra‐arterial bolus administration of mitomycin C, systemic mitomycin C, or oral/rectal tegafur, in Stage II. Among various chemotherapeutic modalities, intra‐arterial bolus injection was superior to systemic chemotherapy in survival in Stage II. In Stage III, chemotherapy improved survival as compared with no specific treatment. The major causes of death were hepatic failure and gastrointestinal bleeding, probably due to the coexistent advanced cirrhosis. These results in survival are much improved over the past reports, and the differences are probably a result of earlier diagnosis and frequent hepatic resections.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1097-0142(19850815)56:4<918::AID-CNCR2820560437>3.0.CO;2-E
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76205736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76205736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-cd17cd87323ad05b738a4401bfa6d393add1e9086a5e9e6ad6a45b0b2b4405cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV-L1DAUxYMo6-zqRxDyIOI-dMyfJm1nZWGts-vCsgOiIL6E2zR1Im0zm6TIfHszzjigD4JPIff-cjg5B6F3lMwpIewNJVWREZqz17QqBSmpOBdykb-taLlYXN2-z-r7-iMrGRGS5Ly45HMyr1cXLFs-QrPj48doRggpM5HzL0_RaQjf07Vggp-gE1ZVREo6Q-t7iJOHHq9tiM5vsevw2mwgOm36furBYw1e29ENgGFs8ca7b6MLNmA7Ym96iNaNODocvYE4mDHiEKf2l1DyjpOUTcPwDD3poA_m-eE8Q5-vl5_qD9nd6ua2vrrLtJC0yHRLC92WBWccWiKagpeQ54Q2HciWV2nYUlORUoIwlZHQSshFQxrWJEpozc_Qq71uMvowmRDVYMPuLzAaNwVVyBRbwWUCv-5B7V0I3nRq4-0AfqsoUbsa1C5JtUtS_a5BCalylWpQKtWg_qxBcUVUvVJMLZP4i4OLqRlMe5Q-5J72Lw97CBr6zsOobThiFZPJJ0-Y2WM_bG-2_2Xwn_7-2vCfj6qzDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76205736</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment study of 850 patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Okuda, Kunio ; Ohtsuki, Toshio ; Obata, Hiroshi ; Tomimatsu, Masahiko ; Okazaki, Nobuo ; Hasegawa, Hiroshi ; Nakajima, Yukio ; Ohnishi, Kunihiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Okuda, Kunio ; Ohtsuki, Toshio ; Obata, Hiroshi ; Tomimatsu, Masahiko ; Okazaki, Nobuo ; Hasegawa, Hiroshi ; Nakajima, Yukio ; Ohnishi, Kunihiko</creatorcontrib><description>A total of 850 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma seen during the last 8 years were analyzed retrospectively for survival in relation to treatment and disease stage. A new staging scheme based on tumor size, ascites, jaundice and serum albumin was used. Clearly, the prognosis depended on disease stage. The median survival of 229 patients who received no specific treatment was 1.6 months, 0.7 month for Stage III patients, 2.0 months for Stage II, and 8.3 months for Stage I. The median survival of Stage I patients who had hepatic resection (n = 115) was 25.6 months and Stage II patients with resection (n = 42) was 12.2 months. In patients who had a small cancer (≤25% of liver area in size) the median survival was 29.0 months. Survival of the surgically treated patients, which represented a highly selected group, was better than that of medically treated patients of a comparable stage. Median survival of Stage I medically treated patients (n = 124) was 9.4 months, for Stage II (n = 290) 3.5 months, and for Stage III (n = 50) 1.6 months. Medical treatment prolonged survival in Stage II and III patients, but not in Stage I. Transcatheter arterial embolization gave a better survival compared with chemotherapy, whether intra‐arterial bolus administration of mitomycin C, systemic mitomycin C, or oral/rectal tegafur, in Stage II. Among various chemotherapeutic modalities, intra‐arterial bolus injection was superior to systemic chemotherapy in survival in Stage II. In Stage III, chemotherapy improved survival as compared with no specific treatment. The major causes of death were hepatic failure and gastrointestinal bleeding, probably due to the coexistent advanced cirrhosis. These results in survival are much improved over the past reports, and the differences are probably a result of earlier diagnosis and frequent hepatic resections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850815)56:4&lt;918::AID-CNCR2820560437&gt;3.0.CO;2-E</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2990661</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy ; Embolization, Therapeutic ; Female ; Fluorouracil - therapeutic use ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Liver Neoplasms - mortality ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Liver Neoplasms - therapy ; Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mitomycin ; Mitomycins - therapeutic use ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Tegafur - therapeutic