Characterization of stationary phases by a linear solvation energy relationship utilizing supercritical fluid chromatography

Supercritical fluid chromatography was utilized in combination with the Abraham model of linear solvation energy relationship to characterize 11 different HPLC stationary phases. System constants were determined at one supercritical fluid chromatography condition for each stationary phase. The resul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of separation science 2010-10, Vol.33 (19), p.3060-3067
Hauptverfasser: Mitchell, Clifford R, Benz, Nancy J, Zhang, Shuhong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3067
container_issue 19
container_start_page 3060
container_title Journal of separation science
container_volume 33
creator Mitchell, Clifford R
Benz, Nancy J
Zhang, Shuhong
description Supercritical fluid chromatography was utilized in combination with the Abraham model of linear solvation energy relationship to characterize 11 different HPLC stationary phases. System constants were determined at one supercritical fluid chromatography condition for each stationary phase. The results indicate that several types of silica columns, including type B silica, type C silica, and fused core silica, are very similar in their retention behavior. Several aromatic stationary phases were characterized and it was found that, in contrast to the other phases studied, all of the aromatic stationary phases had positive contributions from the dispersion/cavity (v) term of the linear solvation energy relationship. Several aliphatic phases were characterized and there were several linear solvation energy relationship constants that differentiated the phases from each other, mainly the polar terms (dipolarity and hydrogen bonding). One stationary phase, a fused core pentafluorophenyl (PFP) phase, had very poor regression quality. The column volume of this phase was lower than the others in the study, which may have had some impact on the results of the regression.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jssc.201000371
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762021725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>762021725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5051-3517e935dd6508be91d4daff23476e5877e51f29289ca53d9beb953d9b4c384a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAURSMEoqWwZQnewSaDP-LYXqIRTEEVSAxV2VmO8zJx8cTBToBU_HjSSRmxgtW7ls49C98se0rwimBMX12nZFcUzxkzQe5lp6QkPFeMFPePGZcn2aOUrjEmQir8MDuhWDAsmTrNfq1bE40dILobM7jQodCgNByiiRPqW5MgoWpCBnnXgYkoBf99QaGDuJtQBH94p9b1aBycdzeu26E09hBtdIOzxqPGj65Gto1hb4awi6Zvp8fZg8b4BE_u7ll2-fbN5_V5fvFx8279-iK3HHOSM04EKMbruuRYVqBIXdSmaSgrRAlcCgGcNFRRqazhrFYVVOpwC8tkYdhZ9mLx9jF8GyENeu-SBe9NB2FMWpQUUyIon8mX_yRJKQgTspR4RlcLamNIKUKj--j2859pgvXtNvp2G33cZi48u3OP1R7qI_5njBlQC_DDeZj-o9Pvt9v13_J86bo0wM9j18SvuhRMcH31YaM3X64YO2dKf5r55wvfmKDNLrqkL7ezjmEiFReyYL8BWtO2pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671378680</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of stationary phases by a linear solvation energy relationship utilizing supercritical fluid chromatography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Mitchell, Clifford R ; Benz, Nancy J ; Zhang, Shuhong</creator><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Clifford R ; Benz, Nancy J ; Zhang, Shuhong</creatorcontrib><description>Supercritical fluid chromatography was utilized in combination with the Abraham model of linear solvation energy relationship to characterize 11 different HPLC stationary phases. System constants were determined at one supercritical fluid chromatography condition for each stationary phase. The results indicate that several types of silica columns, including type B silica, type C silica, and fused core silica, are very similar in their retention behavior. Several aromatic stationary phases were characterized and it was found that, in contrast to the other phases studied, all of the aromatic stationary phases had positive contributions from the dispersion/cavity (v) term of the linear solvation energy relationship. Several aliphatic phases were characterized and there were several linear solvation energy relationship constants that differentiated the phases from each other, mainly the polar terms (dipolarity and hydrogen bonding). One stationary phase, a fused core pentafluorophenyl (PFP) phase, had very poor regression quality. The column volume of this phase was lower than the others in the study, which may have had some impact on the results of the regression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-9306</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1615-9314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-9314</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201000371</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20730839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>Abraham model ; Chromatography ; Chromatography, Liquid - instrumentation ; Chromatography, Liquid - methods ; Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid ; Constants ; Energy use ; Linear solvation energy relationship ; Molecular Structure ; Phases ; Regression ; Silicon dioxide ; Solvation ; Solvation parameter model ; Stationary phase characterization ; Supercritical fluid chromatography ; Supercritical fluids</subject><ispartof>Journal of separation science, 2010-10, Vol.33 (19), p.3060-3067</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5051-3517e935dd6508be91d4daff23476e5877e51f29289ca53d9beb953d9b4c384a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5051-3517e935dd6508be91d4daff23476e5877e51f29289ca53d9beb953d9b4c384a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjssc.201000371$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjssc.201000371$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27928,27929,45578,45579</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20730839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Clifford R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benz, Nancy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuhong</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of stationary phases by a linear solvation energy relationship utilizing supercritical fluid chromatography</title><title>Journal of separation science</title><addtitle>J. Sep. Science</addtitle><description>Supercritical fluid chromatography was utilized in combination with the Abraham model of linear solvation energy relationship to characterize 11 different HPLC stationary phases. System constants were determined at one supercritical fluid chromatography condition for each stationary phase. The results indicate that several types of silica columns, including type B silica, type C silica, and fused core silica, are very similar in their retention behavior. Several aromatic stationary phases were characterized and it was found that, in contrast to the other phases studied, all of the aromatic stationary phases had positive contributions from the dispersion/cavity (v) term of the linear solvation energy relationship. Several aliphatic phases were characterized and there were several linear solvation energy relationship constants that differentiated the phases from each other, mainly the polar terms (dipolarity and hydrogen bonding). One stationary phase, a fused core pentafluorophenyl (PFP) phase, had very poor regression quality. The column volume of this phase was lower than the others in the study, which may have had some impact on the results of the regression.</description><subject>Abraham model</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - instrumentation</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</subject><subject>Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid</subject><subject>Constants</subject><subject>Energy use</subject><subject>Linear solvation energy relationship</subject><subject>Molecular Structure</subject><subject>Phases</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Solvation</subject><subject>Solvation parameter model</subject><subject>Stationary phase characterization</subject><subject>Supercritical fluid chromatography</subject><subject>Supercritical fluids</subject><issn>1615-9306</issn><issn>1615-9314</issn><issn>1615-9314</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAURSMEoqWwZQnewSaDP-LYXqIRTEEVSAxV2VmO8zJx8cTBToBU_HjSSRmxgtW7ls49C98se0rwimBMX12nZFcUzxkzQe5lp6QkPFeMFPePGZcn2aOUrjEmQir8MDuhWDAsmTrNfq1bE40dILobM7jQodCgNByiiRPqW5MgoWpCBnnXgYkoBf99QaGDuJtQBH94p9b1aBycdzeu26E09hBtdIOzxqPGj65Gto1hb4awi6Zvp8fZg8b4BE_u7ll2-fbN5_V5fvFx8279-iK3HHOSM04EKMbruuRYVqBIXdSmaSgrRAlcCgGcNFRRqazhrFYVVOpwC8tkYdhZ9mLx9jF8GyENeu-SBe9NB2FMWpQUUyIon8mX_yRJKQgTspR4RlcLamNIKUKj--j2859pgvXtNvp2G33cZi48u3OP1R7qI_5njBlQC_DDeZj-o9Pvt9v13_J86bo0wM9j18SvuhRMcH31YaM3X64YO2dKf5r55wvfmKDNLrqkL7ezjmEiFReyYL8BWtO2pg</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Mitchell, Clifford R</creator><creator>Benz, Nancy J</creator><creator>Zhang, Shuhong</creator><general>Wiley-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Characterization of stationary phases by a linear solvation energy relationship utilizing supercritical fluid chromatography</title><author>Mitchell, Clifford R ; Benz, Nancy J ; Zhang, Shuhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5051-3517e935dd6508be91d4daff23476e5877e51f29289ca53d9beb953d9b4c384a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abraham model</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - instrumentation</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</topic><topic>Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid</topic><topic>Constants</topic><topic>Energy use</topic><topic>Linear solvation energy relationship</topic><topic>Molecular Structure</topic><topic>Phases</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Solvation</topic><topic>Solvation parameter model</topic><topic>Stationary phase characterization</topic><topic>Supercritical fluid chromatography</topic><topic>Supercritical fluids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Clifford R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benz, Nancy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuhong</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of separation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mitchell, Clifford R</au><au>Benz, Nancy J</au><au>Zhang, Shuhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of stationary phases by a linear solvation energy relationship utilizing supercritical fluid chromatography</atitle><jtitle>Journal of separation science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Sep. Science</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>3060</spage><epage>3067</epage><pages>3060-3067</pages><issn>1615-9306</issn><issn>1615-9314</issn><eissn>1615-9314</eissn><abstract>Supercritical fluid chromatography was utilized in combination with the Abraham model of linear solvation energy relationship to characterize 11 different HPLC stationary phases. System constants were determined at one supercritical fluid chromatography condition for each stationary phase. The results indicate that several types of silica columns, including type B silica, type C silica, and fused core silica, are very similar in their retention behavior. Several aromatic stationary phases were characterized and it was found that, in contrast to the other phases studied, all of the aromatic stationary phases had positive contributions from the dispersion/cavity (v) term of the linear solvation energy relationship. Several aliphatic phases were characterized and there were several linear solvation energy relationship constants that differentiated the phases from each other, mainly the polar terms (dipolarity and hydrogen bonding). One stationary phase, a fused core pentafluorophenyl (PFP) phase, had very poor regression quality. The column volume of this phase was lower than the others in the study, which may have had some impact on the results of the regression.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Wiley-VCH Verlag</pub><pmid>20730839</pmid><doi>10.1002/jssc.201000371</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1615-9306
ispartof Journal of separation science, 2010-10, Vol.33 (19), p.3060-3067
issn 1615-9306
1615-9314
1615-9314
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_762021725
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Abraham model
Chromatography
Chromatography, Liquid - instrumentation
Chromatography, Liquid - methods
Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid
Constants
Energy use
Linear solvation energy relationship
Molecular Structure
Phases
Regression
Silicon dioxide
Solvation
Solvation parameter model
Stationary phase characterization
Supercritical fluid chromatography
Supercritical fluids
title Characterization of stationary phases by a linear solvation energy relationship utilizing supercritical fluid chromatography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T11%3A04%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20stationary%20phases%20by%20a%20linear%20solvation%20energy%20relationship%20utilizing%20supercritical%20fluid%20chromatography&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20separation%20science&rft.au=Mitchell,%20Clifford%20R&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=3060&rft.epage=3067&rft.pages=3060-3067&rft.issn=1615-9306&rft.eissn=1615-9314&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jssc.201000371&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E762021725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671378680&rft_id=info:pmid/20730839&rfr_iscdi=true