use ; Time Factors ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 1985-08, Vol.56 (4), p.918-928</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1985 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-cd17cd87323ad05b738a4401bfa6d393add1e9086a5e9e6ad6a45b0b2b4405cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=9267623$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2990661$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Okuda, Kunio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohtsuki, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obata, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomimatsu, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okazaki, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, Yukio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohnishi, Kunihiko</creatorcontrib><title>Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment study of 850 patients</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>A total of 850 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma seen during the last 8 years were analyzed retrospectively for survival in relation to treatment and disease stage. A new staging scheme based on tumor size, ascites, jaundice and serum albumin was used. Clearly, the prognosis depended on disease stage. The median survival of 229 patients who received no specific treatment was 1.6 months, 0.7 month for Stage III patients, 2.0 months for Stage II, and 8.3 months for Stage I. The median survival of Stage I patients who had hepatic resection (n = 115) was 25.6 months and Stage II patients with resection (n = 42) was 12.2 months. In patients who had a small cancer (≤25% of liver area in size) the median survival was 29.0 months. Survival of the surgically treated patients, which represented a highly selected group, was better than that of medically treated patients of a comparable stage. Median survival of Stage I medically treated patients (n = 124) was 9.4 months, for Stage II (n = 290) 3.5 months, and for Stage III (n = 50) 1.6 months. Medical treatment prolonged survival in Stage II and III patients, but not in Stage I. Transcatheter arterial embolization gave a better survival compared with chemotherapy, whether intra‐arterial bolus administration of mitomycin C, systemic mitomycin C, or oral/rectal tegafur, in Stage II. Among various chemotherapeutic modalities, intra‐arterial bolus injection was superior to systemic chemotherapy in survival in Stage II. In Stage III, chemotherapy improved survival as compared with no specific treatment. The major causes of death were hepatic failure and gastrointestinal bleeding, probably due to the coexistent advanced cirrhosis. These results in survival are much improved over the past reports, and the differences are probably a result of earlier diagnosis and frequent hepatic resections.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy</subject><subject>Embolization, Therapeutic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mitomycin</subject><subject>Mitomycins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tegafur - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV-L1DAUxYMo6-zqRxDyIOI-dMyfJm1nZWGts-vCsgOiIL6E2zR1Im0zm6TIfHszzjigD4JPIff-cjg5B6F3lMwpIewNJVWREZqz17QqBSmpOBdykb-taLlYXN2-z-r7-iMrGRGS5Ly45HMyr1cXLFs-QrPj48doRggpM5HzL0_RaQjf07Vggp-gE1ZVREo6Q-t7iJOHHq9tiM5vsevw2mwgOm36furBYw1e29ENgGFs8ca7b6MLNmA7Ym96iNaNODocvYE4mDHiEKf2l1DyjpOUTcPwDD3poA_m-eE8Q5-vl5_qD9nd6ua2vrrLtJC0yHRLC92WBWccWiKagpeQ54Q2HciWV2nYUlORUoIwlZHQSshFQxrWJEpozc_Qq71uMvowmRDVYMPuLzAaNwVVyBRbwWUCv-5B7V0I3nRq4-0AfqsoUbsa1C5JtUtS_a5BCalylWpQKtWg_qxBcUVUvVJMLZP4i4OLqRlMe5Q-5J72Lw97CBr6zsOobThiFZPJJ0-Y2WM_bG-2_2Xwn_7-2vCfj6qzDg</recordid><startdate>19850815</startdate><enddate>19850815</enddate><creator>Okuda, Kunio</creator><creator>Ohtsuki, Toshio</creator><creator>Obata, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Tomimatsu, Masahiko</creator><creator>Okazaki, Nobuo</creator><creator>Hasegawa, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Nakajima, Yukio</creator><creator>Ohnishi, Kunihiko</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850815</creationdate><title>Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment study of 850 patients</title><author>Okuda, Kunio ; Ohtsuki, Toshio ; Obata, Hiroshi ; Tomimatsu, Masahiko ; Okazaki, Nobuo ; Hasegawa, Hiroshi ; Nakajima, Yukio ; Ohnishi, Kunihiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5617-cd17cd87323ad05b738a4401bfa6d393add1e9086a5e9e6ad6a45b0b2b4405cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy</topic><topic>Embolization, Therapeutic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mitomycin</topic><topic>Mitomycins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tegafur - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okuda, Kunio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohtsuki, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obata, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomimatsu, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okazaki, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, Yukio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohnishi, Kunihiko</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okuda, Kunio</au><au>Ohtsuki, Toshio</au><au>Obata, Hiroshi</au><au>Tomimatsu, Masahiko</au><au>Okazaki, Nobuo</au><au>Hasegawa, Hiroshi</au><au>Nakajima, Yukio</au><au>Ohnishi, Kunihiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment study of 850 patients</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>1985-08-15</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>918</spage><epage>928</epage><pages>918-928</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>A total of 850 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma seen during the last 8 years were analyzed retrospectively for survival in relation to treatment and disease stage. A new staging scheme based on tumor size, ascites, jaundice and serum albumin was used. Clearly, the prognosis depended on disease stage. The median survival of 229 patients who received no specific treatment was 1.6 months, 0.7 month for Stage III patients, 2.0 months for Stage II, and 8.3 months for Stage I. The median survival of Stage I patients who had hepatic resection (n = 115) was 25.6 months and Stage II patients with resection (n = 42) was 12.2 months. In patients who had a small cancer (≤25% of liver area in size) the median survival was 29.0 months. Survival of the surgically treated patients, which represented a highly selected group, was better than that of medically treated patients of a comparable stage. Median survival of Stage I medically treated patients (n = 124) was 9.4 months, for Stage II (n = 290) 3.5 months, and for Stage III (n = 50) 1.6 months. Medical treatment prolonged survival in Stage II and III patients, but not in Stage I. Transcatheter arterial embolization gave a better survival compared with chemotherapy, whether intra‐arterial bolus administration of mitomycin C, systemic mitomycin C, or oral/rectal tegafur, in Stage II. Among various chemotherapeutic modalities, intra‐arterial bolus injection was superior to systemic chemotherapy in survival in Stage II. In Stage III, chemotherapy improved survival as compared with no specific treatment. The major causes of death were hepatic failure and gastrointestinal bleeding, probably due to the coexistent advanced cirrhosis. These results in survival are much improved over the past reports, and the differences are probably a result of earlier diagnosis and frequent hepatic resections.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>2990661</pmid><doi>10.1002/1097-0142(19850815)56:4&lt;918::AID-CNCR2820560437&gt;3.0.CO;2-E</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 1985-08, Vol.56 (4), p.918-928
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76205736
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy
Embolization, Therapeutic
Female
Fluorouracil - therapeutic use
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Liver Neoplasms - drug therapy
Liver Neoplasms - mortality
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Liver Neoplasms - therapy
Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mitomycin
Mitomycins - therapeutic use
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Tegafur - therapeutic use
Time Factors
Tumors
title Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment study of 850 patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T21%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural%20history%20of%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma%20and%20prognosis%20in%20relation%20to%20treatment%20study%20of%20850%20patients&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Okuda,%20Kunio&rft.date=1985-08-15&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=918&rft.epage=928&rft.pages=918-928&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19850815)56:4%3C918::AID-CNCR2820560437%3E3.0.CO;2-E&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76205736%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76205736&rft_id=info:pmid/2990661&rfr_iscdi=true